Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 15, Number 10—October 2009
Dispatch

Diversity and Origin of Dengue Virus Serotypes 1, 2, and 3, Bhutan

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
38
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: Ministry of Health, Thimphu, Bhutan (T. Dorji, S. Wangchuk); United States Army Medical Command–Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand (I.-K. Yoon, A. Nisalak, P. Chinnawirotpisan, K. Sangkachantaranon, R.V. Gibbons, R.G. Jarman); The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA (E.C. Holmes); National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA (E.C. Holmes); Ministry of Health, Gelephu, Bhutan (T. Tobgay).

Cite This Article

Abstract

To determine the serotype and genotype of dengue virus (DENV) in Bhutan, we conducted phylogenetic analyses of complete envelope gene sequences. DENV-2 (Cosmopolitan genotype) predominated in 2004, and DENV-3 (genotype III) predominated in 2005–2006; these viruses were imported from India. Primary dengue infections outnumbered secondary infections, suggesting recent emergence.

Dengue infections have increased worldwide in recent decades. Before 1970, only 9 countries had experienced epidemics of dengue hemorrhagic fever; by 1996, this number had increased to 102 (1). Dengue is endemic to most of Southeast Asia; high numbers of cases are reported each year in Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Singapore, and Thailand. Dengue was first reported in Nepal in 2004 (1). Serologic testing of a group of febrile patients in Nepal showed that 8% had immunoglobulin (Ig) M against dengue, and a recent report noted 11 serologically confirmed dengue cases in 2006 (2,3). The Armed Forces Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS) in Bangkok, Thailand, recently confirmed the presence of all 4 dengue serotypes in Nepal (4).

Appendix Figure

Thumbnail of Map of Bhutan. Selected cites are indicated by enclosed circle and elevation of the city in meters in parentheses.

Appendix Figure. Map of Bhutan. Selected cites are indicated by enclosed circle and elevation of the city in meters in parentheses.

In another Himalayan nation, Bhutan, dengue was first suspected in the summer of 2004. Bhutan is an extremely rugged and mountainous country of 38,394 km2 with an altitude ranging from 150 m on the southern border with India to >7,000 m in the mountains bordering Tibet (Appendix Figure). The dengue outbreak resulted in 2,579 cases (5), almost all of which occurred in and around Phuntsholing district (2005 census population 20,537) in southern Bhutan on the border with India. Fifty-two serum samples from this outbreak were tested by using dengue enzyme immunoassay (EIA) at the National Institute of Communicable Diseases, New Delhi, India. Twelve (23%) samples were positive for antidengue IgM. Thirty-five (67%) of the 52 samples also were tested at Suraksha Hospital, Kolkata, India, of which 5 were positive.

Since the initial report in 2004, fewer clinical cases were reported from Bhutan in 2005 and 2006; dengue virus 3 (DENV)-3 was the dominant serotype (5). Although some serologic analysis is available, serum samples from Bhutan have not been evaluated for dengue by using molecular techniques. In particular, circulating DENV in Bhutan has not been genetically characterized, so from where and how frequently DENV is imported into Bhutan are unclear.

The Study

Acute-phase blood samples were collected from persons with suspected dengue in and around Phuntsholing during 3 periods in 2004–2006 (June 15–August 2, 2004; September 8–December 2, 2005; and July 19–November 30, 2006). All samples were collected from hospitalized patients in whom dengue infection was diagnosed on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms. Convalescent-phase samples were not available. Because all samples were collected by the Bhutan Ministry of Health as part of a public health effort, the study did not require institutional review board–approved human-use protocol.

A total of 168 samples (53 from 2004, 19 from 2005, and 96 from 2006) were delivered to AFRIMS for confirmatory dengue testing. Samples were tested by using reverse transcription–PCR/nested PCR modified from published methods (6) and the in-house dengue IgM/IgG EIA (7). In addition, the complete envelope (E) gene was sequenced for samples that were dengue positive by PCR. Two DENV-2–positive samples from 2004 and 19 DENV-3–positive samples from 2005–2006 underwent E gene sequencing. Sequencing also was attempted on additional PCR-positive samples but was not successful because of insufficient genetic material. All dengue E gene sequences from the study have been submitted to GenBank and assigned accession nos. FJ606692–FJ606712.

The E gene sequences generated here were combined with homologous sequences from 262 isolates of DENV-2 (total data set of 264 sequences, 1,485 nt) and 245 isolates of DENV-3 (total data set of 264 sequences, 1,479 nt), representing the full phylogenetic spectrum of these viruses in humans. Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees were estimated for both datasets using the method implemented in the PAUP* package (8). The general time reversible + I + Γ4 model of nucleotide substitution was the best fit to DENV-2 and DENV-4 as determined by MODELTEST (9). A neighbor-joining bootstrap resampling analysis (1,000 replications) also was performed to assess support for specific nodes, again by using the ML substitution model.

A total of 168 samples from persons suspected to have dengue were tested at AFRIMS. DENV infection was confirmed by PCR or EIA for 34 (64%) of 53 samples from 2004, 12 (63%) of 19 samples from 2005, and 57 (59%) of 96 samples from 2006 (combined 103 [61%] of 168 positive). PCR testing showed 7 samples from 2004 were DENV-2; 4 samples from 2005 were DENV-3; and from 2006, 40 were DENV-3 and 1 was DENV-1 (combined 52 [31%] of 168 PCR positive).

Serologic testing indicated that 28 samples from 2004 were positive for dengue by EIA; 15 were primary infections, and 13 were secondary infections according to published criteria (7). Ten samples from 2005 were EIA positive; 8 were primary infections, and 2 were secondary infections. Thirty-nine samples from 2006 were EIA positive; 23 were primary infections, and 16 were secondary infections (Table).

Clinical information for these dengue-positive samples was limited. However, mean age of the 103 patients with laboratory-confirmed dengue was 31 years (32 years in 2004, 28 years in 2005, and 30 years in 2006) (range 2–69 years). Mean age of the 46 patients with primary dengue infection was 29 years; that of the 31 patients with secondary dengue infections was 32 years.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of A) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of 264 complete envelope gene sequences of dengue virus serotype 2 (DENV-2). The different genotypes of DENV-2 and the isolates from Bhutan (red) are indicated. Scale bar indicates number of substitutions per site. B) Magnification of the part of the phylogeny where the Bhutan sequences (red) fall. The tree is midpoint rooted for clarity only, and all horizontal branch lengths are drawn to a scale of nucleotide substitutions per site. Bootstra

Figure 1. A) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of 264 complete envelope gene sequences of dengue virus serotype 2 (DENV-2). The different genotypes of DENV-2 and the isolates from Bhutan (red) are indicated. Scale...

Figure 2

Thumbnail of A) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of 264 complete envelope gene sequences of dengue virus serotype 3 (DENV-3). The different genotypes of DENV-3 and the isolates from Bhutan (red) are indicated. Scale bar indicates number of substitutions per site. B) Magnification of the part of the phylogeny where the Bhutan sequences (red) fall. The tree is midpoint rooted for clarity only, and all horizontal branch lengths are drawn to a scale of nucleotide substitutions per site. Bootstra

Figure 2. A) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of 264 complete envelope gene sequences of dengue virus serotype 3 (DENV-3). The different genotypes of DENV-3 and the isolates from Bhutan (red) are indicated. Scale bar...

Phylogenetic analysis of complete E gene sequences indicated that the 2 DENV-2 isolates sampled in 2004 fell into the Cosmopolitan genotype, which is widely distributed throughout the tropical and subtropical world (Figure 1). These viruses were closely related to those sampled in a similar period in the Indian subcontinent (India and Sri Lanka), suggesting these DENV-2 isolates were imported into Bhutan from the Indian subcontinent. A remarkably similar picture was seen for DENV-3 (Figure 2). The 19 DENV-3 isolates sampled from 2005 and 2006 clustered closely within viral genotype III, which is found in Africa, the Western Hemisphere, and the Indian subcontinent. Again, the DENV-3 phylogeny is compatible with the migration of this virus northward through India to Bhutan.

Conclusions

Our genetic characterization of DENV in Bhutan demonstrates that at least 3 DENV serotypes have circulated there. The E gene sequence data for the 2 DENV-2 strains from 2004 and the 19 DENV-3 strains from 2005 and 2006 indicate that the DENV strains in Bhutan are similar to those circulating regionally and thus were most likely introduced (or reintroduced) from neighboring areas. That such emergence in Bhutan has occurred only recently is further supported by the observation of more primary than secondary dengue infections for all 3 years, as well as the relatively advanced mean age of patients.

Mr Dorji is the head of the Public Health Laboratory, Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Bhutan, and a member of the Ethical Committee for Health Research and the coordinator for the National Task Force for Laboratory Containment of Wild Poliovirus. His current interests include eliminating iodine deficiency disorders in Bhutan, improving the public health laboratory capacity for diagnosing infectious diseases, improving quality assurance in the laboratory, and investigating and controlling outbreaks in Bhutan.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank the staffs of the Vectorborne Disease Control Program Public Health Laboratory and Phuntsholing Hospital, Ministry of Health, who were involved in the control of dengue in Bhutan. We also thank Chonticha Klungthong and Butsaya Thaisomboonsuk and the laboratory technicians in the Department of Virology at the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences.

This work was funded by the US Department of State Biosecurity Engagement Program.

Top

References

  1. Pandey  BD, Rai  SK, Morita  K, Kurane  I. First case of dengue virus infection in Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J. 2004;6:1579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Blacksell  SD, Sharma  NP, Phumratanaprapin  W, Jenjaroen  K, Peacock  SJ, White  NJ, Serological and blood culture investigations of Nepalese fever patients. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101:68690. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pandey  BD, Morita  K, Khanal  SR, Takasaki  T, Miyazaki  I, Ogawa  T, Dengue virus, Nepal. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:5145. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Malla  S, Thakur  GD, Shrestha  SK, Banjeree  MK, Thapa  LB, Gongal  G, Identification of all dengue serotypes in Nepal. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:166970. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Myint  KS, Gibbons  RV. Hepatitis E: a neglected threat. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:2112. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lanciotti  RS, Calisher  CH, Gubler  DJ, Chang  GJ, Vorndam  AV. Rapid detection and typing of dengue viruses from clinical samples by using reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:54551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Innis  BL, Nisalak  A, Nimmannitya  S, Kusalerdchariya  S, Chongswasdi  V, Suntayakorn  S, An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to characterize dengue infections where dengue and Japanese encephalitis co-circulate. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1989;40:41827.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Swofford  DL. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), 4th ed. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 2003.
  9. Posada  D, Crandall  KA. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1998;14:8178. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1510.090123

Table of Contents – Volume 15, Number 10—October 2009

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Richard G. Jarman, USAMC-AFRIMS, APO 96546, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: December 08, 2010
Page updated: December 08, 2010
Page reviewed: December 08, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external