Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 2—February 2016
Research

Randomized Controlled Trial of Hospital-Based Hygiene and Water Treatment Intervention (CHoBI7) to Reduce Cholera

Christine Marie GeorgeComments to Author , Shirajum Monira, David A. Sack, Mahamud-ur Rashid, K.M. Saif-Ur-Rahman, Toslim Mahmud, Zillur Rahman, Munshi Mustafiz, Sazzadul Islam Bhuyian, Peter J. Winch, Elli Leontsini, Jamie Perin, Farzana Begum, Fatema Zohura, Shwapon Biswas, Tahmina Parvin, Xiaotong Zhang, Danielle Jung, R. Bradley Sack, and Munirul Alam
Author affiliations: Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (C.M. George, D.A. Sack, P.J. Winch, E. Leontsini, J. Perin, X. Zhang, D. Jung, R.B. Sack); icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh (S. Monira, M. Rashid, K.M. Saif-Ur-Rahman, T. Mahmud, Z. Rahman, M. Mustafiz, S.I. Bhuyian, F. Begum, F. Zohura, S. Biswas, T. Parvin, M. Alam)

Main Article

Table 1

Demographic and environmental characteristics of households of patients with cholera, by study arm, Dhaka, Bangladesh, June 2013–November 2014*

Characteristic Control arm Intervention arm p value†
No. households 83 82
No. enrolled household contacts, median ± SD (min–max)
2 ± 0.9 (2–6), n = 220
2 ± 0.8 (2–5), n = 219
0.9
Index patient
Female sex, no. (%) 56 (67) 52 (63) 0.5
Age, y, median ± SD (min–max) 25 ± 17.6 (0.67–95) 25 ± 15 (1–65) 0.3
<5, no. (%) 5 (6) 8 (10) 0.6
5–14, no. (%) 16 (19) 17 (21)
>14, no. (%)
62 (75)
57 (70)
Household contact‡
Female sex, no. (%) 135 (61) 126 (58) 0.3
Age, y, median ± SD (min–max)‡ 13 ± 15 (0.75–67), n = 220 13 ± 16 (0.58–75), n = 219 0.3
<5 years, no. (%) 36 (16) 45 (21)
5–14, no. (%) 84 (38) 68 (31) 0.3
>14, no. (%)
103 (46)
106 (48)
0.4
Television ownership, no. (%) 42 (51) 45 (55) 0.5
Electricity, no. (%) 82 (99) 82 (100) 0.3
Refrigerator ownership, no. (%) 12 (14) 9 (11) 0.5
A household member can read and write, no. (%)
67 (81)
72 (88)
0.2
Educational level of person responsible for primary drinking water collection, no. (%)
No formal education 40 (48) 40 (49) 0.3
Primary school 31 (37) 24 (29)
Secondary school 11 (13) 17 (21)
Higher secondary school 0 0
Bachelor’s degree 1 (1)
Master's degree
0
1 (1)
Water source type, no. (%)
Groundwater 45 (54) 46 (46) 0.3
Piped water supply
380 (46)
34 (41)
Baseline presence, no. (%)
Any type of soap in latrine area of household 13 (16) 9 (11) 0.3
Any type of soap in cooking area of household 10 (12) 8 (10) 0.6
Vibrio cholerae in stored drinking water 5 (6) 9 (11) 0.2
V. cholerae in source water 10 (12) 12 (15) 0.6
Presence of V. cholerae in source water during study period 22 (27) 27 (33) 0.4

*Unless otherwise specified, the denominator for the control are is 83 and for the intervention arm 82.
†χ2 test for categorical variables and 2-sample t test for continuous variables.
‡p values were calculated by using generalized estimating equations to account for the clustering of the data at the household level.

Main Article

Page created: January 13, 2016
Page updated: January 13, 2016
Page reviewed: January 13, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external