Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 12—December 2006
Perspective

Qualitative Assessment of Risk for Monkeypox Associated with Domestic Trade in Certain Animal Species, United States

Susan M. Bernard*Comments to Author  and Steven A. Anderson*
Author affiliations: *US Food and Drug Administration, College Park, Maryland, USA

Main Article

Table 3

Qualitative estimation of risk to humans*

Human exposure to animal Animal infected Infection status of animal unknown
Exposure likely Exposure unlikely
Indirect exposure/no direct contact Low Low Low
Direct contact, type I* (direct contact without type II exposure) Medium Medium Low
Direct contact, type II* (bite, scratch, or contact of animal’s body fluid with mucous membrane or nonintact skin) High High Low

*Risk was based upon type of exposure to an animal and the infection status of the animal. Type I and type II are arbitrary classifications.

*Risk was based upon type of exposure to an animal and the infection status of the animal. Type I and type II are arbitrary classifications.

Main Article

Page created: October 04, 2011
Page updated: October 04, 2011
Page reviewed: October 04, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external