Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 11, Number 7—July 2005
Dispatch

SARS Coronavirus Detection Methods

Susanna K.P. Lau*, Xiao-Yan Che†, Kwok-Yung Yuen*, Beatrice H.L. Wong*, Vincent C.C. Cheng*, Gibson K.S. Woo*, Ivan F.N. Hung‡, Rosana W.S. Poon*, Kwok-Hung Chan*, J.S. Malik Peiris*, and Kwok-Yung Yuen*Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China; †First Military Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China; ‡Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China

Main Article

Figure

Evaluation of polyclonal and monoclonal antibody–based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for detecting nucleocapsid protein in fecal and urine specimens. The dashed horizontal lines represent the corresponding cutoff optical density values at 450 nm (OD450). SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Figure. . Evaluation of polyclonal and monoclonal antibody–based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for detecting nucleocapsid protein in fecal and urine specimens. The dashed horizontal lines represent the corresponding cutoff optical density values at 450 nm (OD450). SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Main Article

Page created: April 23, 2012
Page updated: April 23, 2012
Page reviewed: April 23, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external