Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 1—January 2016
CME ACTIVITY - Synopsis

Epidemiology of Haemophilus ducreyi Infections

Camila González-Beiras, Michael Marks, Cheng Y. Chen, Sally Roberts, and Oriol MitjàComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Nova University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal (C. González-Beiras); Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain (C. González-Beiras, O. Mitjà); London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (M. Marks); Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London (M. Marks); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (C.Y. Chen); Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (S. Roberts); Lihir Medical Centre, Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea (O. Mitjà)

Main Article

Table 1

Characteristics of 35 studies of genital ulcers caused by Haemophilus ducreyi, 1980–1999*

Area, reference† Country Year of study Diagnostic method No. patients with GUD No. cases H. ducreyi infection % (95% CI)
Africa
Paz-Bailey et al. (16) Botswana 1993 Culture 108 27 25.0 (17.7–33.9)
Steen (17) Côte d’Ivoire 1996 PCR NA NA 47
Mabey et al. (18) Gambia 1987 Culture 104 54 51.9 (42.4–61.2)
Hawkes et al. (19) Gambia 1995 M-PCR 18 8 44.4 (24.5–66.2)
Nsanze et al. (20) Kenya 1980 Culture 97 60 61.8 (51.9–70.9)
Kaul et al. (21) Kenya 1997 Culture 189 54 28.5 (22.6–35.3)
Morse et al. (22) Lesotho 1994 M-PCR 105 55 53.3 (43.8–62.6)
Harms et al. (23) Madagascar 1992 Culture 12 61 19.6 (11.6–31.3)
Behets et al. (24) Madagascar 1997 M-PCR 196 64 32.6 (26.4–39.5)
Behets et al. (25) Malawi 1995 M-PCR 778 204 26.2 (23.2–29.4)
Hoyo et al. (26) Malawi 1999 M-PCR 137 41 29.0 (22.8–38.0)
Bogaerts et al. (27) Rwanda 1992 Culture 395 115 29.1 (24.8–33.7)
Totten et al. (28) Senegal 1992 PCR 39 22 56.4 (40.9–70.7)
Crewe-Brown et al. (29) South Africa 1981 Culture 100 45 45 (35.5–54.7)
Dangor et al. (30) South Africa 1989 Culture 240 164 68.3 (62.2–73.8)
Cheng et al. (31) South Africa 1994 M-PCR 538 171 31.7 (27.9–35.8)
Lai et al. (32) South Africa 1994 M-PCR 160 232 68.9 (62.7–74.5)
South Africa 1998 M-PCR 94 186 50.5 (43.4–57.6)
Meheus et al. (33) Swaziland 1979 Culture 155 68 43.8 (36.3–51.7)
Ahmed et al. (34) Tanzania 1999 PCR 102 12 11.7 (6.8–19.4)
Le Bacq et al. (35)
Zimbabwe
1991
Culture
90
22
24.4 (16.7–34.2)
Asia
Wang et al. (36) China 1999 M-PCR 96 0 0.0 (0.0–3.8)
Risbud et al. (37) India 1994 M-PCR 302 84 27.8 (23.0–33.1)
Rajan et al. (38) Singapore 1983 Culture 670 56 8·3 (6·4–10·7)
Beyrer et al. (15)
Thailand
1996
M-PCR
38
0
0.0 (0.0–9.1)
North America
Dillon et al. (39) United States 1990 Culture 82 27 32.9 (23.7–43.6)
Mertz et al. (40) United States 1995 M-PCR 143 56 39.1 (231.5–47.3)
Mertz et al. (41)
United States
1996
M-PCR
516
16
3.1 (1.9–4.9)
South America
Sanchez et al. (42)
Peru
1995
M-PCR
61
3
4.9 (1.6–13.4)
Caribbean
Sanchez et al. (42) Dominican Republic 1996 M-PCR 81 21 25.9 (17.6–36.4)
Behets et al. (43) Jamaica 1996 M-PCR 304 72 23·6 (19.2–28.7)
Bauwens et al. (44)
Bahamas
1992
PCR
47
7
14·8 (7.4–27.6)
Middle East
Madani et al. (45)
Saudi Arabia
1999
Culture
3,679
78
2.1 (1.7–2.5)
Europe
Kyriakis et al. (46) Greece 1996 Culture 695 32 4.6 (3.2–6.4)
Bruisten et al. (47) The Netherlands 1996 M-PCR 368 3 0.8 (0.2–2.3)

*GUD, genital ulcer disease; NA, not available; M-PCR, multiplex PCR.
†References 41–47 provided in the online Technical Appendix (http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/EID/article/22/1/15-0425-Techapp1.pdf).

Main Article

Page created: December 17, 2015
Page updated: December 17, 2015
Page reviewed: December 17, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external