Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 1—January 2006
Letter

Rickettsia massiliae Human Isolation

On This Page
Article Metrics
172
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: The number of new rickettsial species that cause diseases in humans is rapidly increasing (1). Moreover, many of the species first described in ticks have been recently shown to be pathogenic. Of the 10 species or subspecies found to be pathogens after 1984, a total of 7 were first isolated from ticks (2). We report the first isolation of Rickettsia massiliae from a patient. The bacterium was isolated in Sicily in 1985 and identified in 2005.

[[AA:FA1:PREVIEWHTML]]

A 45-year-old man was hospitalized in Palermo, Italy, on June 6, 1985, for fever and a rash. He had been febrile since May 25 and did not respond to antimicrobial drug treatment using cefamezin, a first-generation cephalosporin. On examination, he had a necrotic eschar on his right ankle, a maculopapular rash on his palms and soles (Figure A1), and slight hepatomegaly. Leukocyte count was normal; he received tetracyclines for 13 days and fully recovered. He seroconverted (from 0 to 1:80 between day 11 and day 24) by indirect immunofluorescence to Rickettsia conorii (R. conorii spot, bioMérieux, Marcy l'Étoile, France).

Four milliliters of heparinized blood sampled before treatment were inoculated in a 25-cm2 flask containing Vero cells and incubated at 33°C in a CO2 incubator (1). Direct immunofluorescence test on a sample of the patient's serum was positive 7 days later. The strain was stored for 20 years and tested in 2005 at the Unité des Rickettsies for identification, and R. massiliae was identified. DNA was extracted from the cell culture supernatant and used as template in 2 previously described polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays that targeted a portion of the rickettsial ompA gene as well as a portion of the rickettsial gltA gene (3,4). Amplification products of the expected size were obtained from this extract but from no concurrently processed control materials, including 3 negative controls. DNA sequencing of the positive PCR products gave 100% identity with R. massiliae for ompA (GenBank accession no. RBU43792) and 99.9% homology for gltA (GenBank accession no. RSU 59720).

R. massiliae was first isolated from Rhipicephalus ticks in Marseilles (5). It is transmitted transovarially in Rhipicephalus turanicus (2). R. massiliae is commonly found in Rhipicephalus sanguineus or R. turanicus in France, Greece, Spain (identified as Bar 29) (6), Portugal, Switzerland, Sicily (D. Raoult, unpub. data), Central Africa, and Mali (2). R. massiliae may be commonly associated with these ticks, which are distributed worldwide.

[[AA:FA2:PREVIEWHTML]]

R. massiliae is grouped phylogenically with Rickettsia rhipicephali and Rickettsia aeschlimannii (Figure A2). Bacteria from this group have a natural resistance to rifampin that is associated with an rpoB sequence that is different from that of other rickettsiae. This isolate was not tested for antimicrobial drug susceptibly (7). Rifampin resistance leads us to believe that this isolate may cause a Mediterranean spotted fever–like disease that was described in children in Spain (7,8). Serologic findings were recently reported that showed some patients in Barcelona, Spain, with reactions that indicate R. massiliae (B29 strain) rather than R. conorii (6). However, serologic reactions are only presumptive; isolation from a patient is the required to initially describe a new disease (9).

This Sicilian index case shows that R. massiliae is a human pathogen. It contraindicates using rifampin to treat Mediterranean spotted fever in areas where R. massiliae is endemic, as it cannot as yet be differentiated from R. conorii infection. R. massiliae is a new example of a strain identified in ticks for several years before its first isolation from a human patient (10). The longest delay was observed for Rickettsia parkeri, which was isolated from ticks in 1939 but not from a patient until 2004. Many authors labeled R. parkeri a nonpathogenic rickettsia during this time (1). In the present case, the human isolate was obtained before the tick isolate but was not further identified. When this strain was isolated, R. conorii was the sole Rickettsia sp. found in ticks in southern Europe. Moreover, only 1 tickborne pathogenic Rickettsia sp. was believed to circulate in a single area. Since that time, several tickborne rickettsial diseases have been shown to exist in the same area, which prompted us to retrospectively identify this strain. The patient was reexamined in May 2005, after this identification. He is healthy and has no remaining antibodies against Rickettsia spp.

Top

Giustina Vitale*, Serafino Mansueto*, Jean-Marc Rolain†, and Didier Raoult†Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "P. Giaccone," Palermo, Italy; †Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France

Top

References

  1. Raoult  D, Roux  V. Rickettsioses as paradigms of new or emerging infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:694719.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Matsumoto  K, Ogawa  M, Brouqui  P, Raoult  D, Parola  P. Transmission of Rickettsia massiliae in the tick, Rhipicephalus turanicus. Med Vet Entomol. 2005;19:26370. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Roux  V, Fournier  PE, Raoult  D. Differentiation of spotted fever group rickettsiae by sequencing and analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphism of PCR amplified DNA of the gene encoding the protein rOmpA. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:205865.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Roux  V, Rydkina  E, Eremeeva  M, Raoult  D. Citrate synthase gene comparison, a new tool for phylogenetic analysis, and its application for the rickettsiae. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:25261. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Beati  L, Raoult  L. Rickettsia massiliae sp.nov., a new spotted fever group rickettsia. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993;43:83940. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardenosa  N, Segura  F, Raoult  D. Serosurvey among Mediterranean spotted fever patients of a new spotted fever group rickettsial strain (Bar29). Eur J Epidemiol. 2003;18:3516. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Drancourt  M, Raoult  D. Characterization of mutations in the rpoB gene in naturally rifampin-resistant Rickettsia species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:24003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bella  F, Espejo-Arenas  E, Uriz  S, Serrano  JA, Alegre  MD, Tort  J. Randomized trial of five-day rifampin versus one-day doxycycline therapy for Mediterranean spotted fever. J Infect Dis. 1991;164:4334. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Parola  P, Paddock  CD, Raoult  D. Tick-borne rickettsioses around the world: emerging diseases challenging old concepts. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:71956. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Paddock  CD, Sumner  JW, Comer  JA, Zaki  SR, Goldsmith  CS, Goddard  J, Rickettsia parkeri: a newly recognized cause of spotted fever rickettsiosis in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:80511. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1201.050850

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 12, Number 1—January 2006

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Didier Raoult, Unité des Rickettsies, CNRS UMR 6020, Faculté de Médecine, Université de la Méditerranée, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille CEDEX 05, France; fax: 33-4-91-38-77-72

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: February 21, 2012
Page updated: February 21, 2012
Page reviewed: February 21, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external