Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 19, Number 11—November 2013

Pseudorabies Virus Variant in Bartha-K61–Vaccinated Pigs, China, 2012

Tong-Qing An1, Jin-Mei Peng1, Zhi-Jun Tian1, Hong-Yuan Zhao, Na Li, Yi-Min Liu, Jia-Zeng Chen, Chao-Liang Leng, Yan Sun, Dan Chang, and Guang-Zhi TongComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China (T.-Q. An, J.-M. Peng, H.-Y. Zhao, N. Li, Y.-M. Liu, J.-Z. Chen, C.-L. Leng, Y. Sun, D. Chang, Z.-J. Tian, G.-Z. Tong); Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China (G.-Z. Tong)

Cite This Article


The widely used pseudorabies virus (PRV) Bartha-K61 vaccine has played a key role in the eradication of PRV. Since late 2011, however, a disease characterized by neurologic symptoms and a high number of deaths among newborn piglets has occurred among Bartha-K61–vaccinated pigs on many farms in China. Clinical samples from pigs on 15 farms in 6 provinces were examined. The PRV gE gene was detectable by PCR in all samples, and sequence analysis of the gE gene showed that all isolates belonged to a relatively independent cluster and contained 2 amino acid insertions. A PRV (named HeN1) was isolated and caused transitional fever in pigs. In protection assays, Bartha-K61 vaccine provided 100% protection against lethal challenge with SC (a classical PRV) but only 50% protection against 4 challenges with strain HeN1. The findings suggest that Bartha-K61 vaccine does not provide effective protection against PRV HeN1 infection.

Pseudorabies virus (PRV; family Herpesviridae, subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae, genus Varicellovirus) contains a double-stranded DNA genome with strong genetic stability. The virus has a broad host range and can infect most mammals and some avian species (1). Pigs are the natural reservoir for PRV; infection in adult pigs is called Aujeszky disease. Swine farmers with PRV-infected pigs can incur substantial economic costs from reproductive losses in sows and from weight loss in infected adults (2). PRV is especially prominent in regions of South America, Asia, and Europe with dense swine populations. There have been no reports of PRV in Norway, Finland, or Malta, and the disease has been eradicated from domestic pig populations in Germany, Austria, Sweden, Denmark, the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States (3).

The swine industry worldwide has effectively used vaccines to control pseudorabies for >30 years; cases of the disease are now rarely reported from pig farms (47). Among the vaccines, Bartha-K61 is widely used and has played a key role in the eradication of pseudorabies. This vaccine is an attenuated strain of PRV produced by extensive in vitro passage and contains a well-characterized deletion of several viral proteins (i.e., complete gE and US9, partial gI and US2) that attenuates virulence (810). Thus, the gE ELISA is used for the differential diagnosis of infection with field PRV strains or vaccine strain in pigs.

In China, the first report of a PRV outbreak occurred in the 1950s, and the Bartha-K61 vaccine was imported from Hungary to China in the 1970s (11). From the 1990s until late 2011, >80% of pigs in China were vaccinated with the Bartha-K61 vaccine, and pseudorabies was well controlled (12). However, beginning in late 2011, pseudorabies has occurred on many large pig farms in animals that have been vaccinated with Bartha-K61 vaccine; during the first month of these outbreaks, 50% of samples were positive for pseudorabies gE antibody. The disease is characterized by stillbirth or the birth of weak piglets with neurologic symptoms that ultimately lead to death. The onset of clinical signs in 2- to 3-day-old piglets is sudden, spanning 5 hours from onset to death. The disease in piglets is characterized by shivering and opisthotonos, and 10%–50% of infected piglets die. Since the initial outbreak in late 2011, the disease has occurred in 6 provinces in China with extensive pig-raising industries and caused many piglet deaths and great economic loss (13).

The PRV Bartha-K61 vaccine is widely used to protect pigs against pseudorabies; there has been no reported resistance to the vaccine. In 2012, to determine the cause of recent PRV outbreaks among Bartha-K61–vaccinated pigs, we obtained clinical samples from piglets with suspected pseudorabies. A breakthrough PRV was isolated from the samples, and we identified the pathogenicity and immunologic protection of the novel isolate.

Materials and Methods

In 2012, we collected brain tissue from 154 dead piglets with suspected pseudorabies. The piglets were from 15 farms located in 6 provinces of China: Henan, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Inner Mongolia, and Jiangsu Provinces. All of the farms used PRV Bartha-K61 vaccine to protect their pigs against pseudorabies.

Cells, Vaccine, and Challenge Virus

Vero cells were used for virus propagation and titration in Dulbecco Modified Eagle Medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 100 IU/mL penicillin. PRV Bartha-K61 vaccine with a virus titer of 105.5 50% tissue culture infectious doses (TCID50)/dose was purchased from Harbin Weike Biotechnology Development Co. (Harbin, China). According to the quality standards for this vaccine (14), the virus titer of qualified product is >5,000 TCID50/dose. PRV SC strain, which is highly pathogenic to sheep and pigs (4), was isolated in 1980 and has been maintained in our laboratory. This strain has been used as a challenge virus to test the effectiveness of Bartha-K61 vaccine in China from the time the vaccine was first licensed in this country (14).

Viral Genome Extraction and PCR

DNA extraction was performed as described (15). The sense primer used for PCR was 5′-ATGCGGCCCTTTCTG-3′, and the reverse primer was 5′-CGGTTCTCCCGGTATTTAAGC-3′. The thermal profile used for PCR was 95°C for 4 min; followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 65°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min; and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. This generated the complete sequence of the PRV gE gene (previously US8) and the flanking regions of gI (previously US7), and US9. The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide for visualization using an ultraviolet transilluminator (MiniLumi; DNR Bio-Imaging Systems Ltd., Kibutz Maale HaHamisha, Israel).

Virus Isolation

PRV PCR–positive brain tissue homogenates were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was passed through a 0.45-μm filter and transferred to Vero cell monolayers. The cells were incubated at 37°C and examined daily for cytopathic effect (CPE). After the appearance of CPE, cells were collected and stored at −20°C, and a novel PRV was chosen for further investigation; we named the isolate HeN1. After 3 freeze-thaw cycles, PRV was cultured in Vero cells. The fifth passage of PRV was negatively stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid, and we examined the virus particle morphology by using a transmission electron microscope (H-7650; Hitachi High-Technologies Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

Phylogenetic Analyses

Sixteen of the positive PCR products selected from different farms or collection times were cloned into the pMD18-T vector, and the insert was sequenced in both directions. We analyzed sequence data as described (16) and compared the complete sequences of the gE gene with all PRV gE sequences available in the GenBank database (Table 1). We used Lasergene sequence analysis software (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA) to perform multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic analyses.

Experimental PRV Inoculation of Pigs

Six 3-month-old specific pathogen–free Bama miniature pigs were obtained from the Experimental Animal Center at the Veterinary Research Institute (Harbin, China). All pigs were confirmed to be free of PRV infection by using a gE ELISA kit (HerdChek PRV; IDEXX Laboratories, Westbrook, ME, USA) for PRV antibody detection and by using PCR. The animals were also determined to be free of porcine circovirus type 2, classical swine fever virus, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, and swine influenza virus infections by using serologic methods or reverse transcription PCR or PCR as described (17,18).

The pigs were randomly assigned to 2 rooms and kept under Biosafety Level 2 conditions throughout the experiment. Five of the 6 pigs were in the test group (pigs 011–015); these pigs were injected intramuscularly with a 1-mL inoculum containing 1×107.0 TCID50 of PRV strain HeN1. The sixth pig was used as a control and injected intramuscularly with 1 mL of Vero cell culture supernatant. Clinical symptoms were checked daily throughout the study, and rectal temperatures were recorded daily before feeding. We used the HerdChek PRV gE ELISA kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions to analyze PRV-specific antibodies in serum samples collected 0, 2, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 days after inoculation. All animals were euthanized on postinoculation day 35. Tissue samples were obtained from the brains, lungs, hearts, testicles, and lymphoid nodes (mandibular, mesenteric, and superficial inguinal) for virus detection by PCR or virus isolation and for histopathologic examination.

Virus Neutralization Assay

We intramuscularly inoculated 5 PRV-free piglets with 105.5TCID50 Bartha-K61 vaccine. Blood samples were collected weekly from each animal, and antisera were individually prepared and stored at −80°C until used. The virus neutralization assay was performed as described (4). All sera were heat-inactivated for 30 min at 56°C before testing. The assays were performed by mixing PRV SC and HeN1 strains, respectively, with 50 μL of serially diluted antiserum and 100 TCID50 Bartha-K61 vaccine. Antiserum titers were expressed as the highest dilution that reduced the viral CPE by 50% relative to non-neutralized controls. All samples were analyzed in duplicate, and the results shown are the average of the duplicate assays.

Experimental PRV Inoculation of Sheep

Sheep are commonly used to examine the efficacy of Bartha-K61 vaccine in China. The experimental design, immune dose, and viral challenge level used were in accordance with China’s quality standards for veterinary biological products (14). Fourteen 18-month-old sheep were obtained from a farm determined, by PCR and gE ELISA (HerdChek PRV), to be free from PRV infection. Sheep were randomly assigned to 4 isolation rooms. Each sheep in Groups 1 and 3 was injected intramuscularly with 105.0 TCID50 Bartha-K61 vaccine. Sheep in Groups 2 and 4 were not vaccinated. After continuous observation for 14 days, the sheep in Groups 1 and 2 were each challenged with 1,000 50% lethal doses (LD50) of PRV SC strain, and sheep in Groups 3 and 4 were challenged with 1,000 LD50 of HeN1 strain. The LD50 was titrated according to quality standards (14). According to the quality standards of Bartha-K61 vaccine, at least 2 sheep in the control group would become ill with pseudorabies and die, and all of the vaccinated sheep would be protected against infection.


PCR Survey of Clinical Samples

PRV was detected by PCR in 88 (57.1%) of the 154 clinical samples tested. At least 1 sample from each of the 15 farms examined was positive (Table 2), suggesting that wild-type PRV infection is prevalent in China.

PRV Isolation

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Cytopathic effect and morphology of pseudorabies virus strain HeN1. A) Uninfected control Vero cells. B) Pseudorabies virus–infected Vero cells. A) and B) Original magnification ×200. The cytopathic effect, which was characterized by reticulated cells, was observed 48 h after inoculation. Spherical virus particles without (C) or with (D) viral envelope were observed by electron microscopy.

Figure 1. . Cytopathic effect and morphology of pseudorabies virus strain HeN1. A) Uninfected control Vero cells. B) Pseudorabies virus–infected Vero cells. A) and B) Original magnification ×200. The cytopathic effect, which was...

Positive brain tissue homogenate was filtered to remove bacteria and then inoculated onto Vero cells. CPE was characterized by the appearance of reticulated cells at 48 h (Figure 1). RNA and DNA extracted from the cell cultures were tested by reverse transcription PCR or PCR and were PRV positive but negative for classical swine fever virus and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome. The HeN1 isolate was examined by electron microscopy, and spherical viral particles with or without viral envelope were observed (Figure 1).

Phylogenetic Analysis

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic analysis and comparison, based on gE amino acid sequences, of pseudorabies virus (PRV) isolates. An unrooted tree was constructed from the aligned amino acid sequences of 39 PRV isolates. Black diamonds indicate 16 PRV isolates from China that were collected in 2012; these isolates belong to a relatively independent branch in the phylogenetic tree (A) and possess 2 aspartic acid (Asp, D) insertions (positions 48 and 492–495), which are highlighted in yellow (B).

Figure 2. . Phylogenetic analysis and comparison, based on gE amino acid sequences, of pseudorabies virus (PRV) isolates. An unrooted tree was constructed from the aligned amino acid sequences of 39 PRV isolates....

The complete gE genes of 16 isolates collected in 2012 from pig clinical samples were sequenced; each was 1,740 bp. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the sequences of all 16 isolates clustered to a relatively independent region of the tree; this region was relatively distant from previously isolated strains of PRV (Figure 2, panel A). The PRV isolates shared 98.6%–99.8% aa and 95.0%–99.6% nt identity with previously isolated PRVs. Compared with Kaplan and Becker strains, these 16 isolates contained 2 aa insertions. Aspartate amino acid residues were inserted at positions 48 and 492–495, where the 2012 isolates contained 5 continuous residues and earlier isolates contained 4 continuous residues (Figure 2, panel B). Although amino acid insertion was also observed in a few early Chinese PRV isolates, the insertion in the new 2012 isolates was highly conserved.

PRV HeN1–Inoculated, Bartha-K61–Vaccinated Pigs

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Rectal temperatures and gE antibody levels of Bartha-K61–vaccinated pigs inoculated with pseudorabies virus strain HeN1. A) Rectal temperatures >40.5°C were defined as fever and typically occurred 2–6 days after inoculation. B) Pseudorabies virus gE–specific antibody development was monitored by use of a gE ELISA and reported as blocking ratios; a ratio <0.6 was considered positive.

Figure 3. . Rectal temperatures and gE antibody levels of Bartha-K61–vaccinated pigs inoculated with pseudorabies virus strain HeN1. A) Rectal temperatures >40.5°C were defined as fever and typically occurred 2–6 days after inoculation....

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Brain tissue of an unvaccinated control pig (A) and pig inoculated with pseudorabies virus strain HeN1 (B). Arrows indicate lymphocyte infiltration around the small blood vessels in the brain cortex. Original magnification ×100.

Figure 4. . Brain tissue of an unvaccinated control pig (A) and pig inoculated with pseudorabies virus strain HeN1 (B). Arrows indicate lymphocyte infiltration around the small blood vessels in the brain cortex....

Fever (rectal temperature <41.0°C, reference temperature 39.0°C–39.5°C) developed in HeN1 PRV-inoculated pigs 2–6 days after challenge; temperatures returned to normal 7 days after inoculation and remained normal until the end of the experiment (Figure 3). Four to 6 days after challenge, loss of appetite was observed in the pigs; appetites subsequently returned to normal 6–7 days after inoculation without any other clinical symptoms. PRV gE antibodies were detected in serum samples for all pigs 5–7 days after inoculation (Figure 3). Pathologic examination showed brain hemorrhage in all infected pigs (Figure 4); noteworthy damage did not occur in other organs. In the brain, the histopathologic changes were characterized by local bleeding of the meninges, chronic meningitis, and lymphocyte infiltration around the small blood vessels of the brain cortex. PRV HeN1 was not detectable in serum samples by PCR or virus isolation, but it was detectable in all brains and most testicles by PCR (Table 3).

Virus Neutralization Assay

Figure 5

Thumbnail of Neutralizing ability of antisera generated against pseudorabies Bartha-K61 vaccine to block wild pseudorabies virus strain infection. The neutralization titer to Bartha-K61 was 20- to 40-fold; the neutralization titers to pseudorabies virus SC and HeN1 strains were 10- to 15-fold and 10-fold, respectively. The virus neutralization assay was performed with antiserum from 5 individual piglets; error bars represent the standard deviation of the 5 experiments.

Figure 5. . Neutralizing ability of antisera generated against pseudorabies Bartha-K61 vaccine to block wild pseudorabies virus strain infection. The neutralization titer to Bartha-K61 was 20- to 40-fold; the neutralization titers to pseudorabies...

At different times, we collected antiserum samples from PRV Bartha-K61–vaccinated pigs and measured the virus neutralization capacity against Bartha-K61, SC, and HeN1 PRV strains. The virus neutralization titer of antisera to Bartha-K61 was typically 20- to 40-fold. The capacity of neutralizing heterologous PRVs was lower, and the virus neutralization titer of antisera was 10- to 15-fold against SC strain and 10-fold against the novel HeN1 strain (Figure 5).

Immunologic Protection in Sheep

To determine the protective effect of Bartha-K61 vaccine strain against PRV HeN1 challenge, we vaccinated sheep, challenged them with PRV strain HeN1 or SC, and then continuously observed them for 14 days. The control (unvaccinated) sheep challenged with HeN1 or SC strain all showed signs of disease and died. The vaccinated sheep challenged with SC strain did not show signs of disease; thus, the Bartha-K61 vaccine was confirmed to be of acceptable quality. However, 2 of 4 Bartha-K61–vaccinated sheep challenged with PRV HeN1 strain showed signs of disease and died; thus, the protection ratio was 50% (Table 4). These data suggest that the Bartha-K61 vaccine does not provide effective protection against infection with PRV strain HeN1.


Pigs are the reservoir host for PRV. Nonpregnant adult pigs do not show obvious clinical signs and symptoms of infection, except for weight loss; however, among pregnant sows, the disease causes stillbirths and the birth of weak piglets with neurologic symptoms that lead to death. Newborn piglets are difficult to rear without sows, and they are not suitable for testing the pathogenicity of PRV or immunity to PRV. However, sheep of all ages are highly susceptible to PRV, even with low-dose infections, and they have high death rates from the disease. Typical symptoms observed in PRV-infected sheep are itching, constantly rising and falling head, convulsions, salivation, and difficulty with breathing; up to 100% of infected sheep die (4). Thus, in China, sheep are typically used for determining the efficacy of Bartha-K61 vaccine in quality standards for veterinary biologic products (14). In addition, lethal challenge with 1,000 LD50 PRV SC strain has also been documented in these quality standards.

The findings in this study showed that sheep vaccinated with Bartha-K61 vaccine were protected from a lethal challenge with PRV SC strain, proving that the vaccine was effective. However, only half of the sheep vaccinated with Bartha-K61 vaccine survived challenge with the novel HeN1 strain, suggesting that the vaccine does not provide full protection against this PRV strain. In China, PRV Bartha-K61 vaccine has been widely applied in the field for ≈30 years, and is recognized as an excellent vaccine strain. Nevertheless, since late 2011, cases of pseudorabies have occurred on many farms, and the disease has gradually become widespread in China. Animals on the affected farms had been vaccinated according to normal procedures with PRV Bartha-K61 vaccine. Brain tissue was collected from dead piglets with suspected pseudorabies on 15 pig farms in 6 China provinces and tested for the presence of PRV by PCR and virus isolation. Wild PRV was present in all 15 samples, and gE gene sequencing showed the isolates to be phylogenetically distant from previously characterized PRV isolates.

Newborn piglets infected with virulent PRV occasionally show diarrhea, neurologic signs, and a higher risk for death, all of which can lead to a misdiagnosis of highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome, classical swine fever, or pig epidemic diarrhea. Viremia is not evident in PRV-infected pigs (19), and our results showed that PRV was found at a considerably higher rate in brain tissue than in blood; thus, brain tissue is likely to be the most reliable clinical sample for diagnosing PRV infection.

PRV antibody can be detected in sheep after vaccination. However, protection against PRV challenge is not closely related to the level of antibody because the virus is nonviremic and spreads predominantly by mucosal infection and neuronal innervation (19). Results of a microneutralization assay suggested that serum generated by pigs vaccinated with Bartha-K61 vaccine had neutralizing ability; however, this neutralizing ability was substantially decreased for currently circulating virulent PRV strains. Moreover, there was no correlation between the neutralizing antibody titer and protection rate, so evaluation of vaccine efficacy should not be judged purely by the levels of neutralizing antibodies. Thus, the protective immune response afforded by existing vaccine strains against the currently circulating, virulent PRV HeN1 isolate remains to be elucidated.

The control and prevention of pseudorabies requires depopulation of infected animals, zoning for restricted movement of commercial animals, and improved strategies for detecting PRV infection and vaccinating against the disease (3). Vaccination and DIVA (differentiating infected from vaccinated animals) form the basis of control and prevention (20). In some European Union countries, the disease has been well controlled or eradicated by using a gE-deleted vaccine along with gE ELISA for the differential diagnosis of infection with field PRV or the vaccine strain in pigs (21,22). In China, the epidemiologic surveillance of PRV has been strengthened, PRV-positive pigs are being separated from noninfected pigs, and PRV-free pig farms have been advised to vaccinate their animals. In addition, research on the pathogenicity of PRV is ongoing in China, and a new effective vaccine is also in development in China.

Dr An is an associate professor at the State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Veterinary Research Institute, in Harbin, China. His research interests focus on the epidemiology and molecular biology of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and pseudorabies virus.



This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31270045) and the National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 plan) (grant no. 2011AA10A208).



  1. Klupp  BG, Lomniczi  B, Visser  N, Fuchs  W, Mettenleiter  TC. Mutations affecting the UL21 gene contribute to avirulence of pseudorabies virus vaccine strain Bartha. Virology. 1995;212:46673 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Pomeranz  LE, Reynolds  AE, Hengartner  CJ. Molecular biology of pseudorabies virus: impact on neurovirology and veterinary medicine. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2005;69:462500 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ketusing  N, Reeves  A, Portacci  K, Yano  T, Olea-Popelka  F, Keefe  T, Evaluation of strategies for the eradication of pseudorabies virus (Aujeszky's disease) in commercial swine farms in Chiang-Mai and Lampoon Provinces, Thailand, using a simulation disease spread model. Transbound Emerg Dis. Epub 2012 Oct 3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Yuan  QZ, Li  ZR, Nan  X, Wu  YX, Li  YX. Isolation and identification of pseudorabies virus [in Chinese]. Chin J Prev Vet Med. 1987;3:101.
  5. Chen  HX, Fang  LR, He  QG, Jin  ML, Suo  XF, Wu  MZ. Study on the isolation and identification of the Ea strain of pseudorabies virus. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica. 1998;29:97104.
  6. Fan  WX, Hu  JD, Wu  JQ, Yuan  XF, Zhang  Z, Liu  WQ, Isolation and identification of LA strain of pseudorabies virus [in Chinese]. Chin J Prev Vet Med. 2003;23:53840.
  7. Mettenleiter  TC, Keil  GM, Fuchs  W. Molecular biology of animal herpesviruses. In: Mettenleiter TC, Sobrino F, eds. Animal viruses: molecular biology. Norfolk (United Kingdom): Caister Academic Press; 2008. p. 531.
  8. Petrovskis  EA, Timmins  JG, Gierman  TM, Post  LE. Deletions in vaccine strains of pseudorabies virus and their effect on synthesis of glycoprotein gp63. J Virol. 1986;60:11669 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lomniczi  B, Blan-Kenship  ML, Ben-Porat  TT. Deletions in the genomes of pseudorabies virus vaccine strains and existence of four isomers of the genomes. J Virol. 1984;49:9709 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lomniczi  B, Watanabe  S, Ben-Porat  T, Kaplan  AS. Genome location and identification of functions defective in the Bartha vaccine strain of pseudorabies virus. J Virol. 1987;61:796801 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yuan  QZ, Wu  YX, Li  YX, Li  ZR, Nan  X. The pseudorabies vaccination research. I: pseudorabies attenuated vaccine research [in Chinese]. Chin J Prev Vet Med. 1983;1:16.
  12. Tong  GZ, Chen  HC. Pseudorabies epidemic status and control measures in China [in Chinese]. Chin J Vet Sci. 1999;19:12.
  13. Peng  JM, An  TQ, Zhao  HY, Liu  YM, Chen  JZ, Leng  CL, Identification and antigenic variation of new epidemiology of pseudorabies virus from swine [in Chinese]. Chin J Prev Vet Med. 2013;35:14.
  14. Chinese Ministry of Agriculture. Quality standards for veterinary biological products of People’s Republic of China [in Chinese]. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Press; 2001. p. 84–5.
  15. Sui  X, Yin  J, Ren  X. Antiviral effect of diammonium glycyrrhizinate and lithium chloride on cell infection by pseudorabies herpesvirus. Antiviral Res. 2010;85:34653 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. An  TQ, Zhou  YJ, Liu  GQ, Tian  ZJ, Li  J, Qiu  HJ, Genetic diversity and phylogenetic analysis of glycoprotein 5 of PRRSV isolates in mainland China from 1996 to 2006: coexistence of two NA-subgenotypes with great diversity. Vet Microbiol. 2007;123:4352 and. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tong  GZ, Zhou  YJ, Hao  XF, Tian  ZJ, Qiu  HJ, Peng  JM, Identification and molecular epidemiology of the very virulent porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses emerged in China [in Chinese]. Chin J Prev Vet Med. 2007;29:3237.
  18. Peng  JM, Wang  Y, Tian  ZJ, Zhou  YJ, Chen  J, An  TQ, Construction of a recombinant pseudorabies virus with BAC plasmid insertion in the TK gene [in Chinese]. Chin J Prev Vet Med. 2009;31:105.
  19. Szpara  ML, Tafuri  YR, Parsons  L, Shamim  SR, Verstrepen  KJ, Legendre  M, A wide extent of inter-strain diversity in virulent and vaccine strains of alphaherpesviruses. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002282 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pasick  J. Application of DIVA vaccines and their companion diagnostic tests to foreign animal disease eradication. Anim Health Res Rev. 2004;5:25762 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Müller  T, Bätza  HJ, Schlüter  H, Conraths  FJ, Mettenleiter  TC. Eradication of Aujeszky's disease in Germany. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2003;50:20713 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Komáromi  M, Szabó  I. Eradication of Aujeszky's disease from a large-scale pig farm. Acta Vet Hung. 2005;53:51524 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1911.130177

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 19, Number 11—November 2013

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Guang-Zhi Tong, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, CAAS No. 518, Ziyue Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai 200241, China

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: October 31, 2013
Page updated: October 31, 2013
Page reviewed: October 31, 2013
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.