Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 3—March 2011

Staphylococcus aureus Infections in US Veterans, Maryland, USA, 1999–20081

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
LaRee A. TracyComments to Author , Jon P. Furuno, Anthony D. Harris, Mary Singer, Patricia Langenberg, and Mary-Claire Roghmann
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (L.A. Tracy, J.P. Furuno, A.D. Harris, P. Langenberg, M.-C. Roghmann); Veterans Administration Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore (M.-C. Roghmann); US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA (M. Singer)

Cite This Article


CME Logo

Medscape, LLC is pleased to provide online continuing medical education (CME) for this journal article, allowing clinicians the opportunity to earn CME credit.

This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education through the joint sponsorship of Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CME activity: (1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; (2) study the education content; (3) take the post-test and/or complete the evaluation at; (4) view/print certificate.

Release date: February 25, 2011; Expiration date: February 25, 2012

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  • Describe the change in overall incidence of S. aureus infections between fiscal years 1999 and 2008 based on a retrospective cohort study using patient-level data in the Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System
  • Describe trends in invasive vs noninvasive S. aureus infections, changes in methicillin susceptibility, and changes in location of onset and infection site between fiscal years 1999 and 2008 based on the aforementioned study
  • Describe hospital infection-control practices that may contribute to declining incidence of invasive S. aureus infections

Medscape CME Editor

Karen L. Foster, MA, Technical Writer-Editor, Emerging Infectious Diseases. Karen L. Foster, MA, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Medscape CME Author

Laurie Barclay, MD, freelance writer and reviewer, Medscape, LLC. Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Disclosures: LaRee A. Tracy, MA, PhD; Jon P. Furuno, PhD; Mary Singer, PhD, MD; Patricia Langenberg, PhD; and Mary-Claire Roghmann, MD, MS, have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Anthony D. Harris, MD, MPH, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationship: served as an advisor or consultant for Ansell on a retrospective database project.



Trends in Staphylococcus aureus infections are not well described. To calculate incidence in overall S. aureus infection and invasive and noninvasive infections according to methicillin susceptibility and location, we conducted a 10-year population-based retrospective cohort study (1999–2008) using patient-level data in the Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System. We found 3,674 S. aureus infections: 2,816 (77%) were noninvasive; 2,256 (61%) were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA); 2,517 (69%) were community onset, and 1,157 (31%) were hospital onset. Sixty-one percent of noninvasive infections were skin and soft tissue infections; 1,112 (65%) of these were MRSA. Ten-year averaged incidence per 100,000 veterans was 749 (± 132 SD, range 549–954) overall, 178 (± 41 SD, range 114–259) invasive, and 571 (± 152 SD, range 364–801) noninvasive S. aureus infections. Incidence of all S. aureus infections significantly increased (p<0.001), driven by noninvasive, MRSA, and community-onset infections (p<0.001); incidence of invasive S. aureus infection significantly decreased (p<0.001).

Staphylococcus aureus exists as a commensal organism living on the human body in equilibrium with other bacteria and as a common agent associated with a spectrum of diseases ranging from mild, noninvasive skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) to invasive, life-threatening bloodstream infections. Increasing incidence of infections caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has complicated treatment of S. aureus infection. Previously MRSA infections were problematic primarily among hospitalized persons or persons exposed to the health care settings. However, since the 1990s, MRSA infections have become more prevalent in healthy, younger persons who have little to no exposure to health care settings. Of particular concern is the rapid increase in MRSA SSTIs reportedly driven by emergence of a new MRSA strain, USA300 (1,2).

Despite these changes, the epidemiology of S. aureus infection, particularly the total effect of infection in the United States, is not well described. Several population-based studies on S. aureus infections exist; however, these studies focused on hospital-based populations (36), MRSA infection (79), non-US populations (1012), or only estimated the impact of invasive S. aureus disease (10,1315). Additionally, population-level changes in incidence, particularly before and after USA300 MRSA emerged, are largely unknown. To describe overall trends and recent changes in the incidence of S. aureus infection while differentiating between invasive and noninvasive, community- and hospital-onset, and methicillin-susceptible and -resistant S. aureus infections, we conducted a retrospective population-based study.


Data Source

Our study used data from the Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System (VAMHCS) over a 10-year period (1999–2008). VAMHCS, a large, integrated health care system, comprises 3 medical centers (Baltimore VA Medical Center, Perry Point VA Medical Center, and the Baltimore VA Rehabilitation and Extended Care Center), ≈730 inpatient beds, and 5 community-based outpatient clinics. VAMHCS uses an electronic health information system known as the Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture (VistA). This system is used to collect and maintain all health information at each VA medical facility, including the VAMHCS. VAMHCS’s electronic medical records and administrative data, including codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), and microbiology culture results collected from the VistA served as the primary data source for this study. The VAMHCS Research and Development Committee and the University of Maryland, Baltimore Institutional Review Board approved this study. Given that data were retrospectively obtained from VistA, informed consent requirements were waived.

S. aureus Culture Collection and Classification

We collected data during October 1, 1998–September 30, 2008, on all S. aureus–positive blood and clinical cultures (excluding surveillance and fecal and nasal cultures) identified through microbiologic accession number, date, time, and specimen type (e.g., blood, skin). Each positive culture was classified as originating from a sterile or a nonsterile body site. We defined a sterile body site according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Active Bacterial Core surveillance criteria, and all other body sites were classified as nonsterile (13). We defined a unique culture as the first S. aureus–positive culture obtained from a patient during a 6-month period. If cultures were obtained from a sterile and a nonsterile site from the patient during the same period, we chose the culture from the sterile site.

For S. aureus–positive cultures obtained during an outpatient visit for which the patient was not subsequently hospitalized within a 72-hour period after culture, we obtained all ICD-9-CM codes associated with all of the patient’s outpatient visits on the day of culture. For S. aureus–positive cultures obtained during an outpatient visit for which the patient was subsequently hospitalized within a 72-hour period after culture, we collected the outpatient and hospital discharge ICD-9-CM codes. Finally, we obtained all ICD-9-CM discharge codes for S. aureus–positive cultures obtained during a hospitalization. Using information from previous studies, we developed a comprehensive list of ICD-9-CM codes for S. aureus–related infections and categorized them by the site of infection most consistent with the associated code (16).

We determined an invasive S. aureus infection on the basis of S. aureus isolation from a clinical or blood culture from a normally sterile body site, such as blood, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid, pericardial fluid, peritoneal fluid, joint/synovial fluid, bone, internal body site, and muscle. Identification of noninvasive S. aureus infection was based on isolation of S. aureus from a clinical culture of a nonsterile site, without a concurrent culture from a sterile site obtained during the same 6-month period, and at least 1 ICD-9-CM code for S. aureus–related infection from the outpatient visit or hospitalization associated with the positive culture. For a noninvasive infection, we based the requirement of a matching ICD-9-CM code along with positive culture on concerns that S. aureus obtained from a sample from a nonsterile body site can represent either infection or colonization. In a substudy that used a random sample of cases, we estimated that an ICD-9-CM code for S. aureus–related infection plus positive clinical culture (from a nonsterile site) increases the probability of a true noninvasive S. aureus infection by ≈23.8% over positive clinical culture alone (16).

Positive cultures obtained after the first 48 hours of hospitalization, rehabilitation, or long-term stay were classified as hospital onset and all others as community onset. All S. aureus infections were classified according to methicillin susceptibility on the basis of in vitro susceptibility to oxacillin. All MRSA infections were grouped into the following epidemiologic categories: health care–associated community onset, defined as cases in persons with at least 1 listed risk factor in the past 12 months; health care–associated hospital onset, defined as cases in persons who have a positive culture within 48 hours after hospitalization; or community-associated, defined as cases in persons with no documented health care–associated community-onset risk factor (13). To determine a risk factor for health care–associated community-onset infection, we obtained history of hospitalization, surgery, residence in a long-term care facility, or prior MRSA-positive culture in the past 12 months before the date and time of each index positive MRSA culture. Site of infection (bone or joint, skin or soft tissue, endovascular, respiratory, intraabdominal/pelvic, central nervous system, urinary tract, S. aureus–nonspecific site, bacteremia without focus, and other or site not specified) was determined for each S. aureus infection on the basis of matching ICD-9-CM code. When cultures matched with multiple ICD-9-CM codes, we chose the highest ranking site of infection on the basis of the likelihood that a culture represented true S. aureus infection (16).

Statistical Analysis

Information about annual number of unique veterans, admissions, and total inpatient days for hospitalization, long-term care, and residential rehabilitation programs were obtained from the VAMHCS Medical Administrative Service fiscal year (FY) databases. Annual and 10-year averaged incidence rates per 100,000 veterans were estimated overall and for community-onset infections and per 100,000 inpatient days for hospital-onset S. aureus infections. To account for the first 48 hours in the definition for hospital-onset infection, we adjusted inpatient days (number of annual inpatient days minus 2× the number of annual admissions) (13). Because the average inpatient length of stay in the VAMHCS is >48 hours, this adjustment provides a consistent and reasonably accurate estimate of inpatient days past 48 hours.

Trends in all S. aureus infections were initially assessed by plotting natural and cubic spline smoothers to the observed data plotted as a function of time. The formal analysis of trends of all S. aureus infections was based on generalized linear models, assuming a Poisson distribution with a log link function, including FY as a predictor variable and log total number of unique veterans or log-adjusted inpatient days as an offset variable (17). Model fit was assessed by evaluating the deviance and Akaike information criterion, and regression coefficients for trend were assessed by the partial Wald test (18,19). Additional models were fit for each stratum of interest, i.e., invasive, noninvasive, onset, and methicillin susceptibility. Analyses were performed by using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and R version 2.7.0 (2008) software (


For FY 1999–FY 2008, a mean (± SD) of 48,940 (± 3,926) unique veterans accessed care in the VAMHCS each year. The mean annual numbers of acute care and nursing home or intermediate care admissions was 5,854 (± 199) and 919 (± 161) corresponding to 23,183 (± 1,743) and 98,902 (± 10,893) inpatient days, respectively.

Overall Incidence of S. aureus Infection

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Incidence per 100,000 veterans of Staphylococcus aureus infections by invasive and noninvasive (A), methicillin susceptibility (B), and onset (C), Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, fiscal years 1999–2008. Solid line represents all S. aureus infections. MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; CO, community onset; HO, hospital onset.

Figure 1. Incidence per 100,000 veterans of Staphylococcus aureus infections by invasive and noninvasive (A), methicillin susceptibility (B), and onset (C), Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, fiscal years 1999–2008. Solid line represents...

We identified 3,674 S. aureus infections, of which 2,816 (77%) were noninvasive and 2,256 (61%) were MRSA. The overall proportion of community-onset and hospital-onset infections was 2,517 (69%) and 1,157 (31%), respectively. The 10-year averaged incidence per 100,000 veterans was 749 cases (± 132 SD, range 549–954) overall, 178 (± 41 SD, range 114–259) invasive, and 571 (± 152 SD, range 364–801) for noninvasive S. aureus infections. The annual incidence per 100,000 veterans of all S. aureus infections increased significantly starting in 2003 (p<0.001). This increase was driven by significant (p<0.001) increases in noninvasive, MRSA, and community-onset infections (Figure 1).

Invasive S. aureus Infections

We identified 858 invasive S. aureus infections, of which 75% were based on positive blood cultures, among 800 unique veterans during FY 1999–FY 2008. The proportions of community- and hospital-onset invasive S. aureus infections were 56% and 44%, respectively; 52% were caused by MRSA (Table 1). Among all 449 invasive MRSA infections, 243 (54%) were epidemiologically classified as health care–associated hospital-onset, 152 (34%) as health care–associated community-onset, and 54 (12%) as community-associated MRSA.

The annual incidence of all invasive S. aureus infections decreased gradually from FY 1999 through FY 2008 (Figure 1, panel A). In FY 1999, the estimated incidence of invasive S. aureus infection was 259 infections per 100,000 veterans; however, by FY 2008, incidence was 114 per 100,000 veterans (p<0.001). This decrease appears to be associated with overall decreases in the incidence of invasive MRSA (135–68/100,000; p = 0.02) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) (123–47/100,000; p = 0.009).

The incidence of invasive hospital-onset S. aureus infections decreased from 150 to 85 cases per 100,000 adjusted acute-care inpatient days (Table 2). Invasive hospital-onset MSSA and MRSA infections significantly decreased during the 10-year period (p = 0.01 and p<0.001, respectively). The incidence of invasive community-onset S. aureus infections decreased 1.9-fold from 119 to 64 per 100,000 veterans and was driven by decreases in incidence of invasive community-onset MSSA. Incidence of invasive community-onset MRSA remained relatively unchanged (46 to 41/100,000 veterans).

Noninvasive S. aureus Infections

We identified 2,816 noninvasive S. aureus infections among 2,511 unique patients during FY 1999–FY 2008. Overall, 28% and 72% of S. aureus infections were noninvasive hospital onset and community onset, respectively; 1,807 (64%) were caused by MRSA and 1,006 (36%) by MSSA (Table 1). Of MRSA infections, 539 (30%), 572 (32%), and 696 (39%) were epidemiologically classified as health care–associated community-onset, health care–associated community-onset, and community-associated MRSA infections, respectively.

From FY 1999 through FY 2008, the overall incidence of noninvasive S. aureus infections increased significantly (p<0.001) (Figure 1, panel A). Incidence in FY 1999 was 576 cases per 100,000 veterans and rapidly increased beginning in FY 2003, peaking at 801 cases per 100,000 veterans by FY 2005. These increases were driven primarily by increases in noninvasive MRSA infections, with the most pronounced increases occurring during FY 2003 and FY 2004 (Table 2). The overall incidence of health care–associated hospital-onset MRSA infections decreased nonsignificantly (p = 0.47); however, health care–associated community-onset and community-associated MRSA significantly increased (p<0.001), particularly after FY 2003.

The incidence of noninvasive hospital-onset infections did not follow any apparent increasing or decreasing trend (p = 0.08; Table 2). However, driven by noninvasive MRSA infections, the overall incidence of noninvasive community-onset S. aureus infections increased significantly (p<0.001). Incidence after FY 2003 rapidly increased from 218 to 546, peaking at 644 cases per 100,000 veterans in FY 2005. After FY 2000, incidence of noninvasive community-onset MRSA infections increased 4-fold from 100 to 397 cases per 100,000 veterans. Incidence of noninvasive community-onset MSSA infections did not change (p = 0.83; Table 2).

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Incidence per 100,000 veterans of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) cause by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, fiscal years 1999–2008.

Figure 2. Incidence per 100,000 veterans of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) cause by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, fiscal years 1999–2008.

A total of 1,703 (61%) noninvasive infections were classified as SSTIs of which 1,112 (65%) were caused by MRSA. Changes in incidence of overall noninvasive MRSA infections were driven by increases in MRSA SSTIs (Figure 2). Incidence per 100,000 veterans significantly increased from 90 cases in FY 1999 to 345 in FY 2008 (p<0.0001); the largest increase began in FY 2003 and incidence peaked at 440 cases in FY 2005.


We have described the incidence of all S. aureus infections during a 10-year period in a large US-based population (49,000 persons) using person-level data including clinical culture and administrative data to identify and classify infections. Our results suggest significant increases in overall S. aureus infections from FY 1999 through FY 2008; the largest increases were associated with community-onset MRSA infections of skin and soft tissue and an overall decrease in incidence of invasive S. aureus infections.

During the study period, we implemented many new hospital infection–control practices—including the use of alcohol-based hand gels for hand hygiene (2003), central line bundles (2006), MRSA surveillance cultures (intensive care units in 2003, expanded to acute care in 2007), and chlorhexidine bathing of all surgical patients (2009)—which may have contributed to the decreased incidence of invasive infections. Previous studies suggest that improved infection control practices have contributed to fewer catheter-related and central line–associated bloodstream infections (20,21). However, attributing the decrease to a single practice is difficult, if not impossible, and few published studies exist with which we can compare our invasive S. aureus results.

Laupland et al. estimated an annual incidence of invasive S. aureus of 28 cases per 100,000 population, but their results may not be comparable because they were based primarily on MSSA infections (12). Klevens et al. estimated an incidence of invasive MRSA infection of 32 cases per 100,000 population, 75% were bacteremias, and 27% were hospital-acquired on the basis of 2005 data from 9 US cities (13). Their study reported a noticeably higher incidence of invasive MRSA in Baltimore, Maryland, USA, of 117 per 100,000 compared with estimates of 20–50 per 100,000 population at other sites. Our estimated rate of invasive MRSA infection (160 cases/100,000 veterans) is commensurate during the same year (2005), and our calculated proportion of invasive hospital-onset MRSA in 2005 (20%) also was similar. Klevens et al. reported estimates per 100,000 persons; therefore a direct comparison of rates of invasive hospital-onset MRSA infection is not feasible. However, our rates are potentially higher given the inpatient days adjustment accounting for the first 48 hours in the definition for hospital-onset infection. Another study by Laupland et al. reported an annual incidence of S. aureus bloodstream infections during 2000–2006 of 20 per 100,000 population (14). However, few MRSA cases were identified in this study, thereby making it difficult to compare with our results for which MRSA caused almost half of infections.

For several reasons, our incidence rates of invasive infections are higher than those previously reported. Black race has previously been reported as a marker for increased risk for invasive MRSA infections (13,22). Therefore, we would expect a higher incidence of all S. aureus infections, given that in our study 49% of patients were black. Additionally, given that our study was performed on data from a primarily urban population located in or around Baltimore, we could attribute the higher incidence of infections to suspected risk factors that are more prevalent in this location, including intravenous drug use.

Our study identified increases in noninvasive S. aureus infections, particularly around 2003, which most likely are associated with the emergence of the USA300 MRSA clone that has led to increases in community-associated MRSA, specifically in SSTIs (1,22). Also, despite dramatic increases in noninvasive community-onset MRSA infections, we did not observe a proportionate increase in invasive community-onset MRSA as might be expected if USA300 MRSA had the same propensity as non-USA300 MRSA to invade the bloodstream. No population-based studies have been published with which to compare overall noninvasive S. aureus infections, and few exist for comparison of noninvasive MRSA infections. For instance, Liu et al. recently reported annual (2004–2005) incidence rates of community-acquired and hospital-acquired MRSA among residents in San Francisco, California, USA, community-associated of 316 and 31 cases per 100,000 population, respectively, for which most cultures were from skin and soft tissue (8). The results of our study for community-onset MRSA are slightly lower but similar. Crum et al. reported a dramatic increase during 2002–2004 in community-associated MRSA infections, of which most were classified as SSTIs, and an incidence rate of 155 cases per 100,000 persons from 2004 data (7). The FY 2004 incidence of noninvasive community-associated MRSA in our study was 188 cases per 100,000 veterans, which is similar to that reported by Crum et al.

Our study adds new information to the existing literature and has several strengths. A major strength is its calculation of annual incidence of all S. aureus infections for a 10-year period by using actual numbers of patients at risk, admissions, and inpatient days. Our estimates of incidence are more accurate than those in previous studies, which were based on census-level data (1113,23). Noninvasive infections were identified by using an automated approach that required both positive clinical culture and confirmed ICD-9-CM code for infection. This definition is more rigorous, thereby producing higher positive predictive values than clinical cultures alone, particularly for infections of bone and skin or soft tissue (16). In addition, this automated approach enabled us to identify and classify types of S. aureus infection, which is useful for understanding the overall population distribution of infection. Access to comprehensive, patient-level information, including prior hospitalizations, prior MRSA infections, and surgeries, allowed us determine the epidemiologic class for all MRSA infections. This study was performed in a population receiving standardized health care; therefore, findings should be free of bias associated with access to care or duration and type of treatment received.

Our study also has several limitations. First, the VAMHCS population of adult, mostly male patients living in the mid-Atlantic region does not fully represent the overall US population. We are unable to extrapolate these findings to children, a population for which an increase of community-onset MRSA SSTIs has been reported (24). Previous reports suggest that men are at higher risk than women for S. aureus infections; therefore, our estimates may overestimate true rates for women (8,12,13). Second, although we did not perform molecular typing on the S. aureus–positive isolates, we expect that a significant proportion (>80%) of noninvasive MRSA infections were caused by the USA300 MRSA strain (1). Given that USA300 MRSA reportedly varies across the United States, our findings may not be generalizable to populations in which MRSA strains differ. Third, we may have underestimated incidence because our definition of S. aureus infection required a positive clinical or blood culture. However, given the standardized access to care in the VAMHCS, we expect that cultures were uniformly collected in patients who had clinical signs or symptoms of infection. Fourth, the clinical culturing rate may have increased during our study period, which would contribute to overestimates in the incidence of S. aureus infection, particularly noninvasive infections. Johnston et al. observed an increase in the absolute number of SSTI cultures obtained in the VAMHCS Emergency Care Service (1). However, they determined that the proportion of MRSA infections increased, even though the proportion of MSSA remained the same, which suggests a true increase in MRSA. We observed similar patterns: whereas MRSA infections increased, MSSA infections remained relatively stable, and the annual number of S. aureus cultures did not significantly change.

In conclusion, this large, population-based study demonstrated an increase in the overall incidence of S. aureus infections during FY 1999–FY 2008, which was driven by a rapid increase in noninvasive, community-onset, MRSA skin and soft tissue infections. This increase was most striking during and after 2003, which is coincident with the time during which the USA300 clone became a major contributor to noninvasive S. aureus infections. Despite this increase, incidence of invasive community-onset MRSA infections did not significantly increase, and the overall MSSA infections and noninvasive MSSA infections remained generally stable. These results suggest a shift in the distribution of S. aureus infections to more noninvasive community-onset MRSA infections. This information is useful for interpreting changes in the epidemiology of S. aureus infections, which may help guide additional prevention strategies focused on reducing community-onset S. aureus infections. To further understand these trends, additional studies are warranted to identify risk factors for S. aureus infection and to describe the epidemiology of S. aureus infections across the entire population.

Dr Tracy is an epidemiologist and statistician at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. This study was part of her doctoral research in epidemiology. Her main research interests are epidemiologic patterns and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases, particularly of MRSA infections.



We thank Jingkun Zhu for abstracting the culture and administrative data.

This work was supported by a VA Clinical Science Research and Development Merit Award awarded to M.R. J.P.F. was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) K01 award (5K01AI071015-02) and A.D.H. by an NIH NIAID K24 award (1K24AI079040-01A1) while this work was performed.



  1. Johnson  JK, Khoie  T, Shurland  S, Kreisel  K, Stine  OC, Roghmann  MC. Skin and soft tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 clone. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1195200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. McCaig  LF, McDonald  LC, Mandal  S, Jernigan  DB. Staphylococcus aureus–associated skin and soft tissue infections in ambulatory care. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:171523.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jarvis  WR, Schlosser  J, Chinn  RY, Tweeten  S, Jackson  M. National prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in inpatients at US health care facilities, 2006. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35:6317. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Klevens  RM, Edwards  JR, Tenover  FC, McDonald  LC, Horan  T, Gaynes  R. Changes in the epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units in US hospitals, 1992–2003. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:38991. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kuehnert  MJ, Hill  HA, Kupronis  BA, Tokars  JI, Solomon  SL, Jernigan  DB. Methicillin-resistant-Staphylococcus aureus hospitalizations, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:86872.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Noskin  GA, Rubin  RJ, Schentag  JJ, Kluytmans  J, Hedblom  EC, Smulders  M, The burden of Staphylococcus aureus infections on hospitals in the United States: an analysis of the 2000 and 2001 Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:175661. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Crum  NF, Lee  RU, Thornton  SA, Stine  OC, Wallace  MR, Barrozo  C, Fifteen-year study of the changing epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Med. 2006;119:94351. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu  C, Graber  CJ, Karr  M, Diep  BA, Basuino  L, Schwartz  BS, A population-based study of the incidence and molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in San Francisco, 2004–2005. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:163746. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Richards  MJ, Edwards  JR, Culver  DH, Gaynes  RP. Nosocomial infections in medical intensive care units in the United States. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:88792. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacobsson  G, Dashti  S, Wahlberg  T, Andersson  R. The epidemiology of and risk factors for invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections in western Sweden. Scand J Infect Dis. 2007;39:613. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Laupland  KB, Zygun  DA, Davies  HD, Church  DL, Louie  TJ, Doig  CJ. Population-based assessment of intensive care unit–acquired bloodstream infections in adults: incidence, risk factors, and associated mortality rate. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:24627. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Laupland  KB, Church  DL, Mucenski  M, Sutherland  LR, Davies  HD. Population-based study of the epidemiology of and the risk factors for invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections. J Infect Dis. 2003;187:14529. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Klevens  RM, Morrison  MA, Nadle  J, Petit  S, Gershman  K, Ray  S, Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA. 2007;298:176371. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Laupland  KB, Ross  T, Gregson  DB. Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: risk factors, outcomes, and the influence of methicillin resistance in Calgary, Canada, 2000–2006. J Infect Dis. 2008;198:33643. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Morin  CA, Hadler  JL. Population-based incidence and characteristics of community-onset Staphylococcus aureus infections with bacteremia in 4 metropolitan Connecticut areas, 1998. J Infect Dis. 2001;184:102934. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Tracy  LA, Furuno  JP, Harris  AD, Singer  M, Langenberg  P, Roghmann  MC. Predictive ability of positive clinical culture results and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, to identify and classify noninvasive Staphylococcus aureus infections: a validation study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:694700. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nelder  JA, Wedderburn  RW. Generalized linear models. J Roy Statist Soc A. 1972;135:37084. DOIGoogle Scholar
  18. Chatfield  C. The analysis of time series: an introduction. 6th ed. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2003.
  19. Kedem  B, Fokianos  K. Regression models for time series analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
  20. Burton  DC, Edwards  JR, Horan  TC, Jernigan  JA, Fridkin  SK. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus central line–associated bloodstream infections in US intensive care units, 1997–2007. JAMA. 2009;301:72736. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pronovost  P. Interventions to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU: the Keystone Intensive Care Unit Project. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:S1715. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. King  MD, Humphrey  BJ, Wang  YF, Kourbatova  EV, Ray  SM, Blumberg  HM. Emergence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 clone as the predominant cause of skin and soft-tissue infections. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:30917.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Klein  E, Smith  DL, Laxminarayan  R. Hospitalizations and deaths caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 1999–2005. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:18406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Herold  BC, Immergluck  LC, Maranan  MC, Lauderdale  DS, Gaskin  RE, Boyle-Vavra  S, Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children with no identified predisposing risk. JAMA. 1998;279:5938. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Follow Up

Earning Medscape CME Credit

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers. You must be a registered user on If you are not registered on, please click on the New Users: Free Registration link on the left hand side of the website to register. Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider, For technical assistance, contact American Medical Association's Physician's Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please refer to The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit is acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US and want to obtain an AMA PRA CME credit, please complete the questions online, print the certificate and present it to your national medical association.

Staphylococcus aureus Infections in US Veterans, Maryland, USA, 1999–2008

Medscape CME Questions

1. On the basis of the current retrospective cohort study by Dr. Tracy and colleagues, which of the following statements about the overall incidence of Staphylococcus aureus infections in the Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System between fiscal years 1999 and 2008 is most likely correct?

A. Incidence of all S. aureus infections significantly decreased

B. Changes in incidence of all S. aureus infections were most striking during and following 2005

C. 10-year average overall incidence per 100,000 veterans was 749 ± 132

D. The findings are applicable to pediatric units

2. You are an infection-control officer in a Maryland veterans hospital. On the basis of the study by Dr. Tracy and colleagues, which of the following statements about trends in invasive vs noninvasive S. aureus infections, methicillin susceptibility, and location of onset and infection site is most likely to apply to infection control at your hospital?

A. About half of S. aureus infections are likely to be invasive

B. A projected increase in overall S. aureus infections is most likely to be driven by invasive, methicillin-sensitive, hospital-onset infections

C. More than half of all noninvasive infections are likely to be skin and soft tissue infections

D. Hospital-onset invasive MRSA infections are likely to significantly increase

3. As the infection-control officer described in question 2, which of the following hospital infection-control practices do you think would be most likely to reduce incidence of invasive S. aureus infections, as based on their use in the VA hospital studied by Dr. Tracy and colleagues?

A. Hand-washing with soap and water rather than using alcohol-based hand gels

B. Central-line bundles

C. Surveillance cultures for methicillin-sensitive S. aureus

D. Soap-and-water rather than chlorhexidine bathing for surgical patients

Activity Evaluation

1. The activity supported the learning objectives.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
2. The material was organized clearly for learning to occur.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
3. The content learned from this activity will impact my practice.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree
4. The activity was presented objectively and free of commercial bias.
Strongly Disagree
Strongly Agree


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1703.100502

1This study was presented in part at the 49th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2009 Sep 11–15; San Francisco, California, USA (abstracts 1217 and 3136).

Related Links

Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 3—March 2011

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

LaRee A. Tracy, University of Maryland, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, 685 W Baltimore St, MSTF 336, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: September 01, 2011
Page updated: September 01, 2011
Page reviewed: September 01, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.