Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 21, Number 11—November 2015
Research

USA300 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 2000–2013

Margaret Carrel1Comments to Author , Eli N. Perencevich, and Michael Z. David1
Author affiliations: University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA (M. Carrel, E.N. Perencevich); Iowa Veterans Administration Health Care System, Iowa City (E.N. Perencevich); University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA (M.Z. David)

Main Article

Figure 5

Proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 and USA100 strain types and total sample size in 4 Census regions, United States 2000–2013. A) West. B) Midwest. C) Northeast. D) South. Linear regression lines are fit for each type. Solid line, USA300; dashed line, USA100.

Figure 5. Proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 and USA100 strain types and total sample size in 4 Census regions, United States 2000–2013. A) West. B) Midwest. C) Northeast. D) South. Linear regression lines are fit for each type. Solid line, USA300; dashed line, USA100.

Main Article

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Page created: October 16, 2015
Page updated: October 16, 2015
Page reviewed: October 16, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external