Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 11, Number 6—June 2005

pVir and Bloody Diarrhea in Campylobacter jejuni Enteritis

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Dobryan M. Tracz*, Monika Keelan*†, Jasmine Ahmed-Bentley‡, Amera Gibreel*, Kinga Kowalewska-Grochowska*‡, and Diane E. Taylor*Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; †Public Health Agency of Canada, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; ‡University of Alberta Hospital Microbiology Laboratory and Provincial Laboratory for Public Health (Microbiology), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Cite This Article


The plasmid pVir may play a role in the virulence of Campylobacter jejuni, a leading cause of bacterial gastroenteritis. The pVir plasmid was identified in 17% of 104 C. jejuni clinical isolates studied and was significantly associated with the occurrence of blood in patient stool, a marker of invasive infection. The pVir plasmid was not associated with greater occurrence of diarrhea, fever, pain, vomiting, or need for patient hospitalization. Isolates containing pVir were also associated with the presence of a tetracycline-resistance plasmid, but pVir did not transfer with tetracycline-resistance plasmids to recipient strains of C. jejuni. The association of pVir and bloody stool suggests that pVir may be clinically relevant in C. jejuni infections.

Campylobacter jejuni is a major foodborne pathogen and a leading cause of bacterial gastroenteritis (1,2). Infection with C. jejuni can result in a wide array of clinical symptoms, including diarrhea, fever, abdominal pain, and vomiting, as well as bloody stool with severe invasive infection (3). Various virulence factors, which allow for adherence, colonization, and invasion of the intestinal epithelium, have been proposed to contribute to the pathogenesis of C. jejuni (4). Potential virulence components include flagella (5,6), invasion proteins (7), and toxins (8,9). Although the genome of C. jejuni has been sequenced (10), its mechanisms of pathogenicity remain poorly understood (11).

A number of bacterial enteric pathogens contain plasmids that contribute to pathogenesis, including Shigella sp (12), Salmonella sp (13), and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (14). No evidence was seen for the involvement of plasmids in the virulence of C. jejuni until Bacon et al. (15) identified plasmid pVir in strain 81-176. pVir is an ≈37.5-kb plasmid that contains components of a type IV secretion system (T4SS) (15,16) known to be important for the virulence of a number of major bacterial pathogens (17). Bacon et al. (15) suggested that the pVir plasmid is important in vitro for both adherence and invasion of intestinal epithelial cells in culture. In a survey of fresh clinical isolates of C. jejuni from Thailand, 10% (n = 58) contained pVir (15).

C. jejuni gastroenteritis is primarily self-limiting and is usually treated by supportive therapy (fluid and electrolyte replacement) (3). Erythromycin is the drug of choice for treating severe clinical infections with C. jejuni (18), and fortunately the prevalence of erythromycin resistance has remained low (19). Worldwide, tetracycline resistance in C. jejuni is high: 56% in Canada (20) and up to 95% in Thailand (21). In Alberta, Canada, only 8.6% of human clinical isolates were tetracycline-resistant in 1981 (22). In C. jejuni, tetracycline resistance is primarily mediated by plasmids that carry the tet(O) gene (23,24). The Tet(O) protein binds to the bacterial ribosome and displaces tetracycline (25,26). The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of the pVir plasmid in C. jejuni isolated from clinical specimens in Alberta and the relationship of pVir to the clinical expression of the disease in gastroenteritis.

Materials and Methods

Source of C. jejuni Isolates

We obtained a random sample of 104 human isolates of C. jejuni (fresh and frozen at –70°C in double-strength skim milk) cultured from stool samples from 1999 to 2002 at the University of Alberta Hospital and Provincial Laboratory for Public Health (Microbiology) in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, for this study. All stool specimens were routinely cultured for enteric pathogens tested according to standard laboratory protocols. Most C. jejuni isolates were from northern Alberta and represented ≈10% of C. jejuni infections in Alberta reported annually to Health Canada. The Health Research Ethics Board (Biomedical Panel) of the University of Alberta approved the protocol for access to human isolates and collection of patient information for this study.

Collection of Clinical Data

Clinical data were collected by letter or phone from family physicians' offices and emergency medical records and included information on age, sex, place of residence, travel within the last month, coexisting conditions, symptoms (diarrhea, bloody diarrhea, pain, fever, vomiting) and their duration (interval from symptom onset to initial evaluation), hospitalization (if needed), antimicrobial therapy, and complications. Fever was defined as a complaint of fever stated by the patient or a documented temperature of >38°C. Blood in the stool was observed by the patient and reported to the attending physician. The investigators conducting the chart review and laboratory analyses (pVir screening, antimicrobial susceptibility testing) were blinded to each other's data.

Culture of C. jejuni Isolates

Isolates of C. jejuni were spread on brain heart infusion agar (Difco-Becton-Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA), supplemented with 0.4% yeast extract (Difco), and incubated at 37°C in microaerobic conditions (5% CO2, 10% H2, 85% N2) for 48 h. Isolates were not passaged more than once. All isolates were stored frozen in brain heart infusion broth (Difco) with 20% glycerol at –80°C.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Plasmid Isolation

C. jejuni susceptibility was tested by using the disk diffusion method; the following antimicrobial disks (Oxoid, Nepean, Ontario, Canada) were included: tetracycline (30 μg), kanamycin (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), and nalidixic acid (30 μg). All nalidixic acid-resistant isolates were further tested for resistance to ciprofloxacin (1 μg). Susceptibility testing to all antimicrobial agents was carried out on Mueller-Hinton agar plates that were spread with a 0.5 McFarland standard suspension of C. jejuni in phosphate-buffered saline (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and incubated for 48 h at 37°C under microaerobic conditions. Zones of inhibition were measured as described by Gaudreau and Gilbert (27). Plasmid isolations were performed by using a Qiagen Midi or Mini Plasmid Kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada), by alkaline lysis (28) or by a method used for Helicobacter pylori (29). Tetracycline resistance detected by disk diffusion was confirmed by Etest (Oxoid) and conventional agar dilution.

DNA-DNA Hybridizations for pVir

Purified plasmid DNA from C. jejuni clinical isolates was applied to nitrocellulose paper (Osmonics, Westborough, MA, USA) and air dried. Plasmid pMS11EH was used as a negative control, and plasmid DNA isolated from C. jejuni 81-176 was used as a positive control. Plasmid DNA was denatured in 0.5 mol/L NaOH, 0.15 mol/L NaCl for 5 min, neutralized twice in 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 0.15 mol/L NaCl, pH 7.5 for 5 min each time, soaked in 2× SSPE solution (20× SSPE consists of 3.0 mol/L NaCl, 0.2 mol/L NaH2PO4, and 0.02 mol/L EDTA) for 5 min, air dried, and baked overnight at 65°C.

The cjp5 (virB11) DNA probe was prepared with primers virB11 Fwd (5´ GAACAGGAAGTGGAAAAACTAGC 3´) and virB11 Rev (5´ TTCCGCATTGGGCTATATG 3´) (15) that were used to amplify by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) a 708-bp product from within the cjp5 gene on pVir. Conditions for the PCR were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (1 min, 95°C), annealing of primers (1 min, 50°C) and primer extension (1 min, 72°C). PCR was performed in a BioRad Gene Cycler (BioRad, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). The cjp5 PCR product was purified with a PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and eluted with TE (Tris-EDTA) buffer. DNA was denatured after boiling for 5 min, and the tube was then placed directly on ice. A random primers DNA labeling system (Gibco, Burlington, ON) was used to prepare the 32P-labeled cjp5 DNA probe. The 32P-labeled cjp5 DNA probe was used immediately in DNA-DNA hybridizations to screen isolated C. jejuni plasmids for the presence of pVir, under the same stringency conditions defined by Bacon and coworkers (15). Hybridizations were performed in a solution consisting of 6× SSC (20× consists of 3.0 mol/L NaCl and 0.3 mol/L sodium acetate), 5× Denhart solution (50× Denhardt solution consists of 1% wt/vol Ficoll 400 (Sigma), 1% wt/vol polyvinylpyrrolidone (Sigma), and 1% wt/vol bovine serum albumin (Sigma, Fraction V), 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, BioRad) and 100 μg/mL herring sperm DNA (Invitrogen, Burlington, Ontario, Canada). The 32P-labeled cjp5 DNA probe was added directly to the hybridization solution in the tube, mixed, and incubated overnight (18 h) at 50°C. The probed nitrocellulose paper was washed in 0.5× SSC 4 times, dried, and then exposed to BioMax MS Film (Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY, USA) overnight at –70°C.

Identifying Tetracycline-Resistance Plasmids

Tetracycline-resistance plasmids were identified by a PCR screen for the tet(O) gene on purified plasmid preparations. Primers tet(O) Fwd (5´ GGCGTTTTGTTTATGTGCG 3´) and tet(O) Rev (5´ ATGGACAACCCGACAGAAGC 3´) were used to amplify a 559-bp fragment of the tet(O) gene from isolated C. jejuni plasmid DNA (15,30). PCR conditions were the same as for the cjp5 PCR described above. Gel electrophoresis was used to confirm the presence of an ≈40-kb plasmid.

Transfer of Plasmids between C. jejuni Strains

The transfer of plasmids from C. jejuni clinical isolate 23-51 (containing both a tetracycline-resistance plasmid and pVir) to C. jejuni UA 543 (a nalidixic acid–resistant, tetracycline-susceptible recipient strain with no plasmids) was carried out (23). Suspensions of donor strain 23-51 and UA 543 recipient strains were mixed in ratios of 1:4 and 1:6, centrifuged, and resuspended in 100 μL of Lennox broth (Difco). Mating suspensions were inoculated onto a 0.22-μm Millipore filter (Millipore Corporation, Nepean, Ontario, Canada), placed on brain heart infusion agar, and incubated for 24 h. Cultures were resuspended in 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline, diluted, and plated onto Mueller-Hinton agar containing 25 μg/mL tetracycline and 50 μg/mL of nalidixic acid. Plasmids were isolated from the transconjugants by a Qiagen Mini Kit. The cjp5 DNA probe was used to screen for pVir as described above.

Statistical Analysis

The Fisher exact test was used to test the significance (p<0.05) of the association between pVir and clinical symptoms, association of pVir and tetracycline-resistance plasmids, and the frequency of tetracycline resistance from this study and a previous study (22).


Clinical Data

The patients were 7 months to 87 years of age (average 35 years); 47% were female. Ninety-five percent of the patients resided in Alberta, and the remaining 5% were from other Canadian provinces. Only 10 patients reported a history of travel outside Canada before becoming ill, namely to Mexico (3 patients), Alaska, Nicaragua, Ecuador, England, India, Lebanon, and Africa (1 patient each). The most commonly reported clinical symptom was diarrhea (99%); the exception was in an 86-year-old woman, who had an ileus. Other commonly reported symptoms were abdominal pain (83%) and fever (77%). Bloody stool was reported in 27% of patients and vomiting in 30% of patients; 18% of patients were hospitalized for treatment of severe dehydration. Fifty-eight patients received antimicrobial therapy: 34 ciprofloxacin (1 was switched to erythromycin after culture results, 2 received ciprofloxacin in combination with metronidazole), 20 macrolides (13 erythromycin, 5 clarithromycin, 3 azithromycin), 2 metronidazole (1 in combination with cephalexin), 1 amoxicillin, and 1 cotrimoxazole. Sixteen patients had other associated conditions: 4 cardiac disorders (2 arrhythmias, 2 ischemic heart disease), 3 hypertension (1 also had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), 3 diabetes, 2 neoplasms (1 leukemia, 1 Wilm tumor), 2 gastrointestinal disorders (1 ulcerative colitis, 1 irritable bowel), 1 hepatitis C, and 1 seizure. Campylobacteremia with febrile seizures developed in a previously healthy patient.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility

The antimicrobial susceptibility of 104 human isolates of C. jejuni is shown in Table 1. Tetracycline resistance was identified in 63 isolates (60%); of these, 4 isolates were also resistant to nalidixic acid, 2 isolates were also resistant to kanamycin, and 1 isolate was also resistant to both nalidixic acid and kanamycin. Three of the 4 nalidixic acid–resistant isolates were also resistant to ciprofloxacin. In the tetracycline-sensitive isolates, no resistance to other antimicrobial agents was detected.

Plasmid Content

Tetracycline-resistance plasmids were found in 50 (79%) of 63 tetracycline-resistant isolates. DNA-DNA hybridizations for the cjp5 gene on pVir determined that 18 (17%) of 104 C. jejuni isolates contained the pVir plasmid. Stocked frozen clinical isolates had a slightly higher frequency of pVir than fresh clinical isolates (18% vs. 13%, respectively), most likely because of sampling error. Tetracycline-resistance plasmids were found in 17 (94%) of 18 pVir-positive C. jejuni isolates compared with 33 (38%) of 86 pVir-negative isolates. The presence of pVir plasmids was associated with the presence of tetracycline-resistance plasmids (p<0.00001). Alternatively, 33 (66%) of the 50 isolates that contained tetracycline-resistance plasmids did not contain pVir, demonstrating that plasmid-mediated tetracycline resistance does not occur exclusively with pVir.

Relationship of Signs and Symptoms to Plasmid Content

Pain, diarrhea, vomiting, and fever were equally likely to occur in all C. jejuni infections, regardless of the presence of pVir (Table 2). However, 53% of patients infected with pVir-positive C. jejuni strains had bloody stool, as opposed to 21% of patients infected with pVir-negative C. jejuni strains (p = 0.011). pVir was not associated with age, sex, antimicrobial therapy, coexisting conditions, or travel. The patient with campylobacteremia and febrile seizures was infected with a pVir-negative C. jejuni. None of the patients infected with pVir-positive C. jejuni strains had a history of travel outside of Alberta in the week preceding the illness, and all of the patients who traveled outside of Alberta were infected with pVir-negative C. jejuni strains.

Transfer of Plasmids between C. jejuni Strains

Tetracycline-resistant transconjugants contained ≈40-kb plasmids that carried tet(O) but were negative for pVir in DNA-DNA hybridizations with the cjp5 probe (data not shown). This finding confirmed the finding of Bacon et al. (15) that pVir could not be transferred with tetracycline-resistance plasmids in conjugal mating between C. jejuni strains.


The role of pVir in human C. jejuni infections has not been investigated previously. Bacon et al. (15,16) presented evidence for the role of pVir in the virulence of C. jejuni based on in vitro cell-culture experiments and limited animal data with the ferret model (15). In our study, symptoms associated with C. jejuni infection were correlated with the presence or absence of pVir plasmids. Symptoms varied from mild discomfort to severe cases with bloody diarrhea. Travel and coexisting medical conditions were not predictors of severity of C. jejuni infections and were not associated with a higher frequency of blood in the stool or pVir-positive C. jejuni infections. Although the pVir virulence plasmid did not correlate with most clinical symptoms, patients infected with a pVir-positive C. jejuni strain were more likely to produce bloody stool than those infected with a pVir-negative strain. The time course of the disease may have affected whether or not blood was observed in the stool sample. The clinical data collected reflect both the observations of the patient as reported to the physician and the physician's records. Accordingly, these conclusions are based upon the necessary limitations of this retrospective study of patients from different unconnected study sites within a region, with perhaps some differences in diagnostic definitions.

Bloody stool in C. jejuni gastroenteritis indicates the progression of the infection into the tissues of the colon and rectum (3). This invasion of the intestinal epithelium is responsible for the mucosal damage and inflammatory lesions seen in C. jejuni infections and is a major component of pathogenesis, although the mechanism is currently unknown (11). pVir was previously found to be important for the in vitro invasion of intestinal epithelial cell lines (15,16). The association of pVir in C. jejuni with bloody diarrhea in a clinical setting supports the role of pVir for in vivo epithelial cell invasion and stresses its potential as a marker for the risk of developing a more severe clinical infection.

The lack of association of pVir with bloody stool in a small proportion of patients suggests that other virulence determinants are likely to be involved in severe C. jejuni infections, as are several other host factors that determine the clinical expression of the disease (3). Further studies are necessary to clarify these aspects of clinical C. jejuni infection.

Large variations in invasion frequency have been observed among strains of C. jejuni (4). Fearnely et al. (31) found that C. jejuni strains can either invade cell cultures at high frequencies (hyperinvasive) or have low invasive potential. Subsets of the C. jejuni strains may exist that use different mechanisms to produce disease (15,32). Whether or not the pVir virulence plasmid is the defining feature of a hyperinvasive subset of C. jejuni strains remains to be determined.

The finding that the pVir virulence plasmid is present in C. jejuni isolates containing a tetracycline-resistance plasmid is of considerable interest. One potential explanation for this association is the impact on the invasive ability of the strain. Variation in the invasion frequencies of C. jejuni 81-176 pVir gene mutants has been observed (33) and may be due to the functional redundancy of T4SS genes found on pVir and a tetracycline-resistance plasmid (16). This finding may, in part, explain the dependence of pVir on the tetracycline-resistance plasmid observed in this study.

The prevalence of tetracycline resistance in C. jejuni in our study (60%) represents a significant increase from 8.6% in 1981 (p<0.0001) (22), but the frequency of resistance to erythromycin or ciprofloxacin has remained low. These results confirm those of other Canadian studies that have identified increasing levels of tetracycline resistance and low levels of erythromycin resistance (20,34,35). Considering that erythromycin is the drug of choice for treating C. jejuni gastroenteritis, that its efficacy has not been compromised by the emergence of resistance is surprising. In our study, a low level of resistance to ciprofloxacin, commonly prescribed to prevent travelers' diarrhea, is also a surprising finding. A temporal link between veterinary use of fluoroquinolones and the emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in human isolates of C. jejuni coincided with the licensing of fluoroquinolones, such as enrofloxacin, in the late 1980s and early 1990s in the Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada (36). In the eastern Canadian province of Quebec, resistance to ciprofloxacin increased from 13% in 1995 to 47% in 2001 (20,37). Approval for fluoroquinolone as a therapeutic agent for use in agriculture in Canada was withdrawn in 1997 (38) and may explain the low prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant C. jejuni isolated from human specimens in the western Canadian province of Alberta.

Serotyping was not conducted in our study since on its own it is not a useful discriminating marker for the ability of C. jejuni isolates to cause severe gastroenteritis. Molecular subtyping studies in the United States reported virtually identical isolates of C. jejuni in locally purchased retail poultry products and human infections (39). Future studies will continue to investigate the association of pVir-positive C. jejuni infections with the presence of blood in stool and employ a variety of genotypic tools (molecular typing, DNA microarrays) and phenotypic assays (i.e., invasion) to identify the characteristics of C. jejuni isolates from animal and human sources that allow them to be effective pathogens in humans.

Dobryan Tracz works in research at the Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health at the Public Health Agency of Canada in Winnipeg, Canada. He is also a laboratory instructor at the University of Manitoba and volunteers with local science education programs for children.



Our thanks to Scott Forbes and Jalene LaMontagene for statistical advice, Matt Gilmour and James Gunton for critical review of this manuscript; and Betty Lui and the staff of the Provincial Laboratory for Public Health (Microbiology) for supplying C. jejuni isolates.

This research was supported by grants from the University Hospital Foundation (Edmonton, Canada), the National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Safe Food and Water Initiative). D.M.T. held both NSERC and Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR) studentships during his graduate program. A.G. is an AHFMR postdoctoral fellow. D.E.T. is an AHFMR scientist.



  1. Blaser  MJ. Epidemiologic and clinical features of Campylobacter jejuni infections. J Infect Dis. 1997;176(Suppl 2):S1035. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mead  PS, Slutsker  L, Dietz  V, McCaig  LF, Bresee  JS, Shapiro  C, Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:60725. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Skirrow  MB, Blaser  MJ. Clinical aspects of Campylobacter infection. In: Nachamkin I, Blaser MJ, editors. Campylobacter. Washington: ASM Press; 2000. p. 69–88.
  4. Hu  L, Kopecko  DJ. Interactions of Campylobacter with eukaryotic cells: gut luminal colonization and mucosal invasion mechanisms. In: Nachamkin I, Blaser MJ, editors. Campylobacter. Washington: ASM Press; 2000. p. 191–217.
  5. Grant  CC, Konkel  ME, Cieplak  W Jr, Tompkins  LS. Role of flagella in adherence, internalization, and translocation of Campylobacter jejuni in nonpolarized and polarized epithelial cell cultures. Infect Immun. 1993;61:176471.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yao  R, Burr  DH, Doig  P, Trust  TJ, Niu  H, Guerry  P. Isolation of motile and non-motile insertional mutants of Campylobacter jejuni defective in invasion of eukaryotic cells: the role of flagella in invasion. Mol Microbiol. 1994;14:88393. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Konkel  ME, Kim  BJ, Rivera-Amill  V, Garvis  SG. Bacterial secreted proteins are required for the internalization of Campylobacter jejuni into cultured mammalian cells. Mol Microbiol. 1999;32:691701. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hanel  I, Schulze  F, Hotzel  H, Schubert  E. Detection and characterization of two cytotoxins produced by Campylobacter jejuni strains. Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1998;288:13143. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Whitehouse  CA, Balbo  PB, Pesci  EC, Cottle  DL, Mirabito  PM, Pickett  CL. Campylobacter jejuni cytolethal distending toxin causes a G2-phase cell cycle block. Infect Immun. 1998;66:193440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Parkhill  J, Wren  BW, Mungall  K, Ketley  JM, Churcher  C, Basham  D, The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences. Nature. 2000;403:6658. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. van Vliet  AH, Ketley  JM. Pathogenesis of enteric Campylobacter infection. Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol. 2001;30:45S56S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sansonetti  PJ, Egile  C. Molecular bases of epithelial cell invasion by Shigella flexneri. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1998;74:1917. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Guiney  DG, Fang  FC, Krause  M, Libby  S, Buchmeier  NA, Fierer  J. Biology and clinical significance of virulence plasmids in Salmonella serovars. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21(Suppl 2):S14651. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tobe  T, Hayashi  T, Han  C-G, Schoolnik  GK, Ohtsubo  E, Saskawa  C. Complete DNA sequence and structural analysis of the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli adherence factor plasmid. Infect Immun. 1999;67:545562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bacon  DJ, Alm  RA, Burr  DH, Hu  L, Kopecko  DJ, Ewing  CP, Involvement of a plasmid in virulence of Campylobacter jejuni 81-176. Infect Immun. 2000;68:438490. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bacon  DJ, Alm  RA, Hu  L, Hickey  TE, Ewing  CP, Batchelor  RA, DNA sequence and mutational analyses of the pVir plasmid of Campylobacter jejuni 81-176. Infect Immun. 2002;70:624250. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Christie  PJ. Type IV secretion: intercellular transfer of macromolecules by systems ancestrally related to conjugation machines. Mol Microbiol. 2001;40:294305. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nachamkin  I, Engberg  J, Aarestrup  FM. Diagnosis and antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. In: Nachamkin I, Blaser MJ, editors. Campylobacter. Washington: ASM Press; 2000. p. 45–66.
  19. Nachamkin  I, Ung  H, Li  M. Increasing fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni, Pennsylvania, USA, 1982–2001. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:15013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaudreau  C, Gilbert  H. Antimicrobial resistance of clinical strains of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni isolated from 1985 to 1997 in Quebec, Canada. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:21068.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Li  CC, Chiu  CH, Wu  JL, Huang  YC, Lin  TY. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Campylobacter jejuni and coli by using E-test in Taiwan. Scand J Infect Dis. 1998;30:3942. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Taylor  DE, Chang  N, Garner  RS, Sherburne  R, Mueller  L. Incidence of antibiotic resistance and characterization of plasmids in Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from clinical sources in Alberta, Canada. Can J Microbiol. 1986;32:2832. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Taylor  DE, De Grandis  SA, Karmali  MA, Fleming  PC. Transmissible plasmids from Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981;19:8315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor  DE, Hiratsuka  K, Ray  H, Manavathu  EK. Characterization and expression of a cloned tetracycline resistance determinant from Campylobacter jejuni plasmid pUA466. J Bacteriol. 1987;169:29849.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Trieber  CA, Burkhardt  N, Nierhaus  KH, Taylor  DE. Ribosomal protection from tetracycline mediated by Tet(O): Tet(O) interaction with ribosomes is GTP-dependent. Biol Chem. 1998;379:84756. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Connell  SR, Trieber  CA, Dinos  GP, Einfeldt  E, Taylor  DE, Nierhaus  KH. Mechanism of Tet(O)-mediated tetracycline resistance. EMBO J. 2003;22:94553. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaudreau  C, Gilbert  H. Comparison of disc diffusion and agar dilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;39:70712. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sambrook  J, Russell  DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001.
  29. De Ungria  MC, Tillett  D, Neilan  BA, Cox  PT, Lee  A. A novel method of extracting plasmid DNA from Helicobacter species. Helicobacter. 1998;3:26977. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Manavathu  EK, Hiratsuka  K, Taylor  DE. Nucleotide sequence analysis and expression of a tetracycline-resistance gene from Campylobacter jejuni. Gene. 1988;62:1726. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Fearnley  C, Manning  G, Frost  J, Penn  CW, Newell  DG. The invasiveness of C. jejuni isolates in relation to the source and host presentation of disease. Int J Med Microbiol. 2001;291:124.
  32. Kopecko  DJ, Hu  L, Zaal  KJ. Campylobacter jejuni—microtubule-dependent invasion. Trends Microbiol. 2001;9:38996. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hu  L, Kiavand  A, Ewing  CP, Bacon  DJ, Guerry  P. Characterization of a plasmid-encoded type IV secretion system in Campylobacter jejuni 81-176. Int J Med Microbiol. 2001;291:120.
  34. Harnett  N, McLeod  S, Yong  YA, Hewitt  C, Vearncombe  M, Krishnan  C. Quinolone resistance in clinical strains of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995;36:26970. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gibreel  A, Tracz  DM, Nonaka  L, Ngo  TM, Connell  SR, Taylor  DE. Incidence of antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter jejuni isolated in Alberta, Canada, from 1999 to 2002, with special reference to tet(O)-mediated tetracyclinli resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:344250. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith  KE, Bender  JB, Osterholm  MT. Antimicrobial resistance in animals and relevance to human infections. In: Nachamkin I, Blaser MJ, editors. Campylobacter. Washington: ASM Press; 2000. p. 483–95.
  37. Gaudreau  C, Gilbert  H. Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni strains isolated from humans in 1998 to 2001 in Montreal, Canada. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:20279. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Engberg  J, Aarestrup  FM, Taylor  DE, Gerner-Smidt  P, Nachamkin  I. Quinolone and macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli: resistance mechanisms and trends in human isolates. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:2434. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith  KE, Besser  JM, Hedberg  CW, Leano  FT, Bender  JB, Wicklund  JH, Quinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni investigations in Minnesota, 1992–1998. Investigation team. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:152532. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1106.041052

Table of Contents – Volume 11, Number 6—June 2005

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Diane E. Taylor, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, 1-28 Medical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H7; fax: 780-492-7521

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: April 24, 2012
Page updated: April 24, 2012
Page reviewed: April 24, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.