Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 15, Number 12—December 2009

Bartonella rochalimae in Raccoons, Coyotes, and Red Foxes

Jennifer B. Henn, Bruno B. ChomelComments to Author , Henri-Jean Boulouis, Rickie W. Kasten, William J. Murray, Gila K. Bar-Gal, Roni King, Jean-François Courreau, and Gad Baneth
Author affiliations: Napa County Health and Human Services, Napa, California, USA (J.B. Henn); University of California, Davis, California, USA (B.B. Chomel, R.W. Kasten); École Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, Maisons-Alfort, France (H.-J. Boulouis, J.-F. Courreau); San José State University, San José, California, USA (W.J. Murray); Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel (G.K. Bar-Gal, G. Baneth); Nature Parks Authority, Jerusalem, Israel (R. King)

Main Article

Table 1

Percent similarity based on comparisons of the combined gltA, rpoB, ftsZ, from 7 Bartonella rochalimae isolates

Isolate source Red fox, France Coyote 004 Coyote 22/sub2 Raccoon 60 Dog 318006 Dogs/gray foxes Human
Red fox (Paris suburb, France) 100 99.5 99.8 99.6 99.5 99.9 99.8
Coyote 004 (San Mateo County, CA, USA) 100 99.6 100 100 99.6 99.6
Coyote 22/sub2 (Santa Clara County, CA, USA) 100 99.6 99.6 100 99.8
Raccoon 60 (San Jose, Santa Clara County, CA, USA) 100 100 99.6 99.6
Dog 318006 (San Mateo County, CA, USA) 100 99.6 99.6
Dogs/gray foxes (Humboldt County, CA, USA) 100 99.8
Human (Peru) 100

Main Article

Page created: December 09, 2010
Page updated: December 09, 2010
Page reviewed: December 09, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.