Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 19, Number 11—November 2013
Dispatch

Increased Incidence of Campylobacter spp. Infection and High Rates among Children, Israel

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
24
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel (M. Weinberger); Tel Aviv University Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel (M. Weinberger, C. Peretz); Israel Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel (L. Lerman, L. Valinsky, I. Nissan, V. Agmon); Israel Ministry of Health Public Health Services, Jerusalem (J. Moran-Gilad)

Cite This Article

Abstract

During 1999–2010, the annual incidence of Campylobacter spp. infection in Israel increased from 31.04 to 90.99 cases/100,000 population, a yearly increase of 10.24%. Children <2 years of age were disproportionally affected; incidence in this age group (356.12 cases/100,000 population) was >26-fold higher than for the 30–<50 age group.

Campylobacter spp. have become the leading cause of foodborne infections in many industrialized countries, despite extensive control efforts (1). Recent studies suggest that Campylobacter spp. infection in Israel may also be on the rise (2), in contrast to a substantial decrease in the incidence of Salmonella spp. infection, from 86.9 cases/100,000 population in 1995 to 44.0 cases/100,000 population in 2009 (3). We examined recent trends of Campylobacter spp. infection in Israel, with a focus on age- and sex-specific rates of infection.

The Study

Campylobacteriosis is a reportable disease in Israel. Microbiology laboratories countrywide passively submit human isolates from all sources to the National Campylobacter Reference Laboratory, Israeli Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, for confirmatory testing. Species are identified by using standard methods (4). The reporting system and laboratory methods did not change during the study period of January 1, 1999–December 31, 2010.

For this study, patients’ date of birth and sex were retrieved using special permission by using identification numbers, which were subsequently replaced by unique numbers to retain patient anonymity. An infection episode was defined as the isolation of Campylobacter spp. from a single patient from any clinical source. Annual incidence rates for the study period were calculated by dividing the number of annual infection episodes by the population size retrieved from the Israeli Bureau of Statistics (5). The average age-specific annual incidence rate was calculated on the basis of the 12 annual incidence rates obtained for the study period. Because incidence counts and rates follow a Poisson distribution, Poisson regression models accounting for overdispersion were used to study annual trends of the incidence rate (dependent variable) for all isolates and for 2 major Campylobacter species, C. jejuni and C. coli; the calendar year was the independent variable. Poisson models were also used to study the effects of sex and age group on the incidence rates, adjusted for annual trends. All model effects were expressed by incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% CI. SAS software version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used for all analyses. The study was approved by the Assaf Harofeh Medical Center local ethics committee.

During the study period, the Campylobacter Reference Laboratory confirmed 47,253 episodes of Campylobacter spp. infection. Most (>99%) infections were C. jejuni (37,062 episodes, 78.43%) and C. coli (10,092 episodes, 21.36%); the remaining <1% were C. fetus (25 episodes), C. upsaliensis (6 episodes), C. lari (2 episodes), or unidentified species (66 episodes). Bacteremia was noted for 331 (0.7%) episodes.

During the 12 study years, the annual incidence rate of all laboratory-confirmed Campylobacter spp. infection episodes increased 2.93-fold, from 31.04 to 90.99 cases/100,000 population. A similar increase was observed for C. jejuni (2.87-fold, 24.59 to 70.54 cases/100,000) and C. coli (3.06-fold, 6.38 to 19.54 cases/100,000). The linear annual increase in the incidence rate for the entire study period was 10.24% (95% CI 8.46–12.06) for all episodes, 10.07% (95% CI 8.42–11.74) for C. jejuni episodes, and 10.73% (95% CI 8.19–13.33) for C. coli episodes. A sharp rise in the annual increase rate, from 8.22% (95% CI 4.88–11.68) to 18.97% (95% CI 12.95–25.31), was noted between 1999–2006 and 2007–2010 (period I and period II) (Table).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Annual incidence trends of laboratory-confirmed Campylobacter spp. infection, by species, Israel, 1999–2010.

Figure 1. . Annual incidence trends of laboratory-confirmed Campylobacter spp. infection, by species, Israel, 1999–2010.

Complete patient age and sex data were available for 38,092 (80.63%) of all infection episodes, including 29,931 (80.76%) C. jejuni infection episodes and 8,083 (80.09%) C. coli infection episodes. The annual incidence trends of Campylobacter spp. infection for the subgroup with complete demographic data were similar to those described for the entire group. Further age- and sex-related analyses were completed for episodes for which complete demographic data was available. IRR was 1.36 (95% CI 1.22–1.52) for male sex compared with female sex, adjusted for annual trends; similar elevated rates for male sex were found for C. jejuni (IRR 1.39, 95% CI 1.25–1.54) and C. coli (IRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10–1.50) and for the 2 study periods (Figure 1; Table).

The age-specific average annual incidence rate formed an asymmetric, U-shaped curve. The highest average annual incidence rate occurred during the first decade of life (135.44 cases/100,000 population), and more specifically, during the first and second years of life (363.39 and 348.80 cases/100,000 population, respectively). The lowest average annual incidence rate occurred in the fifth decade of life (12.82 cases/100,000 population), with a slight increase toward the eighth decade of life (26.44 cases/100,000 population).

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Annual incidence trends of laboratory-confirmed Campylobacter infection, by 6 age groups, with (A) and without (B) the very young age group (0–&lt;2 y), Israel, 1999–2010.

Figure 2. . Annual incidence trends of laboratory-confirmed Campylobacter infection, by 6 age groups, with (A) and without (B) the very young age group (0–<2 y), Israel, 1999–2010.

Six age groups were established for comparison of incidence rates; the age group of 30–<50 years was used as reference. The average annual incidence rate of infection in age group 0–<2 years (356.12 cases/100,000 population) was 26.27 (95% CI 18.70–36.99) times higher than for the reference group (13.63 cases/100,000 population), adjusted for annual trends. Differences in incidence between the other age groups and the reference age groupwere smaller, ranging from an IRR of 1.42 (95% CI 0.92–2.20) for the 50–<70-year group to an IRR of 5.50 (95% CI 3.91–7.75) for the 2–<10-year age group. Similar IRRs for the respective age groups were found for infection caused by the 2 major Campylobacter species and throughout the study periods (Figure 2; Table).

Conclusions

We found a sharp increase in the incidence of Campylobacter spp. infection in Israel, with rates tripling within just 12 years. This trend was observed for the 2 major Campylobacter species, C. jejuni and C. coli, and affected all age groups; the highest infection rates were seen during the first 2 years of life. Infection rates were substantially higher among children <2 years of age compared with rates for other Western countries (6,7) but were comparable to that reported for New Zealand (8). The difference in incidence between this and the other age groups, forming a U-shaped curve, is more characteristic of rates for developing countries and is believed to be indicative of repeated exposure to Campylobacter spp. in early childhood that results in the acquisition of protective immunity at older age (9). Similar trends have also been described for defined subpopulations in the United Kingdom (10).

The global disproportional burden of campylobacteriosis among young children is far from being understood (11). A recent study could not show increased exposure to known risk factors in young children compared with other age groups (12). Increased susceptibility because of immature immune systems, environmental contamination, cross-contamination in the kitchen, hand-to-mouth behavior, and overreporting have all been implicated.

The rapid increase and high incidence of campylobacteriosis in Israel resemble that of New Zealand (13). A food source of Campylobacter spp. infection in Israel has not been elucidated; however, during the study period, poultry meat sales markedly transitioned from mainly frozen to mainly fresh or chilled products (S. Dolev, pers. comm.). Similar trends were implicated for the rising incidence in New Zealand and were successfully mitigated by supervising fresh poultry sales (13). However, toddlers who do not consume poultry had the highest incidence of Campylobacter spp. infection for both countries (8).

Our study was conducted using a large and comprehensive national database of laboratory-confirmed Campylobacter spp. infections that has a high rate of species characterization. However, laboratory-confirmed infections represent only a small portion of diarrheal diseases (14,15). Moreover, young children may be more likely to receive medical care and have stool cultured (14,15).

In conclusion, the rapid increase in Campylobacter spp. incidence in Israel illustrates the need for an urgent national intervention plan. In particular, high infection rates among young children should prompt intensive research efforts to discover the routes of exposure.

Dr Weinberger is the head of the Infectious Diseases Unit at Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel and a senior lecturer at the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Her primary research interest is the epidemiology of zoonotic infections, with a focus on foodborne infections.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Sergio Dolev for his comments regarding poultry meat sale trends in Israel.

Top

References

  1. European Food Safety Authority European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2011. EFSA Journal. 2013;11:3129 [cited 2013 Aug 20]. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/3129.pdf
  2. Stein-Zamir  C, Shoob  H, Abramson  N, Zentner  G, Agmon  V. The changing panorama of bacterial enteric infections. Epidemiol Infect. 2009;137:15317. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gal-Mor  O, Valinsky  L, Weinberger  M, Guy  S, Jaffe  J, Schorr  YI, Multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis, Israel. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:17547. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fitzgerald  C, Nachamkin  I. Diagnosis and antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter species. In: Fitzgerald C, Whichard J, Nachamkin I, editors. Campylobacter. 3rd ed. Washington (DC): ASM Press; 2008. p. 227–43.
  5. Statistical Abstracts of Israel Central Bureau of Statistics the State of Israel [cited 2013 June 27]. http://www1.cbs.gov.il/reader/shnatonenew_site.htm
  6. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual epidemiological report 2012. Reporting on 2010 surveillance data and 2011 epidemic intelligence data. Stockholm: The Centre; 2013 [cited 2013 Aug 20]. http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/publications/annual-epidemiological-report-2012.pdf
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet): FoodNet surveillance report for 2011 (final report). Atlanta: The Centers; 2012 [cited 2013 Aug 20]. http://www.cdc.gov/foodnet/PDFs/2011_annual_report_508c.pdf
  8. Nelson  W, Harris  B. Campylobacteriosis rates show age-related static bimodal and seasonality trends. N Z Med J. 2011;124:339 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Miller  G, Dunn  GM, Reid  TM, Ogden  ID, Strachan  NJ. Does age acquired immunity confer selective protection to common serotypes of Campylobacter jejuni? BMC Infect Dis. 2005;5:66 and. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Manaseki  S, Hawker  J, Ali  S. Ethnic inequalities in campylobacter infection in Birmingham, UK: descriptive study of notified cases. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:2789. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Marcus  R. New information about pediatric foodborne infections: the view from FoodNet. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008;20:7984. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. MacRitchie  LA, Hunter  CJ, Strachan  NJ. A population-based exposure assessment of risk factors associated with gastrointestinal pathogens: a Campylobacter study. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141:97686. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sears  A, Baker  MG, Wilson  N, Marshall  J, Muellner  P, Campbell  DM, Marked campylobacteriosis decline after interventions aimed at poultry, New Zealand. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:100715. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Scallan  E, Mahon  BE, Hoekstra  RM, Griffin  PM. Estimates of illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths caused by major bacterial enteric pathogens in young children in the United States. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32:21721 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ziv  T, Heymann  AD, Azuri  J, Leshno  M, Cohen  D. Assessment of the underestimation of childhood diarrhoeal disease burden in Israel. Epidemiol Infect. 2011;139:137987. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1911.120900

Table of Contents – Volume 19, Number 11—November 2013

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Miriam Weinberger, Infectious Diseases Unit, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin 70300, Israel

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: October 31, 2013
Page updated: October 31, 2013
Page reviewed: October 31, 2013
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external