Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 18, Number 11—November 2012

Antigenic Diversity of Enteroviruses Associated with Nonpolio Acute Flaccid Paralysis, India, 2007–2009

C. Durga RaoComments to Author , Prasanna Yergolkar1, and K. Subbanna Shankarappa12
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India (C.D. Rao, K.S. Shankarappa); National Institute of Virology–World Health Organization–South East Asia Region Polio Laboratory Network, Victoria Hospital, Bangalore (P. Yergolkar); National Institute of Virology, Bangalore (P. Yergolkar); Victoria Hospital, Bangalore (P. Yergolkar)

Cite This Article


Because of the broadened acute flacid paralysis (AFP) definition and enhanced surveillance, many nonpolio AFP (NP-AFP) cases have been reported in India since 2005. To determine the spectrum of nonpolio enterovirus (NPEV) serotypes associated with NP-AFP from polio-endemic and -free regions, we studied antigenic diversity of AFP-associated NPEVs. Of fecal specimens from 2,786 children with NP-AFP in 1 polio-endemic and 2 polio-free states, 823 (29.5%) were positive for NPEVs in RD cells, of which 532 (64.6%) were positive by viral protein 1 reverse transcription PCR. We identified 66 serotypes among 581 isolates, with enterovirus 71 most frequently (8.43%) detected, followed by enterovirus 13 (7.1%) and coxsackievirus B5 (5.0%). Most strains within a serotype represented new genogropups or subgenogroups. Agents for ≈35.0% and 70.0% of culture-positive and -negative cases, respectively, need to be identified. Association of human enterovirus with NP-AFP requires better assessment and understanding of health risks of NPEV infections after polio elimination.

Acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) is defined as sudden onset of weakness and floppiness in any part of the body in a child <15 years of age or paralysis in a person of any age in whom polio is suspected (1). It is a complex and broad clinical syndrome associated with a wide range of microbial and nonmicrobial agents and immune processes; clinical presentations and numbers are influenced by environmental and geographic factors. To cast a wider net for poliovirus detection and to maximize sensitivity so that every poliomyelitis case is detected, in 2005, the Global Poliomyelitis Eradication Initiative adapted AFP as a surveillance tool and broadened the case definition of AFP in India. The expanded case definition of AFP encompasses causes of nonpolio AFP (NP-AFP), including Guillian-Barré syndrome, transverse myelitis and traumatic neuritis, and ambiguous cases (1).

With the launch of the Global Poliomyelitis Eradication Initiative in 1988 for effective vaccination, surveillance, and monitoring of wild poliovirus transmission toward the target of polio eradication, the number of wild polio AFP cases declined remarkably from ≈300,000 to 974 in 2010 globally (2). Introduction of Pulse Polio Immunization, in addition to routine administration of oral polio vaccine, effectively interrupted indigenous wild poliovirus transmission and led to a remarkable decline in the number of poliomyelitis cases from ≈35,000 cases annually during 1994–1995 to 66 in 2005 in India. However, during 2006–2009, the number of polio cases hovered at ≈559–874 each year (25), with most cases reported primarily from the 2 northern states of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, in which wild poliovirus remained endemic. The last case of type 2 wild poliovirus globally occurred in 1999 in India. Introduction of bivalent oral polio vaccine types 1 and 3 resulted in a dramatic decline in wild poliovirus cases to 42 in 2010 and only 1 case reported in January 2011 (25). India is now considered a polio-free nation by the Government of India, National Polio Surveillance Project (NPSP) and by the World Health Organization (WHO)/South-East Asia Regional Office and WHO.

However, analysis of WHO-monitored polio surveillance data on the number of AFP, polio AFP, and NP-AFP cases available at the public domains (;; (25) from 1998 through June 2, 2012, in India shows that concomitant with the phenomenal elimination of wild poliovirus transmission in India was an annual increase in the number of reported AFP cases from 2005 to date throughout the country (24). Although 8,103–9,705 were reported during 1998–2003, a total of 55,782 and 60,883 cases were reported during 2010 and 2011, respectively. Through June 2, a total of 20,677 AFP cases were reported in India during 2012, compared with 18,625 during the corresponding period in 2011 (4). This large increase in NP-AFP cases, which represent AFP cases caused by agents other than poliovirus, probably reflects the excellent implementation of the expanded definition of AFP and highly sensitive surveillance and detection methods used by NPSP in India from 2005 onwards, in contrast to the other polio-endemic countries, i.e., Pakistan, Nigeria, and Afghanistan, where the expanded AFP surveillance is not in place (15). The large increase in the NP-AFP rate from 1.45 and 1.97 per 100,000 children during 1998–2003 to 16.20 in 2011 (35) further reflects the excellent operational performance of the expanded AFP surveillance in India.

The genus Enterovirus within the family Picornaviridae comprises a diverse group of 10 species, of which 7 are associated with a wide spectrum of acute and chronic human diseases (6,7). Human enteroviruses (HEVs) are ubiquitous, infecting ≈1 billion persons worldwide. Although the actual incidence of enteroviral diseases is not known, most infections are thought to be asymptomatic, with ≈1% resulting in severe illness with high rates of death, especially in infants and young children (6). The >100 HEV serotypes comprising echoviruses (E), coxsackieviruses A (CAV) and B (CBV), polioviruses, and newer enteroviruses (EV) have been grouped into 4 species—HEV-A, HEV-B, HEV-C, and HEV-D—with poliovirus being part of HEV-C. Recently, rhinoviruses also have been included in the genus Enterovirus (8).

Molecular typing methods based on reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) amplification, nucleotide sequencing of the complete or the 3′ portion of the viral protein (VP) 1 gene, and comparison of the derived sequences with those of prototype and variant HEVs in the databases are widely used to identify EV types in clinical samples (9,10). In the current most commonly used molecular typing scheme, homotypic viruses generally share at least 75% nt identity and 85%–88% aa identity in VP1 (9,10).

Although nonpolio enteroviruses (NPEVs) are a major cause of AFP (6,7,11) and NP-AFP cases are being detected in large numbers, detailed knowledge is lacking about the serotypes associated with NP-AFP or other enteroviral diseases in India. We aimed to determine the spectrum of NPEV serotypes associated with NP-AFP from polio-endemic and polio-free regions of India with a view to develop strategies against the so-far unrecognized viral infections.

Materials and Methods

AFP Samples and Processing Laboratory

The National Institute of Virology Bangalore Unit in Victoria Hospital (Bangalore, India) is a WHO-accredited National Polio Laboratory for receiving, processing, and analyzing AFP specimens for polio and NPEVs (5,12). At least 2 specimens, obtained ≈24 hr apart, from each person with AFP were collected during 2007–2009. The National Institute of Virology–National Polio Laboratory receives fecal specimens of persons with AFP in accordance with WHO NPSP guidelines from the southern states of Karnataka and Kerala, 5 districts of the polio-endemic Uttar Pradesh State (Pilibhit, Badaun, Bareilly, Rampur, and Shahjahanpur), and other districts as and when required by the NPSP.

The chloroform-treated supernatants from 2,786 first-collection fecal samples from NP-AFP patients and second specimens from 310 of the patients were examined for EVs by observing cytopathic effects in L20B and RD cells. Poliovirus-positive isolates were further identified by neutralization tests, RT-PCR and ELISA following WHO-prescribed protocols (12) and sequence analysis of VP1 gene for determining vaccine-derived polioviruses. RT-PCRs have replaced all the earlier methods for identifying wild and vaccine polioviruses. All fecal specimens are stored for 1 year at −20°C and discarded by autoclaving. The virus-positive cell culture supernatants were stored at −20°C until completion of reporting, and only NPEVs were retained for further studies. RNA was extracted from 1,129 samples from children with NP- AFP, which include 823 NPEV-positive individual cases and 138 NPEV-positive second specimens. A total of 174 NPEV-negative fecal samples, including 16 second specimens, were used as controls to determine whether any of the samples negative for EV in cell culture became positive in RT-PCR.

Healthy Children

Fecal specimens from 780 apparently healthy children 3 months–3 years of age who did not receive vaccine and did not have diarrhea or any other illnesses during the 2 weeks before sample collection from different localities in the Bangalore community were used as healthy controls to determine the frequency of EV detection in healthy children. We obtained the necessary approvals from Institutional Biosafety and Ethical committees for carrying out the work.

Laboratory Analyses

Total RNA was extracted from 200 µL of NPEV–positive RD cell culture supernatants or clarified chloroform extracted fecal samples by using RNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). RNA was eluted in 100 µL of RNase-free water and stored at −80°C. EV species–specific degenerate primers were constituted into 4 sets (online Technical Appendix, Set 1 contained EV-B and EV-C–specific primers; set 2 contained primers specific for EV-A, EV71, and EV-D and sets 3 and 4 consisted of primers specific for Aichi virus/kobuvirus and klasseviruses and for cardioviruses and human cosaviruses, respectively. VP1 region was amplified by 1-step RT-PCR (QIAGEN) with reverse transcription at 40–42°C for 45 min depending on the primer, followed by heating at 94°C for 15 min. The first 2 PCR cycles were performed with melting, annealing, and extension at 94°C (40 s), 45–50°C (30 s), and 68°C (2 min), respectively. PCR was continued for 40 cycles with annealing and extension at 55°C (30 s) and 72°C (2 min), respectively. VP1 PCR fragments were sequenced (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, South Korea; SciGenom, Cochin, India) either directly by using primers corresponding to arbitrary sequences present at the 5′ end of the PCR primers or by using M13 forward and reverse primers after cloning the inserts between EcoRI or BamHI and HindIII sites in pBluescript KS+ (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Phylogenetic Analyses

EV serotypes were identified by comparing VP1 nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences from NP-AFP isolates among themselves and with those of other prototype or variant strains belonging to all known serotypes available in GenBank. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted by using MEGA5 (13) as described in the legends to the figures. GenBank accession numbers of reference strains used for sequence comparisons are available at, some of which are indicated in the trees. The VP1 gene GenBank accession numbers of 618 India NP-AFP isolates are HQ454497–454499 and JN203499–JN204113.


Frequency of NPEV Detection in Children with NP-AFP and in Healthy Children

A total of 2,786 fecal specimens from individual NP-AFP patients and second-collection specimens from 310 of the patients were examined for EV. Samples from 823 (29.5%) NP-AFP patients were positive for virus growth in RD cells. The percentage of virus positivity varied from 24.0% to 33.0% in different years from the 3 states. The remaining ≈70% samples were negative for EV in RD cells (Table). Of the 823 NPEV-positive cases, 532 (64.6%) yielded VP1-specific PCR fragments corresponding to EV-A, EV-B, or EV-C species. Sequencing of VP1 from 154 second specimens confirmed the serotype specificity of the isolate determined from the first sample (Tables 1 and 2 in Technical Appendix). Whereas the species-specific primers yielded a PCR product of ≈1,200 bp, the EV71–specific primers F1 and R1 yielded an 850-bp fragment. VP1 region from 291 (35.4%) samples could not be amplified by using primers designed for EV-A, EV-B, EV-C, and EV-D, bovine enterovirus, porcine enterovirus, klassevirus, kobuvirus, human cosavirus, or parechovirus under various PCR conditions (8,1420). Four (2.3%) of 174 NPEV-negative samples showed positivity in RT-PCR (Table; Table 1 in Technical Appendix).

Of the 780 fecal specimens from apparently healthy children, ≈20 (2.6%) fecal samples were positive for NPEV in cell culture, and ≈23 (3.0%) were RT-PCR-positive with the same primers used for AFP samples (Table). Although only 4 (0.9%) of 450 samples collected during winter months (November–March) were positive for NPEV, most virus-positive samples (16 [4.8%] of 330) were those collected in other months, suggesting seasonal incidence of NPEV infections in Bangalore.

Extreme Antigenic Diversity of EVs Associated with NP-AFP

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Strains belonging to each serotype detected in children with acute febrile paralysis, India, 2007–2009. CA, coxsackievirus; E, echovirus; EV, enterovirus.

Figure 1. . . . Strains belonging to each serotype detected in children with acute febrile paralysis, India, 2007–2009. CA, coxsackievirus; E, echovirus; EV, enterovirus.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic tree based on viral protein 1 gene nucleotide sequences of strains representing each of the 66 enterovirus serotypes detected in children with acute febrile paralysis, India, 2007–2009. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by using the maximum-parsimony method and with search level 1 close-neighbor-interchange algorithm. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated types clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) is shown next to the branche

Figure 2. . . . Phylogenetic tree based on viral protein 1 gene nucleotide sequences of strains representing each of the 66 enterovirus serotypes detected in children with acute febrile paralysis, India, 2007–2009....

Comparison of the complete or partial VP1 gene sequences of the clinical isolates with those of prototype and other EVs available in GenBank and phylogenetic analyses (13) showed 66 serotypes among isolates associated with NP-AFP (Figures 1, 2). Among the 66 serotypes, EV71 was more frequently detected than others, representing ≈8.4% of the characterized isolates, followed by E13 (7.1%) and CBV5 (5.0%). Although strains belonging to 6 serotypes (E6, E7, E11, E14, E19, and E33) each accounted for 3.3%–4.5% of the characterized strains, those belonging to 13 serotypes (CVA4, CBV1, CBV2, CBV4, CBV6, E1, E20, E24, E25, E29, E30, EV69, and EV75) each represented 1.7%–2.9%. The frequency of detection of each of the other serotypes ranged from 0.2% to 1.6% (Figure 1; Tables 1 and 2 in Technical Appendix). Only 15 serotypes (CAV4, CBV2, CBV4, E6, E7, E13, E14, E17, E19, E25, E30, E33, EV71, EV75, EV80) were detected in all 3 states. Forty-eight serotypes, including CBV5, were not detected in Kerala, probably because of the relatively small number of samples available from that state or noncirculation of these serotypes. Strains representing 16 serotypes were each detected only 1× or 2× during the period and represented <0.2%–0.3% of the characterized isolates (Figure 1). Strains belonging to EV-C species, to which poliovirus belongs, were rarely observed, with 1 CAV17 strain in Karnataka and 1 CAV21 strain in Uttar Pradesh being detected in samples collected during 2008. Of the 4 NPEV-negative samples that showed positivity in RT-PCR, 3 belonged to CAV4 and the other to CAV8.

Of the 532 NPEV-positive cases, 41 (7.7%) were identified as exhibiting mixed infection by >1 strain, as indicated by RT-PCR and sequence analysis of the cloned fragments. Although 37 cases of mixed infections involved 2 different serotypes, infections involving 3 different serotypes were detected in 4 cases. Although 32 serotypes were detected in mixed infections, CBV4, CBV5, E6, EV69, and EV71 accounted for 12.2%, 12.2%, 14.6%, 17.1%, and 31.7% of these infections, respectively. Mixed infections involving EV69 and CBV4 accounted for 58.3% and 41.7%, respectively, of their total detections (Table 3 in Technical Appendix).

A notable observation was detection of EV71 as the single most prevalent serotype; it accounted for ≈8.5% of the characterized isolates. Although EV71 was undetectable in 2007 and only 1 isolate was detected during 2008 in Karnataka, it was the most frequently detected serotype in Kerala during these 2 years. EV71 appears to have spread from Kerala to the neighboring Karnataka, resulting in its frequent detection in 2009. EV71 was frequently detected in Uttar Pradesh only during 2008 and 2009. Although 26.5% of total EV71 detections involved mixed infection, it alone accounted for 31.7% of mixed infections (Table 3 in Technical Appendix).

Genetic Relatedness of EV71, E13, and CBV Strains in India with Strains from Other Countries

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic analyses of viral protein 1 sequences of enterovirus 71 and echovirus 13 strains with those of reference strains representing different genogroups and subgenogroups within a serotype, India, 2007–2009. Multiple sequence alignments were performed by using ClustalW program ( and phylogenetic analysis by MEGA5 program (12) with pairwise comparison and maximum composite likelihood nucleotide substitution model. Phylogenetic trees were construct

Figure 3. . . . Phylogenetic analyses of viral protein 1 sequences of enterovirus 71 and echovirus 13 strains with those of reference strains representing different genogroups and subgenogroups within a serotype, India,...

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic tree of viral protein 1 sequences of coxsackievirus B1–B6 isolates generated in comparison with those of strains belonging to different genotypes of B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, and B6 serotypes, India, 2007–2009. Multiple sequence alignments were performed by using ClustalW program ( and phylogenetic analysis by MEGA5 program (12) with pairwise comparison and maximum composite likelihood nucleotide substitution model. Phylogenetic trees were constr

Figure 4. . . . Phylogenetic tree of viral protein 1 sequences of coxsackievirus B1–B6 isolates generated in comparison with those of strains belonging to different genotypes of B1, B2, B3, B4, B5,...

To understand the genetic relatedness of isolates in India that belonged to an EV type to those from other countries, we performed initially phylogenetic analyses of VP1 sequences of isolates from India that belonged to the prevalent EV71, E13, and CBV types with a large number of VP1 sequences representing different genogroups or subgenogroups within the types available in GenBank. Final phylogenetic trees, generated by using a few representative strains belonging to different genogroups and subgenogroups of EV71, E13, and CBV serotypes, are shown in Figure 3, panels A and B, and Figure 4. These studies showed that most of the India isolates segregated into either distinct genogroups or subgenogroups within known genogroups. Among the India EV71 isolates, 3 distinct new genogroups tentatively assigned as D (represented by N975c), E (N493), and F (N390), were identified (Figure 3, panel A). Isolate N975c showed ≈76%-nt sequence identity with a few EV71 strains but exhibited <70% aa identity, which suggests that it represents a new EV71 lineage. Other EV71 India strains segregated into different subgenogroups within C (C6 and C7) and B (B6) genogroups (2123). Most India E13 strains formed 2 distinct subgenogroups within 2 E13 genogroups (Figure 3, panel B) (2426). Most India CBV isolates, although grouped according to serotypes CBV1 to CBV6, represented a different subgenogroup within each type (Figure 4) (27,28). Preliminary phylogenetic analyses of VP1 sequences of strains belonging to a few other types also showed similar results (data not shown). These data suggest that most India EVs represent evolutionary lineages, within a given serotype, that differ from those prevalent in other countries.


This study, which represents a comprehensive molecular epidemiologic investigation of EVs associated with NP-AFP in India, was feasible because of the detection of a large number of AFP cases during the last several years from all regions of the country. The few previous studies from India and Pakistan identified 6–15 serotypes (11,29) in AFP cases by using methods that are limited in scope in identifying the >100 known HEV serotypes. Although studies in other countries (14,15,30,31) identified 6–12 serotypes, those in Romania and the People’s Republic of China observed 20 and 40, respectively (32,33). The serotypes that were prevalent varied in each of these studies. In contrast, we identified 66 NPEV serotypes in samples collected during 2007–2009 from children with NP-AFP in India. Detailed phylogenetic analysis of strains belonging to a few prevalent serotypes showed that NP-AFP is associated with circulation of strains belonging to different genogroups and subgenogroups of a serotype in widely separated geographic regions of the country (Figure 3, panels A and B; Figure 4).

Our results raise several issues that require immediate attention for the future direction of clinical and basic research and for better understanding of the health risks posed by NPEV infections. First, no virus was isolated in ≈70% of the AFP cases that remain to be identified. Second, the genetic nature of the viral agent(s) in ≈35% cases that were positive for virus in RD cells remains to be determined. Third, the association of a wide spectrum of serotypes with NP-AFP poses a challenging problem toward development of effective anti-enteroviral strategies. However, the need for effective antiviral strategies, including vaccines, is a major leap from the findings reported here and requires an in-depth analysis of the true effect of disease.

Detection of EV71 as the single most prevalent EV type associated with NP-AFP is of clinical significance because it is regarded as the most virulent neurotropic EV, next to poliovirus, associated with poliomyelitis-like paralytic disease, meningitis, meningoencephalomyelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, transeverse myelitis, cerebellar ataxia, opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome, benign intracranial hypertension, brainstem encephalitis (3436), and frequent epidemics of hand, foot, and mouth disease with substantial illness and death worldwide affecting >500,000 children in the Asia-Pacific region and causing >200 deaths in China during the past decade (3739). The observation that >30% of EV71 detections involved mixed infections could be of clinical significance in terms of severity and spectrum of the diseases associated with these infections. Detection of 3 new genogroups of EV71 in widely separated geographic regions in India suggests uniform spread of EVs of different lineages of EV71 and other types in India. Long-term assessment of the clinical outcome of the EV71 infections would be of interest to better understand the severity of the disease in children with AFP.

Our study provides a wealth of information about NP-AFP in India. It suggests the necessity for the WHO-NPSP programs, which are primarily directed for a 60-day follow-up of poliomyelitis cases, to design and implement a long-term strategic plan for understanding and addressing the short-term and long term health risks in children arising from NPEV infections after poliomyelitis elimination in India.

Dr Rao is a professor at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. His research interests include molecular epidemiology, molecular biology and mechanism of pathogenesis of rotavirus and EVs, and posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression.



We thank A. Raghavendra, Sudheendra Kumar, D. Dhananjaya, D. Poornima, and P. Aishwarya for their excellent technical help. We also thank staff at WHO-NPSP and WHO-South-East Asia Regional Office for their support on laboratory investigation of AFP cases. We acknowledge the technical staff of the National Institute of Virology Bangalore unit for virologic investigation of AFP cases. We thank A.C. Mishra for providing consent for carrying out the work in collaboration with WHO–National Polio Laboratory in Bangalore.

The laboratory study at Indian Institute of Science was supported by a grant from the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India. AFP surveillance and the work at the National Institute of Virology–National Polio Laboratory were supported by the WHO-NPSP, WHO-SEARO and Indian Council of Medical Research. K.S.S. was supported by the DBT Postdoctoral Fellowship program.



  1. Field Guide. Surveillance of acute flaccid paralysis. 3rd ed. Child Health Division, Department of Family Welfare, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi, September 2005 [cited 2012 Jun 28].
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Progress toward poliomyelitis eradication—India, January 2009–October 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:15815.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Global Polio Eradication Initiative [cited 2012 Mar 21].
  4. World Health Organization. Immunization and vaccine development. Polio eradication, VPD surveillance, 2011 [cited 2012 Mar 21].]
  5. National Polio Surveillance Project. A Government of India–WHO collaboration [cited 2012 Jun 8].
  6. Pallansch  M, Roos  R. Enteroviruses: polioviruses, coxsackieviruses, echoviruses, and newer enteroviruses. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, Griffin DE, Lamb RA, Martin MA, Roizman B, et al. Fields virology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007:839–93.
  7. Solomon  T, Willison  H. Infectious causes of acute flaccid paralysis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2003;16:37581. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Picornaviridae [cited 2012 Mar 21].
  9. Nix  WA, Oberste  MS, Pallansch  MA. Sensitive, seminested PCR amplification of VP1 sequences for direct identification of all enterovirus serotypes from original clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:2698704. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Oberste  MS, Maher  K, Flemister  MR. Comparison of classic and molecular approaches for the identification of untypeable enteroviruses. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:11704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dhole  TN, Ayyagari  A, Chowdhary  R, Shakya  AK, Shrivastav  N, Datta  T, Non-polio enteroviruses in acute flaccid paralysis children of India: vital assessment before polio eradication. J Paediatr Child Health. 2009;45:40913. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. World Health Organization. Polio laboratory manual. 4th ed. Geneva: The Organization; 2004.
  13. Tamura  K, Peterson  D, Peterson  N, Stecher  G, Nei  M, Kumar  S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:27319. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Khetsuriani  N, Lamonte-Fowlkes  A, Oberst  S, Pallansch  MA. Enterovirus surveillance—United States, 1970–2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006;55:120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nonpolio enterovirus and human parechovirus surveillance—United States, 2006–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:157780.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kapoor  A, Victoria  J, Simmonds  P, Slikas  E, Chieochansin  T, Naseem  A, A highly prevalent and genetically diversified Picornaviridae genus in south Asian children. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:204827. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Victoria  JG, Kapoor  A, Li  L, Blinkova  O, Slikas  B, Wang  C, Metagenomic analyses of viruses in stool samples from children with acute flaccid paralysis. J Virol. 2009;83:464251. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Blinkova  O, Kapoor  A, Victoria  J, Jones  M, Wolfe  N, Naeem  A, Cardioviruses are genetically diverse and cause common enteric infections in south Asian children. J Virol. 2009;83:463141. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Greninger  AL, Runckel  C, Chiu  CY, Haggerty  T, Parsonnet  J, Ganem  D, The complete genome of Klassevirus—a novel picornavirus in pediatric stool. Virol J. 2009;6:82. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Reuter  G, Boros  A, Pankovics  P. Kobuviruses-a comprehensive review. Rev Med Virol. 2011;21:3241. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. van der Sanden  S, Koopmans  M, Uslu  G, van der Avoort  H. Epidemiology of enterovirus 71 in the Netherlands, 1963 to 2008. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:282633. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. van der Sanden  S, van der Avoort  H, Lemey  P, Uslu  G, Koopmans  M. Evolutionary trajectory of the VP1 gene of human enterovirus 71 genogroup B and C viruses. J Gen Virol. 2010;91:194958. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yu  H, Chen  W, Chang  H, Tang  R, Zhao  J, Gan  L, Genetic analysis of the VP1 region of enterovirus 71 reveals the emergence of genotype A in central China in 2008. Virus Genes. 2010;41:14. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Avellón  A, Casas  I, Trallero  G, Pérez  C, Tenorio  A, Palacios  G. Molecular analysis of echovirus 13 isolates and aseptic meningitis, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:93441. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mullins  JA, Khetsuriani  N, Nix  WA, Oberste  MS, LaMonte  A, Kilpatrick  DR, Emergence of echovirus type 13 as a prominent enterovirus. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:707. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Iwai  M, Yoshida  H, Matsuura  K, Fujimoto  T, Shimizu  H, Takizawa  T, Molecular epidemiology of echoviruses 11 and 13, based on an environmental surveillance conducted in Toyoma Prefecture, 2002–2002. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:63817. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindberg  AM, Polacek  C. Molecular analysis of the prototype coxsackievirus B5 genome. Arch Virol. 2000;145:20521. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wikswo  ME, Khetsuriani  N, Fowlkes  AL, Zheng  X, Penaranda  S, Verma  N, Increased activity of coxsackievirus B1 strains associated with severe disease among young infants in the United States, 2007–2008. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:e4451. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Saeed  M, Zaidi  SZ, Naeem  A, Masroor  M, Masroor  M, Sharif  S, Epidemiology and clinical findings associated with enteroviral acute flaccid paralysis in Pakistan. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Oderinde  BS, Olabode  AO, Harry  TO, Baba  MM, Bukbuk  DN, Ogunmola  OO. Non-polio enteroviruses implicated in acute flaccid paralysis in northern Nigeria. Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 2007;2:258.
  31. Ortner  B, Huang  C-W, Schmid  D, Mutz  I, Wewalka  G, Allerberger  F, Epidemiology of enterovirus types causing neurological disease in Austria 1999–2007: detection of clusters of echovirus 30 and enterovirus 71 and analysis of prevalent genotypes. J Med Virol. 2009;81:31724. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Persu  A, Baicus  A, Stavri  S, Combiescu  M. Non-polio enteroviruses associated with acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) and facial paralysis (FP) cases in Romania, 2001–2008. Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol. 2009;68:206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bingjun  T, Yoshida  H, Yan  W, Lin  L, Tsuji  T, Shimizu  H, Molecular typing and epidemiology of non-polio enteroviruses isolated from Yunnan Province, the People’s Republic of China. J Med Virol. 2008;80:6709. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ooi  MH, Wong  SC, Lewthwaite  P, Cardosa  MJ, Solomon  T. Clinical features, diagnosis, and management of enterovirus 71. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:1097105. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee  TC, Guo  HR, Su  HJ, Yang  YC, Chang  HL, Chen  KT. Diseases caused by enterovirus 71 infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28:90410. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang  YF, Chou  CT, Lei  HY. A mouse-adapted anterovirus 71 strain causes neurological disease in mice after oral infection. J Virol. 2004;78:791624. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lin  TY, Twu  SJ, Ho  MS, Chang  LY, Lee  CY. Enterovirus 71 outbreaks, Taiwan: occurrence and recognition. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:2913. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu  Y, Yeo  A, Phoon  MC, Tan  EL, Poh  CL, Quak  SH, The largest outbreak of hand, foot and mouth disease in Singapore in 2008: the role of enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A strains. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:e107681. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. De  W, Changwen  K, Wei  L, Monaqin  C, Jin  Y, Conq  M, A large outbreak of hand, foot, and mouth disease caused by EV71 and CAV16 in Guangdong, China, 2009. Arch Virol. 2011;156:94553. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1811.111457

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

2Current affiliation: University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot, India.

Table of Contents – Volume 18, Number 11—November 2012

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

C. Durga Rao, Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: October 15, 2012
Page updated: October 15, 2012
Page reviewed: October 15, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.