Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 11, Number 3—March 2005
Research

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Horses and Horse Personnel, 2000–2002

J.S. Weese*Comments to Author , M. Archambault*, H. Dick‡, P. Hearn§, B.N. Kreiswirth§, B. Said-Salim¶, A. McGeer†, Y. Likhoshvay¶, J.F. Prescott*, D.E. Low†, and B.M.Willey
Author affiliations: *University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada; †Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ‡Vita-Tech Laboratories, Markham, Ontario, Canada; §Hearn Veterinary Services, Orangeville, Ontario, Canada; ¶New York University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA

Main Article

Table

In vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of 101 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from humans and horses*

Antimicrobial agent MIC in μg/mL
% of isolates
50% 90% Range Intermediate Resistant
Tetracycline >16 >16 <4–>16 0 96
Doxycycline 8 8 <4–8 78.2 0
Minocycline <4 <4 <4–8 14.8 0
Erythromycin >8 >8 <0.5–>8 0 86.1
Gentamicin >16† >16† <2–>16† 9.9 88.1
Rifampicin >4 >4 <1–>4 10.9 71.2
TMP/SMX 8/152 >8/152 <2/38–8/152 NA 79.2

*MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; TMP/SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; NA, no intermediate MIC category in NCCLS guidelines.
†All strains were susceptible to gentamicin at a concentration of 500 μg/mL.

Main Article

Page created: April 25, 2012
Page updated: April 25, 2012
Page reviewed: April 25, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external