Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 20, Number 11—November 2014
Dispatch

Raw Pig Blood Consumption and Potential Risk for Streptococcus suis Infection, Vietnam

Vu Thi Lan HuongComments to Author , Ngo Thi Hoa, Peter W. Horby, Juliet E. Bryant, Nguyen Van Kinh, Tran Khanh Toan, and Heiman F.L. Wertheim
Author affiliations: Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hanoi, Vietnam (V.T.L. Huong, P. Horby, J.E. Bryant, H.F.L. Wertheim); Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam (N.T. Hoa); University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (V.T.L. Huong, N.T. Hoa, P. Horby, J.E. Bryant, H.F.L. Wertheim); National Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Hanoi (N.V. Kinh); Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi (T.K. Toan)

Main Article

Table 1

Factors associated with consumption of raw pig blood among respondents in 2 districts of Hanoi, Vietnam*

Factor Ba Vi District (rural)
Dong Da District (urban)
Consumption, no. (%) No consumption, no. (%) OR (95% CI) Consumption, no. (%) No consumption, no.(%) OR (95% CI)
Sex
M 900 (52.6) 810 (47.4) 3.0 (2.7–3.4) 250 (18.5) 1,103 (81.5) 6.4 (4.9–8.2)
F 1,527 (29.2) 3,706 (70.3) 1 88 (3.4) 2,480 (96.6) 1
Age, y
<20 17 (13.8) 106 (86.2) 0.4 (0.2–0.7) 2 (4.1) 47 (95.9) 0.8 (0.2–3.7)
20–29 209 (28.8) 516 (71.2) 1.5 (1.2–1.8) 37 (8.3) 411 (91.7) 1.7 (1.1–2.7)
30–39 535 (38.3) 863 (61.7) 2.3 (2.0–2.8) 68 (8.7) 713 (91.3) 2.2 (1.5–3.4)
40–49 759 (42.3) 1,037 (57.7) 2.6 (2.2–3.0) 85 (11.3) 668 (88.7) 2.8 (1.9–4.1)
50–59 593 (36.2) 1,046 (63.8) 1.9 (1.6–2.2) 104 (11.2) 823 (88.8) 2.6 (1.8–3.8)
≥60 314 (24.9) 948 (75.1) 1 42 (4.4) 921 (95.6) 1
Education, y
≤5 303 (27.3) 807 (72.7) 1.5 (1.0–2.1) 10 (6.8) 138 (93.2) 2.2 (1.0–4.5)
6–9 1,637 (38.0) 2,673 (62.0) 1.7 (1.2–2.5) 97 (11.4) 755 (88.6) 2.0 (1.5–2.8)
10–12 441 (32.6) 910 (67.4) 1.3 (0.9–1.9) 124 (7.9) 1,450 (92.1) 1.1 (0.9–1.5)
>12 44 (26.7) 121 (73.3) 1 103 (7.8) 1,218 (92.2) 1
Occupation
Office worker 41 (24.4) 127 (75.6) 1 88 (7.6) 1,067 (92.4) 1
Manual laborer† 277 (41.6) 389 (58.4) 1.5 (1.0–2.3) 55 (16.2) 284 (83.8) 1.9 (1.3–2.8)
Services and sales 195 (34.8) 366 (65.2) 1.6 (1.0–2.3) 113 (12.2) 810 (87.8) 1.9 (1.4–2.5)
Farmer 1,649 (36.9) 2,825 (63.1) 2.0 (1.4–2.9) 0 2 (100) -
Other 98 (37.7) 162 (62.3) 1.4 (0.9–2.3) 12 (21.4) 44 (78.6) 2.1 (1.1–4.3)
Not working‡ 156 (19.8) 630 (80.2) 1.1 (0.7–1.6) 69 (4.8) 1,355 (95.2) 1.2 (0.8–1.9)
HES quintiles
Lowest 346 (30.4) 794 (69.6) 0.9 (0.7–1.0) 71 (11.0) 574 (89.0) 2.1 (1.4–3.0)
Second 472 (32.0) 1,002 (68.0) 0.9 (0.7–1.0) 100 (12.5) 697 (87.5) 2.2 (1.5–3.1)
Third 617 (37.9) 1,011 (62.1) 1.1 (0.9–1.3) 58 (6.9) 779 (93.1) 1.1 (0.8–1.7)
Fourth 561 (36.9) 960 (63.1) 1.0 (0.9–1.2) 54 (6.5) 773 (93.5) 1.1 (0.7–1.6)
Highest 416 (36.2) 732 (63.8) 1 55 (6.8) 751 (93.2) 1
Marital status
Married 2,186 (38.1) 3,559 (61.9) 1.6 (1.4–1.9) 260 (8.9) 2,663 (91.1) 0.8 (0.6–1.1)
Single 241 (20.1) 957 (79.9) 1 78 (7.8) 920 (92.2) 1

*Values in bold are significant (p<0.05). OR, odds ratio; HES, household economic status. OR was adjusted for sex and age.
†Includes construction, factory work, casual manual work on call, handicraft work, and mining.
‡Includes children, housewives, elderly persons, and retired persons.

Main Article

Page created: October 17, 2014
Page updated: October 17, 2014
Page reviewed: October 17, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external