Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 14, Number 7—July 2008

Anthropogenic Influence on Prevalence of 2 Amphibian Pathogens

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Although the relationship between the emergence of zoonotic diseases and human influenced landscapes is accepted (13), the relationship between human-influenced landscapes and wildlife disease is less so. Evidence does support correlations between human activities and environmental conditions affecting wildlife disease emergence (2,3). These studies assume relationships between component(s) of human habitat modification and the virulence of disease, and derive estimates of virulence from counts of the visibly diseased or those that have seroconverted (3). This explains only part of the host and pathogen dynamic; it seems reasonable to extend the relationship to include prevalence of infection. Data supporting this extension are lacking. Here we present data from a study examining the correlations between human influences on habitat and prevalence of 2 amphibian pathogens (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and ranavirus FV3) in populations of Rana clamitans in central and northeastern Ontario, Canada.

We sampled an average of 25 animals (standard deviation ± 6.16) from 11 populations during summer 2005. We washed equipment in bleach and air-dried equipment between visits and sites. All animals were kept individually to avoid cross-contamination, euthanized with MS22, and assessed for infection using molecular diagnostics. We tested for ranavirus infection of livers by amplifying the major capsid protein using standard PCR (4). We tested for infection with B. dendrobatidis by using a quantitative real-time PCR (5). Prevalence for each pathogen was estimated as the proportion of animals testing positive at a pond.

Site coordinates were determined by using global positioning satellite (GPS), and 4 quantitative measures of human habitat modification were also assessed. GPS coordinates were used to map sites and to measure distance to the nearest road, industrial activity (agriculture, mine, paper mill), and human habitation; all measurements were in meters. We further assigned a qualitative measure of human influence on each breeding pond by assigning ponds to each of the following categories: 1) human presence without human habitat modification or extensive disturbance; 2) recreational activities (fishing, boating); 3) property development (housing or commercial buildings); 4) agricultural activity; and 5) industrial activity. Each of the 5 categories was assigned a 0/1 score; scores for each pond were summed 1–5 (by definition no site scored 0 due to sampling strategy) to derive the final measure of human influence. We modeled the relationship between prevalence and human habitat modification or influence using general linear models (GLM) with prevalence as the dependent variable and with all human influence variables log-transformed to meet assumptions of normality. A type III model structure was used to account for the influence of all explanatory variables in each analysis.

Eight ponds exhibited signs of FV3 infection (range 0%–63% prevalence); 6 ponds contained frogs infected with the amphibian chytrid (range 0%–36% prevalence). GLM did not show any relationship between the prevalence of chytrid infection and all of our explanatory variables (Table). In contrast, 3 of our explanatory variables had a significant influence of ranavirus prevalence. Distance to industrial activity (p<0.05), to human habitation (p<0.05), and degree of human influence (p<0.01) all had a significant effect on the dependent variable (Table).

The disparity between results for the 2 pathogens generates several possible hypotheses. First, proximity to human activities may correlate with the probability of pathogen introduction through introduced species (6), fomites, or other sources of infectious particles, with the likelihood of introduction higher for ranavirus. Certainly, both pathogens are presumed to be vectored in association with human activities (7,8), but B. dendrobatidis exhibits a greater host and geographic range and thus should exhibit greater prevalence if humans were mediating introduction across the range of our study. Second, human activities such as construction and industry, may directly or indirectly influence the basic reproductive number, R0, of ranavirus to a greater extent than for that of B. dendrobatidis. Although ranavirus does exhibit optimal environmental ranges for replication and infection, the virulence of B. dendrobatidis can be directly influenced by the environment (2). Furthermore, infection by B. dendrobatidis occurs through a free-living stage; ranavirus is more likely transmitted through direct contact, which suggests that B. dendrobatidis would be more sensitive to environmental factors. Last, human activities may influence host ability to mediate immune responses that have the capability to prevent infection. Evidence exists that amphibian host responses to ranavirus are predominantly acquired (9); those for B. dendrobatidis may be more innate and less prone to environmental manipulation (10). Although the observed correlation should be further tested and the disturbance index should be refined, we believe our observed pattern may reflect the influence of human activities and habitat modification in the dispersal of infectious diseases. With increasing evidence pointing towards the role of emerging infectious diseases in the decline of amphibian populations, management plans should therefore account for the indirect effects related to human activities.



We thank Albrecht Schulte-Hostedde and Eric Gauthier for use of their molecular equipment for ranaviral analysis. Earlier versions of this manuscript also benefited from comments given by Scott Kaufman, Bruce Pauli, and 2 anonymous reviewers.

This research was funded by NSERC and Laurentian University Research Fund and has been approved by the Laurentian Animal Care Committee (Protocols no. 2005-05-01 and 2005-05-02).


Valerie St-Amour*, Wai M. Wong†, Trenton W.J. Garner†, and David Lesbarrères*Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada; †Institute of Zoology, London, UK;



  1. Jones  KE, Patel  NG, Levy  MA, Storeygard  A, Balk  D, Gittleman  JL, Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. In press.
  2. Bosch  J, Carrascal  LM, Durán  L, Walker  S, Fisher  MC. Climate change and outbreaks of amphibian chytridiomycosis in a montane area of Central Spain; is there a link? Proc Biol Sci. 2007;274:25360. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley  CA, Altizer  S. Urbanization and the ecology of wildlife diseases. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22:95102. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. St.-Amour  V, Lesbarrères  D. Genetic evidence of Ranavirus in toe clips: an alternative to lethal sampling methods. Conserv Genet. 2007;8:124750. DOIGoogle Scholar
  5. Garner  TWJ, Perkins  M, Govindarajulu  P, Seglie  D, Walker  SJ, Cunningham  AA, The emerging amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis globally infects introduced populations of the North American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Biol Lett. 2006;2:4559. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Garner  TWJ, Walker  S, Bosch  J, Hyatt  A, Cunningham  A, Fisher  MC. Chytrid fungus in Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:163941.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jancovich  JK, Davidson  EW, Parameswaran  N, Mao  J, Chinchar  G, Collins  JP, Evidence for emergence of an amphibian iridoviral disease because of human-enhanced spread. Mol Ecol. 2005;14:21324. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher  MC, Garner  TWJ. The relationship between the introduction of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, the international trade in amphibians and introduced amphibian species. Fungal Biol Rev. 2007;21:29. DOIGoogle Scholar
  9. Robert  J, Morales  H, Buck  W, Cohen  N, Marr  S, Gantress  J. Adaptive immunity and histopathology in frog virus 3-infected Xenopus. Virology. 2005;332:66775. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Woodhams  DC, Ardipradja  K, Alford  RA, Marantelli  G, Reinert  LK, Rollins-Smith  LA. Resistance to chytridiomycosis varies among amphibian species and is correlated with skin peptide defenses. Anim Conserv. 2007;10:40917. DOIGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1407.070602

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 14, Number 7—July 2008

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

David Lesbarrères, Biology Department, Laurentian University, Ramsey Lake Rd, Sudbury, Ontario P3B 3C8, Canada;

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: July 12, 2010
Page updated: July 12, 2010
Page reviewed: July 12, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.