Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 13, Number 2—February 2007

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Excretion by Child and Her Cat

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) can cause severe hemorrhagic colitis characterized by gastrointestinal symptoms and bloody diarrhea as well as hemolytic uremic syndrome (1). Cattle and small ruminants are the major natural reservoir of these foodborne pathogens (1,2). Human infections may also develop after direct contact with cows, goats, sheep, and deer (1). Although domestic dogs and cats are known as rare EHEC carriers (3,4), no human EHEC infections associated with pet contact have been reported. Here we report the first case of an EHEC strain infecting both a child and her domestic cat.

A 2-year-old girl with bloody diarrhea and vomiting subsequently tested positive for EHEC serotype O145:H–. The isolated strain harbored the pathogenicity-associated genes stx1, stx2, eae, and hly, as tested by PCR. An enterohemolytic phenotype was also present. After notification of the local health authority, a rigorous search for the possible source of the girl’s infection was started. When asked for instances of animal contact, her parents mentioned the family cat, which the girl often handled. The cat is restricted to the house, has no contact with other animals, and is fed only canned catfood. The animal strictly uses a litter box, which is cleaned regularly by the parents. No gastrointestinal symptoms in the cat were recorded. Repeated stool samples from the cat grew a strain of EHEC O145:H– that showed the identical pathogenicity gene pattern as the girl’s isolate. Moreover, a restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis proved the clonal identity of both strains. Because both the girl and the cat continuously excreted the EHEC strain, the cat was assumed to be a possible source of the girl’s infection or reinfection. The cat’s’ infection was treated with probiotics, but the child’s EHEC positivity did not change. After 3 months, the girl spontaneously stopped excreting EHEC, while the cat’s stool samples remained EHEC positive. The cat was then treated by peroral autovaccination with the heat-inactivated EHEC strain for 10 consecutive days and subsequently stopped shedding EHEC. In the Table, the clinical course and laboratory findings of both girl and cat are summarized.

To our knowledge, this case is the first documented of an EHEC strain’s affecting both a human and a domestic cat. Both excreted EHEC for ≈3 months. Although the girl had vomiting and diarrhea, the cat was asymptomatic. Several possibilities regarding the infectious process can be noted. First, the girl might have contracted the disease from her asymptomatic pet. Although in a study on eae-positive E. coli strains, ≈6% of the investigated 62 cats tested positive, none of these cats was infected with EHEC serotype O145:H– (3); this finding indicates that in our case the cat might not have been the direct source for the girl’s infection. Moreover, foodborne transmission to the cat seems unlikely because it was exclusively fed with canned food that was heated during preparation. Second, the cat might have been infected by the girl. Although the prevalence of EHEC serotype O145:H– is relatively low, it ranks among the 6 most often isolated non–O157 EHEC strains in human infections, accounting for 5%–7% of all non–O157 EHEC strains in prevalence studies in Finland (5), Germany (6), and the United States (2,7). A similar epidemiologic pattern for EHEC serotype O145:H– is seen in cattle (2,8). Taken together, the prevalence of EHEC serotype O145:H– in cats, humans, and cattle might indicate that the girl was probably more likely the infection source for the cat than vice versa. Third, a cycle of mutual infection and reinfection between the girl and her pet cat cannot be ruled out. Although the excretion rate for EHEC changes over time and EHEC can therefore remain undetected in stool samples while still present within the patient, the child tested EHEC negative for a short period. Despite all the precautions taken, the girl may have been reinfected by the cat.

This case illustrates several issues: 1) domestic animals such as cats (3), dogs (3,4), and rabbits (9) may serve as reservoirs for EHEC, irrespective of whether they are the primary or secondary source for these bacteria; 2) domestic cats as carriers may excrete EHEC for a prolonged period; 3) autovaccination may be effective for treating EHEC-infected animals; and 4) fondness for pets may be problematic: although EHEC O145:H– is among the 4 most often isolated EHEC serotypes associated with severe colitis or life-threatening hemolytic uremic syndrome (10), the girl’s parents, after weighing the infectious risks against the psychological benefits for both their daughter and her feline companion, decided not to send the cat to an animal shelter until its EHEC infection disappeared.


Ulrich Busch*, Stefan Hörmansdorfer*, Stephan Schranner†, Ingrid Huber†, Karl-Heinz Bogner*, and Andreas Sing*Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleißheim, Germany; †Veterinary Inspection Office, Landshut, Germany;



  1. Nataro JP, Kaper JB. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli.Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:142201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bettelheim KA. Non-O157 verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli: a problem, paradox, and paradigm.. Exp Biol Med. 2003;228:33344.
  3. Krause G, Zimmermann S, Beutin L. Investigation of domestic animals and pets as a reservoir for intimin- (eae) gene positive Escherichia coli types.Vet Microbiol. 2005;106:8795. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sancak AA, Rutgers HC, Hart CA, Batt RM. Prevalence of enteropathic Escherichia coli in dogs with acute and chronic diarrhoea.Vet Rec. 2004;154:1016.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Eklund M, Scheutz F, Siitonen A. Clinical isolates of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: serotypes, virulence characteristics, and molecular profiles of strains of the same serotype.J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:282934. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Beutin L, Zimmermann S, Gleier K. Human infections with Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli other than serogroup O157 in Germany.Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4:6359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks JT, Sowers EG, Wells JG, Greene KD, Griffin PM, Hoekstra RM, Non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli infections in the United States, 1983–2002.J Infect Dis. 2005;192:14229. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pearce MC, Evans J, McKendrick IJ, Smith AW, Knight HI, Mellor DJ, Prevalence and virulence factors of Escherichia coli serogroups O26, O103, O111, and O145 shed by cattle in Scotland.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:6539. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Garcia A, Fox JG. The rabbit as a new reservoir host of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli.Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:15927.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerber A, Karch H, Allerberger F, Verweyen HM, Zimmerhackl LB. Clinical course and the role of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli infection in the hemolytic-uremic syndrome in pediatric patients, 1997–2000, in Germany and Austria: a prospective study.[PMID: 12195376]. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:493500. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1302.061106

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 13, Number 2—February 2007

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Andreas Sing, MA DTM&H, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Veterinärstraße 2, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany;

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: June 29, 2010
Page updated: June 29, 2010
Page reviewed: June 29, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.