Volume 19, Number 4—April 2013
CME ACTIVITY - Research
Serotype IV and Invasive Group B Streptococcus Disease in Neonates, Minnesota, USA, 2000–20101
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a major cause of invasive disease in neonates in the United States. Surveillance of invasive GBS disease in Minnesota, USA, during 2000–2010 yielded 449 isolates from 449 infants; 257 had early-onset (EO) disease (by age 6 days) and 192 late-onset (LO) disease (180 at age 7–89 days, 12 at age 90–180 days). Isolates were characterized by capsular polysaccharide serotype and surface-protein profile; types III and Ia predominated. However, because previously uncommon serotype IV constitutes 5/31 EO isolates in 2010, twelve type IV isolates collected during 2000–2010 were studied further. By pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, they were classified into 3 profiles; by multilocus sequence typing, representative isolates included new sequence type 468. Resistance to clindamycin or erythromycin was detected in 4/5 serotype IV isolates. Emergence of serotype IV GBS in Minnesota highlights the need for serotype prevalence monitoring to detect trends that could affect prevention strategies.
Streptococcus agalactiae, or group B Streptococcus (GBS), is one of the leading causes of invasive bacterial diseases, such as bacteremia, pneumonia, and meningitis, in newborns and infants in the first months of life in the United States (1,2) and in other parts of the world (3–6). In newborns birth through 6 days of age, invasive GBS disease is designated as early-onset (EO) and late-onset (LO) in infants 7 days to 3 months of age; some investigators report an ultra-late period extending well beyond 3 months of age (3).
During the past 20 years, prevention of EO and LO invasive GBS disease in the United States has been an area of interest for clinicians and public health officials. In the early 1990s, the overall rate of EO disease in the United States was 1.7/1,000 live-born infants (7,8) but differed from one part of the country to another: for example, 0.56 for Minneapolis/St. Paul, 1.3 for Houston (9), and 1.3 for Maryland (10). This high rate prompted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to issue guidelines in 1996 for preventing EO disease by screening pregnant women at 35–37 weeks’ gestation for GBS colonization and administering antimicrobial drug prophylaxis to women at risk of transmitting the organism to the child (11). Although implementation of the prescribed measures reduced the rate of EO disease in the United States to 0.47/1,000 live births by 1999–2001, problems remained (e.g., risk-based vs. culture-based approaches to prevention, laboratory detection of colonized mothers, use of antimicrobial drugs in women with allergies to penicillin, use of secondary prevention among infants) (12); these factors required revision of the guidelines in 2002 (7) and again in 2010 (13). However, measures designed to prevent EO disease have had little effect on the rate of LO disease, which remained 0.4/1,000 live births throughout the 1990s, varying only slightly from year to year (8,12).
GBS isolates are characterized according to capsular polysaccharide (CPS) serotype, of which 9 are recognized: Ia, Ib, II–VIII (9, 14–16), and a recently proposed serotype IX (17). Results from earlier studies in various parts of the United States, including Minnesota, indicated that Ia, III, and V were the predominant serotypes in EO disease, whereas serotype III and Ia were predominant in LO disease (9,10,12,15).
Since 1995, our laboratory has collaborated with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) to serotype isolates from cases of EO and LO disease in Minnesota in conjunction with the CDC Emerging Infections Program (7). This collaboration has enabled us to follow for almost 2 decades changes in serotype distribution of GBS isolates that cause invasive disease in Minnesota. Here we report on the epidemiology of EO and LO GBS disease in Minnesota over 11 years, the recent emergence of invasive disease in infants with serotype IV GBS, and an increase in disease caused by this serotype in 2010 compared with our previous findings (15). We provide serotyping results of all isolates from EO and LO disease collected during 2000–2010 and present data from molecular characterization by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of serotype IV isolates from EO and LO disease.
As part of the CDC Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Program, GBS isolates from 453 infants in Minnesota with invasive GBS disease reported during January 1, 2000–December 31, 2010, were submitted to the MDH Public Health Laboratory, and the case details were reviewed (7). Infants were classified according to GBS disease onset and age: 257 (age birth–6 days) with EO disease, 180 (age 7–89 days) with LO disease, and 12 (age 90–180 days) with delayed LO disease. Four infants with first GBS-positive culture at age 6–13 months were classified with ultra-LO disease (ULOD) (3) and were not included in our analyses. The total numbers of live births in Minnesota by year were provided by MDH.
Study Isolates and Culture Sites
Of the 449 EO and LO isolates studied and analyzed, 403 were from blood, 42 from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and 4 from normally sterile sites (1 bone, 1 joint, and 2 obtained postmortem from liver and lung). One isolate per infant was included in the analysis. Isolates received from MDH without patient identifiers were serotyped and studied by molecular methods at the GBS Molecular Reference Laboratory (University of Minnesota Medical School Twin Cities Campus, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Isolates were tested by using single-colony picks in Todd-Hewitt Broth (THB) (Bacto; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA), supplemented with 2% sheep blood.
Reference Strains and Antiserum for Serotyping
We used GBS prototypes from our laboratory of internationally recognized reference strains of serotypes Ia, Ib, II–VIII, and newly proposed IX; Rabinowitz 3139 was used for serotype IV (17–19). The prototype strains for surface-expressed proteins were those used previously (18). Monospecific rabbit antisera to serotypes Ia, Ib, II–VIII, proposed IX, and atypical V (serotype V genetic variant); surface proteins C-α and C-β; group B protective surface (BPS) protein; and the R4(Rib), R1, and R1, R4 (Alp3) species of R were produced in our laboratory against international reference strains (17,18,20,21). All antisera were tested against all serotypes to ensure no immunologic cross-reactions. In addition, molecular typing by PCR confirmed all prototype strains used for production of each type-specific antiserum, including serotype IV.
CPS and Detection of Surface-expressed Proteins
Isolates grown in THB were extracted with hot hydrochloric acid and typed by double-diffusion immunoprecipitation in agarose slides with specific antisera to serotypes Ia, Ib, and II–VIII, as described (18). An isolate nonreactive with any of these antisera was considered nontypeable and was regrown in supplemented THB to upregulate CPS production; the extract was retested (concentrated 3-fold) with antisera to Ia–VIII, proposed IX, and atypical V. Extracts from nontypeable and serotype IV isolates were also tested with antisera to GBS surface-expressed proteins (16,18–20). Statistical analyses of the typing results (2-sided p value, Fisher exact test) were done by using InStat (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA); p values <0.05 were considered significant.
DNA Macrorestriction Profile Analysis
All 12 serotype IV and 2 nontypeable isolates were studied by PFGE according to published methods (16,22,23) by using bacterial DNA digested with SmaI (Invitrogen, La Jolla, CA, USA). The PFGE profile of an isolate was determined by comparing its macrorestriction band pattern to those of the prototype isolates in our PFGE library (16,22), including the prototypes from 4 PFGE profile groups delineated among our serotype IV isolates from recent years.
MLST and Clonal Complex Assignment
At least 1 serotype IV isolate from each PFGE profile was studied by MLST as described (14,16,24). Also studied were 4 serotype IV blood isolates collected from 2 mothers during the peripartum period and from 2 nonpregnant adults. Results from partial sequencing of 7 housekeeping genes were compared with data from the Streptococcus agalactiae MLST Database (http://pubmlst.org/sagalactiae/) to arrive at an allelic profile and sequence type (ST) for each isolate, as described (16). The clonal complex (CC) assignment of each isolate was determined by using eBURST software (25) so that each CC comprised STs that had alleles at 6 of 7 loci in common with >1 other member of the complex. The study STs were compared with all STs in the Streptococcus agalactiae MLST Database.
Antimicrobial Drug Susceptibility Studies
All 45 isolates from 2010 were tested for susceptibility to clindamycin and erythromycin according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (www.microbiolab-bg.com/CLSI.pdf) by a microdilution MIC method or gradient diffusion E-test. For 2000–2009, only the 7 serotype IV isolates were tested. Isolates sensitive to clindamycin but resistant to erythromycin were further tested by using a double-disk diffusion D-zone test to determine whether resistance to clindamycin could be induced (26).
During January 2000–December 2010, a total of 257 infants in Minnesota with invasive GBS disease had EO disease, with GBS isolated from cultures taken during the first 6 days of life (Table 1). An additional 192 infants had LO disease, 180 with GBS-positive cultures at 7–89 days and 12 at 90–180 days of age (delayed LO). Four isolates from infants with ULOD were not included in our analyses. Nearly 90% of all isolates were from blood, but the source of the isolates differed significantly for EO versus LO disease: 251 EO isolates were from blood, compared with 152 LO isolates (p<0.0001), but CSF was the culture source for 4 EO isolates compared with 38 LO isolates (p<0.0001).
III and Ia were the predominant serotypes, accounting for approximately two thirds of the 449 GBS isolates from all EO and LO invasive disease (Table 2). Nearly another third consisted of serotypes V, II, and Ib. A few isolates, mostly from infants with EO disease, were serotype IV or VII; 5 (1.1%) were nontypeable. All serotype IV isolates were identified by routine serotyping and did not require supplemental growth or concentration of the extracts; only a few isolates of other serotypes required these extra approaches.
When the distribution of serotypes in EO versus LO disease was compared, Ia was most commonly isolated in the 257 EO cases (79, 30.7%), followed by III (57, 22.2%), II (43, 16.7%), and V (39, 15.2%). In contrast, among the 192 LO isolates, serotypes III (95, 49.5%) and Ia (57, 29.7%) predominated. Serotypes Ia and IV were distributed similarly among EO and LO isolates (Ia, 30.7% of EO vs. 29.7% of LO; IV, 3.1% of EO vs, 2.1% of LO). Serotypes II and III, however, had significantly different distribution in EO and LO disease; serotype II accounted for 16.7% of EO versus 2.6% of LO isolates (p<0.0001), whereas serotype III accounted for 22.2% of EO versus 49.5% of LO isolates (p<0.0001). Of the 42 isolates from CSF, serotype III accounted for 50%, whether from infants with EO (2/4) or LO (19/38) disease. The 4 isolates from ULOD were 1 each of serotypes Ia, Ib, II, and V (data not shown).
During the 11-year study period, the number of infants with EO or LO invasive disease varied from year to year; most years had more EO than LO cases (Figure 1). This variation resulted in yearly incidence that ranged from 0.21 to 0.45 (mean 0.33) per 1,000 live births for EO and from 0.14 to 0.34 (mean 0.25) per 1,000 live births for LO disease (Figure 2). Although serotype IV was seen only sporadically in previous years (Figure 1), incidence of this serotype increased in 2010, when it was isolated from 5 (16.1%) of 31 infants with EO disease. These 5 cases were not clustered geographically or temporally.
Among the 12 infants who had serotype IV invasive disease during 2000–2010, 11 survived (Table 3). Eight infants had EO disease, all of which were diagnosed within 2 days of birth; only 4 infants, separated temporally, had LO disease. All infants with EO disease were full term (gestational age 37–42 weeks); for LO infants, all but 1 were not full term (gestational age 23–34 weeks). Overall, the proportion of babies born prematurely (<37 weeks) and infected with any GBS serotype was 23.4% (54/231) for EO disease, 47.0% (77/164) for LO disease, and 53.8% (7/13) for delayed LO or ULOD disease (data not shown).
Blood was the most common culture source for serotype IV isolates (11/12); 1 was from a joint fluid. Isolates from all 7 infants who had serotype IV GBS disease during 2000–2009 were susceptible to clindamycin, but 4/5 (80%) isolates from infants who had EO disease in 2010 were clindamycin resistant.
Emergence of resistance to clindamycin in serotype IV isolates during 2010 led us to investigate antimicrobial drug resistance for all 45 serotype IV isolates cultured from infants with invasive GBS disease during that year. Antimicrobial drug susceptibility profiles (Table 4) revealed that 14 (31.1%) of these isolates were resistant to clindamycin and erythromycin; clindamycin resistance was inducible for 4 of these 14 isolates. In addition, a higher percentage (>60%) of isolates of serotypes IV, V, or Ib were clindamycin resistant compared with isolates of the predominant serotypes Ia (8.3%) and III (11.1%). Specifically, the percentage of serotype IV isolates that were clindamycin resistant (4/5, 80%) was significantly higher than for all other serotypes combined (10/40, 25%; p = 0.027). In 2010, serotype IV accounted for 28.6% (4/14) of all isolates resistant to clindamycin.
Because of the increase of invasive disease caused by serotype IV GBS, we pursued molecular studies on isolates of this serotype. Figure 3, panel A, shows the PFGE DNA macrorestriction band patterns of the serotype IV prototype isolates, designated 37, 38, and 39 (16), and profiles we classified as 39c and 39a from 2 study isolates expressing only C-α protein. Profiles of 6 isolates with C-α protein and BPS protein or only BPS protein appeared to be identical or very similar and were designated 37 or 37a for their resemblance to the group 37 prototype (Figure 3, panel B). The profile of an isolate that did not express any of the surface proteins studied was unique and was classified as profile 40. Overall, isolates with C-α and BPS proteins or BPS protein alone were in PFGE profile group 37 or its subgroups and were susceptible to clindamycin; those with only C-α protein were in subgroups of PFGE group 39 and were resistant to clindamycin (Table 3).
To investigate further genetic relatedness among serotype IV isolates from invasive GBS disease in Minnesota, we studied 4 isolates from infants and 4 from adults by using MLST (Table 5). We found that the serotype IV prototype strain 3139, studied for comparison, was ST2 in CC1 (data not shown). Among isolates from infants, 1 was ST196, 2 were ST452, and 1 was ST468, a new sequence type (allelic profile 5,25,4,3,2,3,1). Among isolates from adults, 1 was ST196, 2 were ST291, and 1 was ST459. The 5 STs were grouped into 3 major CCs: ST196 and ST459 in CC1, ST291 in CC17, and ST452 and ST468 in CC23. ST468 was a single-locus variant of ST452, which we recently described (16), while ST459 was a single-locus variant of the much older ST196. Of the 8 isolates, 1 (PFGE profile 39a, ST459) was resistant to clindamycin (data not shown), as were other isolates in subgroups of PFGE profile group 39 (Table 3). The PFGE profiles of all the serotype IV isolates were classified into 5 groups or their subgroups: 37, 39, and 40 for isolates from infants; 36, 38, and 39 for isolates from adults (Tables 3, 5).
As in the rest of the United States and other parts of the world (8,12,13,27,28), in Minnesota, GBS is one of the leading causes of invasive bacterial infections in infants during the first year of life. Overall, the yearly incidence rate of EO and LO disease in this state decreased modestly from 2000 to 2010; however, even with implementation of control guidelines issued by CDC, some years had an increase in incidence, as occurred for EO disease in 2010.
Our finding that GBS caused invasive disease beyond the third month of life for ≈9% of infants in our study was in keeping with previous reports (3). Investigators have found that premature birth was a major risk factor for LO or ULOD GBS disease (8,13,28,29). Prematurity was likely a contributing factor for LO disease in infants <90 days of age, in particular for those with delayed LO disease or ULOD. The proportion of infants with these disease types who were born preterm was >2× that for infants with EO disease; in Minnesota, as in other parts of the United States (30), ≈75% of infants with EO disease are born at full term.
Our results on the distribution of serotypes from all GBS invasive disease were consistent with studies showing that, worldwide, serotype III continues to predominate, followed by serotypes Ia and V (27,31). We found that the predominant serotypes in EO disease continued to be Ia, followed by III, with these serotypes in reverse order for LO disease, similar to our previous findings for Minnesota (15) and findings for other parts of the country (9). However, in marked contrast to the 1990s, when the prevalence of serotype V was 2× that for serotype II (15), serotype II was the third most prevalent serotype for EO disease in our study.
Characterization of GBS isolates by serotype over time enabled us to track the emergence and spread of serotype IV as a cause of invasive disease in Minnesota. These results showed that this previously less common serotype has become more common, starting in the mid-1990s, when serotype IV was found in a few adults (2 mothers in the peripartum period and 1 nonpregnant adult) (15); subsequently, in 2001, the first case of LO disease caused by serotype IV was found, and in 2010, this serotype became prominent in causing GBS disease. Isolation of this serotype in 2011 from 2 infants with LO disease suggests its continued presence in the community (P. Ferrieri, unpub. data).
Our findings raise the possibility that serotype IV, although reported previously from a case of EO disease in the United States (32) and in small numbers from other parts of the world (6), has the potential to emerge as a notable cause of invasive GBS disease not only among newborns but also among older infants through the first year of life, just as occurred with serotype V during the past 2 decades (33,34). The sharp increase in 2010 of disease caused by serotype IV isolates and concurrent emergence of clindamycin resistance within this serotype could foreshadow problems similar to those for serotype V; a high percentage of antimicrobial drug–resistant serotype V isolates (14,26,35) cause disease in infants and older adults (33,36). We found not only an increase in the percentage of nonpregnant women in the United States colonized with serotype IV in vaginal/rectal sites (16) but also evidence of clindamycin resistance, with 3 of 8 representative serotype IV isolates studied found to be resistant (P. Ferrieri, unpub. data). Because the vaginal tract is a reservoir for GBS causing EO disease (13,37), increased colonization of this site with clindamycin-resistant serotype IV GBS is of concern. Careful attention must be given to the type of intrapartum antimicrobial drug prophylaxis administered; GBS isolates should be assessed for inducible clindamycin resistance when penicillin, ampicillin, or cefazolin cannot be used.
Among the serotype IV isolates from invasive GBS disease, we observed association among PFGE profile, surface protein profile, and susceptibility/resistance to clindamycin. Isolates with only BPS protein or C-α and BPS proteins were in PFGE group 37 and susceptible to clindamycin; those with only C-α protein were in group 39 or its subgroups and resistant to clindamycin. Results from a study of serotype IV isolates from colonized nonpregnant women living in various areas in the United States showed a similar association between surface protein profile and PFGE profile (16). MLST results suggested a possible association between clindamycin resistance and ST459.
In contrast to colonizing serotype IV isolates, which have limited clonal diversity (16), results from our molecular studies of invasive serotype IV isolates showed that the 16 isolates cultured since 1995 spanned 5 PFGE profiles, 5 STs, and 3 CCs, which suggests greater genetic diversity. Among 97 colonizing serotype IV isolates from a wider area of the United States, we found 3 PFGE profile groups (37–39) and 2 STs (452 and 459) (16); in contrast, among just 16 invasive isolates in this study, we found the same PFGE profiles and STs and 2 additional PFGE profile groups (36 and 40) and STs (196 and 468). In other MLST studies of GBS isolates (4–6,14,38,39), only small numbers of serotype IV have been included, and these have most often been placed in CC1 and a few in CC17, 2 CCs with STs seen in our study. The fact that 3 of our serotype IV isolates, particularly ST459, were in CC1 may be of importance because a large percentage of serotype V isolates, many of them antimicrobial drug resistant, have been placed in this CC (4,14). Two of our invasive isolates were in CC17 and 3 in CC23; these are well-known CCs that contain many isolates of various serotypes from invasive disease in infants and adults (38,39) or that are associated with virulent clones (5,6,38). ST452 and ST459 are new STs from women colonized with serotype IV (16).
The emergence of invasive serotype IV GBS disease in Minnesota underscores the value of monitoring prevalent serotypes in a community to detect new epidemiologic trends. In an era when antimicrobial drug prophylaxis is used during childbirth, these findings also highlight the need to be aware of antimicrobial drug–resistant isolates of all serotypes (26,35). Although maternal immunization with conjugate vaccines incorporating the most common GBS serotypes remains one of the most promising strategies for disease prevention (27,40), continued assessment of this and other approaches is essential (8,13,30,37).
Dr Ferrieri is a professor in the Departments of Laboratory Medicine/Pathology and Pediatrics, medical director of the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, and attending physician in pediatric infectious diseases at the University of Minnesota Hospital, Minneapolis. Her research interests include GBS and pneumococcal disease, animal models of infection, pathogenic mechanisms of disease, host defense responses, innovation in diagnostic microbiology, and clinical infectious diseases.
We thank Jean Rainbow, Craig Morin, Brenda Jewell, Lori Triden, Billie Juni, and Kerry MacInnes for providing cultures and epidemiologic data for this work and Dave Guse for performing antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing.
Funding for GBS surveillance in Minnesota was provided through the CDC Emerging Infections Program.
- Edwards MS, Baker CJ. Group B streptococcal infections. In: Remington JS, Klein JO, editors. Infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn infant. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2001. p. 1091–156.
- Ferrieri P, Wallen L. Neonatal bacterial sepsis. In: Gleason CA, Devaskar S, editors. Avery’s diseases of the newborn. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2012. p. 538–50.
- Guilbert J, Levy C, Cohen R; Bacterial Meningitis Group. Delacourt C, Renolleau S, et al. Late and ultra late onset Streptococcus B meningitis: clinical and bacteriological data over 6 years in France. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:47–51.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Imperi M, Gherardi G, Berardi A, Baldassarri L, Pataracchia M, Dicuonzo G, Invasive neonatal GBS infections from an area-based surveillance study in Italy. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:1834–9 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manning SD, Springman AC, Lehotzky E, Lewis MA, Whittam TS, Davies HD. Multilocus sequence types associated with neonatal group B streptococcal sepsis and meningitis in Canada. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:1143–8 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martins ER, Pessanha MA, Ramirez M, Melo-Cristino J; The Portuguese Group for the Study of Streptococcal Infections. Analysis of group B streptococcal isolates from infants and pregnant women in Portugal revealing two lineages with enhanced invasiveness. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:3224–9 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schrag S, Gorwitz R, Fultz-Butts K, Schuchat A. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease. Revised guidelines from CDC. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51(RR-11):1–22 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jordan HT, Farley MM, Craig A, Mohle-Boetani J, Harrison LH, Petit S, Revisiting the need for vaccine prevention of late-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease: a multistate, population-based analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27:1057–64 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zaleznik DF, Rench MA, Hillier S, Krohn MA, Platt R, Lee M-LT, Invasive disease due to group B streptococcus in pregnant women and neonates from diverse population groups. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:276–81 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harrison LH, Elliott JA, Dwyer DM, Libonati JP, Ferrieri P, Billmann L, Serotype distribution of invasive group B streptococcal isolates in Maryland: implications for vaccine formulation. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:998–1002 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: a public health perspective. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1996;45(RR-7):1–24 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Phares CR, Lynfield R, Farley MM, Mohle-Boetani J, Harrison LH, Petit S, Epidemiology of invasive group B streptococcal disease in the United States, 1999–2005. JAMA. 2008;299:2056–65 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ; Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-10):1–36 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gherardi G, Imperi M, Baldassarri L, Pataracchia M, Alfarone G, Recchia S, Molecular epidemiology and distribution of serotypes, surface proteins, and antibiotic resistance among group B streptococci in Italy. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:2909–16 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shet A, Ferrieri P. Neonatal & maternal group B streptococcal infections: a comprehensive review. Indian J Med Res. 2004;120:141–50 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diedrick MJ, Flores AE, Hillier SL, Creti R, Ferrieri P. Clonal analysis of colonizing group B Streptococcus, serotype IV, an emerging pathogen in the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:3100–4 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Slotved H-C, Kong F, Lambertsen L, Sauer S, Gilbert GL. Serotype IX, a proposed new Streptococcus agalactiae serotype. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:2929–36 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferrieri P, Baker CJ, Hillier SL, Flores AE. Diversity of surface protein expression in group B streptococcal colonizing & invasive isolates. Indian J Med Res. 2004;119(Suppl):191–6 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson DR, Ferrieri P. Group B streptococcal Ibc protein antigen: distribution of two determinants in wild-type strains of common serotypes. J Clin Microbiol. 1984;19:506–10 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Erdogan S, Fagan PK, Talay SR, Rohde M, Ferrieri P, Flores AE, Molecular analysis of group B protective surface protein, a new cell surface protective antigen of group B streptococci. Infect Immun. 2002;70:803–11 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ramaswamy SV, Ferrieri P, Madoff LC, Flores AE, Kumar N, Tettelin H, Identification of novel cps locus polymorphisms in nontypable group B Streptococcus. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55:775–83 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amundson NR, Flores AE, Hillier SL, Baker CJ, Ferrieri P. DNA macrorestriction analysis of nontypeable group B streptococcal isolates: clonal evolution of nontypeable and type V isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:572–6 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benson JA, Ferrieri P. Rapid pulsed-field gel electrophoresis method for group B streptococcus isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:3006–8 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones N, Bohnsack JF, Takahashi S, Oliver KA, Chan M-S, Kunst F, Multilocus sequence typing system for group B streptococcus. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:2530–6 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feil EJ, Li B, Aanensen DM, Hanage WP, Spratt BG. eBURST: inferring patterns of evolutionary descent among clusters of related bacterial genotypes from multilocus sequence typing data. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:1518–30 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Castor ML, Whitney CG, Como-Sabetti K, Facklam RR, Ferrieri P, Bartkus JM, Antibiotic resistance patterns in invasive group B streptococcal isolates. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2008;2008:727505.DOIGoogle Scholar
- Edmond KM, Kortsalioudaki C, Scott S, Schrag SJ, Zaidi AKM, Cousens S, Group B streptococcal disease in infants aged younger than 3 months: systemic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:547–56 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin F-YC, Weisman LE, Troendle J, Adams K. Prematurity is the major risk factor for late-onset group B streptococcus disease. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:267–71 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamada S, Vearncombe M, McGeer A, Shah PS. Neonatal group B streptococcal disease: incidence, presentation, and mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21:53–7 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Dyke MK, Phares CR, Lynfield R, Thomas AR, Arnold KE, Craig AS, Evaluation of universal antenatal screening for group B streptococcus. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2626–36 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thigpen MC, Whitney CG, Messonnier NE, Zell ER, Lynfield R, Hadler JL, Bacterial meningitis in the United States, 1998–2007. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2016–25 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Puopolo KM, Madoff LC. Type IV neonatal early-onset group B streptococcal disease in a United States hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1360–2 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blumberg HM, Stephens DS, Modansky M, Erwin M, Elliot J, Facklam RR, Invasive group B streptococcal disease: the emergence of serotype V. J Infect Dis. 1996;173:365–73 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elliott JA, Farmer KD, Facklam RR. Sudden increase in isolation of group B streptococci, serotype V, is not due to emergence of a new pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2115–6 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manning SD, Foxman B, Pierson CL, Tallman P, Baker CJ, Pearlman MD. Correlates of antibiotic-resistant group B streptococcus isolated from pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:74–9 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kothari NJ, Morin CA, Glennen A, Jackson D, Harper J, Schrag SJ, Invasive group B streptococcal disease in the elderly, Minnesota, USA, 2003–2007. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1279–81 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koenig JM, Keenan WJ. Group B streptococcus and early-onset sepsis in the era of maternal prophylaxis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2009;56:689–708 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luan S-L, Granlund M, Sellin M, Lagergård T, Spratt BG, Norgren M. Multilocus sequence typing of Swedish invasive group B streptococcus isolates indicates a neonatally associated genetic lineage and capsule switching. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:3727–33 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martins ER, Andreu A, Correia P, Juncosa T, Bosch J, Ramirez M, Group B streptococci causing neonatal infections in Barcelona are a stable clonal population: 18-year surveillance. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:2911–8 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edwards MS, Lane HJ, Hillier SL, Rench MA, Baker CJ. Persistence of functional antibodies to group B streptococcal capsular polysaccharides following immunization with glycoconjugate vaccines. Vaccine. 2012;30:4123–6 and .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
TablesCite This Article
1This work was presented in part at the XVIII Lancefield International Symposium on Streptococci and Streptococcal Diseases, September 4–8, 2011, Palermo, Italy.
Table of Contents – Volume 19, Number 4—April 2013
|EID Search Options|
|Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.|
|Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.|
|Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.|
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Patricia Ferrieri, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St SE, Mayo Mail Code 134, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA