Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 11, Number 5—May 2005

Are Noroviruses Emerging?

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Marc-Alain Widdowson*Comments to Author , Stephan S. Monroe*, and Roger I. Glass*
Author affiliations: *Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Cite This Article

In 1972, noroviruses (previously called "Norwalk-like viruses") were discovered as the first viruses definitively associated with acute gastroenteritis. During the next 2 decades, researchers were unable to develop simple methods to detect these common viruses or to find the etiologic agents of nonbacterial gastroenteritis outbreaks and hospitalizations. Indeed, of >2,500 foodborne outbreaks reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from 1993 to 1997, <1% were attributed to noroviruses, and 68% were of "unknown etiology" (1). As a result, noroviruses were out of sight and mind and thus relegated to a minor role as agents of gastroenteritis at a time when high-profile outbreaks of Salmonella Enteritidis (2) and Escherichia coli (3) had focused attention and budgets on preventing foodborne bacterial illnesses.

The development of reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction in the early 1990s provided the breakthrough needed to facilitate diagnosis of norovirus infection. Today, noroviruses are recognized as the most common cause of infectious gastroenteritis among persons of all ages (4). They are responsible for ≤50% of all foodborne gastroenteritis outbreaks in the United States (5) and are a major contributor to illness in nursing homes (6) and hospitals (7). Noroviruses have been detected in 35% of persons with sporadic gastroenteritis of known cause (8) and in 14% of all children <3 years old hospitalized for gastroenteritis (9). Norovirus infection has put apparently healthy people in intensive care (10) and has been associated with chronic diarrhea among transplant patients (11). In addition, we now know of a myriad of strains of norovirus, which have been classified into 5 genogroups, distinguishable from sapoviruses, a separate genus of human caliciviruses, but also in the Caliciviridae family. This diversity represents a dramatic increase from the single calicivirus strain discovered >30 years ago. Moreover, the known host range of noroviruses has expanded: the virus is found in mice (12), cows (13), and pigs (14), and antibodies to bovine strains have been found in humans, which has stimulated speculation about zoonotic transmission (15). However, a fundamental question remains—is the increased detection of norovirus the result of better application of improved diagnostics or does evidence exist that norovirus disease is an emergent problem?

Recent reports have established that norovirus strains can periodically emerge either globally or nationally, displace other strains, and increase disease incidence (16,17). In winter 2002, a new virus variant was attributed to a well-publicized surge of norovirus outbreaks on cruise ships and in nursing homes in the United States (18,19) and in healthcare facilities in Europe (20). Why these strains emerge into prominence is unclear, but they often belong to genogroup II, cluster 4 (Bristol virus). Whether these strains cause different or more severe symptoms than other noroviruses, are more transmissible, or can better evade the host immune response is not known. The periodic emergence of strains is likely to have always been a feature of noroviruses, but we do not know whether norovirus infections are more frequent now than in 1929, when Zahorsky first described "winter vomiting disease" (21). Despite a lack of consistent retrospective data to definitively answer this question, several factors suggest that norovirus disease may actually be more common today.

First, the rates of bacterial foodborne illnesses are declining, in large part because of measures such as improved refrigeration and use of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point systems to reduce contamination of food of animal origin (22). Most of these measures, however, will be ineffective against noroviruses, which are resistant to chlorination and freezing, persist in the environment, and require only very low inoculums to infect. Thus, the relative contribution of noroviruses to foodborne disease is likely to be increasing. Second, modern lifestyles make us more vulnerable to norovirus infection than when these viruses were discovered. Since 1972 in the United States, more elderly people live in communal settings, with the number of beds in nursing homes increasing >75% (23). In addition, we now eat more foods that have been handled by a variety of potentially infected people; 46% of household food expenditures is now spent on eating out, compared with 32% in 1972 (24). We also eat more of the foods that are likely to be contaminated with norovirus; consumption of fresh vegetables and fruit has risen >20% in the last 30 years (25), and this produce is often grown in countries where crops are still irrigated with sewage-contaminated water. Finally, more people than ever are traveling and have an increased risk for norovirus infection through exposure to hotels, airplanes, and cruise ships. From 1993 to 1998, for example, the number of cruise ship passengers in the United States increased by 50% (26). Faced with these trends, how should the public health community respond?

First, research on the disease prevalence of noroviruses is only beginning. If noroviruses are an increasingly common cause of infectious gastroenteritis, with some cases resulting in diarrhea-related deaths and hospitalizations, then substantially greater investments are required in their diagnosis. Increased use of diagnostics along with improved surveillance, such as in sentinel sites, will permit identification of new strains and shifts in the epidemiology of norovirus disease. The development of easy-to-use, sensitive assays for use by clinical and public health laboratories should also have a high priority.

Second, we do not know how to stop norovirus transmission. Foods can be contaminated with norovirus either at the source (27) or at the point of service by infected food handlers. Noroviruses can spread by water, direct person-to-person contact, or airborne droplets of vomitus (28), and they can persist in the environment as a source of continuing infection despite efforts at disinfection (29). Recent advances in finding a cell culture system for noroviruses may allow for assessing the efficacy of various disinfectants (30), but only by full epidemiologic investigation of viral gastroenteritis outbreaks and by application of molecular tests will transmission routes be determined, differences in epidemiology between strains be detected, and targeted control measures implemented.

Norovirus infections are common and likely to become more so. Effective prevention strategies must now be designed and implemented.

Dr. Widdowson is a medical epidemiologist in the Respiratory and Enteric Viruses Branch, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. His research interests include all aspects of the epidemiology of viral gastroenteritis and its prevention.



We thank Alicia Fry for critical review of the manuscript and Claudia Chesley for editorial help.



  1. Olsen  SJ, MacKinnon  LC, Goulding  JS, Bean  NH, Slutsker  L. Surveillance for foodborne-disease outbreaks—United States, 1993–1997. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000;49(No.SS-1):164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lin  FY, Morris  JG Jr, Trump  D, Tilghman  D, Wood  PK, Jackman  N, Investigation of an outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis gastroenteritis associated with consumption of eggs in a restaurant chain in Maryland. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128:83944.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell  BP, Goldoft  M, Griffin  PM, Davis  MA, Gordon  DC, Tarr  PI, A multistate outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7-associated bloody diarrhea and hemolytic uremic syndrome from hamburgers. The Washington experience. JAMA. 1994;272:134953. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mead  PS, Slutsker  L, Dietz  V, McCagi  LF, Bresee  JS, Shapiro  C, Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:60725. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Widdowson  M-A, Sulka  A, Bulens  S, Beard  R, Chaves  S, Hammond  R, Norovirus and foodborne disease, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:95102. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Green  K, Belliot  G, Taylor  J, Valdesuso  J, Lew  J, Kapikian  A, A predominant role for Norwalk-like viruses as agents of epidemic gastroenteritis in Maryland nursing homes for the elderly. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:13346. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lopman  BA, Reacher  MH, Vipond  IB, Sarangi  J, Brown  DW. Clinical manifestation of norovirus gastroenteritis in health care settings. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:31824. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. de Wit  MA, Koopmans  MP, Kortbeek  LM, Wannet  WJ, Vinje  J, van Leusden  F, Sensor, a population-based cohort study on gastroenteritis in the Netherlands: incidence and etiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154:66674. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bon  F, Fascia  P, Dauvergne  M, Tenenbaum  D, Planson  H, Petion  AM, Prevalence of group A rotavirus, human calicivirus, astrovirus, and adenovirus type 40 and 41 infections among children with acute gastroenteritis in Dijon, France. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:30558.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of acute gastroenteritis associated with Norwalk-like viruses among British military personnel—Afghanistan, May 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:4779.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaufman  SS, Chatterjee  NK, Fuschino  ME, Magid  MS, Gordon  RE, Morse  DL, Calicivirus enteritis in an intestinal transplant recipient. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:7648. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Karst  SM, Wobus  CE, Lay  M, Davidson  J, Virgin  HW. IVth. STAT1-dependent innate immunity to a Norwalk-like virus. Science. 2003;299:15758. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. van der Poel  WHM, Vinje  J, van der Heide  R, Herrera  M-I, Vivo  A, Koopmans  MPG. Norwalk-like calicivirus genes in farm animals. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000;6:3641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sugieda  M, Nagaoka  H, Kakishima  Y, Ohshita  T, Nakamura  S, Nakajima  S. Detection of Norwalk-like virus genes in the caecum contents of pigs. Arch Virol. 1998;143:121521. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Widdowson  M-A, Rockx  B, Schepp  R, van Duynhoven  YTHP, Vinje  J, van der Poel  WHM, Detection of serum antibodies to bovine norovirus in veterinarians and the general population in the Netherlands. J Med Virol. 2005;76:11928. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hale  A, Mattick  K, Lewis  D, Estes  M, Jiang  X, Green  J, Distinct epidemiological patterns of Norwalk-like virus infection. J Med Virol. 2000;62:99103. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Noel  JS, Fankhauser  RL, Ando  T, Monroe  SS, Glass  RI. Identification of a distinct common strain of "Norwalk-like viruses" having a global distribution. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:133444. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Widdowson  M-A, Cramer  E, Hadley  L, Bresee  J, Beard  RS, Bulens  S, Outbreaks of acute gastroenteritis on cruise ships and on land: identification of a predominant strain of norovirus (NV), United States 2002. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:2736. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Norovirus activity—United States, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:415.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lopman  B, Vennema  H, Kohli  E, Pothier  P, Sanchez  A, Negredo  A, Increase in viral gastroenteritis outbreaks in Europe and epidemic spread of new norovirus variant. Lancet. 2004;363:6828. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zahorsky  J. Hyperemesis heimis or the winter vomiting disease. Arch Pediatr. 1929;46:391.
  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preliminary FoodNet data on the incidence of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food—selected sites, United States, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53:33843.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Center for Health Statistics. National Nursing Home Survey, selected years (1973–1999) [cited 2005 Mar 17]. Available from
  24. Economic Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture. Food cpi, prices, and expenditures: food and alcoholic beverages: total expenditures [cited 2005 Mar 17]. Available from
  25. Economic Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture. Food consumption (per capita) data system [cited 2005 Mar 17]. Available from
  26. Cramer  EH, Gu  DX, Durbin  RE. Diarrheal disease on cruise ships, 1990–2000. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24:22733. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaulin  CD, Ramsay  D, Cardinal  P, D'Halevyn  M-A. Epidemie de gastro-enterite d'origine virale associee a la consommation de framboises importees. Can J Public Health. 1999;90:3740.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Marks  PJ, Vipond  IB, Regan  FM, Wedgwood  K, Fey  RE, Caul  EO. A school outbreak of Norwalk-like virus: evidence for airborne transmission. Epidemiol Infect. 2003;131:72736. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Isakbaeva  E, Widdowson  MA, Bulens  SN, Mullins  JA, Cramer  EH, Monroe  SS, Norovirus transmission on a cruise ship. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1548. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wobus  CE, Karst  SM, Thackray  LB, Chang  KO, Sosnovtsev  SV, Belliot  G, Replication of Norovirus in cell culture reveals a tropism for dendritic cells and macrophages. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:e432. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1105.041090

Table of Contents – Volume 11, Number 5—May 2005

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Marc-Alain Widdowson, Respiratory and Enteric Viruses Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop GO4, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA; fax: 6404-639-4960

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: April 24, 2012
Page updated: April 24, 2012
Page reviewed: April 24, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.