Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 9—September 2006

Mycobacterium bovis Infection, Lyon, France

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Sophie Mignard*†Comments to Author , Catherine Pichat*, and Gerard Carret*†
Author affiliations: *Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France; †Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Lyon, France

Cite This Article


In a 5-year retrospective study, we used spoligotyping and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units to type 13 strains of Mycobacterium bovis isolated from human sources. Despite the relatively high incidence of human tuberculosis caused by M. bovis (2%), these tools showed no clonal evolution and no relationships between the isolates.

Mycobacterium bovis belongs to the M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and has a wide host range, infecting animals and occasionally humans. M. bovis has been a historical source of tuberculosis (TB) in humans infected through drinking contaminated unpasteurized milk or inhaling aerosols produced by diseased farm animals. Due to a national program of TB control, the incidence of M. bovis in France has dramatically decreased in cattle herds, falling from 10% in the1960s to 0.09% in 1998, and in humans, falling from 1.5% of TB cases in the 1960s to 0.5% (0.07/100,000) in 1995 (1,2). We describe 13 (2 were BCG strains) of 555 MTBC strains isolated from human samples (2% of incidence; we did not quantify the BCG strains), in Lyon, France, over a period of 5 years. Despite the small number of patients, our study shows a relatively high local incidence of infections caused by M. bovis. Advances in molecular typing have improved our understanding of the dissemination of M. bovis and helped improve our ability to distinguish among strains. Spoligotyping and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units–variable number of tandem repeats (MIRU-VNTR) are now considered standard alternative molecular techniques (3,4). Both are PCR-based techniques that evaluate the polymorphism of the tandem repeat copy number at several loci and have been used to identify different strains of M. bovis (5,6). We used these molecular methods to identify different strains of M. bovis.

The Study

From 2000 to 2005, positive cultures were obtained from 13 patients with a diagnosis of M. bovis infection. The strains were screened by using pncA gene for resistance to pyrazinamide sequencing, and all displayed the 169 C→G mutation (7). To differentiate between M. bovis and M. bovis BCG, we tested for the presence or absence of the region of difference 1 because the absence of this region is a specific marker of BCG strains (7,8). Spoligotyping was performed in accordance with Kamerbeek guidelines, and the data were compared with the Institute Pasteur (IP) Spoligotype Database and with the International M. bovis Spoligotype Database (9,10). We performed MIRU-VNTR typing as described by Supply et al. (11,12).

Patient age, sex, sample site, and country of birth are provided in Table 1. Most of the clinical samples were from lymph nodes (n = 6). Others samples were from urine (n = 2), lung (n = 1), sputum (n = 1), cerebrospinal fluid (n = 1), ascitic fluid (n = 1), and synovial fluid (n = 1). Patient SO, who was 4 years old when his condition was diagnosed, had been born in France, but he spent months in Algeria with his grandmother who was ill with TB. Patient GD had a history of BCG-disseminated infection after being vaccinated with a BCG strain when he was 1 year of age. His condition had also been diagnosed as a familial form of septic granulomatosis, and he was immunocompromised. The strain was isolated only after he underwent lymph node resection at the age of 17. The bacillus isolated was an M. bovis BCG strain. Patient BL had undergone immunotherapy with a BCG strain for bladder cancer, and a BCG infection of the bladder developed.

The results of spoligotyping and MIRU are shown in Table 2. Spoligotype profiles were typical of M. bovis with the absence of spacers 3, 9, 16, and 39–43 (1,13). Four distinct patterns were identified; the main one corresponded to spoligotype 482 in the IP database (70% of strains); both BCG strains exhibited this pattern. Others patterns represented were spoligotype 481 (2 strains) and 2 that were not included in the IP database (although one was identified as SB0914 in the international spoligotype database). These 2 spoligotypes (481 and 482) have been reported by Haddad et al. as the ones most commonly seen in bovine TB in France (1). Patient MB's spoligotype was not found in the databases, likely because of its origin (this patient was born in Djibouti), and it could be native to Africa.

MIRU typing identified 12 individual patterns; 2 strains possessed the same MIRU patterns but not the same spoligotype. Both BCG strains showed the same pattern, except at locus 4 (14). Patient BL was found to have a BCG strain with 1 copy on locus 4. This profile is very similar to that of the Connaught strain used for the treatment of bladder cancer, which also has 1 copy at locus 4. Patient GD's strain of BCG had 2 copies at locus 4. This characteristic is similar to that of the BCG strain used for human vaccination in France (Mérieux strain derived from the Glaxo 1077 strain) (14).


This 5-year study of human M. bovis infections in humans leads to 3 main conclusions. First, we observed a relatively high incidence of this disease: 2% of TB cases were caused by M. bovis, compared with 0.5% reported 10 years earlier and ≈1% reported in England by Smith in 2004 (15). Second, in France TB caused by MTBC occurs mainly in patients born abroad (55%), whereas in this study 70% of TB due to M. bovis occurred in French-born patients (4 of the patients had been born abroad). Therefore, human disease due to M . bovis, in contrast with that due to M. tuberculosis, appears to be predominantly indigenous in France, according to our study. However, we must note that human M. bovis infection varies throughout the world, even in industrialized countries, as reported in MMWR in 2005 when patients infected in New York were young persons born in Mexico or children of Mexican-born parents (16). Finally, we should note that French patients with M. bovis infections, in contrast to patients born abroad, were usually >50 years of age and sought treatment for a torpid infection. Measures to reduce bovine TB and the human transmission of M. bovis began in the 1950s. The disease was due to the reactivation of a past infection that had been acquired before milk pasteurization rather than a primary infection. Few cases have been reported in French-born children, which is in accordance with the effectiveness of preventive measures and their long-term effect. We cannot tell whether this is an emerging or a reemerging disease, but M. bovis is clearly still responsible for human TB. Global monitoring is required to confirm the progress of the disease and perhaps to explain why it is (re)emerging. In summary, we found the combination of spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR to be a useful tool for identifying M. bovis infections and for determining whether patients were infected with the same strain. In our population of patients in Lyon, France, we did not detect any clonal epidemiologic features for M. bovis disease.

Dr Mignard is a clinical scientist in the Department of Bacteriology, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France. Her research interests include TB and molecular methods for identifying mycobacteria.



  1. Haddad  N, Ostyn  A, Karoui  C, Masselot  M, Thorel  MF, Hughes  SL, Spoligotype diversity of Mycobacterium bovis strains isolated in France from 1979 to 2000. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:362332. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boulahbal  F, Robert  J, Trystram  D, de Benoist  AC, Vincent  V, Jarlier  V, La tuberculose humaine à Mycobacterium bovis en France durant l'année 1995. Bulletin Epidemiologique Hebdomadaire. 1998;48.
  3. Frothingham  R, Meeker-O'Connell  WA. Genetic diversity in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex based on variable numbers of tandem DNA repeats. Microbiology. 1998;144:118996. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Allix  C, Supply  P, Fauville-Dufaux  M. Utility of fast mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable number tandem repeat genotyping in clinical mycobacteriological analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:7839. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gibson  AL, Hewinson  G, Goodchild  T, Watt  B, Story  A, Inwald  J, Molecular epidemiology of disease due to Mycobacterium bovis in humans in the United Kingdom. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:4314. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Skuce  RA, Neill  SD. Molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis: exploiting molecular data. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2001;81:16975. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Scorpio  A, Collins  D, Whipple  D, Cave  D, Bates  J, Zhang  Y. Rapid differentiation of bovine and human tubercle bacilli based on a characteristic mutation in the bovine pyrazinamidase gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:10610.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Talbot  EA, Williams  DL, Frothingham  R. PCR identification of Mycobacterium bovis BCG. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:5669.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kamerbeek  J, Schouls  L, Kolk  A, Van Agterveld  M, Van Soolingen  D, Kuijper  S, Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:90714.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mycobacterium bovis international database [cited 2005 November 20]. Available from
  11. Supply  P, Lesjean  S, Savine  E, Kremer  K, Van Soolingen  D, Locht  C. Automated high-throughput genotyping for study of global epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on myobacterial interspersed repetitive units. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:356371. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. MIRU-VNTR allele tables [cited 2005 Nov 20]. Available from
  13. Sales  MP, Taylor  GM, Hughes  S, Yates  M, Hewinson  G, Young  DB, Genetic diversity among Mycobacterium bovis isolates: a preliminary study of strains from animal and human sources. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:455862. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Supply  P, Mazars  E, Lesjean  S, Vincent  V, Gicquel  B, Locht  C. Variable human minisatellite-like regions in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome. Mol Microbiol. 2000;36:76271. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith  RM, Drobniewski  F, Gibson  A, Montague  JD, Logan  MN, Hunt  D, Mycobacterium bovis infection, United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:53941.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Human tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium bovis—New York City, 2001–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:6058.PubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1209.060209

Table of Contents – Volume 12, Number 9—September 2006

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Sophie Mignard, Laboratoire de bacteriologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Chemin du grand revoyet, 69495 Pierre Benite, Lyon CEDEX, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: November 18, 2011
Page updated: November 18, 2011
Page reviewed: November 18, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.