Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 11, Number 7—July 2005
Research

Emergency Department Response to SARS, Taiwan

Wei-Kung Chen*Comments to Author , Hong-Dar Isaac Wu*, Cheng-Chieh Lin†, and Yi-Chang Cheng†
Author affiliations: *China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; †China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

Main Article

Table 5

Rating scale and correlation of difficulty and effectiveness of infection control measures (ICM) implemented*

Response to the SARS outbreak Difficulty
Effectiveness
Median IQR Median IQR Correlation p value
Basic ICM
Entrance body temperature screen 1 1 5 1 –0.061 0.55
Visitors restriction 2 2 4 2 –0.309 0.002
Quarantine of fever patients outside of EDs 2 3 5 1 –0.283 0.005
Institution of isolation room at ED 3 3 4 1 –0.226 0.026
Institution of fever screening station 1 2 5 1 –0.128 0.214
Additional ICM
Institution of fever triage ward 3 2 4 4 –0.210 0.042
Restriction of fever patient admission 3 2 4 2 –0.283 0.005
SARS screening team 4 2.25 4 3 –0.408 0.000
Restriction of transfer in 4 2 3 2 –0.269 0.010
Suspected cases transfer out 3 3 3 3 –0.210 0.040
Closure of ED 4 2 2 3 –0.153 0.140

*SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome; IQR, interquartile range; ED, emergency department.

Main Article

Page created: April 23, 2012
Page updated: April 23, 2012
Page reviewed: April 23, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external