Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 11, Number 4—April 2005

Reemergence of Canine Echinococcus granulosus Infection, Wales

Imad Buishi*, Tom Walters†, Zoë Guildea‡, Philip S. Craig*, and Stephen Palmer‡
Author affiliations: *University of Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom; †Powys Health Promotion Unit, Powys, Wales, United Kingdom; and; ‡University of Wales, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom

Main Article

Table 2

Multivariate logistic regression model of possible risk factors for a positive Echinococcus coproantigen-test result in farm dogs (n = 1,164)

Risk factor p value Regression coefficient OR 95% CI
Location of dog (compared to chained dogs)
  Free roaming <0.0001 1.07 2.91 1.77–4.8
  Other 0.411 0.53 1.7 0.48–5.91
Frequency of anthelmintic treatment (compared to <4 months)
  4–6 months 0.002 0.84 2.31 1.35–3.95
  >6 months 0.004 1.15 3.16 1.46–6.85
Constant <0.0001 –2.52

*Sampled July–November 2002, Powys and Gwent Counties, Wales. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Main Article

Page created: May 23, 2011
Page updated: May 23, 2011
Page reviewed: May 23, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.