Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 4—April 2006

Potential Arbovirus Emergence and Implications for the United Kingdom

Ernest Andrew Gould*Comments to Author , Stephen Higgs†, Alan Buckley*, and Tamara Sergeevna Gritsun*
Author affiliations: *Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; †University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA

Cite This Article


Arboviruses have evolved a number of strategies to survive environmental challenges. This review examines the factors that may determine arbovirus emergence, provides examples of arboviruses that have emerged into new habitats, reviews the arbovirus situation in western Europe in detail, discusses potential arthropod vectors, and attempts to predict the risk for arbovirus emergence in the United Kingdom. We conclude that climate change is probably the most important requirement for the emergence of arthropodborne diseases such as dengue fever, yellow fever, Rift Valley fever, Japanese encephalitis, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, bluetongue, and African horse sickness in the United Kingdom. While other arboviruses, such as West Nile virus, Sindbis virus, Tahyna virus, and Louping ill virus, apparently circulate in the United Kingdom, they do not appear to present an imminent threat to humans or animals.

This page was updated on July 19, 2006 to incorporate the corrections in Vol. 12, No. 8

More than 550 arboviruses have been identified (1). Many are mammalian and avian pathogens, 4 of which (West Nile virus [WNV], Usutu virus, Sindbis virus [SINV], and Tahyna virus) circulate in the United Kingdom in resident and migratory birds (2,3). The only zoonotic arboviruses isolated from field material in the United Kingdom are the flavivirus Louping ill virus (LIV) (4) and the bunyavirus Uukuniemi virus (5). LIV is included in the tickborne encephalitis virus (TBEV) complex that includes Kyasanur Forest disease virus and Alkhurma virus. These viruses can cause encephalitis and hemorrhagic disease (6). Other human pathogens in the genus Flavivirus that will be discussed in this review include yellow fever virus (YFV), dengue virus (DENV), Israel turkey meningoencephalomyelitis virus, and Bagaza virus. European human and animal pathogens in the genus Alphavirus include SINV, Ockelbo virus, and Chikungunya virus and in the family Bunyaviridae, sandfly fever Naples virus (often referred to as Toscana virus), sandfly fever Sicilian virus, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV), Inkoo virus, and Tahyna virus, which is widespread throughout Europe. Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) and Nairobi sheep disease virus (NSDV) could be introduced to Europe from Africa through animal transportation. Finally, the family Reoviridae contains a variety of animal arbovirus pathogens, including bluetongue virus, which is currently circulating in Europe, and African horse sickness virus, which has been found in Europe but is not currently circulating. This review considers whether any of these pathogenic arboviruses are likely to emerge and cause disease in the United Kingdom in the foreseeable future.

Factors That May Determine Arbovirus Emergence

Transmission of arboviruses between invertebrates and vertebrates imposes constraints on evolution and dispersal, which are reflected in their phylogenetic relationships (7). However, the influence of modern life on arbovirus emergence cannot be overemphasized. The following human activities may influence arbovirus emergence: 1) increased transportation of animals, humans, plants, arthropods, and other materials; 2) increased outdoor leisure activities; 3) reduced or nonexistent arthropod control programs; 4) deforestation; 5) reforestation; 6) land reclamation; 7) altered farming practices; 8) urbanization programs; 9) irrigation projects, including building dams or creating reservoirs and lakes; 10) military activities; 11) movement of military personnel and local populations in war zones; 12) natural disasters, such as flooding; and 13) the early effects of climate change (8).

Examples of Emerging Tickborne Arboviruses

TBEV complex viruses rarely cause disease in indigenous forest animals but may emerge as pathogens when they infect introduced species. Members of the complex have evolved and dispersed westward across Asian and European forests during the past 3–5 millenia. This dispersion is driven by Ixodes spp. vectors that inhabit the moist forest undergrowth. Nymphal ticks may infect newly hatched larvae when they co-feed on forest animals. Since these vertebrates do not become sick or have detectable viremia, this direct method of vector infection is known as nonviremic transmission. In contrast, LIV and related viruses in Spain, Turkey, Greece, and nearby regions produce viremia and fatal encephalomyelitis in domesticated animals when infectious ticks feed on them (9). These animals have no genetic resistance or immunity to the TBEV-related viruses that have emerged from the forests (8).

Kyasanur Forest disease virus emerged in Karnataka, India, in 1957 after forests were cleared for urbanization and farmland reclamation. Arboreal monkeys scavenging on the exposed forest floor became infested with Kyasanur Forest disease virus–infected ticks from the undergrowth. Local inhabitants and veterinary scientists who examined dead and dying monkeys also became infected. A closely related virus, Alkhurma virus, emerged in Saudi Arabia in 1992, causing hemorrhagic disease in butchers who handled sheep imported into Saudi Arabia for the Hajj (10). Alkhurma virus was detected in ticks removed from imported sheep, but the country from which these sheep originated has not been identified.

CCHFV emerges sporadically in Africa, Asia, and Europe. This arbovirus may be transmitted to animals by ticks, especially members of the Hyalomma genus. Emergence of CCHFV largely depends on the transportation of livestock such as cattle and goats, on which infected ticks feed. Most cases of hemorrhagic disease occur in humans involved with the livestock industry. Since >21 tick species are present in the United Kingdom, and since viruses such as CCHFV can infect a wide variety of ticks, the introduction and emergence of CCHFV are not inconceivable.

NSDV (family Bunyaviridae, genus Nairovirus) is transmitted to sheep by Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and causes fever and gastroenteritis; the infection is often fatal. NSDV is distributed widely throughout Africa (1) but not elsewhere. However, the closely related Ganjam virus is found in India, which may imply that NSDV has been transported in ticks on animals imported to India from Africa. Both NSDV and Ganjam virus produce febrile illness with polyarthritis in humans.

Examples of Emerging Mosquitoborne Arboviruses

YFV circulates among simians and Aedes and Hemagogus spp. mosquitoes in the forest canopy and adjacent savannah regions of Africa and South America. In Africa, nonhuman primates do not become ill from YFV infection, presumably because the virus has adapted to the simian hosts. Nevertheless, human yellow fever epidemics do occur in Africa because the virus emerges sporadically from the jungles and savannah into rural and urban areas, where most of the human population is susceptible. In South American jungles, moribund monkeys are usually found immediately before local epidemics of yellow fever, implying that the virus recently encroached into the region. YFV was introduced into South America on ships that sailed from Africa during the past few centuries (8). Many European and North American ports observed cases of yellow fever. In some cases, the virus was carried on sailing ships from Cuba to Europe, causing localized outbreaks where the ships docked (11). Infections in Swansea (Wales) and St. Nazaire (France) resulted from the bite of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes released from the newly arrived ships. However, the disease immediately disappeared when the local temperature dropped and the tropical mosquitoes died. Thus, such viruses are unlikely to emerge in the United Kingdom.

The 4 DENV serotypes emerged more recently than YFV (8) and can generate epidemics in humans without depending on a sylvatic cycle in the jungles. Therefore, in contrast to YFV, which is maintained in the jungles of Africa and South America, DENV continues to be dispersed by humans and mosquitoes throughout the tropics and subtropics worldwide (8,12). Presumably, as Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus continue to spread, the geographic distribution of these viruses will also expand.

Since birds are highly mobile and can travel great distances in a relatively short time, they play a role in arbovirus dispersal. SINV, for example, is carried annually between South Africa and Scandinavia by migrating birds (12). SINV is rarely associated with disease in Africa. However, when cases of arthritis, polyarthritis, and fever associated with rash were recorded in Scandinavia, the antigenically closely related Ockelbo virus was isolated. Presumably, Ockelbo virus evolved from introduced SINV and subsequently became established in a local transmission cycle. In the New World, St. Louis encephalitis virus is also carried long distances by migrating birds. It was probably introduced into South America from Africa during the past few centuries and gradually dispersed by migrating birds to North America (13). More recently, WNV was introduced into the New York area, probably in 1999. The virus became established in birds and was rapidly dispersed north to Canada; south to Florida, Mexico, and the Caribbean; and west, reaching California in 2004 ( The WNV that was introduced into New York was related to an Egypt/Israel strain that is also present in the Volga River Delta. Despite its high virulence in birds (particularly corvids), horses, and alligators in North America, WNV circulates relatively harmlessly in the Old World, presumably reflecting co-evolution of virus and host over a long period.

Other emerging flaviviruses include Usutu virus, which appeared unexpectedly in Austria in 2000 (14), killing birds in Vienna and surrounding areas. Previously, Usutu virus had only been found in Africa. Israel turkey meningoencephalitis virus, isolated in Israel, is phylogenetically closely related to the African Bagaza virus (7). Thus, Israel turkey meningoencephalitis virus may represent the birdborne version of Bagaza virus.

RVFV (family Bunyaviridae, genus Phlebovirus) is usually transmitted by Aedes spp. mosquitoes and occasionally infects livestock, producing epizootics with high death rates in sheep and other ruminants. Humans in areas where RVFV is epizootic may also become infected. Until 2000, RVFV was most commonly found only in eastern, western, and southern Africa. However, in September 2000, an outbreak was reported in Saudi Arabia and subsequently in Yemen, representing the first cases identified outside Africa and showing the potential for global dispersal.

Bluetongue virus (family Reoviridae, genus Orbivirus) is transmitted to domestic and wild ruminants by culicoide midges. Bluetongue virus epidemics can threaten entire livestock populations and were first described in South Africa after Merino sheep were introduced from Europe in the late 18th century. The virus subsequently dispersed globally, recently reemerging in Italy, Spain, and Portugal (15), most likely through the transportation of ruminants. Whether bluetongue virus will emerge in the United Kingdom likely depends on the effects of climate change on vector dispersal.

Arboviruses Most Likely To Circulate in the United Kingdom

The English Channel and North Sea are not barriers to migrant birds, bats, or commercial transportation systems. Therefore, most mainland European arboviruses could be introduced and established in the United Kingdom. The Table presents a summary of all recognized zoonotic mosquitoborne and tickborne arboviruses circulating in western Europe. While Uukuniemi virus has not been shown to be a human pathogen, it circulates widely in Europe, and seropositivity in humans has been demonstrated many times. YFV, DENV, RVFV, Ganjam virus, and NSDV are excluded from the Table because they only arise as imported viruses. Only LIV and Uukuniemi virus have been isolated from field specimens in the United Kingdom, probably because of limited investigation, although the other viruses in the Table have been isolated in Europe. Serologic evidence obtained from bird sera (2) implies that at least 3 additional arboviruses, WNV, Usutu virus, and SINV, circulate in the United Kingdom. Currently, TBEV has not dispersed west beyond the Alsace forests in France (29). LIV, Spanish sheep encephalomyelitis virus, and Greek goat encephalomyelitis virus, on the other hand, represent more recent lineages of western European and Far Eastern TBEV that have emerged on the moorlands after the introduction of sheep and goats for grazing (8).

Three alphaviruses are listed in the Table, SINV, Semliki Forest virus, and Chikungunya virus. SINV has been isolated from field material in Scandinavia, Estonia, Czechoslovakia, and Italy. This virus is widespread throughout the Old World. In Albania, seroconversion to Chikungunya virus was detected in 5 patients with mild flulike symptoms (12); other findings of antibodies to Chikungunya virus have been reported, but evidence of cross-reactivity with other alphaviruses was not always tested. Among the remaining zoonotic arboviruses included in the Table, Tahyna virus is the most common. This virus is widespread throughout western Europe in humans and many nonhuman mammalian species and birds (12). Inkoo virus has only been found in Scandinavia, but few investigations have taken place elsewhere. While investigations for Batai virus have not been extensive, this virus is also widespread throughout western Europe (12).

Probability That Arboviruses Will Emerge as Epidemic Pathogens

Tickborne Arboviruses

Many arboviruses emerged relatively recently (30) and have therefore had little time to be dispersed to new environments, such as the United Kingdom. Although birds carry millions of ticks north and south annually between Africa and Europe, tickborne African bunyaviruses and flaviviruses have not yet appeared as notable pathogens in the United Kingdom. European, Siberian, and Far Eastern strains of TBEV have been isolated in Estonia, probably introduced by migratory birds (31). However, they have not caused substantial disease in these regions. TBEV is less virulent than LIV for sheep (6) and might, therefore, become less dominant than LIV if it were introduced into the sheep-grazing moorlands of the United Kingdom. Whether such introduced viruses would emerge may reflect the level of contact between humans and farm animals. Although ticks are less susceptible to the effects of environmental disruption, the specific region into which TBEV-carrying ticks are introduced might determine whether they survived and then reproduced. The United Kingdom has an abundant supply of Ixodes ticks, but the risk that virulent Far Eastern TBEV would be introduced, become established, and emerge as an endemic pathogen in UK forests is probably low. Alternatively, in the case of CCHFV, the fact that this virus has been isolated from ticks in Greece, the Balkans, and western Russia in the Volga Delta cannot be ignored. Other tickborne virus pathogens are presumably subject to the same qualifications.

Mosquito-, Sandfly- and Midge-transmitted Arboviruses

When one takes into account the information in the Table and the serologic evidence of antibodies against SINV, WNV, Usutu virus, and Tahyna virus in sera of migrant and resident UK birds, the likelihood is high that mosquitoborne arboviruses, particularly those associated with ornithophilic mosquitoes, such as Culex spp., circulate, albeit harmlessly, in the United Kingdom. Other arboviruses circulating in Europe that are not recognized in the United Kingdom include Toscana virus, bluetongue virus, and African horse sickness virus, which was probably introduced into Spain after the importation of infected horses.

Tahyna virus, which causes encephalitis in humans, is widespread across western Europe (Table). Birds and rabbits are vertebrate hosts. Since the movement of rabbits between the United Kingdom and mainland Europe is extensive, and since many bird migratory routes from Africa pass over the United Kingdom, Scandinavia, and mainland western Europe, Tahyna virus is most likely to appear, if not emerge, in the United Kingdom.

Why has none of these viruses yet emerged as a noticeable pathogen in the United Kingdom? Perhaps they have, and we do not realize it. Recent reports state that <40% of human deaths from viral encephalitis are attributed to a specific etiologic agent in the United Kingdom (32). Moreover, no systematic studies have been conducted to determine the extent to which Tahyna virus is circulating, even though the virus is known to be present in UK birds (3). In addition, on the basis of serologic tests (2), a SINV-like virus also circulates among birds in the United Kingdom, possibly vectored by Culex mosquitoes. In Scandinavia, this virus causes rash, fever, and acute polyarthritis in humans.

Necessary Arthropods for Arbovirus Emergence

At least 21 species of hard ticks and 3 argasids are recognized in mainland Britain and its islands (33). Most parasitize mammals, but at least 12 prefer birds, and 2 are regularly found on reptiles. In many parts of the United Kingdom, LIV has been isolated from I. ricinus ticks, which are believed to maintain LIV in the wild by nonviremic transmission during co-feeding (34). Other tick species, such as Ornithodorus maritimus and I. uriae, transmit bunyaviruses, nairoviruses, and orbiviruses among seabirds (5,35) that inhabit the cliffs around the UK coastline. However, these seabird-tickborne viruses do not cause disease in mammals in the United Kingdom. Nevertheless, the United Kingdom has a wide range of ticks that can transmit arboviruses.

At least 33 mosquito species are endemic in the United Kingdom (36), but their susceptibility to infection by arboviruses and ability to replicate and transmit them to vertebrate hosts have not been assessed. At least 9 of these mosquito species have been linked to transmission of WNV (37). Many related viruses cause encephalitic infections and are transmitted in nature between birds and mosquitoes, particularly Culex spp. Six of the 33 endemic mosquito species feed on humans and birds, which makes them potential bridge vectors (36). Eleven of the remaining 33 species bite humans. Clearly, the United Kingdom has a wide range of potential mosquito vectors. Moreover, if DENV vector species that survive in colder temperatures, such as Ae. albopictus, become established, the United Kingdom may be more vulnerable to outbreaks of dengue fever.

Several pathogenic mosquitoborne viruses have been isolated from animals, mosquitoes, and humans in Europe and Scandinavia (Table). The same viruses are likely also to exist in the United Kingdom, but why do these mosquitoborne viruses not cause disease? Possible explanations include the following: 1) the level of disease in the United Kingdom is low and therefore missed by surveillance systems; 2) the climate rarely satisfies the requirements for efficient arbovirus transmission by mosquitoes; 3) resident arthropods in the United Kingdom have low competence for arboviruses; 4) low-level immunity has been established among mammalian and avian species involved in virus circulation; and 5) viruses are circulating, but nonviremic transmission of the virus is occurring between mosquitoes co-feeding on nonsusceptible vertebrate hosts (38).

Some species of Culicoides (biting midges) are vectors of animal diseases, such as bluetongue virus (e.g., Culicoides imicola and C. variipennis) and African horse sickness. According to Campbell and Pelham-Clinton (39), 41 Culicoides spp. occur in the United Kingdom; dominant species include C. impunctatus in Scotland and C. obsoletus in southern England. In Scotland, 37 species occur, ≈20 of which are mammalophilic, but only 5 of which bite humans. In the highlands of Scotland, C. impunctatus can reach pest proportions and is associated with "nuisance biting." However, bluetongue virus and African horse sickness virus are not present in the United Kingdom, and because its climate is cooler than that of southern Europe, they are not likely to become established in the near future (

Sandflies are not known to be endemic in the United Kingdom, but they are present in all Mediterranean countries. As climate change takes effect, sandflies are expected to become established in the United Kingdom. Thus, sandfly fever/Toscana virus might emerge later in this century.

Finally, direct transmission of arboviruses between vertebrates (i.e., not requiring an arthropod vector) has been recognized for many years. For example, LIV and TBEV may be transmitted through the milk of sheep and goats (6). Moreover, evidence is accumulating that mosquitoborne arboviruses can be transmitted among vertebrate species by routes additional to those involving arthropods (40). While invertebrates almost certainly contribute to arbovirus transmission in northern Europe, the relatively lower numbers and density of mosquitoes in these regions might limit their efficiency in disease transmission. These alternative nonvectored modes of transmission could in part explain how such viruses might circulate between vertebrates in environments previously considered suboptimal for efficient circulation of arboviruses.


Arboviruses rarely cause disease in their maintenance hosts or vectors; consequently, viremic blood is not available for vectorborne transmission. Arboviruses have therefore developed other transmission strategies to ensure their survival. For years, the favorite mechanisms to explain virus survival in the absence of disease were vertical transmission, overwintering, or persistent infection in the arthropod or vertebrate host. We now recognize that the process of nonviremic transmission between co-feeding ticks or co-feeding mosquitoes, and perhaps ticks co-feeding with mosquitoes, is a powerful force for virus transmission even in the presence of immunity. Therefore, this repertoire of transmission strategies can ensure arbovirus perpetuation in the absence of disease.

Armed with this versatility, arboviruses can adapt to virtually any situation. Most arboviruses have evolved a sylvatic existence that is infrequently associated with disease in vertebrate hosts. However, in the presence of susceptible hosts, an environment that favors rapid arthropod amplification, an efficient mechanism for dispersal, and a suitable climate for transmission, DENV, RVFV, Japanese encephalitis virus, and YFV may cause epidemic outbreaks of immense proportions.

This variety of critical factors must come together at an appropriate time for an arbovirus to emerge as an epidemic pathogen, a situation that has rarely happened in the United Kingdom. Of course, if climate change has the effects that experts predict it will, the situation could change during the 21st century. In conclusion, despite compelling evidence that potentially highly pathogenic arboviruses are circulating or, alternatively, are being introduced annually into the United Kingdom, no imminent threat exists that they will cause epidemic outbreaks of serious concern to public or environmental health.

Dr Gould is a senior research fellow in the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Oxford. He has been an arbovirologist since 1968, although his interests include several other mammalian and avian viruses.



  1. Karabatsos  N. International catalogue of arthropod-borne viruses. 3rd ed. San Antonio (TX): American Society for Tropical Medicine and Hygiene; 1985.
  2. Buckley  A, Dawson  A, Moss  SR, Hinsley  SA, Bellamy  PE, Gould  EA. Serological evidence of West Nile virus, Usutu virus and Sindbis virus infection of birds in the UK. J Gen Virol. 2003;84:280717. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chastel  C, Couatarmanac'h  A, Le Lay  G, Guiguen  C, Linn  I, Hardy  E, Infections à arbovirus chez let petits mammifères du parc d'Amorique (Bretagne) et de la région d'Exeter (Grand Bretagne): enquêtes sérologiques comparatives. Bull Soc Fr Parasitol. 1985;:7982.
  4. Pool  WA, Brownlee  A, Wilson  DR. The etiology of louping ill. J Comp Pathol. 1930;43:25365.
  5. Moss  SR, Nuttall  PA. Isolation of orbiviruses and uukuviruses from puffin ticks. Acta Virol. 1985;29:15861.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gritsun  TS, Nuttall  PA, Gould  EA. Tick-borne flaviviruses. Adv Virus Res. 2003;61:31771. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaunt  MW, Sall  AA, Lamballerie  X, Falconar  AK, Dzhivanian  TI, Gould  EA. Phylogenetic relationships of flaviviruses correlate with their epidemiology, disease association and biogeography. J Gen Virol. 2001;82:186776.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gould  EA, de Lamballerie  X, Zanotto  PM, Holmes  EC. Origins, evolution, and vector/host co-adaptations within the genus Flavivirus. In: Chambers TJ, Monath TM, editors. The flaviviruses: current molecular aspects of evolution, biology, and disease prevention. London: Academic Press; 2003. p. 277–314.
  9. McGuire  K, Holmes  EC, Gao  GF, Reid  HW, Gould  EA. Tracing the origins of louping ill virus by molecular phylogenetic analysis. J Gen Virol. 1998;79:9818.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Charrel  RN, Zaki  AM, Attoui  H, Fakeeh  M, Billoir  F, Yousef  AI, Complete coding sequence of the Alkhurma virus, a tick-borne flavivirus causing severe hemorrhagic fever in humans in Saudi Arabia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;287:45561. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Smith  CE, Gibson  ME. Yellow fever in South Wales, 1865. Med Hist. 1986;30:32240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lundstrom  JO. Mosquito-borne viruses in Western Europe: a review. J Vector Ecol. 1999;24:139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gould  EA, Moss  SR, Turner  SL. Evolution and dispersal of encephalitic flaviviruses. Arch Virol. 2004;Suppl:6584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Weissenbock  H, Kolodziejek  J, Url  A, Lussy  H, Rebel-Bauder  B, Nowotny  N. Emergence of Usutu virus, an African mosquito-borne flavivirus of the Japanese encephalitis virus group, Central Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:6526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Purse  BV, Mellor  PS, Rogers  DJ, Samuel  AR, Mertens  PP, Baylis  M. Climate change and the recent emergence of bluetongue in Europe. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:17181. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Francy  DB, Jaenson  TGT, Lundstrom  JO, Schildt  E-B, Espmark  A, Henrrikson  B, Ecologic studies of mosquitoes and birds as hosts of Ockelbo virus in Sweden, and isolation of Inkoo and Batai viruses from mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1989;41:35563.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Traavik  T, Mehl  R, Wiger  R. The first tick-borne encephalitis virus isolates from Norway. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand [B]. 1978;86:2535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Juricova  Z, Pinowski  J, Literak  I, Hahm  KH, Romanowski  J. Antibodies to alphavirus, flavivirus, and bunyavirus arboviruses in house sparrows (Passer domesticus) and tree sparrows (P. montanus) in Poland. Avian Dis. 1998;42:1825. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kunz  C, Buckley  SM. Antibodies in man against Tahyna and Lumbo viruses determined by hemagglutination-inhibition and tissue culture neutralization tests. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1964;13:73841.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hubálek  Z, Halouzka  J. West Nile fever—a reemerging mosquito-borne viral disease in Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:64350. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hannoun  C, Chatelain  J, Krams  S, Guillon  JC. Isolation, in Alsace, of the tick encephalitis virus (arbovirus, group B). C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D. 1971;272:7668.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Filipe  AR. Antibodies against arboviruses of wild birds in Portugal. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch. 1971;35:3958. DOIGoogle Scholar
  23. Filipe  AR. Serological survey for antibodies to arboviruses in the human population of Portugal. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1974;68:3114. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chastel  C, Launay  H, Rogues  G, Beaucournu  JC. Arbovirus infections in Spain: serological survey on small mammals. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1980;73:38490.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bardos  V, Sefcovicova  L. The presence of antibodies neutralizing Tahyna virus in the sera of inhabitants of some European, Asian, African and Australian countries. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1961;5:5014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Vesenjak-Hirjan  J. Arboviruses in Yugoslavia. In: Vesenjak-Hirjan J, Porterfield JS, Arslanagic E, editors. Arboviruses in the Mediterranean countries. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag; 1980. p. 165–77.
  27. Draganescu  N, Girjabu  E, Iftimovici  R, Totescu  E, Iacobescu  V, Tudor  G, Investigations on the presence of antibodies to alphaviruses, flaviviruses, bunyavirus and Kemerovo virus in humans and some domestic animals. Virologie. 1978;29:10711.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Antoniadis  A, Alexiou-Daniel  S, Malissovas  N, Doutsos  J, Polyzoni  T, LeDuc  JW, Seroepidemiological survey for antibodies to arboviruses in Greece. Arch Virol. 1990;Suppl 1:27785.
  29. Chatelain  J, Hannoun  C, Rodhain  F, Chatelain  J, Hannoun  C, Salmon  AM, Ecology of indigenous arboviruses in Alsace. Tick Central European encephalitis. I.—Complex Ixodes ricinus—bank voles. II.—Study of bank voles population immunity. III.—Virologic results in bank voles population (author's transl.). Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1979;27:27799.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zanotto  PM, Gould  EA, Gao  GF, Harvey  PH, Holmes  EC. Population dynamics of flaviviruses revealed by molecular phylogenies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:54853. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Golovljova  I, Vene  S, Sjolander  KB, Vasilenko  SK, Plyusnin  A, Lundkvist  A. Characterization of tick-borne encephalitis virus from Estonia. J Med Virol. 2004;74:5808. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Davison  KL, Crowcroft  NS, Ramsay  ME, Brown  DWG, Andrews  NJ. Viral encephalitis in England 1989–1998: What did we miss? Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:23440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hendry  GAF, Ho-Yen  D. Ticks—a lay guide to a human hazard. Edinburgh (Scotland): Mercat Press; 1998.
  34. Jones  LD, Gaunt  M, Hails  RS, Laurenson  K, Hudson  PJ, Reid  H, Transmission of louping ill virus between infected and uninfected ticks co-feeding on mountain hares. Med Vet Entomol. 1997;11:1726. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Spence  RP, Harrap  KA, Nuttall  PA. The isolation of Kemerovo group orbiviruses and Uukuniemi group viruses of the family Bunyaviridae from Ixodes uriae ticks from the Isle of May, Scotland. Acta Virol. 1985;29:12936.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Medlock  JM, Snow  KR, Leach  S. Potential transmission of West Nile virus in the British Isles: an ecological review of candidate mosquito bridge vectors. Med Vet Entomol. 2005;19:221. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Higgs  S, Snow  KR, Gould  EA. The potential for West Nile virus to establish outside of its natural range: a consideration of potential mosquito vectors in the United Kingdom. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004;98:827. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Higgs  S, Schneider  BS, Vanlandingham  DL, Klingler  KA, Gould  EA. Non-viremic transmission of West Nile virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:88714. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Campbell  JA, Pelham-Clinton  EC. A taxonomic review of the British species of Culicoides latreille (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae). Proc R Ent Soc Lond. 1960;67B:181302.
  40. Komar  N, Langevin  S, Hinten  S, Neneth  N, Edwards  E, Hettler  D, Experimental infection of North American birds with the New York strain of West Nile virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:31127.PubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1204.051010

Table of Contents – Volume 12, Number 4—April 2006

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Earnest A. Gould, CEH Oxford, Mansfield Rd, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK; fax: 0044-1865-281696

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: January 24, 2012
Page updated: January 24, 2012
Page reviewed: January 24, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.