Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 15, Number 10—October 2009
Dispatch

Independent Lineage of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus in Wood Mice (Apodemus sylvaticus), Spain

Author affiliations: Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain (J. Ledesma, L. Lledό, J.V. Saz, M.I. Gegúndez); Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid (C.G. Fedele, M.P. Sánchez-Seco, A. Tenorio); Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Seville, Spain (F. Carro, R.C. Soriguer); Consejería de Sanidad y Bienestar Social de la Junta de Castilla y León, Burgos, Spain (G. Domínguez); Centro de Biologia Molecular Severo Ochoa, Madrid (M.F. Rosas); NEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario, Vizcaya, Spain (J.F. Barandika)

Cite This Article

Abstract

To clarify the presence of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) in Spain, we examined blood and tissue specimens from 866 small mammals. LCMV RNA was detected in 3 of 694 wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). Phylogenetic analyses suggest that the strains constitute a new evolutionary lineage. LCMV antibodies were detected in 4 of 10 rodent species tested.

Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) is a ubiquitous rodent-borne virus belonging to the family Arenaviridae, whose genome consists of 2 single strands of RNA, named small (S) and large (L), respectively. The S segment encodes the nucleocapsid protein (NP) and the glycoprotein precursor (GPC). The L segment encodes a viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and a zinc-binding protein. The common house mouse (Mus musculus) is the principal reservoir for LCMV. Infected mice can shed the virus in large quantities throughout their lives. Some epidemiologic studies show that ≈9% of wild mice are infected with LCMV (1,2), and other species of rodents have been reported to be possible reservoirs of LCMV (24).

Humans become infected with LCMV by inhaling contaminated feces or urine, through bite wounds, by vertical route, or after organ transplants (5). LCMV is responsible for aseptic meningitis and encephalitis (6) and may cause congenital malformations or abortion (7). In Spain, 1 case of encephalitis caused by LCMV has been reported (8), and recently, LCMV infection has been detected in 4 patients with aseptic meningitis (9). LCMV infection in rodents and the general population has also been demonstrated by serologic tests (2). The aim of this study was to improve our knowledge of LCMV in rodents in Spain.

The Study

A total of 866 small mammals were trapped from July 2003 through June 2006 in 19 Spanish provinces. Of those captured, 833 were rodents from 10 species: 694 wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus), 17 yellow-necked mice (A. flavicollis), 27 house mice (M. musculus), 6 Algerian mice (M. spretus), 21 Norway rate (Rattus norvegicus), 50 bank voles (Myodes [Clethrionomys] glareolus), 9 snow voles (Chionomys [Microtus] nivalis), 3 Orkney voles (Microtus arvalis), 3 Mediterranean pine voles (Microtus [Pitymys] duodecimcostatus), and 3 garden dormice (Eliomys quercinus). Thirty-three were insectivores (18 shrews [Sorex spp.] and 15 white-toothed shrews [Crocidura russula]). Tissue samples (lungs, kidneys, spleens) were obtained in all cases and stored at –20°C in RNAlater solution (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX, USA) to preserve the RNA and inactivate the virus. Serum samples were only available from 665 specimens.

Serum samples were assayed against LCMV, diluted 1:16 as previously described (9), but using immunoglobulins against mice or rats as secondary antibodies. Western blot assays confirmed 25 of the 35 positive serum specimens detected by the immunofluorescence antibody (IFA) assay. The overall prevalence of antibodies against LCMV was 3.76%. Antibodies were detected in 4 species: A. sylvaticus (21/536, 3.92%), M. musculus (2/24, 8.33%), M. spretus (1/6, 16.67%), and R. norvegicus (1/21, 4.76%). Titers ranged from 16 to 2,048 by IFA assay.

LCMV-related genome was detected in 3 of 866 specimens corresponding to A. sylvaticus mice trapped in Sierra Nevada (SN05), Cabra (CABN), and Grazalema (GR01), 3 well-preserved natural areas in the southern Spain. Only serum specimens from 2 of these rodents were available, and LCMV antibodies were detected in only 1 sample.

Briefly, pools were prepared by mixing 3- to 4-mm pieces of lung, kidney, and spleen from each trapped animal; the mixture was homogenized and their nucleic acid extracted by using RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted RNA was analyzed by reverse transcription and nested PCR. The first round was performed with primers AREN1+ (5′-2367CWATRTANGGCCAICCITCICC2388-3′) and AREN1– (5′-2789TNRWYAAYCARTTYGGIWCIRTKCC2813-3′) and primers AREN2+ (5′-2396CANANYTTRTANARNAIRTTYTCRTAIGG2424-3′) and AREN2– (5′-2567AGYYTNKNNGCNGCIGTIAARGC2589-3′) for nested PCR. The symbols + and – correspond to sense and antisense sequences, respectively. Indicated positions correspond to those of LCMV-Armstrong 53b (GenBank accession no. M20869). Primers were designed on conserved motifs of the NP gene and were able to detect arenaviruses from the Old World and from the New World. Amplification products of the expected size (194 bp) were purified and sequenced. Positive results were also obtained when each tissue from these 3 animals was analyzed separately. Viral isolation was not attempted because samples were inactivated with RNA later.

The complete S segment sequence of every detected virus was obtained from lung lysates by using primers designed based on LCMV conserved sequences of the S segments available in GenBank that enable amplification of overlapping complementary DNAs (sequences of the primers are available upon request). The lengths of the S-segments were 3,357, 3,364, and 3,366 nt for samples GR01, SN05, and CABN, respectively (GenBank accession nos. FJ895882–FJ895884, respectively). As expected for LCMV, the sequences defined 2 nonoverlapping genes (genes GPC and NP, with 498 and 558 aa, respectively) arranged in ambisense direction, separated by an intergenic noncoding region, and flanked by 5′ and 3′ ends. Sequence comparison with the complete S segment from other LCMV strains showed deletions and insertions of nucleotides in the noncoding regions (information available on request).

Figure

Thumbnail of Phylogeny of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) strains and the viruses detected in this study based on the analysis of complete sequences of amino acids (aa) and nucleotides (nt) of glycoprotein (GPC) and nucleocapsid protein (NP) genes. A) GPC nt; B) GPC aa; C) NP nt; D) NP aa. Each sequence used shows the name of LCMV strain followed by GenBank accession number. Numbers indicate >80% bootstrap values. Scale bars indicate nucleotide substitutions per site. IPPIV, Ippy vi

Figure. Phylogeny of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) strains and the viruses detected in this study based on the analysis of complete sequences of amino acids (aa) and nucleotides (nt) of glycoprotein (GPC)...

Nucleotide and amino acid sequence distances were calculated by the pairwise distance algorithm (p distance) with MEGA version 3.1 (10). Phylograms were reconstructed using the neighbor-joining algorithm and tested with the bootstrap method and 1,000 replicates. GPC gene sequences detected in A. sylvaticus mice showed 15.9%–19.7% amino acid differences and 23.4%–27.7% nucleotide differences with the rest of the LCMV sequences (Appendix Table 1). Moreover, A. sylvaticus-LCMV sequences of the NP gene differed 8.3%–10.6% at the amino acid level and 19.8%–22.0% at the nucleotide level in comparison with the rest of the LCMV sequences ( Appendix Table 2). Phylogenetic analyses based on the entire amino acid and nucleotide sequences of NP and GPC genes showed that new sequences were grouped with other LCMV strains but in an isolated cluster with a high bootstrap value (Figure).

Conclusions

The LCMV seroprevalence detected in this study was similar to that found in other European countries ranging from 3.6% to 16.3% (3,11,12). Specific LCMV antibodies were detected in 4 of 10 rodent species tested; all belonged to the subfamily Murinae and were trapped throughout the country. These results suggest LCMV infection is widespread in Spain.

Phylogenetic analyses showed the close relationship between the new sequences detected in A. sylvaticus mice and the previously known LCMV strains, although they formed a separate cluster with a high bootstrap (Figure). The differences found in NP and GPC genes suggest that the new viruses detected in A. sylvaticus mice may constitute a new lineage of LCMV. In Lassa virus, similar differences in NP gene sequences served to group different strains into 4 lineages (13). Furthermore, comparison of noncoding regions showed that, in spite of the genetic variability in LCMV strains, CABN, GR01 and SN05 had specific deletions and insertions. In conclusion, our data suggest that the described genetic differences of the new sequences contribute to the definition of a new LCMV lineage.

A. sylvaticus has previously been related to LCMV (4) and its role as a reservoir for this virus has also been suggested (14). LCMV genome has recently been detected in this species, but the phylogenetic study grouped the sequence within LCMV strains isolated from M. musculus (15). By contrast, our analysis showed that CABN, GR01, and SN05 strains define a different branch from the previously known LCMVs, suggesting that A. sylvaticus might have been responsible for consolidating genetic changes in these new strains during their evolution, and that A. sylvaticus could be their natural reservoir. Further research should be conducted on LCMV in Spain to isolate autochthonous strains and establish their serologic and genomic characterization as well as their potential pathogenicity for humans.

Dr Ledesma is a biologist at the Institute of Health Carlos III. His research focus is on infectious viral diseases.

Top

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to P. Fernández-Soto and R. Pérez-Sánchez for providing rodents samples from Salamanca and Zamora. We also thank José Luis Serrano, Mónica Pérez Mola, Leticia Álvaro, and Magdalena Delgadillo for technical support.

This work was supported in part by the Enfermedades Viricas Transmitidas por Artropodos y Roederes multidisciplinary network funds by the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, the Spanish Ministry of Health, grant no. G03/059.

Top

References

  1. Riera  L, Castillo  E, Del Carmen Saavedra  M, Priotto  J, Sottosanti  J, Polop  J, Serological study of the lymphochoriomeningitis virus (LCMV) in an inner city of Argentina. J Med Virol. 2005;76:2859. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lledo  L, Gegundez  MI, Saz  JV, Bahamontes  N, Beltrán  M. Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection in a province of Spain: analysis of sera from the general population and wild rodents. J Med Virol. 2003;70:2735. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kallio-Kokko  H, Laakkonen  J, Rizzoli  A, Tagliapietra  V, Cattadori  I, Perkins  SE, Hantavirus and arenavirus antibody prevalence in rodents and humans in Trentino, Northern Italy. Epidemiol Infect. 2006;134:8306. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lehmann-Grube  F. Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. Vienna: Springer-Verlag; 1971.
  5. Fischer  SA, Graham  MB, Kuehnert  MJ, Kotton  CN, Srinivasan  A, Marty  FM, Transmission of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus by organ transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:223549. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton  LL, Hyndman  NJ. Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus: reemerging central nervous system pathogen. Pediatrics. 2000;105:E35. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barton  LL, Mets  MB. Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus: pediatric pathogen and fetal teratogen. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18:5401. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Martos Fernandez  E, Garcia Gestoso  ML, Marin Perez  J, Jimenez Ales  R, Catalan Munoz  M, Romero Cachaza  J, Encefalítis por el virus de la coriomeningitis linfocitaria. An Esp Pediatr. 1996;44:5124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. De Ory  F, Gegundez  MI, Fedele  CG, Sánchez-Seco  MP. Toscana virus, West Nile virus and lymphocoriomeningitis virus as causing agents of aseptic meningitis in Spain [in Spanish]. Med Clin (Barc). 2009;132:58790. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kumar  S, Tamura  K, Nei  M. MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform. 2004;5:15063. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Laakkonen  J, Kallio  ER, Kallio-Kokko  H, Vapalahti  O, Vaheri  A, Henttonen  H. Is there an association of Pneumocystis infection with the presence of arena-, hanta-, and poxvirus antibodies in wild mice and shrews in Finland? Parasitology. 2006;132:4616. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Filipe  AR, Alves  MJ. Presença o vírus da coriomeningite linfocitária (LCMV) em Portugal. Revista Portuguesa de Doenças Infecciosas. 1994;4:22731.
  13. Bowen  MD, Rollin  PE, Ksiazek  TG, Hustad  HL, Bausch  DG, Demby  AH, Genetic diversity among Lassa virus strains. J Virol. 2000;74:69927004. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hugot  JP, Gonzalez  JP, Denys  C. Evolution of the Old World Arenaviridae and their rodent hosts: generalized host-transfer or association by descent? Infect Genet Evol. 2001;1:1320. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Blasdell  KR, Becker  SD, Hurst  J, Begon  M, Bennett  M. Host range and genetic diversity of arenaviruses in rodents, United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:14558. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1510.090563

Table of Contents – Volume 15, Number 10—October 2009

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

María Isabel Gegúndez, Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Universidad de Alcalá, Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona, Km. 33.6, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: December 08, 2010
Page updated: December 08, 2010
Page reviewed: December 08, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external