Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 13, Number 2—February 2007

No Evidence of Avian Influenza A H5N1 among Returning US Travelers

Justin R. Ortiz*Comments to Author , Teresa R. Wallis*, Mark A. Katz*, LaShondra S. Berman*, Amanda Balish*, Stephen E. Lindstrom*, Vic Veguilla*, Kathryn S. Teates*, Jacqueline M. Katz*, Alexander Klimov*, and Timothy M. Uyeki*
Author affiliations: *Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA;

Cite This Article


We reviewed reports to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of US travelers suspected of having avian influenza A H5N1 virus infection from February 2003 through May 2006. Among the 59 reported patients, no evidence of H5N1 virus infection was found; none had had direct contact with poultry, but 42% had evidence of human influenza A.

As of June 2006, the epizootic of highly pathogenic avian influenza A H5N1 virus among birds had spread to 3 continents (1). Sporadic human H5N1 cases characterized by severe respiratory disease with high case-fatality have been reported in 10 countries: Azerbaijan, Cambodia, Djibouti, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, People’s Republic of China, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam (2). Investigations have implicated direct contact with diseased poultry as the primary risk factor for H5N1 virus infection (3,4).

To date, H5N1 virus infections among poultry or wild birds in the United States have not been identified. However, US residents may be exposed if they travel to H5N1-affected countries. In February 2003, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed interim guidance for testing of suspected cases of H5N1 in returned travelers (5). CDC revised the recommendations in February 2004 (6). We report the results of investigations of patients with suspected H5N1 that were reported to CDC from February 2003 through May 2006.

The Study


Thumbnail of Influenza testing of suspected US cases of avian influenza A H5N1 reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from February 2003 through May 2006. *Of the 37 samples tested by CDC, 35 were respiratory samples, 1 was serum, and 1 was a lung specimen. All 35 respiratory samples received by CDC were tested for human influenza by reverse transcription–PCR, and the serum sample was tested by microneutralization assay. †CDC suspected H5N1 case definition, February 2,

Figure. Influenza testing of suspected US cases of avian influenza A H5N1 reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from February 2003 through May 2006. *Of the 37 samples...

We retrospectively analyzed available data on US patients with suspected H5N1 that were reported to CDC by clinicians and public health departments from February 2003 through May 2006. Clinical and epidemiologic data about reported patients were communicated to CDC by telephone, email, and/or fax. For each patient, we assessed whether criteria for recommended H5N1 testing were met (suspected H5N1 case definition). The suspected H5N1 case definition had 2 components: the hospitalized case definition included severe respiratory illness and recent travel to an H5N1-affected country; and the ambulatory case definition included acute respiratory illness, contact with domestic poultry or a known or suspected H5N1 case-patient, and recent travel to an H5N1-affected country (6) (Figure). Contact was defined as proximity <1 m, and direct contact was defined as physical touching.

If a patient met the suspected H5N1 case definition, or if exposure data were incomplete and clinicians or public health authorities had persistent concerns, H5N1-specific testing was recommended by CDC. A standard case report form was completed by state health departments.

Diagnostic testing for patients with suspected H5N1 was performed at CDC, state laboratories, or both. Procedures for reverse transcription–PCR (RT-PCR) and microneutralization assay for H5N1 have been previously described (7,8). Epidemiologic and laboratory data were analyzed by using EpiInfo version 3.3.2 (CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA).

Fifty-nine patients from 26 states were reported to CDC for suspicion of H5N1 virus infection from February 2003 through May 2006 (Table and Figure). Nineteen (37%) were male (n = 52), and the median age was 47 years (n = 49, range 2–87 years). Of the 37 specimens from patients tested at CDC, none had evidence of H5N1 virus infection. CDC tested samples from 8 persons for human influenza A only, and 5 were positive. Among the samples from 22 (37%) patients not tested at CDC, 4 (7%) were tested for H5N1 at state public health laboratories, and all were negative. Of the remaining 18 (31%) patients, 15 were not tested for H5N1 and state testing data were unavailable for 3 (Figure).

On the basis of available information, 27 (46%) patients met the CDC suspected H5N1 case definition (Table). Fourteen (24%) had severe, acute respiratory illness with recent travel to an H5N1-affected country. Overall, 25 (42%) patients, including 2 of 4 who died, tested positive for human influenza A. In addition, 52% of the 27 patients who met the CDC suspected H5N1 case definition had samples that tested positive for human influenza A. Four influenza A cases occurred outside the US influenza season. Of the influenza A–positive patients, 10 had H3N2 viral isolates that were characterized at CDC. All isolates were similar to human influenza A virus strains concurrently circulating in North America.

Other diagnoses included community-acquired pneumonia, bronchiolitis obliterans and organizing pneumonia, toxic shock syndrome, lymphoma, and rickettsial typhus (Table). Among 28 patients without a diagnosis, 8 (29%) tested negative for influenza but had influenzalike illness and contact with an influenza A (H3)–positive person.

Among all reported patients, 52 (88%) had traveled to >1 of 11 countries in Asia with either confirmed human H5N1 cases or H5N1 in avian species before illness onset (Table). Four (7%) patients with suspected H5N1 had not traveled outside the United States, but they had contact with recent travelers to Asia, and 1 had traveled to a country without confirmed H5N1 in poultry or wild birds. Although 14 (24%) reported having been <1 m of any live poultry or domesticated birds in Asia, none reported touching live poultry, domesticated birds, or recently butchered poultry. No patients with suspected H5N1 had contact with any confirmed or suspected human H5N1 case-patients.


Our review of patients evaluated for H5N1 among returned US travelers through May 2006 indicates that the risk for H5N1 to US travelers has been extremely low to date. A high proportion of the reported patients had evidence of human influenza A virus infection, but none tested positive for H5N1. Although direct contact with infected poultry is the primary risk factor for H5N1 virus infection (3,4), H5N1 virus transmission has been low, even among persons directly exposed to poultry suspected of infection with currently circulating H5N1 virus strains (9,10). None of the patients reported to CDC had touched poultry, and 48% of persons with cases that met the CDC suspected H5N1 case definition had not been <1 m of birds during travel.

Our finding that 42% of patient with suspected H5N1 had human influenza A emphasizes the importance of considering this disease year-round in returned travelers with acute respiratory infections. Human influenza activity in tropical and subtropical countries occurs year-round outside the typical US influenza season (11) and is the most frequent vaccine-preventable infection among travelers from Europe to tropical and subtropical countries (12). Moreover, the effect of influenza disease in tropical countries is substantial; for example, rates of influenza-associated hospitalizations in subtropical Hong Kong approximate US estimates (13).

Annual influenza vaccination is the best way to prevent human influenza. Influenza vaccine effectiveness depends upon multiple factors, including the degree of similarity between the vaccine strains and those in circulation. Persons at high risk for complications from influenza who were not vaccinated during the preceding fall or winter should consider influenza vaccination, if available, before travel (14). However, no human H5N1 vaccine is currently available.

Our study is subject to several limitations. The reported patients may not be representative of all US travelers at risk for H5N1 among whom respiratory illness developed, but were persons for whom health departments and physicians sought CDC consultation. States may have evaluated travelers for H5N1 virus infection without notifying CDC. Additionally, some reported patients were not tested for H5N1 if available epidemiologic and clinical information suggested that H5N1 virus infection was unlikely. Clinical charts were not independently reviewed, and clinical, epidemiologic, and laboratory data were limited to that sent to CDC by state and local health departments. In many instances, the role of CDC was to exclude the diagnosis of H5N1, and further testing to establish a diagnosis other than influenza was not always performed.

Continued surveillance and testing for H5N1 is warranted, given the current H5N1 epizootic, the ongoing occurrence of human H5N1 cases globally, and the importance of identifying influenza A viruses with pandemic potential in the United States as early as possible. In 2006, CDC and WHO revised their definitions for suspected H5N1 cases (15,16). The revised CDC suspected H5N1 case definition now specifically requires the person to have touched poultry or to have had contact with a patient with a confirmed or suspected H5N1 case, and it more clearly defines an H5N1-affected country. The findings of our study support these changes. Guidance for the evaluation of patients with suspected H5N1 should continue to be evaluated as more epidemiologic data become available.

Dr Ortiz is an Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer in the Influenza Division at CDC. His primary research interest is the epidemiology of viral respiratory infections.



We thank the reporting state and local health departments; the reporting healthcare professionals; and Jenna Achenbach, Niranjan Bhat, Lynnette Brammer, Lindsay Edwards, Steven M. Erb, Doan C. Nguyen, and Justine M. Pompey for their contributions to this study.



  1. World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). Update on avian influenza in animals (type H5). 2006. [cited 2006 Nov 4]. Available from
  2. World Health Organization. Confirmed human cases of avian influenza A(H5N1). 2006. [cited 2006 Nov 4]. Available from
  3. Areechokchai D, Jiraphongsa C, Laosiritaworn Y, Hanshaoworakul W, O’Reilly M. Investigation of avian influenza (H5N1) outbreak in humans—Thailand, 2004.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55(Suppl 1):36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dinh PN, Long HT, Tien NTK, Hien NT, Mai LTQ, Phong LH, Risk factors for human infection with avian influenza A H5N1, Vietnam, 2004.Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:18417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: influenza activity—United States and worldwide, 2002–03 season, and composition of the 2003–04 influenza vaccine.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:51621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update on influenza A(H5N1) and SARS: interim recommendations for enhanced U.S. surveillance, testing, and infection controls. 2004 [cited 2006 Nov 4]. Available from
  7. Rowe T, Abernathy RA, Hu-Primmer J, Thompson WW, Lu X, Lim W, Detection of antibody to avian influenza A (H5N1) virus in human serum by using a combination of serologic assays.J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:93743.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. World Health Organization. Recommended laboratory tests to identify avian influenza A virus in specimens from humans. 2005. [cited 2006 Jan 26]. Available from
  9. Vong S, Coghlan B, Mardy S, Holl D, Seng H, Ly S, Low frequency of poultry-to-human H5N1 virus transmission, southern Cambodia.Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:15427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang M, Di B, Zhou D-H, Zheng B-J, Jing H, Lin Y-P, Food markets with live birds as source of avian influenza.Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:17735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Shek LP, Lee BW. Epidemiology and seasonality of respiratory tract virus infections in the tropics.Paediatr Respir Rev. 2003;4:10511. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mutsch M, Tavernini M, Marx A, Gregory V, Lin YP, Hay AJ, Influenza virus infection in travelers to tropical and subtropical countries.Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:12827. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wong CM, Yang L, Chan KP, Leung GM, Chan KH, Guan Y, Influenza-associated hospitalization in a subtropical city.PLoS Med. 2006;3:e121. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith NM, Bresee JS, Shay DK, Uyeki TM, Cox NJ, Strikas RA. Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55:142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. World Health Organization. WHO case definitions for human infections with influenza A(H5N1) virus. 2006. [cited 2006 Aug 30]. Available from
  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated interim guidance for laboratory testing of persons with suspected infection with avian influenza A (H5N1) virus in the United States. 2006. [cited 2006 Nov 4]. Available from




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1302.061052

Table of Contents – Volume 13, Number 2—February 2007

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Justin R. Ortiz, Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop A32, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA;

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: June 29, 2010
Page updated: June 29, 2010
Page reviewed: June 29, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.