Volume 21, Number 10—October 2015
Research
Effect of Live Poultry Market Closure on Avian Influenza A(H7N9) Virus Activity in Guangzhou, China, 2014
Table 3
During market closure | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poultry cage | 2/91 (2.2) | 0/2 | 3/59 (5.1) | 0/3 | – | – | ||
Defeathering machine | 4/58 (6.9) | 0/4 | 2/30 (6.7) | 1/2 (3.3) | – | – | ||
Chopping board | 9/96 (9.4) | 1/8 (1.2) | – | – | 3/27 (11.1) | 0/3 | ||
Processing table | 7/188 (3.7) | 0/7 | – | – | 0/59 | – | ||
Bucket holding poultry meat | – | – | 0/30 | – | – | – | ||
Wastewater | 4/92 (4.3) | 1/4 (1.1) | 3/83 (3.6) | 0/3 | 1/33 (3.0) | 1/1 (3.0) | ||
Drinking water | – | – | 1/6 (16.7) | 0/1 | – | – |
*DPM, dressed poultry market; LPM, live poultry market; rRT-PCR, real-time reverse transcription PCR; –, no samples collected.
†Because not all positive samples from rRT-PCR were available for virus culture, isolation rates were derived by using the product of the percentage of rRT-PCR–positive samples and the percentage of those samples that were also culture-positive.
‡These positive samples from rRT-PCR did not have sufficient material available for virus culture.
1These first authors contributed equally to this article.
2These senior authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: September 22, 2015
Page updated: September 22, 2015
Page reviewed: September 22, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.