Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 7—July 2004

Emergence of Multidrug-resistant Salmonella Paratyphi B dT+, Canada

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Michael R. Mulvey*Comments to Author , David Boyd*, Axel Cloeckaert†, Rafiq Ahmed*, Lai-King Ng, and the Provincial Public Health Laboratories1
Author affiliations: *Health Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; †Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Nouzilly, France

Cite This Article


We document an increase in the number of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B dT+ identified in Canada. Most of these strains harbor Salmonella genomic island 1 (SGI1). Further studies are needed to determine factors contributing to the observed emergence of this multidrug-resistant strain.

Salmonella genomic island 1 (SGI1) was first characterized in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium definitive phage type 104 (DT104). It consists of a 43-kb DNA segment harboring genes responsible for the pentaresistance phenotype ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfonamide, and tetracycline (ACSSuT) and is inserted into the chromosome at the end of the thdF gene (1). Complete nucleotide sequence of this region revealed 44 open reading frames, of which some displayed homology to genes associated with plasmid transfer, which suggests SGI1 may be at least partially plasmidic in origin (2). The SGI1 is associated with the multidrug-resistant DT104 clone that has disseminated worldwide (3). Recently, a number of reports have described SGI1 and variants in other Salmonella serovars, including S. Agona, S. Albany, and S. Paratyphi B dT+ (2,46). The worldwide dissemination of the DT104 clone has led some investigators to suggest SGI1 contains genes that may provide a selective advantage to the organism (2,4). We document the rapid increase of S. Paratyphi B dT+ isolates harboring SGI1 in Canada and provide further evidence to support that other unknown genetic factors may contribute to the rapid dissemination of multidrug-resistant strains of Salmonella serotypes globally.

The Study

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Total number of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B dT+ identified in Canada (gray bars) and the number of multidrug-resistant S. Paratyphi B dT+ identified over the same period (black bars), by quarter.

Figure 1. Total number of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B dT+ identified in Canada (gray bars) and the number of multidrug-resistant S. Paratyphi B dT+ identified over the same period (black bars), by quarter.

This report is a result of a collaborative effort between the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML), Health Canada, and the Provincial Public Health Laboratories (PPHLs) in Canada. The PPHLs represent every province in Canada and also include the Yukon and North West Territories. All S. Paratyphi B dT+ identified at the PPHLs were forwarded to the NML for additional characterization. Between 1998 and 2002, 252 S. Paratyphi B dT+ strains were submitted to the NML, of which 246 were from a human source. Distribution of the strains over time is shown in Figure 1. Incidence of S. Paratyphi B dT+ has generally increased since 1998; the spike in S. Paratyphi B dT+ in the third and fourth quarters of 1999 can be attributed to an outbreak in British Columbia, Alberta, and Saskatchewan caused by contaminated alfalfa sprouts (7). In addition to this large outbreak, additional outbreaks were reported between 1998 and 2002; however, each outbreak was small, and most involved fewer than six persons.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on all strains by using the disk-diffusion method as described by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (8). Susceptibilities were determined for ampicillin (A), chloramphenicol (C), ciprofloxacin (Cp), streptomycin (S), sulfamethoxazole (Su), tetracycline (T), and trimethoprim (Tm). Of the 237 strains examined for susceptibility, 123 (52%) were susceptible to all antimicrobial agents tested. Sixty-seven strains (28%) displayed the pentaresistance phenotype (ACSSuT), and the second most prevalent resistance profile was Su (n = 41, 17%). Single strains displayed the phenotypes A, T, CSSu, ASuTm, ASSu, and ACSuTTm. A significant increase was observed in ACSSuT strains over the time period from 1998 to 2002 (p < 0.001). Rates for the years are as follows: 1998, n = 2 (2%); 1999, n = 4 (18%); 2000, n = 2 (10.5%); 2001, n = 23 (39%); and 2002, n = 36 (58%). No large outbreaks were reported during this time period. To determine if the pentaresistance phenotype was caused by SGI1, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect integrons and the left (thdF-S001) and right (S044-yidY) junctions of SGI1 as previously described (2). Of the 67 strains identified with the ACSSuT phenotype, 63 contained 1.0-kb and 1.2-kb integrons and left and right junctions of SGI1, which suggests that these strains contained SGI1 inserted into the same location on the chromosome as was described for DT104 (1). One strain with the ACSSuT phenotype contained 1.0-kb and 1.2-kb integrons and gave a PCR product for the left junction amplification reaction but not the right junction, which suggests that a portion of SGI1 downstream of the integrons was missing. Three strains with the ACSSuT phenotype did not give the characteristic size products for integron (0.7 kb, n = 2; 2.0 kb, n = 1), and all were negative for the junction PCR, which suggests that these strains most likely harbored other resistance genes giving the ACSSuT phenotype. Only four strains with the ACSSuT phenotype were identified from a nonhuman source (one poultry, three environmental). Although the three environmental isolates contained SGI1, the ACSSuT strain isolated from poultry did not; instead, it contained a 2-kb integron. Of the human isolates for which source was reported for the ACSSuT strains (n = 53), all were isolated from stool, with the exception of three that were isolated from blood. To ensure the SGI1 was intact, a selected number of isolates were subjected to additional PCR with primers representing all regions of the 44-kb SGI1 element (Table). PCR conditions used were previously described (2). DNA from all of these strains gave positive reactions for all primer sets described, which suggests SGI1 was intact in these strains.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Dendrogram depicting the DNA fingerprints of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B dT+ identified from 2000 through 2002. Multidrug-resistant clonal groups labeled clusters 1 to 3 are shown.

Figure 2. Dendrogram depicting the DNA fingerprints of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B dT+ identified from 2000 through 2002. Multidrug-resistant clonal groups labeled clusters 1 to 3 are shown.

S. Paratyphi B dT+ recovered from 2000 to 2002 were subtyped by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) after DNA extraction and digestion with BlnI according to the standardized Salmonella protocol (9). PFGE-generated DNA profiles were entered into the BioNumerics software program version 3.0 (Applied Maths, St. Martens-Latem, Belgium) for analysis. Cluster analysis was performed by the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averages, and DNA relatedness was calculated on the basis of the Dice coefficient. In addition, all PFGE patterns were visually compared and assigned a number or letter identification (10). A dendrogram depicting the S. Paratyphi B dT+ BlnI macrorestriction patterns is shown in Figure 2. Of the 139 strains available to subtype (total = 142), visual comparison of the fingerprints revealed a total of 63 unique fingerprint patterns that grouped into 24 clusters. Analysis of the dendrogram revealed that all but three strains with the ACSSuT phenotype were grouped into three closely related clusters named clusters 1 to 3 (Figure 2). The three strains that did not cluster with the other ACSSuT strains did not harbor SGI1 as described above.

Cluster 1 contained 32 strains that represented 10 subtypes. Cluster 2 contained 17 strains that represented 7 subtypes, all of which showed <7 band differences between strains from cluster 1. Cluster 3 contained 15 strains that represented 6 subtypes, all of which showed fewer than seven band differences between subtypes in cluster 2, but had more than seven band differences between the cluster 1 fingerprints. In addition, six other strains identified before 2000 were subtyped. Five were other ACSSuT identified in 1998 (n = 1) and 1999 (n = 4), and all were identified in cluster 2. In addition, one S. Paratyphi B dT+ recently shown to harbor SGI1 that was isolated in Singapore from a fish was grouped into cluster 3 (4). The Canadian isolates in clusters 1 to 3 have been identified from multiple provinces, including British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, and Québec, representing western and central regions of Canada.


The emergence of multidrug-resistant S. Paratyphi B dT+ was documented recently in the Netherlands and Scotland (11,12). Some isolates had the ACSSuT susceptibility pattern and did not harbor any plasmids, which suggests the resistance is of chromosomal origin (12). However, in neither study was the presence of SGI1 or other resistance genes examined. We demonstrate the rapid emergence of multidrug-resistant S. Paratyphi B dT+ in Canada. The increase is due to three clusters, all of which contain the multidrug-resistant genomic island SGI1. That three closely related clonal groups were present suggests SGI1 may have inserted into the genome of S. Paratyphi B dT+ in three separate events, as shown by clusters 1, 2, and 3, or the insertion may have occurred once, with strains diverging over time. We also identified three strains with the ACSSuT phenotype that did not contain SGI1 sequences, which emphasizes the need to monitor genotypic resistance factors and not just phenotypic resistance traits to understand the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance.

The emergence of multidrug-resistant enteric pathogens is a concern because of the lack of suitable antimicrobial agents available to treat invasive infections. One organism that emerged in the 1990s is multidrug-resistant S. Typhimurium DT104, which harbors SGI1 (3). Along with the multidrug-resistant phenotype, reports suggest the strain may be more virulent than other salmonellae (13,14). However, in vitro studies have not shown any increase in invasiveness or survival in mammalian cells (15,16). Whether multidrug-resistant DT104 is more virulent remains to be determined, the underlying question remains: why has this clone of DT104 emerged as a major pathogen? Selective pressure, resulting from the widespread use of antimicrobial drugs in animals for growth promotion or prophylaxis, may have played a role in disseminating this organism. However, this factor may not completely account for its prevalence, because other multidrug-resistant strains of DT104 have emerged but have not disseminated internationally. Other factors may contribute to the international dissemination of this clone. For example, additional determinants in SGI1 may contribute to the fitness or virulence of Salmonella strains harboring it. In the present study, three closely related clusters of S. Paratyphi B dT+ carrying SGI1 have emerged in Canada and make up 46% (64 of 139) of all strains identified in 2001 and 2002. Furthermore, three additional S. Paratyphi B dT+ strains with the ACSSuT phenotype were identified that do not harbor SGI1 and do not appear to be rapidly increasing in Canada. In this hypothesis, SGI1 may predict the next emerging Salmonella serotype. Other factors, such as processing food products and the structure of the food distribution system, could play a role in disseminating these organisms. We continue to monitor this pathogen and are designing studies to improve understanding of the epidemiology of S. Paratyphi B dT+ in Canada. We suggest all strains of Salmonella with the ACSSuT phenotype be examined for SGI1.

Dr. Mulvey is chief of Antimicrobial Resistance and Nosocomial Infections at the National Microbiology Laboratory, Health Canada. His main interests are antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and the dissemination of resistance genes.



We thank Dave Spreitzer for PFGE analysis, Kevin Nelson for PCR analysis, and Derrick Ozunko for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

This work was funded by Health Canada and the Provincial Public Health Laboratories.



  1. Boyd  DA, Peters  GA, Ng  LK, Mulvey  MR. Partial characterization of a genomic island associated with the multidrug resistance region of Salmonella enterica Typhimurium DT104. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;189:28591. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd  D, Peters  G, Cloeckaert  A, Boumedine  K, Chaslus-Dancla  E, Imberechts  H, Complete nucleotide sequence of a 43 kb genomic island associated with the multidrug resistance region of Salmonella enterica Typhimurium DT104 and its identification in phage type DT120 and serovar Agona. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:572532. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cloeckaert  A, Schwarz  S. Molecular characterization, spread and evolution of multidrug resistance in Salmonella enterica Typhimurium DT104. Vet Res. 2001;32:30110. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Meunier  D, Boyd  D, Mulvey  MR, Baucheron  S, Mammina  C, Nastasi  A, Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium DT 104 antibiotic resistance genomic island I in serotype Paratyphi B. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:4303. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyd  D, Cloeckaert  A, Chaslus-Dancla  E, Mulvey  MR. Characterization of variant Salmonella genomic island 1 multidrug resistance regions from serovars Typhimurium DT104 and Agona. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:171422. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Doublet  B, Lailler  R, Meunier  D, Brisabois  A, Boyd  D, Mulvey  MR, Variant Salmonella genomic island 1 antibiotic resistance gene cluster in Salmonella enterica serovar Albany. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:58591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Stratton  J, Stefaniw  L, Grimsrud  K, Werker  DH, Ellis  A, Ashton  E, Outbreak of Salmonella Paratyphi B var Java due to contaminated alfalfa sprouts in Alberta, British Columbia and Saskatchewan. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2001;27:1337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A5. Wayne (PA): The Committee; 2000.
  9. Swaminathan  B, Barrett  T, Hunter  SB, Tauxe  R. PulseNet: the molecular subtyping network for foodborne disease surveillance in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:3829.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tenover  FC, Arbeit  RD, Goering  RV, Mickelsen  PA, Murray  BE, Persing  DH, Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:22339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. van Pelt  W, van der Zee  H, Wannet  WJ, van de Giessen  AW, Mevius  DJ, Bolder  NM, Explosive increase of Salmonella Java in poultry in the Netherlands: consequences for public health. Euro Surveill. 2003;8:315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown  DJ, Mather  H, Browning  LM, Coia  JE. Investigation of human infections with Salmonella enterica serovar Java in Scotland and possible association with imported poultry. Euro Surveill. 2003;8:3540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Helms  M, Vastrup  P, Gerner-Smidt  P, Molbak  K. Excess mortality associated with antimicrobial drug-resistant Salmonella typhimurium. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:4905.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wall  PG, Morgan  D, Lamden  K, Ryan  M, Griffin  M, Threlfall  EJ, A case control study of infection with an epidemic strain of multiresistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104 in England and Wales. Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev. 1994;4:R1305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fratamico  PM. Tolerance to stress and ability of acid-adapted and non-acid-adapted Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 to invade and survive in mammalian cells in vitro. J Food Prot. 2003;66:111525.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Carlson  SA, Browning  M, Ferris  KE, Jones  BD. Identification of diminished tissue culture invasiveness among multiple antibiotic resistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104. Microb Pathog. 2000;28:3744. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1007.030862

1Provincial Public Health Laboratory Members: Lewis Abbott (Prince Edward Island), Kevin Forward (Nova Scotia), Glenna Hardy (New Brunswick), Greg Horsman (Saskatchewan), Judy Isaac-Renton (British Columbia), Frances Jamieson (Ontario), Jean Joly (Quebec), Jutta K. Preiksaitis (Alberta), Sam Ratnam (Newfoundland), Paul Van Caeseele (Manitoba).

Table of Contents – Volume 10, Number 7—July 2004

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Michael Mulvey, National Microbiology Laboratory, 1015 Arlington St., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2; fax: 204-789-5020Michael Mulvey, National Microbiology Laboratory, 1015 Arlington St., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3R2; fax: 204-789-5020

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: January 27, 2011
Page updated: January 27, 2011
Page reviewed: January 27, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.