Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 20, Number 7—July 2014
About the Cover

After the Resistance: The Alamo Today

Byron BreedloveComments to Author  and Murray L. Cohen
Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; US Public Health Service (retired), Fort Worth, Texas, USA

Cite This Article

Eileen Pestorius (b. 1939) The Alamo (2014) Watercolor on paper (12.75 in x 24 in/32.385 cm x 60.96 cm) Courtesy of the Artist
Eileen Pestorius (b. 1939) The Alamo (2014) Watercolor on paper (12.75 in x 24 in/32.385 cm x 60.96 cm) Courtesy of the Artist

San Antonio de Valero is a former Roman Catholic mission and fortress where the Battle of the Alamo occurred from February 23 until March 6, 1836. Now known simply as the Alamo, this compound has been damaged, ransacked, and renovated many times before work on its present configuration as a museum in downtown San Antonio, Texas, USA, was completed in 1968.

Texas artist Eileen Pestorius used watercolors to capture the setting on a still, spring day. In her painting, trees and grass frame the mission; a flagstone pathway leads to the entrance, and thin clouds swirl overhead in a hazy blue sky. A Texas flag hangs limply on this calm day. The stonework looks weathered, even warm in the bright sunlight; a large wooden door flanked by pairs of columns invites exploration, as does an archway that juts from the right and seems to lead to a garden.

Although located in a bustling urban setting, the modern day Alamo seems a tranquil, restive place suited for relaxation or contemplation. It takes some effort to associate the Alamo that Pestorius has rendered with the garrison known as an iconic symbol of heroic fighting and resistance.

The story is well known. During the 1836 battle, a Mexican force numbering in the thousands and led by General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna besieged the Alamo. The vastly outnumbered defenders—200 men, including the frontiersman Davy Crockett, commanded by Colonel James Bowie and Lieutenant Colonel William Travis—valiantly held the compound for 13 days before the Mexicans breached the mission, killing nearly everyone. On April 21, 1836, when the outnumbered Texan militia commanded by General Sam Houston defeated Santa Anna’s troops at San Jacinto, the rallying cry was “Remember the Alamo!” Houston’s surprise attack proved such a tactical advantage that he routed the larger force in just 18 minutes, effectively ending the Texas Revolution and leading to treaties that established the independent Republic of Texas.

Our often-used metaphor of humans waging “war” on infectious diseases and on the microbes that cause them invites comparison with the Battle of the Alamo. Through various antibiotics, we reduced the number of deaths caused by infections and, bolstered by successes, assumed we would win this war.

In reality, we live in a microbial world where we are the invaders. The Board on Global Health and Institute of Medicine noted that “On reflection, perhaps it would be wise to reconsider the frequently used metaphor of humans being ‘at war with microbes.’ It is absurd to believe that we could ever claim victory in a war against organisms that outnumber us by a factor of 1022, that outweigh us by a factor of 108, that have existed for 1,000 times longer than our species, and that can undergo as many as 500,000 generations during 1 of our generations.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that in 2013, antibiotic resistance threats caused more that 2 million illnesses and 23,000 deaths in the United States and that in 2011, those threats were responsible for an estimated $20 million in excess health care costs, 8 million additional hospital days, and $35 million in societal costs. Many factors, including overuse and misuse of antibiotics, global climate change, human encroachment into more remote, less hospitable places, modern factory farming and food production practices, and rapid and accessible global mobility have heightened our vulnerability. Since the 1980s, nearly 40 new pathogens have been identified as human disease threats, and 12% of known human pathogens have been classified as either emerging or remerging.

The cycle of many of these emerging microbes can be seen with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections moving from being hospital associated to community acquired and now to a ubiquitous supply-chain associated infection. Clostridium difficile seems headed on the same path.

Successfully controlling drug-resistant microbes requires not just greater vigilance with our infection control tools, but it also requires developing and deploying creative and aggressive tactics. Changing our tactics against drug-resistance microbes involve keeping pathogens out of our supply chains to schools, hospitals, and workplaces, and keeping sick workers at home. New guidelines from the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, for example, provide recommendations to reduce the role that health care personnel attire plays in the cross-transmission of pathogens.

The scenario of a postantibiotic era of infectious diseases that looks like the preantibiotic era that preceded penicillin and vaccines is an alarming scenario. Sir Alexander Fleming even warned about antibiotic resistance in his 1945 Nobel Prize speech. Now is the time to incorporate new strategies into our battle plans and prepare to fight against overwhelming odds.

Eileen Pestorius, MA, is a painter and art instructor who lives in Austin, Texas. She is docent emerita at Blanton Museum of Art at the University of Texas and signature member of the Texas Watercolor Society. She leads in-residence painting clinics in France and Italy. Ms. Pestorius is the Past President of the Waterloo Watercolor Group and was an adjunct faculty member at Austin Community College. She earned her BA degree in English from Nazareth College and her MA degree in art education from the University of Texas at Austin.





  1. Texas State Historical Association. The Battle of the Alamo [cited 2014 May 8].
  2. Edmondson  JR. The Alamo story: from history to current conflicts. Plano (TX): Republic of Texas Press; 2000.
  3. The Board on Global Health and Institute of Medicine. Ending the war metaphor: the changing agenda for unraveling the host-microbe relationship—workshop summary. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2006.
  4. Bearman  G, Bryant  K, Leekha  S, Mayer  J, Munoz-Price  LS, Murthy  R, Healthcare personnel attire in non-operating-room settings. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35:10721 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fleming  SA. Nobel lecture: penicillin. Nobel media AB 2013 [cited 2014 May 19].
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistant threats in the United States, 2013 [cited 2014 Jun 9].
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Control of infectious diseases. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:6219 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Merrick  J. Public health in a global context. Front Public Health. 2013;1:9.
  9. Spellberg  B, Guidos  R, Gilbert  D, Bradley  J, Boucher  HW, Scheld  MW, The epidemic of antibiotic-resistant infections: a call to action for the medical community from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:15564 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2007.ac2007

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 20, Number 7—July 2014

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Byron Breedlove, EID Journal, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop E41, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: June 23, 2014
Page updated: June 23, 2014
Page reviewed: June 23, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.