Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 21, Number 5—May 2015
Dispatch

Low-level Circulation of Enterovirus D68–Associated Acute Respiratory Infections, Germany, 2014

Author affiliations: Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany

Cite This Article

Abstract

We used physician sentinel surveillance to identify 25 (7.7%) mild to severe infections with enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) in children and adults among 325 outpatients with acute respiratory infections in Germany during August–October 2014. Results suggested low-level circulation of enterovirus D68 in Germany. Viruses were characterized by sequencing viral protein (VP) 1 and VP4/VP2 genomic regions.

Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) belongs to the family Picornaviridae, genus Enterovirus, species Enterovirus D. Since its initial discovery in 1962 (1), EV-D68 infections in humans have been reported rarely. However, since 2008, clusters of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) associated with EV-D68 have been reported worldwide, including Europe (25).

During mid-August 2014–January 2015, the United States and Canada had nationwide outbreaks of EV-D68 infections associated with severe respiratory disease (6,7). The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state public health laboratories confirmed 1,153 persons in 49 states and the District of Columbia infected by EV-D68 (8). Over the same period, >200 specimens tested were positive for EV-D68 throughout Canada (7). Clinical symptoms ranged from mild to severe disease requiring intensive care and mechanical ventilation. Children were predominantly affected, in particular if they had asthma or wheezing (6,9). After ARIs, symptoms of neurologic illness or acute flaccid myelitis developed in an increasing number of children (10,11).

To describe EV-D68 circulation in a large country in Europe in the fall of 2014, we investigated specimens from patients with respiratory illness for EV-D68. This investigation was conducted within the national outpatient ARI sentinel surveillance in Germany.

The Study

Nasal swab specimens from outpatients with influenza-like illness (ILI), ARI, or both were collected by sentinel physicians participating in sentinel surveillance in Germany during weeks 32–44 in 2014 and sent to the Robert Koch Institute (Berlin, Germany). All specimens were tested in parallel for respiratory viruses, including influenza viruses A and B, rhinovirus/enterovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus, and metapneumovirus by specific real-time reverse transcription PCRs (Technical Appendix). The rhinovirus/enterovirus real-time PCR detected rhinovirus at a limit of detection of 26 copies/reaction. EV-D68 was identified at a slightly lower sensitivity of 118 copies/reaction.

Rhinovirus/enterovirus–positive specimens were screened for EV-D68 by sequencing the viral protein (VP) 4/VP2 gene regions. Rhinovirus/enterovirus–negative specimens and samples without sequencing results were additionally analyzed by using a specific EV-D68 PCR (12). VP4/VP2 and VP1 regions were sequenced (GenBank accession nos. KP189380–KP189403 and KP657730–KP657747) for EV-D68–positive specimens.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Detection of enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), Germany, week 32–44, 2014.

Figure 1. Detection of enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), Germany, week 32–44, 2014.

Rhinovirus/enterovirus was detected in 44% (143/325) of the specimens; 98 were identified as rhinovirus types A–C and 25 as EV-D68. The remaining 20 specimens could not be subtyped, but were negative for EV-D68 by using the specific PCR. The proportion of EV-D68 corresponded to 7.7% of the study collective. EV-D68 was initially detected from week 36 (August) through 38 (September) and continuously from week 41 through week 44 in October (Figure 1).

In addition to the other viruses tested, EV-D68–positive specimens were screened for parainfluenza virus 1–4, coronaviruses (NL63, OC43, HKU1, 229E), and bocavirus. None of these viruses was detected in EV-D68–positive patients, which suggested that EV-D68 played a major role in causing respiratory disease.

Major symptoms associated with EV-D68 infection included sudden onset, fever/shivers, cough, and sore throat (Table 1). Pneumonia was diagnosed in a 7-year-old boy and a 10-year-old girl, and a 2-year-old girl was hospitalized because of obstructive bronchitis. For 11 (44%) of 25 case-patients, a concurrent chronic condition was reported: 5 with a respiratory condition, 3 with a cardiac condition, 2 with diabetes, and 1 with a neurologic disorder. EV-D68 was detected in 10 children and 15 adults; 56% of these patients were male.

Patients infected with EV-D68 came from different federal states in Germany; no epidemic cluster or outbreak was detected in the context of these patients. Syndromic surveillance data of corresponding sentinel practices showed only a partial coincidence of EV-D68–positive patients and an increase of ARI activity in the practice. However, the increase in ARI activity was probably caused by unrelated RV activity.

Sequence analysis is not regularly performed for rhinovirus/enterovirus–positive specimens within sentinel surveillance in Germany. However, comparative data can be provided for week 36 through week 20 for the 2009–10 and 2010–11 seasons (Table 2). During those seasons, patients with ILI in 5 age groups (<1–4, 5–15, 16–34, 35–60, and >60 years) were investigated by using the rhinovirus/enterovirus real-time reverse transcription PCR. Within the seasons, an average of 21% (198/952 for 2009–10) and 13% (128/1002 for 2010–11) of specimens were positive for rhinovirus/enterovirus (Table 2). At least 20% of the rhinovirus/enterovirus–positive specimens were arbitrarily chosen for sequencing (mainly RV A, B, or C; 1 echovirus), but no EV-D68 was identified.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic analysis of selected enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) strains based on nucleotide sequences of A) partial viral protein (VP) 4/VP2 region (357 nt) corresponding to nt 733–1089 in the Fermon strain (GenBank accession no. AY426531; and B) partial VP1 region (339 nt) corresponding to nt 2521–2859 in the Fermon strain. Trees were constructed by using maximum-likelihood estimation (Tamura 3-parameter with 5 gamma distributed rates among sites) with 1,000 replicates through MEGA 5.2.

Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of selected enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) strains based on nucleotide sequences of A) partial viral protein (VP) 4/VP2 region (357 nt) corresponding to nt 733–1089 in the Fermon strain (GenBank...

Phylogenetic analysis of EV-D68 strains detected in Germany was conducted for the VP1 and the VP4/VP2 genomic regions (Figure 2). Analysis placed EV-D68 isolates from Germany into major groups 1 or 3 and clustered with strains from the United States and the Netherlands from 2014, which indicated circulation of similar strains in the United States and Europe.

Conclusions

In the 2014 outbreak in the United States, ≈36% (2,600) of specimens were positive for EV-D68; children were predominantly affected. Because testing was prioritized for children with severe respiratory illness, there were probably more cases of mild infections (8). Information on EV-D68 circulation during this period for Europe is rare. This finding might be caused by insufficient sampling of patients with ARI or limited detection of EV-D68 by laboratory diagnostics (9). Sporadic cases of neurologic disease after EV-D68 infection were reported from France and the United Kingdom (9,10).

Investigation for EV-D68 has been continuously performed in the Netherlands since the increase in infections in 2010 (13). The ILI/ARI sentinel system in the Netherlands identified 24 EV-D68 infections in 2010, none in 2011, 7 in 2012, 3 in 2013, and 5 in 2014 (by week 40) (13,14), which probably increased toward the end of that year (9). For the 2014 season, a hospital in the Netherlands reported an increase of EV-D68; 16 patients were infected (12). Such an increase in EV-D68 infections was already seen in 2010 at the same hospital along with an increased number of cases throughout the country (13). This finding increased the possibility that an increase in EV-D68 infections in primary care will also extend to increased numbers of infections in patients in secondary care. So far, we report low EV-D68 circulation in Germany: 25 sporadic cases in 2014.

Clinical patterns in patients in Germany were largely determined by the ILI/ARI case definition for collecting specimens. Most (88%) patients had mild disease. Severe disease was observed in 3 children who had obstructive bronchitis and pneumonia, and 1 child required hospital care. Similarly, mild respiratory disease was predominantly observed for patients in the Netherlands (14). However, more severe cases were detected among hospitalized children who had life-threatening respiratory illness, as described in the United States (6,12,14). More than half of patients with severe respiratory illness in Germany and the Netherlands had concurrent conditions (12,14), which seem to be a major factor for development of severe disease after EV-D68 infection (6).

Phylogenetic analysis of EV-D68 from Germany showed high similarity with current strains from the United States and the Netherlands (12,14). These new genetic clusters reflect the evolution of EV-D68 and might be associated with an increasing activity of this virus. For an improved understanding of the factors determining local and temporal differences in respiratory disease outbreaks, continuous collection of global data by representative surveillance systems is needed.

Dr. Reiche is a staff scientist in the Division of Influenza Viruses and Other Respiratory Viruses, National Reference Centre for Influenza, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany. Her research focuses on molecular epidemiology and characterization of respiratory viruses and evaluation of diagnostic methods.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank all primary care physicians for participating in the national ARI sentinel surveillance system and technical staff, especially Susi Hafemann and Berit Lenz, for expert technical assistance.

Top

References

  1. Schieble  JH, Fox  VL, Lennette  EH. A probable new human picornavirus associated with respiratory diseases. Am J Epidemiol. 1967;85:297310 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Imamura  T, Fuji  N, Suzuki  A, Tamaki  R, Saito  M, Aniceto  R, Enterovirus 68 among children with severe acute respiratory infection, the Philippines. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:14305 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clusters of acute respiratory illness associated with human enterovirus 68–Asia, Europe, and United States, 2008–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:13014 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rahamat-Langendoen  J, Riezebos-Brilman  A, Borger  R, van der Heide  R, Brandenburg  A, Scholvinck  E, Upsurge of human enterovirus 68 infections in patients with severe respiratory tract infections. J Clin Virol. 2011;52:1036. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lauinger  IL, Bible  JM, Halligan  EP, Aarons  EJ, MacMahon  E, Tong  CY. Lineages, sub-lineages and variants of enterovirus 68 in recent outbreaks. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e36005. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Midgley  CM, Jackson  MA, Selvarangan  R, Turabelidze  G, Obringer  E, Johnson  D, Severe respiratory illness associated with enterovirus D68—Missouri and Illinois, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63:7989 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. National Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases. Disease debrief: EV-D68 [cited 2014 Nov 5]. http://www.nccid.ca/disease-debrief-ev-d68#Q1
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Enterovirus D68 in the United States, 2014 [cited 2014 Nov 13]. http://www.cdc.gov/non-polio-enterovirus/outbreaks/EV-D68-outbreaks.html
  9. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Rapid risk assessment: enterovirus 68 detected in the USA, Canada and Europe, second update [cited 2014 Nov 24]. http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/Enterovirus-68-detected-in-the-USA-Canada-Europe-second-update-25-November-2014.pdf
  10. Lang  M, Mirand  A, Savy  N, Henquell  C, Maridet  S, Perignon  R, Acute flaccid paralysis following enterovirus D68 associated pneumonia, France, 2014. Euro Surveill. 2014;19:20952 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Notes from the field: acute flaccid myelitis among persons aged ≤21 years—United States, August 1–November 13, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;63:12434 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Poelman  R, Scholvinck  EH, Borger  R, Niesters  HG, van Leer-Buter  C. The emergence of enterovirus D68 in a Dutch University Medical Center and the necessity for routinely screening for respiratory viruses. J Clin Virol. 2015;62:15. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Meijer  A, van der Sanden  S, Snijders  BE, Jaramillo-Gutierrez  G, Bont  L, van der Ent  CK, Emergence and epidemic occurrence of enterovirus 68 respiratory infections in The Netherlands in 2010. Virology. 2012;423:4957 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Meijer  A, Benschop  K, Donker  G, van der Avoort  H. Continued seasonal circulation of enterovirus D68 in the Netherlands, 2011–2014. Euro Surveill. 2014;19:20935 .PubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2105.141900

Table of Contents – Volume 21, Number 5—May 2015

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Thorsten Wolff, Division of Influenza Viruses and Other Respiratory Viruses, Robert Koch Institute, Seestraße 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: April 18, 2015
Page updated: April 18, 2015
Page reviewed: April 18, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external