Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 18, Number 2—February 2012

High Seroprevalence of Enterovirus Infections in Apes and Old World Monkeys

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Heli HarvalaComments to Author , Chloe L. McIntyre, Natsuko Imai, Lucy Clasper, Cyrille F. Djoko, Matthew LeBreton, Marion Vermeulen, Andrew Saville, Francisca Mutapi, Ubald Tamoufé, John Kiyang, Tafon G. Biblia, Nicholas Midzi, Takafira Mduluza, Jacques Pépin, Richard Njouom, Teemu Smura, Joseph N. Fair, Nathan D. Wolfe, Merja Roivainen, and Peter Simmonds

Author affiliations: Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland (H. Harvala); University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (H. Harvala, C.L. McIntyre, N. Imai, L. Clasper, F. Mutapi, P. Simmonds); Global Viral Forecasting Initiative, Yaoundé, Cameroon (C.F. Djoko, M. LeBreton, U. Tamoufé, J.N. Fair, N.D. Wolfe); Global Forcasting Initiatve, San Francisco, California, USA (C.F. Djoko, M. LeBreton, N.D. Wolfe); South African National Blood Service, Weltevreden Park, South Africa (M. Vermeulen, A. Saville); Limbe Wildlife Centre, Limbe, Cameroon (J. Kiyang); Ape Action Africa, Yaoundé, (T.G. Biblia); National Institute of Health Research, Harare, Zimbabwe (N. Midzi); University of Zimbabwe, Harare (T. Mduluza); Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (J. Pepin); Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, Yaoundé (R. Njouom); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland (T. Smura, M. Roivainen)

Cite This Article


To estimate population exposure of apes and Old World monkeys in Africa to enteroviruses (EVs), we conducted a seroepidemiologic study of serotype-specific neutralizing antibodies against 3 EV types. Detection of species A, B, and D EVs infecting wild chimpanzees demonstrates their potential widespread circulation in primates.

Enteroviruses (EVs) form a diverse genus in the virus family Picornaviridae. EVs that infect humans are divided genetically into 4 species (EV A–D), and each contains numerous antigenically distinct serotypes (1). Although EVs were originally classified by serologic analysis and pathogenic properties in laboratory animals, sequences from the viral capsid region provide an alternative method for classification (2). More recently, classified variants have been assigned as chronologically numbered EV types (currently to EV-C116).

EVs also naturally infect other mammalian species, although most are in separate species from those that infect humans. However, EVs isolated from Old World monkeys (OWMs) (principally Asian macaques) are grouped into species A and B; a separate simian species (SEV-A); or are unassigned (EV-108, SV6, and EV-103) (3).

Although EV isolates from OWMs have been extensively characterized, little attention has been paid to EVs that circulate in apes. We recently detected EV-A76 (species A) and a new EV type in species B and D (EV-B110 and EV-D111) that infect a wild population of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in Cameroon (3). Detection frequencies of 15% in fecal samples suggest that EV infections are relatively common in this species. We estimated population exposure of apes in Africa and OWM species to EVs.

The Study

To estimate population exposure of apes and OWM species in Africa to EVs, we conducted a seroepidemiologic study of serotype-specific neutralizing antibodies against 3 EV types. These seroprevalences were compared with seroprevalences in human populations in areas where primates also lived (Cameroon, Zimbabwe, and South Africa) and with those in control populations in Europe (United Kingdom and Finland). Ethical approval for the use of study samples was obtained from the University of Zimbabwe Institutional Review Board and the Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe; the Human Research Ethics Committee, South African National Blood Service; the ethics committees of the Cameroonian Ministry of Health; the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Canada; and Lothian Regional Ethics Committee, Edinburgh.

EV-D94 (E210), EV-A76 (KAZ00–14550) (4,5), and a clinical isolate of echovirus 11 from Edinburgh (E-11) were used for seroprevalence studies. Neutralization assays were performed in human rhabdomyosarcoma cells as described (6) with 1 minor change (inactivation at 56°C for 45 min). Serum specimens at 2 dilutions (1:16 and 1:64) were incubated with virus (one hundred 50% tissue culture infectious doses) in 96-well plates. Rhabdomyosarcoma cells were added to wells (≈2 × 105 cells/mL), and cultures were incubated at 37°C for <6 days. The highest dilution that completely inhibited viral replication was taken as the endpoint titer for the sample.

Plasma samples were collected from chimpanzees (P. troglodytes), gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla), and several OWMs (Table 1). Sample shipments complied with the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Samples were collected for veterinary welfare purposes from animals in 2 wildlife sanctuaries in Yaoundé and Limbe, Cameroon. Animals were primarily wild born and brought to sanctuaries after confiscation by authorities or abandonment by owners. Human samples were obtained from 3 sub-Saharan African populations and control groups in the United Kingdom and Finland (Table 2). None had identifiable compounding risk factors that influenced their exposure to EVs. Plasma was separated from anticoagulated blood by centrifugation and stored at −70°C until testing.

The study was designed to determine the extent to which a human EV serotype (E-11) could spread into nonhuman populations, and conversely, the extent to which EV-A76 (previously recovered from chimpanzees) circulated in human populations in areas where chimpanzees also lived (Cameroon), elsewhere in Africa in regions without apes, and in nonprimate-exposed control populations in Europe. Species D viruses are frequently isolated from chimpanzees and gorillas (3), and we selected EV-D94, isolated from populations in central Africa, as a representative of this species.


Thumbnail of Seroprevalence of neutralizing antibody (titers &gt;16) to echovirus 11 (E-11) and enteroviruses A76 (EV-A76) and D94 (EV-D94) in A) human populations and B) nonhuman primates.

Figure. Seroprevalence of neutralizing antibody (titers >16) to echovirus 11 (E-11) and enteroviruses A76 (EV-A76) and D94 (EV-D94) in A) human populations and B) nonhuman primates.

Chimpanzees and gorillas showed evidence (Figure) of extensive previous exposure to E-11 (58% and 72%) and EV-A76 (40% and 11%). Lower levels of antibodies were detected against EV-D94 (13% and 0%). Conversely, OWMs showed higher seroreactivity with EV-A76 (37%) than with E-11 (15%) and EV-D94 (2%), which demonstrated wide circulation of this virus among OWM species. Seven samples from mona monkeys accounted for half of E-11–positive samples, and EV-A76 antibodies were widely distributed in baboons, mandrills, and other species.

Contrasting patterns of EV exposure to the 3 EV types were observed in humans (Figure). High seroprevalences of E-11 and EV-D94 were observed in all human populations (53%–95% and 63%–85%), whereas seroreactivity to EV-A76 was largely confined to Cameroon (55%) and Zimbabwe (35%), and uniformly <6% elsewhere.


Serologic testing of nonhuman primate samples provided unequivocal evidence of exposure to all 3 serotypes. Although primate sampling was restricted to animals held in sanctuaries under veterinary supervision and infections may have been acquired in captivity from human or dietary sources, epidemiologic observations support the hypothesis that EV infections may also be acquired in the wild. Many sampled animals were adults on entry to sanctuaries, while analogous to human infections, and EV exposure is frequent during infancy or childhood. Also, EV infections in apes are widespread in the wild, and active infections are found in more than one sixth of animals screened (3).

Another factor determining whether EVs can be indigenous to a species or originate from repeated external (cross-species) transmission is host population size. Perpetuation of nonpersistent viruses requires minimum population sizes large enough to sustain chains of transmission, which is dependent on duration of infectivity, seasonality of infections, duration of immunity, generation time of the virus and host, rate of population turnover (7,8), and degree of fragmentation of populations. These parameters are difficult to estimate in nonhuman primates, although studies of isolated human communities show that population size needed for maintaining transmission of EVs may be large, e.g., poliovirus infections were not sustained among an Eskimo community of 450 persons (9). Therefore, chimpanzee and gorilla populations may be too small and fragmented to sustain EV infections. However, relatively long-term fecal excretion of EVs, the environmental stability of shed EVs, and contamination of nest sites may perpetuate infections within an established group.

In contrast to apes, the population size of several OWM species is large, and with higher population connectivity, turnover, and supply of susceptible animals, it may support indigenous circulation of EVs. Supporting this suggestion is genetic evidence that EVs isolated from OWMs in southern Asia and Africa group separately from most variants identified in humans elsewhere by phylogenetic analysis (10). EV variants in chimpanzees that matched OWM serotypes (e.g., EV-B110 most closely related to SA5, and EV-A76, EV-A89, and EV-A90 in the OWM species A group) (3; unpub. data) suggest that OWMs are a potential source of infection. Predation of the red colobus monkey by chimpanzees (11,12) may favor such cross-species transmissions, as documented in the genesis of simian immunodeficiency virusCPZ from OWM simian immunodeficiency viruses (13). Cross-species transmission from OWMs to apes is consistent with high seroprevalences of EV-A76 antibodies in apes, baboons, and other OWMs.

Overall, our serologic survey data and previous fecal sampling data (3) provide evidence for extensive circulation of EVs between primates and existence of human and OWM reservoirs of infection that may spill over into ape populations too small to maintain indigenous EV variants. Whether OWMs or apes represent a potential source of new EVs in humans (that may become pandemic in the absence of prior population exposure) is uncertain. However, the global outbreak of EV-D70 that originally centered on a cluster of human infections in central Africa (14,15) provides a potential example of this occurrence. Extensive past infection of a variety of EVs in apes and OWMs should lead to a reappraisal of the host range of what have been considered to be primarily human viruses and a potential source for the periodic emergence of new EV types into immunologically naive human populations.

Dr Harvala is specialist registrar at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh. Her research interest is enterovirus pathogenesis.



We thank the Cameroon Ministry of Forestry and Fauna, Limbe Wildlife Centre, Ape Action Africa, and the US Embassy in Cameroon for support; the Ministry of Health and Child Welfare in Zimbabwe; the Provincial Medical Director of Mashonaland East; and the environmental health workers, residents, teachers, and school children in Mutoko and Rusike for their cooperation; and members of the National Institutes for Health Research (Zimbabwe) for technical support.

This study was supported by the Wellcome Trust, UK (grant no. WT082028MA), and the Thrasher Foundation. Global viral forecasting is supported by, the Skoll Foundation, the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, the US Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center Division of Global Emerging Infections Surveillance Operations, and the US Agency for International Development Emerging Pandemics Threat Program (PREDICT Project) under Cooperative Agreement no. GHN-A-OO-09-00010-00. F.M. was supported by Medical Research Council UK (grant no G81/538). N.D.W. was supported by the National Institutes of Health Director’s Pioneer Award (DP1-OD000370),



  1. Stanway  G, Brown  F, Christian  P, Hovi  T, Hyypia  T, King  AM, Family Picornaviridae. In: Fauquet CM, Mayo MA, Maniloff J, Desselberger U, Ball LA, editors. Virus taxonomy. Eighth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. London: Elsevier/Academic Press; 2005. p. 757–78.
  2. Oberste  MS, Maher  K, Kilpatrick  DR, Pallansch  MA. Molecular evolution of the human enteroviruses: correlation of serotype with VP1 sequence and application to picornavirus classification. J Virol. 1999;73:19418.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Harvala  H, Sharp  CP, Ngole  EM, Delaporte  E, Peeters  M, Simmonds  P. Detection and genetic characterisation of enteroviruses circulating among wild populations of chimpanzees in Cameroon; relationship with human and simian enteroviruses. J Virol. 2011;85:44806. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Smura  TP, Junttila  N, Blomqvist  S, Norder  H, Kaijalainen  S, Paananen  A, Enterovirus 94, a proposed new serotype in human enterovirus species D. J Gen Virol. 2007;88:84958. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Smura  T, Blomqvist  S, Paananen  A, Vuorinen  T, Sobotova  Z, Bubovica  V, Enterovirus surveillance reveals proposed new serotypes and provides new insight into enterovirus 5′-untranslated region evolution. J Gen Virol. 2007;88:25206. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Smura  T, Ylipaasto  P, Klemola  P, Kaijalainen  S, Kyllonen  L, Sordi  V, Cellular tropism of human enterovirus D species serotypes EV-94, EV-70, and EV-68 in vitro: implications for pathogenesis. J Med Virol. 2010;82:19409. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yorke  JA, Nathanson  N, Pianigiani  G, Martin  J. Seasonality and the requirements for perpetuation and eradication of viruses in populations. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;109:10323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Nathanson  N. Virus perpetuation in populations: biological variables that determine persistence or eradication. Arch Virol Suppl. 2005:315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Paffenbarger  RS, Bodian  DH. Poliomyelitis immune status in ecologically diverse populations, in relation to virus spread, clinical incidence, and virus disappearance. Am J Hyg. 1961;74:31125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Oberste  MS, Maher  K, Michele  SM, Belliot  G, Uddin  M, Pallansch  MA. Enteroviruses 76, 89, 90 and 91 represent a novel group within the species human enterovirus A. J Gen Virol. 2005;86:44551. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Leendertz  SA, Locatelli  S, Boesch  C, Kucherer  C, Formenty  P, Liegeois  F, No evidence for transmission of SIVwrc from western red colobus monkeys (Piliocolobus badius badius) to wild west African chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) despite high exposure through hunting. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:24. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mitani  JC, Watts  DP. Demographic influences on the hunting behavior of chimpanzees. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1999;109:43954. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bailes  E, Gao  F, Bibollet-Ruche  F, Courgnaud  V, Peeters  M, Marx  PA, Hybrid origin of SIV in chimpanzees. Science. 2003;300:1713. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kono  R, Sasagawa  A, Ishii  K, Sugiura  S, Ochi  M. Pandemic of new type of conjunctivitis. Lancet. 1972;1:11914. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kew  OM, Nottay  BK, Hatch  MH, Hierholzer  JC, Obijeski  JF. Oligonucleotide fingerprint analysis of enterovirus 70 isolates from the 1980 to 1981 pandemic of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis: evidence for a close genetic relationship among Asian and American strains. Infect Immun. 1983;41:6315.PubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1802.111363

Table of Contents – Volume 18, Number 2—February 2012

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Heli Harvala, Virology Laboratory, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SU, Scotland

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: January 18, 2012
Page updated: March 13, 2012
Page reviewed: March 13, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.