Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 15, Number 12—December 2009

Chorioamnionitis and Neonatal Sepsis from Community-associated MRSA

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Chorioamnionitis is a common cause of maternal and neonatal illness and death (1), but chorioamnionitis attributed to Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), is reported infrequently (25). In the context of the rising incidence of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections (6), we report an apparent case of CA-MRSA chorioamnionitis.

The patient, a 31-year-old woman with polycystic ovary syndrome and hypothyroidism, had 1 prior pregnancy but no viable offspring. After a clomiphene-assisted conception, routine ultrasound at 21 weeks’ gestation identified a shortened cervix (5 mm). The patient declined amniocentesis for cerclage and was treated with pelvic rest and vaginal progesterone. Five days later, she arrived at the emergency department with foul-smelling vaginal discharge. At this time, the patient was afebrile and hemodynamically stable, had no abdominal pain, and had a leukocyte count of 9.5 × 103 cells/mm3.

Premature rupture of membranes was diagnosed, and the patient was admitted and administered intravenous ampicillin and azithromycin. Nine days into treatment, at 23 weeks’ gestation, 210 hours after membrane rupture, a 415-g live-born girl was delivered spontaneously in footling breech with Apgar scores of 1 (1 min) and 5 (5 min). During admission, the mother was never febrile and did not complain of abdominal tenderness or chills. The highest leukocyte count was 12.4 × 103 cells/mm3. The mother was discharged the day after delivery without further complications. At 6-week follow-up, she remained well, with no signs of infection.

Pathologic examination of the placenta demonstrated focal acute funisitis, acute chorioamnionitis with fetal surface acute arteritis and acute deciduitis. Cultures from the maternal and fetal sides of the placenta grew predominantly MRSA and rare colonies of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus. The MRSA antimicrobial drug profile, including trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and clindamycin susceptibility, was characteristic of CA-MRSA (6).

The neonate, who died on day 16, was culture-positive for CA-MRSA from blood, 2 umbilical swabs, and a tracheal aspirate. The antibiogram of these isolates was identical to the placental cultures, including absence of inducible clindamycin resistance. Postmortem examination showed hemorrhagic necrotizing pneumonia and gram-negative bacilli. Culture of lung tissue grew Escherichia coli. Isolates from the placenta and neonate were identified phenotypically, without molecular testing.

Maternal complications of chorioamnionitis include endometritis, bacteremia, hemorrhage, and cesarean delivery (1). Clinically, chorioamnionitis can be diagnosed by maternal fever (>38°C) and 2 of the following: maternal leukocytosis (>15 × 103cells/mm3), maternal tachycardia (>100 bpm), fetal tachycardia (>160 bpm), uterine tenderness, and foul-smelling amniotic fluid (1). This patient had none of these signs, except foul-smelling amniotic fluid, and fetal tachycardia was absent. In this case, chorioamnionitis was diagnosed by histology.

Amniotic fluid cultures from pregnancies complicated by chorioamnionitis have shown multiple organisms from the vaginal flora, such as Streptococcus agalactiae, Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, anaerobes, and E. coli (1). Chorioamnionitis associated with S. aureus is uncommon (2,3), and MRSA chorioamnionitis is rare (4,5). The first 2 reports of MRSA chorioamnionitis appeared in 1998 (4) and 2002 (5). In both instances, the patients worked in the healthcare industry, and the authors considered the MRSA to have been nosocomial strains. The patient in our report was a restaurant manager, had no prior recorded hospital admissions, and was not previously known to be colonized by MRSA.

CA-MRSA strains are epidemiologically and clonally unrelated to hospital-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) strains and can be differentiated by the presence of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IV and the absence of multidrug resistance seen with HA-MRSA (6). Recently, the incidence of CA-MRSA infections increased in community settings, including outbreaks in settings in which CA-MRSA is endemic, with manifestations ranging from skin and soft tissue infections to necrotizing pneumonia (6). Genital colonization with MRSA recently has been reported with a frequency of 0.5%–3.5% in pregnant women (7,8). In 1 study, most (93%) of these isolates were CA-MRSA (7).

Eckhardt et al. described a patient with chorioamnionitis in whom CA-MRSA bacteremia developed (9). However, this descriptor was used to specify multidrug-resistant MRSA not acquired in a hospital. Moreover, neither placental nor amniotic fluid cultures were described. Laibl et al. reported 2 patients with CA-MRSA infections in whom chorioamnionitis developed (10). Again, placental and amniotic fluid culture results were not reported, nor was chorioamnionitis listed as an infection caused by CA-MRSA in their cohort. However, these latter 2 patients might represent additional cases of CA-MRSA chorioamnionitis.

Although the incidence of CA-MRSA infections continues to increase, CA-MRSA chorioamnionitis appears to remain rare. Nevertheless, the prevalence of MRSA genital colonization among pregnant women creates an opportunity for this agent to cause ascending gestational infection. This finding is meaningful because recommended empirical antimicrobial drug treatments may not cover CA-MRSA, increasing the likelihood of infectious complications (1). However, culture results when available can provide therapeutic guidance. We hope this report raises awareness of the possibility of CA-MRSA chorioamnionitis and encourages reports from other authors so this entity can be better established, characterized, and monitored.


Jason D. PimentelComments to Author , Frederick A. Meier, and Linoj P. Samuel
Author affiliations: Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA



  1. Newton  ER. Preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and chorioamnionitis. Clin Perinatol. 2005;32:571600. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-David  Y, Hallak  M, Evans  MI, Abramovici  H. Amnionitis and premature delivery with intact amniotic membranes involving Staphylococcus aureus. A case report. J Reprod Med. 1995;40:4856.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Negishi  H, Matsuda  T, Okuyama  K, Sutoh  S, Fujioka  Y, Fujimoto  S. Staphylococcus aureus causing chorioamnionitis and fetal death with intact membranes at term. A case report. J Reprod Med. 1998;43:397400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Geisler  JP, Horlander  KM, Hiett  AK. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a cause of chorioamnionitis. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1998;25:11920. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fowler  P. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus chorioamnionitis: a rare cause of fetal death in our community. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;42:978. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Palavecino  E. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Lab Med. 2004;24:40318. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen  KT, Huard  RC, Della-Latta  P, Saiman  L. Prevalence of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:4827.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Andrews  WW, Schelonka  R, Waites  K, Stamm  A, Cliver  SP, Moser  S. Genital tract methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: risk of vertical transmission in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:1138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Eckhardt  C, Halvosa  JS, Ray  SM, Blumberg  HM. Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the neonatal intensive care unit from a patient with community-acquired disease. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003;24:4601. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Laibl  VR, Sheffield  JS, Roberts  S, McIntire  DD, Trevino  S, Wendel  GD Jr. Clinical presentation of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:4615.PubMedGoogle Scholar


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1512.090853

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 15, Number 12—December 2009

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Jason D. Pimentel, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: December 09, 2010
Page updated: December 09, 2010
Page reviewed: December 09, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.