Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 4—April 2004
Dispatch

Human Challenge Pilot Study with Cyclospora cayetanensis

Tables
Article Metrics
33
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: *Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA; †Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ‡University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; §Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Cite This Article

Abstract

We describe a pilot study that attempted to infect human volunteers with Cyclospora cayetanensis. Seven healthy volunteers ingested an inoculum of Cyclospora oocysts (approximately 200–49,000 oocysts). The volunteers did not experience symptoms of gastroenteritis, and no oocysts were detected in any stool samples during the 16 weeks volunteers were monitored.

Cyclospora cayetanensis is a protozoan parasite that may cause gastroenteritis with prolonged, intermittent diarrhea in humans. Characterizatioin and magnitudes of risk factors associated with food and water consumption are unclear because the dose-response relationship and other host-parasite factors for infection with Cyclospora are unknown. To characterize infectivity, we performed a study in which inocula of Cyclospora oocysts were administered to human volunteers.

The Study

Stool samples containing high concentrations of Cyclospora oocysts and serum specimens were collected from persons with cyclosporiasis in Haiti and the United States. Informed consent was obtained from persons providing the specimens. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) institutional review board (IRB) reviewed specimen collection, informed consent, and patient counseling procedures. Stool specimens were homogenized with water and sieved through cheesecloth. Since Cyclospora oocysts must form sporocysts outside the human host before becoming infectious, the filtrate was resuspended in potassium dichromate (2.5%) and shaken for about 3 weeks at room temperature to induce sporulation. After sporulation (67%–94% of oocysts sporulated), samples were stored at room temperature until further processing (2–3 months). Suspensions with the highest oocyst counts were purified and concentrated by sucrose and cesium chloride gradients (1). See the Table for additional inoculum treatment conditions.

Each candidate inoculum was tested for Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Campylobacter spp., Yersinia spp., Mycobacterium spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7, enteroviruses, Hepatitis A virus (HAV), Herpesvirus, Cytomegalovirus, Coronavirus, Astrovirus, Rotavirus, Norovirus, Adenovirus, HIV, Clostridium difficile toxin, enterotoxin, and intestinal parasites (data not shown). Serum specimens from the donors of Cyclospora-positive stools were tested for serum markers of HIV, HAV, Hepatitis B virus, and Taenia solium. If serum from a Cyclospora-positive stool donor tested positive for any of the above, oocysts from that person were not used. Candidate inocula in which none of these pathogens or toxins were found were used in the human challenge study. This safety-testing protocol was reviewed and approved by both the University of North Carolina School of Medicine IRB and the CDC IRB. Cell culture infectivity assays and animal models were not available to determine the infectivity or viability of the oocysts. Attempts were made to assess the viability of the inoculum by observing sporozoite motility after excystation of the oocysts by different methods. However, these methods did not yield a sufficient number of motile sporozoites to measure viability.

The study was conducted at the General Clin ical Research Center at the University of North Carolina Hospital, Chapel Hill, NC. Inclusion and exclusion criteria determined whether a person was eligible to participate in the study. Healthy volunteers were recruited from the University of North Carolina (UNC), Chapel Hill, NC, and the surrounding community. Before enrollment, each candidate received a medical evaluation, and preinoculation serum specimens were collected and archived. The seven study participants comprised four women and three men; three were white, and four were African American. The median age was 26.

After ingesting the inoculum, volunteers were asked to collect all stool specimens for 4 weeks and one specimen a week at weeks 5, 6, 8, and 16. They were also asked to keep a daily record of physical symptoms and the time of each stool passage. In addition, volunteers provided blood and saliva specimens weekly for 6 weeks and at weeks 8 and 16 postdosing. Study outcome measures were a) shedding Cyclospora oocysts in stool; b) frequency, weight, color, and consistency of stool; and c) clinical symptoms of gastroenteritis: diarrhea (>3 stools in 24 hours), nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, myalgia, headache, fever, chills, or fatigue.

Stools were examined to detect oocysts at UNC Chapel Hill. All stool specimens were concentrated by using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration procedure routinely used to examine ova and parasites in stool specimens (2). In addition, to increase the sensitivity of detection, all stools from the first 2 weeks postdosing were concentrated by a sucrose floatation procedure (1). Aliquots of the concentrated sample from each procedure were examined microscopically by using a wet mount preparation (2), and 87% of these concentrates were confirmed by a second laboratory at CDC. Criteria to identify Cyclospora oocysts were based on size, morphologic characteristics, and ability of the oocysts to autofluoresce under epifluorescence (3).

Inoculum treatment and challenge conditions of this study are described in the Table. Numbers of stools examined per volunteer ranged from 19 to 40; no oocysts were detected in any of the stool samples. Volunteer 1 experienced a brief episode of abdominal cramps on day 7 postdosing. This volunteer attributed the symptom to possible dehydration due to strenuous activity performed in the heat that day. Volunteer 5 produced four loose stools on day 10 postdosing but reported feeling well. This volunteer also had a mildly elevated leukocyte count (15.8 x 109/L; normal range 4.5–11.0 x 109/L) on day 13 postdosing. However, this volunteer had a mildly elevated baseline leukocyte count (13.8 x 109/L) 14 days before dosing. Overall, no conclusive evidence based on clinical or parasitologic diagnostic procedures showed that any volunteers became infected.

Conclusions

Cyclosporiasis continues to be a difficult emerging infectious disease to understand. Our results are consistent with other researchers’ inability to establish C. cayetanensis infection in a wide variety of animal models (4). Given these results, questions relating to host susceptibility and risk factors for infection with Cyclospora, the biology of C. cayetanensis, survival conditions for C. cayetanensis in vitro and in vivo, and factors that allow Cyclospora to become infectious in the environment need further study.

Host susceptibility and risk factors for infection are always a consideration when evaluating host response to pathogen exposure. Epidemiologic data suggest that immunity may develop to C. cayetanensis in areas where cyclosporiasis is endemic and that the disease is more severe in naïve populations (5). Persons affected in foodborne outbreaks of cyclosporiasis in North America were mostly adults who experienced prolonged symptomatic gastroenteritis, and median food-specific attack rates were high (6,7). In this study, only healthy adult volunteers (22–53 years of age) were recruited from areas in which cyclosporiasis is not known to be endemic. Therefore, although the number of volunteers in this study was small (N = 7), epidemiologic data suggest that host susceptibility factors did not substantially contribute to inability of the inocula to cause infection in the volunteers at the doses administered.

Virulence and characteristics of Cyclospora necessary to infect human hosts are unknown. Nucleotide sequence variability in the first internal transcribed spacer regions within C. cayetanensis from different geographic origins has been observed and suggests the existence of multiple strains (8,9). In addition, data from Cryptosporidium human volunteer studies demonstrated that the 50% infectious dose (ID50) differed (from 9 to 1,042 oocysts), depending on the isolate used in the study (10). For these reasons, we attempted to vary the inocula by selecting oocysts from persons in different geographic regions (Haiti, Missouri, and Georgia) and increasing the numbers of oocysts ingested by volunteers (from <1,000 oocysts to approximately 49,000) during the course of this study. Thus, differences in virulence characteristics of C. cayetanensis isolates appear not to have been a major factor in failing to establish infection.

All oocysts in stool samples in this study were stored in potassium dichromate (2.5%), and most of the final inoculum preparations were disinfected with bleach (5.25%). Cryptosporidium parvum has been stored in 2.5% potassium dichromate (for <6 weeks to >12 weeks) and remained infectious in human volunteers, cell culture, and animals (11,12). Also, baboons inoculated with oocysts never exposed to potassium dichromate were not infected with Cyclospora (M. Eberhard, unpub. data). Other parasites of genera related to Cyclospora (Cryptosporidium, Eimeria spp., Toxoplasma gondii, sporocysts of Sarcocystis spp.) have been shown to resist high levels of bleach (1315). However, the effects of potassium dichromate and bleach on the Cyclospora oocysts used in this study are unknown, since methods to evaluate infectivity and viability were not available.

Naturally occurring Cyclospora oocysts may survive for extended periods in the environment, given the marked seasonality of infection in areas where the disease is endemic (6). However, many questions remain about the triggers and conditions necessary for Cyclospora oocysts to survive and become infectious in the environment. Given the results of this study, conditions necessary for Cyclospora to become infectious were probably not achieved in preparing and storing the oocysts. Future studies are necessary to examine individual and combined effects of temperature, humidity, storage media, and disinfection on the survival, viability, and infectivity of stored Cyclospora oocysts. These studies would help determine optimal conditions to stimulate sporulation and maintain infectivity of oocysts in vitro over time. However, such studies will not be possible until suitable cell culture systems or animal host models for cyclosporiasis are developed.

Dr. Alfano-Sobsey is an epidemiologist and industrial hygiene consultant for the Public Health Regional Surveillance Team, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Division of Public Health, North Carolina. Her professional interests include public health preparedness and emerging infectious diseases.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank all the volunteers in this study; Susan Pusek for assistance recruiting and caring for study volunteers; and Alexandre DaSiva, Lisa Lindesmith, Erin-Joi Collins McNeal, Deanne Rhodes, Douglas Wait, and Michael Arrowood for assistance with laboratory procedures.

This study was funded by a cooperative agreement with the Association of Schools of Public Health, the University of North Carolina, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The University of North Carolina General Clinical Research Center is supported by PHS Grant RR00046, Clinical Research Centers Program, National Institutes of Health.

This study was conducted at the General Clinical Research Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals and the Epidemiology Department, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Top

References

  1. Upton  SJ. In vitro cultivation of Cryptosporidium. In: Fayer R, editor. Cryptosporidiosis of man and animals. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1997. p. 181–207.
  2. Ash  RA, Orihel  TC. Parasites: a guide to laboratory procedures and identification. Chicago: ASCP Press; 1991.
  3. Eberhard  ML, Pieniazek  NJ, Arrowood  MJ. Laboratory diagnosis of Cyclospora infections. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121:7927.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Eberhard  ML, Ortega  YR, Haynes  DE, Nace  EK, Do  RQ, Robi  MG, Attempts to establish experimental Cyclospora cayetanensis infection in laboratory animals. J Parasitol. 2000;86:57782.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ortega  YR, Nagle  R, Gillman  RH, Watanabe  J, Miyagui  J, Kanagusuku  P, Pathologic and clinical findings in patients with cyclosporiasis and a description of intracellular parasite life-cycle stages. J Infect Dis. 1997;176:15849. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Herwaldt  BL. Cyclospora cayetanensis: a review, focusing on the outbreaks of cyclosporiasis in the 1990s. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:104057. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lopez  AS, Dodson  DR, Arrowood  MJ, Orlandi  PA Jr, daSilva  AJ, Bier  JW, Outbreak of cyclosporiasis associated with basil in Missouri in 1999. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:10107. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Adams  RD, Ortega  YR, Gilman  RH, Sterling  CR. Intervening transcribed spacer region 1 variability in Cyclospora cayetanensis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:233943.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Olivier  C, van de Pas  S, Lepp  PW, Yoder  K, Relman  DA. Sequence variability in the first internal transcribed spacer region within and among Cyclospora species is consistent with polyparasitism. Int J Parasitol. 2001;31:147587. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Okhuysen  PC, Chappell  CL, Crabb  JH, Sterling  CR, DuPont  HL. Virulence of three distinct Cryptosporidium parvum isolates for healthy adults. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:127581. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dupont  HL, Chappell  CL, Sterling  CR, Okhuysen  PC, Rose  JB, Jakubowski  W. The infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum in healthy volunteers. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:8559. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pokorny  NJ, Weir  SC, Carreno  RA, Trevors  JT, Lee  H. Influence of temperature on Cryptosoridium parvum oocyst infectivity in river water samples as detected by tissue culture assay. J Parasitol. 2002;88:6413.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Barbee  SL, Weber  DJ, Sobsey  MD, Rutala  WA. Inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst infectivity by disinfection and sterilization processes. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:60511. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fayer  R. Effect of sodium hypochlorite exposure on infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts for neonatal BALB/c mice. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:8446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dubey  JP, Miller  NL, Frenkel  JK. The Toxoplasma gondii oocysts from cat feces. J Exp Med. 1970;132:63662. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1004.030356

Table of Contents – Volume 10, Number 4—April 2004

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Edith M. Alfano-Sobsey, Durham County Health Department, 414 E. Main St., Durham, NC 27701, USA; fax: 919-560-7895

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: February 09, 2011
Page updated: February 09, 2011
Page reviewed: February 09, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external