Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 10—October 2006
Research

Campylobacter jejuni Multilocus Sequence Types in Humans, Northwest England, 2003–2004

Will Sopwith*Comments to Author , Andrew Birtles†, Margaret Matthews†, Andrew Fox†, Steven Gee‡, Michael Painter*, Martyn Regan*, Qutub Syed*, and Eric Bolton†
Author affiliations: *Health Protection Agency (North West), Liverpool, United Kingdom; †Regional Health Protection Agency Laboratory, Manchester, United Kingdom; ‡Cumbria and Lancashire Health Protection Unit, Preston, United Kingdom

Main Article

Table 2

Comparative distributions of the most common MLST clonal complexes by study area, April 2003 to March 2004*

Clonal complex Isolates
Incidence/100,000
Incidence ratio 95% confidence intervals p value
Rural Suburban Rural Suburban
ST–21 36 66 19.91 15.50 1.28 0.83–1.96
ST–45 21 14 11.61 3.29 3.53 1.71–7.51 <0.001
UA 12 22 6.64 5.17 1.28 0.58–2.71
ST–257 9 19 4.98 4.46 1.12 0.44–2.59
ST–443 6 15 3.32 3.52 1.01 0.32–2.80
ST–48 6 13 3.32 3.05 1.09 0.34–3.07
ST–206 8 10 4.42 2.35 1.88 0.65–5.30
ST–353 4 9 2.21 2.11 1.05 0.24–3.75
ST–22 2 5 1.11 1.17 0.94 0.09–5.75
ST–49 2 5 1.11 1.17 0.94 0.09–5.75
C. coli 16 14 8.85 3.29 2.69 1.23–5.95 <0.01
All cases† 181 312 100.08 73.25 1.37 1.13–1.65 <0.001

*Including UA (new sequence types as yet unassigned to a clonal complex), Campylobacter coli isolates, and all cases of campylobacteriosis reported. Annual estimated incidence was calculated for each clonal complex and incidence ratios were calculated for rural incidence/suburban incidence, including confidence intervals. Those data with a statistically significant difference between the study areas are shown in boldface type (level of significance p<0.05). MLST, multilocus sequence typing.
†Refers to the entire dataset for reference, i.e., those shown in this table plus all others.

Main Article

Page created: November 10, 2011
Page updated: November 10, 2011
Page reviewed: November 10, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external