Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 20, Number 6—June 2014

Sequential Gastroenteritis Episodes Caused by 2 Norovirus Genotypes

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Gabriel I. ParraComments to Author  and Kim Y. GreenComments to Author 
Author affiliations: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Cite This Article


We investigated sequential episodes of acute norovirus gastroenteritis in a young child within an 11-month period. The infections were caused by 2 distinct genotypes (GII.4 and GII.6). Failure to achieve cross-protective immunity was linked to absence of an enduring and cross-reactive mucosal immune response, a critical consideration for vaccine design.

Noroviruses are major pathogens associated with acute gastroenteritis in persons of all ages. It is estimated that each year in developing countries, noroviruses are responsible for up to 200,000 deaths of children <5 years of age (1). Moreover, in the United States, because of the successful implementation of vaccination against rotaviruses, noroviruses have emerged as the leading cause of severe gastroenteritis requiring medical intervention among infants and young children (2).

Noroviruses are genetically diverse, and differences in the major capsid protein (VP1) have led to their classification into 6 genogroups (GI–GVI) and ≈30 genotypes. Noroviruses from genogroups GI, GII, and GIV infect humans; worldwide, GII.4 is the most prevalent genotype (35). Expression of VP1 results in self-assembly of virus-like particles that have been used to examine structural and antigenic differences among genotypes (3,68). However, lack of an in vitro cell culture system has hindered the ability to establish serotype differences by neutralization. Initial evidence for the existence of at least 2 distinct norovirus serotypes came from early studies among volunteers; these studies showed that infection with Norwalk or Hawaii viruses (representing GI and GII, respectively) did not induce cross-protection (9). Evidence also exists for the periodic emergence of new GII.4 strain variants that cause large global epidemics, possibly driven by escape from herd immunity (5,10). Further understanding of the natural history of these viruses is needed to establish the potential role of genotypic and antigenic variation in vaccine development.

The Study

On January 15, 2012, a 13-month-old girl enrolled in a childcare center in Rockville, Maryland, experienced 3 episodes of vomiting within 1 hour, after which she had diarrhea or loose stools for ≈1 week. Within 24 hours after this child’s onset of symptoms, 2 family members reported multiple episodes of vomiting and diarrhea that lasted >3 days. Because several children and teachers at the childcare center reported similar symptoms, parents of children enrolled at the childcare center were alerted to the possibility of a gastroenteritis outbreak.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Characterization of norovirus detected in stool samples and levels of local IgA responses for each infection. A) Phylogenetic tree of the major capsid protein (VP1) region from representative norovirus strains from each of the 22 genotypes within strain GII. Representative strains from each GII.4 and GII.6 cluster were compared with the strains reported in this article (boxed). For each strain, the name/year/country of isolation are shown. B) Levels of IgA in feces collected during

Figure 1. Characterization of norovirus detected in stool samples and levels of local IgA responses for each infectionA) Phylogenetic tree of the major capsid protein (VP1) region from representative norovirus strains from each...

The patient reported here was subsequently enrolled in National Institutes of Health clinical study NCT01306084, after receipt of informed consent from the mother. Fecal samples were collected from the child and examined for norovirus RNA by reverse transcription PCR. Viral RNA was detected for 4 weeks after the onset of symptoms, and viral RNA quantification reached up to 1.7 × 108 genome copies/g feces. Sequence and phylogenetic analyses of VP1 from the virus (designated norovirus Hu/GII.4/RockvilleD1/2012/U.S.) showed that it grouped within the newly emerging virus GII.4 Sydney_2012 cluster (Figure 1, panel A) (11).

On December 10, 2012, a gastroenteritis outbreak occurred in a different childcare center in Bethesda, Maryland, at which the same child (now 24 months of age) was enrolled. The child experienced vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue that lasted ≈2 days, and a similar disease pattern developed in a family member 24 hours after the onset of the child’s symptoms. Fecal samples were again positive for norovirus with 5.3 × 109 genome copies/g of feces, and viral RNA was detected up to 3 weeks after disease onset. Phylogenetic and sequence analyses revealed a GII.6 norovirus (designated norovirus Hu/GII.6/BethesdaD1/2012/U.S.), most closely related to GII.6 noroviruses detected in Miami (Florida, USA) and Texas (USA) in 1994 and 1997, respectively (Figure 1, panel A).

Figure 2,

Thumbnail of Appendix. Differences in the major capsid protein (VP1) between norovirus strains GII.4 and GII.6. A) Amino acid sequence alignment of the VP1 sequences. The shell (S) domain is highlighted with a dark line, and the protruding (P) domain is highlighted with a gray line. The color code for each of the epitopes and insertions is indicated. Residue numbers are based on norovirus strain GII.4. B) Top and side views of the P domain of GII.4 norovirus showing the location of the epitopes

Figure 2,. AppendixDifferences in the major capsid protein (VP1) between norovirus strains GII.4 and GII.6A) Amino acid sequence alignment of the VP1 sequencesThe shell (S) domain is highlighted with a dark line, and...

Norovirus strains GII.4 and GII.6 differed by ≈38% in VP1 sequences; most amino acid sequence variation occurred in the capsid protruding domain (29%; 163/556). Alignment of the VP1 sequences from the 2 strains in this study showed several gaps; each strain bore discrete regions of amino acid insertions or deletions that differed from those in the other strain. The GII.6 VP1 (547 aa long) contained 3 insertions at positions 296 (11 residues), 310 (2 residues), and 344 (3 residues); GII.4 VP1 (540 aa long) did not contain these insertions. The same alignment showed GII.4 VP1 insertions at positions 190 (1 residue), 373 (1 residue), and 390 (7 residues) (Figure 2, Appendix). Of note, most gaps in the alignment of the VP1 sequences were present in or near recently described GII.4 epitopes (7,12), thereby suggesting that these residues might play a role in defining the antigenic specificity of the 2 genotypes.

To understand the absence of immunity to the second norovirus and to gain insight into the specificity of the mucosal immune response after sequential norovirus infections, we developed virus-like particles from both noroviruses. We used the Bac-to-Bac Baculovirus Expression System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and baculovirus–infected Sf-9 cells for virus-like particle production as described elsewhere (7). The corresponding virus-like particles were used to test for IgA in feces with an ELISA that used polyclonal goat anti-human IgA conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1:2,000 dilution; KPL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) as the detector antibody and 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS; KPL) as the substrate. During the child’s first infection with norovirus GII.4, virus-specific IgA was not detectable until 3 weeks after infection (Figure 1, panel B). At the onset of symptoms during the second infection with norovirus GII.6, a rapid anamnestic response specific for GII.4 virus-like particles developed. The GII.6-specific IgA response was detected at day 6 after infection, and IgA was detectable in feces until the last daily collection at 4 weeks (Figure 1, panel B). Examination of feces for norovirus-specific IgG after the second infection showed a similar anamnestic response that endured throughout the period examined (data not shown).

The child’s clinical history, young age, and absence of early detectable norovirus-specific fecal IgA suggest that she experienced a primary infection with GII.4 norovirus in the first childcare center outbreak. During the second infection with GII.6 norovirus, a rapid anamnestic GII.4-specific IgA response developed and persisted up to 4 weeks as the slower primary GII.6-specific IgA response developed ≈1 week after symptom onset. Follow-up fecal samples collected at 14 weeks after the second infection contained little or no detectable levels of either GII.6- or GII.4-specific IgA, indicating an eventual decline in mucosal IgA titers against each genotype (data not shown).

Previous data from human volunteer studies suggest that homologous immunity to Norwalk virus (genotype GI.1) lasts from 2 months to 2 years (13) and that a rapid and specific mucosal IgA response (likely anamnestic) was a correlate of protection (14). The data presented here are consistent with the development of a genotype-specific, short-lived mucosal IgA response to norovirus infection that, when stimulated anamnestically, might provide little or no protection against other norovirus genotypes.


This study shows that a young child can experience 2 episodes of acute gastroenteritis caused by distinct norovirus genotypes (GII.4 and GII.6) within 1 year. Reinfection with distinct genotypes can commonly occur in younger persons, as recently demonstrated in a longitudinal study of norovirus infection in infants and young children in Peru (15). Genotypes within the 2 major genogroups of human noroviruses might represent distinct serotypes. The mechanisms of enduring norovirus immunity in the development of cross-protective and effective vaccines need to be elucidated.

Dr Green is chief of the Caliciviruses Section of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. Her research is directed toward the prevention and control of acute gastrointestinal disease caused by noroviruses.



We thank Rachel J. Dexter and Ronald W. Jones for their technical assistance and Stanislav V. Sosnovtsev for helpful discussions.

This research was funded by the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.

Dr Parra is a visiting fellow at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. His research interests include epidemiology, immunology, and vaccine development against gastrointestinal viral infections.



  1. Patel  MM, Widdowson  MA, Glass  RI, Akazawa  K, Vinje  J, Parashar  UD. Systematic literature review of role of noroviruses in sporadic gastroenteritis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:122431 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Payne  DC, Vinje  J, Szilagyi  PG, Edwards  KM, Staat  MA, Weinberg  GA, Norovirus and medically attended gastroenteritis in U.S. children. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:112130. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kroneman  A, Vega  E, Vennema  H, Vinje  J, White  PA, Hansman  G, Proposal for a unified norovirus nomenclature and genotyping. Arch Virol. 2013;158:205968. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Glass  RI, Parashar  UD, Estes  MK. Norovirus gastroenteritis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:177685 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Siebenga  JJ, Vennema  H, Zheng  DP, Vinje  J, Lee  BE, Pang  XL, Norovirus illness is a global problem: emergence and spread of norovirus GII.4 variants, 2001–2007. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:80212. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jiang  X, Wang  M, Graham  DY, Estes  MK. Expression, self-assembly, and antigenicity of the Norwalk virus capsid protein. J Virol. 1992;66:652732 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Parra  GI, Abente  EJ, Sandoval-Jaime  C, Sosnovtsev  SV, Bok  K, Green  KY. Multiple antigenic sites are involved in blocking the interaction of GII.4 norovirus capsid with ABH histo–blood group antigens. J Virol. 2012;86:741426. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hansman  GS, Natori  K, Shirato-Horikoshi  H, Ogawa  S, Oka  T, Katayama  K, Genetic and antigenic diversity among noroviruses. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:90919 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wyatt  RG, Dolin  R, Blacklow  NR, DuPont  HL, Buscho  RF, Thornhill  TS, Comparison of three agents of acute infectious nonbacterial gastroenteritis by cross-challenge in volunteers. J Infect Dis. 1974;129:70914. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lindesmith  LC, Donaldson  EF, Lobue  AD, Cannon  JL, Zheng  DP, Vinje  J, Mechanisms of GII.4 norovirus persistence in human populations. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e31. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. van Beek  J, Ambert-Balay  K, Botteldoorn  N, Eden  JS, Fonager  J, Hewitt  J, Indications for worldwide increased norovirus activity associated with emergence of a new variant of genotype II.4, late 2012. Euro Surveill. 2013;18:89 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Debbink  K, Lindesmith  LC, Donaldson  EF, Baric  RS. Norovirus immunity and the great escape. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002921. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Parrino  TA, Schreiber  DS, Trier  JS, Kapikian  AZ, Blacklow  NR. Clinical immunity in acute gastroenteritis caused by Norwalk agent. N Engl J Med. 1977;297:869. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindesmith  L, Moe  C, Marionneau  S, Ruvoen  N, Jiang  X, Lindblad  L, Human susceptibility and resistance to Norwalk virus infection. Nat Med. 2003;9:54853. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Saito  M, Goel-Apaza  S, Espetia  S, Velasquez  D, Cabrera  L, Loli  S, Multiple norovirus infections in a birth cohort in a Peruvian periurban community. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:48391 .DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2006.131627

Table of Contents – Volume 20, Number 6—June 2014

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Gabriel I. Parra and Kim Y. Green, Room 6318, Bldg 50, Caliciviruses Section, Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 50 South Dr, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; and

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: May 16, 2014
Page updated: May 16, 2014
Page reviewed: May 16, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.