Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 4—April 2006
Research

Reducing Legionella Colonization of Water Systems with Monochloramine

Brendan Flannery*Comments to Author , Lisa B. Gelling†, Duc J. Vugia‡, June M. Weintraub§, James J. Salerno¶, Michael J. Conroy¶, Valerie A. Stevens*, Charles E. Rose*, Matthew R. Moore*, Barry S. Fields*, and Richard E. Besser*
Author affiliations: *Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; †California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, California, USA; ‡California Department of Health Services, Richmond, California, USA; §City and County of San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, USA; ¶San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, Burlingame, California, USA

Main Article

Table 2

Prevalence of Legionella colonization and concentrations in hot water systems in buildings in San Francisco, California, by residual disinfectant and sampling interval*

Water source Chlorine (2003)
Chloramine (2004)
Jan–May Jun–Jul Oct–Dec Mar–May Jun–Aug Sep–Dec p value†
Building water systems (n = 53)
No. colonized with Legionella spp. (%) 27 (51) 34 (64) 35 (66) 5 (9) 0 2 (4) <0.001
Median no. Legionella-positive samples in colonized buildings (range)‡ 3 (1–9) 3 (1–8) 4 (1–8) 1 (1–4) 1 (1–2) 0.007
Water heaters (n = 53)
No. colonized with Legionella spp. (%) 12 (23) 16 (30) 17 (33) 1 (2) 0 0 <0.001
Median Legionella concentration in colonized water heaters, CFU/mL (range)‡ 200 (40–400) 40 (10–500) 20 (10–5,000) 10 0.17
Point-of-use outlets (n = 212)
No. colonized with Legionella spp. (%) 75 (37) 85 (41) 86 (41) 7 (3) 0 2 (1) <0.001
Median Legionella concentration in colonized sites, CFU/mL (range)‡ 2.5 (0.05–25.0) 1.5 (0.05–25.0) 1.0 (0.05–25.0) 0.05 (0.05–0.40) 0.18 (0.10–0.25) <0.001

*Percentages calculated based on number of samples included in analyses (see Methods).
†For Wilcoxon rank sum test comparing number of sites colonized with Legionella spp. before and after the conversion to chloramine disinfectant.
‡Includes only Legionella-positive sites.

Main Article

Page created: January 24, 2012
Page updated: January 24, 2012
Page reviewed: January 24, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external