Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 18, Number 7—July 2012
Dispatch

Changing Socioeconomic Indicators of Human Plague, New Mexico, USA

Anna M. Schotthoefer1Comments to Author , Rebecca J. Eisen, Kiersten J. Kugeler, Paul Ettestad, Pamela J. Reynolds, Ted Brown, Russell E. Enscore, James Cheek, Rudy Bueno, Joseph Targhetta, John A. Montenieri, and Kenneth L. Gage
Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (A.M. Schotthoefer, R.J. Eisen, K.J. Kugeler, R.E. Enscore, J.A. Montenieri, K.L. Gage); New Mexico Department of Health, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA (P. Ettestad, P.J. Reynolds [retired]); New Mexico Environment Department, Santa Fe (T. Brown [retired]); Indian Health Services, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA (J. Cheek); Harris County Public Health and Environmental Services, Houston, Texas, USA (R. Bueno, Jr.); and City of Albuquerque Division of Environmental Health, Albuquerque (J. Targhetta)

Main Article

Table 1

Characteristics of census block groups considered in analysis for human plague on the basis of 1980, 1990, and 2000 US Census data, New Mexico, USA*

Variable 1976–1985
1986–1995
1996–2007
Positive, n = 64 Negative, n = 405 Positive, n = 29 Negative, n = 430 Positive, n = 20 Negative, n = 434
Population density/km2 4.34 (11.54) 22.68 (264.48)† 8.31 (34.66) 23.46 (238.31) 13.70 (31.82) 25.96 (267.56)
Housing density/km2 1.46 (4.18) 8.38 (107.56)† 3.33 (12.57) 9.33 (95.91) 5.87 (12.13) 11.30 (107.09)
Poverty rate‡ 0.34 (0.23) 0.22 (0.23)§ 0.32 (0.42) 0.28 (0.23) 0.16 (0.18) 0.24 (0.24)¶
% Housing units
Vacant 12.0 (8.84) 10.8 (7.09) 14.0 (15.54) 14.5 (16.34) 8.4 (10.77) 10.7 (18.46)
Rural farms 2.1 (5.19) 1.3 (6.03)§ 0 (1.18) 0 (0.66) 0 (1.02) 0 (1.24)
Occupied, incomplete plumbing# 8.6 (15.93) 2.5 (6.22)† 7.5 (30.57) 2.3 (9.21)§ 1.5 (5.77) 1.1 (4.47)
Occupied mobile homes 16.2 (5.89) 15.5 (17.88) 17.4 (23.31) 23.7 (20.25) 17.1 (13.19) 18.4 (24.21)
Built before 1940 16.0 (14.98) 11.4 (16.92)§ 6.7 (16.81) 5.0 (15.67) 3.7 (10.38) 3.8 (11.72)
>40 y old 16.0 (14.98) 11.4 (16.92)§ 14.3 (20.38) 11.1 (22.71) 8.3 (22.42) 15.8 (25.83)
<5 y old 20.6 (11.06) 21.7 (19.65) 17.1 (21.42) 13.6 (13.97) 21.5 (15.43) 14.5 (14.86)§
Heated with wood fuel 18.5 (20.80) 6.8 (16.73)† 31.56 (34.65) 13.0 (31.99)† 16.9 (21.79) 6.8 (20.91)¶
Occupied by >6 persons 9.5 (6.28) 7.1 (4.89)§ 5.4 (11.97) 5.0 (6.90) 3.3 (4.48) 3.5 (5.94)
Household income** $28,477 ($11,544) $30,190 ($16,367)¶ $29,644 ($30,784) $28,822 ($16,775) $44,098 ($30,563) $31,323 ($18,541)§
Value of homes** $85,280 ($67,672) $95,791 ($78,706) $83,614 ($104,492) $80,237 ($75,854) $132,350 ($90,050) $84,300 ($90,400)¶
Year housing unit built NA NA 1972 (9) 1974 (11) 1987 (13) 1979 (11)§
% Census block group area
Ecotone habitat†† 2.8 (11.36) 0 (3.34)† 5.5 (13.44) 0 (4.33)† 10.7 (23.28) 0 (4.63)†
Water 0.60 (0.45) 0.56 (0.83) 0.60 (0.31) 0.56 (0.71) 0.43 (0.33) 0.58 (0.67)

*Values are medians (interquartile ranges) for plague-positive and negative census block groups in the respective time frames. Boldface indicates variables significantly different between positive and negative groups. NA, not available.
†p≤0.001, by Wilcoxon rank sum test.
‡Defined by the US Census Bureau as the proportion of the population living near or below the federal poverty line, which is based on household income adjusted for number of household members. The definition of the federal poverty line changed between the 1980 and 1990 censuses. Therefore, rates are not directly comparable across decennials.
§p≤0.01, by Wilcoxon rank sum test.
¶p≤0.05 by Wilcoxon rank sum test.
#Defined by the US Census Bureau as lacking >1 of the following: hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet, and a bathtub or shower. Values are not directly comparable among censuses. In 1980, a housing unit was considered to have complete plumbing only if plumbing fixtures were for exclusive for the residents of that unit. In 1990, the requirement of exclusive use was dropped.
**In US year 2000–adjusted dollars, rounded to the nearest dollar.
††Identified as the convergence of the Rocky Mountain/Great Basin open and closed coniferous woodland habitats by Eisen et al. (6).

Main Article

References
  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Summary of notifiable diseases—United States, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;58:1100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Human plague—four states, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55:9403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Craven  RB, Maupin  GO, Beard  ML, Quan  TJ, Barnes  AM. Reported cases of human plague infections in the United States, 1970–1991. J Med Entomol. 1993;30:75861.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gage  KL, Kosoy  MY. Natural history of plague: perspectives from more than a century of research. Annu Rev Entomol. 2005;50:50528. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kartman  L. Historical and oecological observations on plague in the United States. Trop Geogr Med. 1970;22:25775.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eisen  RJ, Reynolds  PJ, Ettestad  P, Brown  T, Enscore  RE, Biggerstaff  BJ, Residence-linked human plague in New Mexico: a habitat-suitability model. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77:1215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes  AM. Surveillance and control of bubonic plague in the united States. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London. 1981;50:237–70.
  8. Mann  JM, Martone  WJ, Boyce  JM, Kaufmann  AF, Barnes  AM, Weber  NS. Endemic human plague in New Mexico: risk factors associated with infection. J Infect Dis. 1979;140:397401. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kulldorff  M. A spatial scan statistic. Comm Statist Theory Methods. 1997;26:148196. DOIGoogle Scholar
  10. Kulldorff  M. Information Management Services, Inc., 2011. SaTScan™ v9.1.1: software for the spatial and space-time scan statistics [cited 2012 Apr 6]. www.satscan.org
  11. Enscore  RE, Biggerstaff  BJ, Brown  TL, Fulgham  RF, Reynolds  PJ, Engelthaler  DM, Modeling relationships between climate and the frequency of human plague cases in the southwestern United States, 1960–1997. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;66:18696.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Main Article

1Current affiliation: Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.

Page created: June 13, 2012
Page updated: June 13, 2012
Page reviewed: June 13, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external