Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 7—July 2016
Letter

Detection and Genomic Characterization of Senecavirus A, Ohio, USA, 2015

On This Page
Figures
Article Metrics
12
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Senecavirus A (SVA), formerly Seneca Valley virus, is a single-stranded positive-sense, nonenveloped RNA virus (1). The RNA genome of SVA is 7.2 kb long and is translated into a polyprotein in a host cell. The polyprotein is then posttranslationally cleaved into mature proteins, including 4 structural viral capsid proteins (VP 1–4) in the N terminus and 7 nonstructural proteins (2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B, 3Cpro, and 3Dpol) in the C terminus (1). SVA was discovered as a contaminant of PER.C6 cells and is closely related to viruses in the genus Cardiovirus (1). Genomic characterization has led to classification of SVA in a new genus, Senecavirus, family Picornaviridae. A retrospective study conducted in the United States showed that the samples collected during 1988–2001 were SVA positive, and genetic analysis revealed that the sequences of all 7 SVA isolates are considerably similar to the first US SVA strain (SVV-001), suggesting that SVA may have been circulating in the US pig population for a long time (2).

Idiopathic vesicular disease (IVD) is a vesicular disease of pigs, and etiology is unknown (3). The clinical signs of IVD are fever, lameness, and vesicular lesions on various body parts including the oral cavity, snout, and coronary bands (3). Despite not being a debilitating disease, IVD is noteworthy because it causes lesions clinically indistinguishable from those of other vesicular animal diseases, including foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), vesicular stomatitis, swine vesicular disease, and vesicular exanthema of swine. IVD has been reported in several countries, including the United States (47), and has been recognized in several US states, including Florida, Indiana, and Iowa (4,8,9). Several lines of evidence show that SVA may be associated with IVD outbreaks in Canada, the United States, and Brazil (3,7,10). We describe the detection and genomic characterization of SVA isolated from pigs with vesicular lesions in Ohio.

In October 2015, the Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory of the Ohio Department of Agriculture received vesicle tissue, a vesicle swab sample, and whole blood from a sow with vesicular disease for rule-out testing for FMD virus (FMDV). The sow was lame on both front feet and had ruptured vesicular lesions on the snout and coronary bands of both front feet (Technical Appendix Figure). FMDV-specific real-time reverse transcription PCR was applied to the nucleic acid samples extracted from the 3 samples by using a MagMAX Pathogen RNA/DNA kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). All samples were negative for FMDV. We then performed 2 conventional reverse transcription PCRs with primers targeting 2 regions of the SVA genome (VP3/VP1, 3D/3′ untranslated region) on the same set of samples; the vesicle tissue and swab samples were SVA positive. Subsequently, we determined the whole-genome sequence of SVA by using 7 pairs of SVA–specific primers (Technical Appendix Table 1).

We completed sequencing the whole genomes for the vesicle tissue (SVA-OH1) and vesicle swab sample (SVA-OH2). On the basis of BLAST (http:blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) searches, the SVA-OH1 and -OH2 isolates had 99% nt identity to 3 new US strains (USA/IA40380/2015, USA/SD41901/2015, USA/IA46008/2015) and 98% nt identity to 3 Brazil strains (SVV/BRA/MG1/2015, SVV/BRA/MG2/2015, SVV/BRA/GO3/2015) from GenBank. The Ohio isolates also shared 96% and 94% nt identity with a Canada strain (11-55910-3) and the first US SVA strain (SVV-001), respectively. Further analysis showed that, in comparison with these 8 strains with complete genome sequences available in GenBank, the 2 Ohio SVA isolates had 22 unique nucleotide mutations in the genome: 1 in the VP4 gene, 5 in VP2, 2 in VP3, 1 in VP1, 4 in 2B, 3 in 2C, 3 in 3A, 1 in 3B, and 2 in 3D (Technical Appendix Table 2). Among the 22 unique mutations, there were 2 nonsynonymous mutations at position 2082 in the VP3 gene of both isolates and position 5037 in the 3A gene of SVA-OH1 and 1 unique synonymous mutation only in SVA-OH2.

Phylogenetic analysis of the complete genome further supports that the 2 Ohio SVA isolates are closely related to each other and clustered together with the 3 recently isolated US strains, were less closely related to the isolates of the Brazil cluster, and were more distantly related to the isolate from Canada and the original SVA strain reported from United States (Figure). Consistent with the previous findings (1), all SVA isolates from different countries clustered together under the genus Senecavirus, which is most closely related to the genus Cardiovirus of the family Picornaviridae (Figure).

Our findings that a pig with clinical signs of IVD was infected with SVA and our genetic analysis demonstrating that the 2 Ohio SVA isolates are closely related to the other SVA strains from different countries provide further support for SVA involvement in IVD in pigs. More support could be provided by future studies, including continued surveillance of SVA and confirmation of the Koch postulates.

Top

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge and appreciate the excellent technical support provided by Jason Herr.

Top

Leyi WangComments to Author , Melanie Prarat, Jeff Hayes, and Yan ZhangComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Ohio Department of Agriculture, Reynoldsburg, Ohio, USA

Top

References

  1. Hales  LM, Knowles  NJ, Reddy  PS, Xu  L, Hay  C, Hallenbeck  PL. Complete genome sequence analysis of Seneca Valley virus-001, a novel oncolytic picornavirus. J Gen Virol. 2008;89:126575. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Knowles  NJ, Hales  LM, Jones  BH, Landgraf  JG, House  JA, Skele  KL, Epidemiology of Seneca Valley virus: identification and characterization of isolates from pigs in the United States. XIVth meeting of the European Study Group on the Molecular Biology of Picornaviruses; 2006 Nov 26–Dec 1; Saariselka, Inari, Finland; 2006. p. G2 [cited 2016 Apr 26]. http://www.europic.org.uk/Europic2006/europic_2006_posters.htm
  3. Singh  K, Corner  S, Clark  SG, Scherba  G, Fredrickson  R. Seneca Valley virus and vesicular lesions in a pig with idiopathic vesicular disease. J Vet Sci Technol. 2012;3:123.
  4. Amass  SF, Schneider  JL, Miller  CA, Shawky  SA, Stevenson  GW, Woodruff  ME. Idiopathic vesicular disease in a swine herd in Indiana. Journal of Swine Health and Production. 2004;12:1926.
  5. Montgomery  JF, Oliver  RE, Poole  WS. A vesiculo-bullous disease in pigs resembling foot and mouth disease. I. Field cases. N Z Vet J. 1987;35:216. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Munday  BL, Ryan  FB. Vesicular lesions in swine—possible association with the feeding of marine products. Aust Vet J. 1982;59:193. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pasma  T, Davidson  S, Shaw  SL. Idiopathic vesicular disease in swine in Manitoba. Can Vet J. 2008;49:845.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibbs  EPJ, Stoddard  HL, Yedloutchnig  RJ, House  JA, Legge  M. A vesicular disease of pigs in Florida of unknown etiology. Florida Veterinary Journal. 1983;12:257.
  9. Kresse  JI, Taylor  WD, Stewart  WW, Eernisse  KA. Parvovirus infection in pigs with necrotic and vesicle-like lesions. Vet Microbiol. 1985;10:52531. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Vannucci  FA, Linhares  DC, Barcellos  DE, Lam  HC, Collins  J, Marthaler  D. Identification and complete genome of Seneca Valley virus in vesicular fluid and sera of pigs affected with idiopathic vesicular disease, Brazil. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2015;62:58993. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2207.151897

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 22, Number 7—July 2016

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Yan Zhang or Leyi Wang, Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Ohio Department of Agriculture, 8995 E Main St, Blvd #6, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068, USA; or

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: June 14, 2016
Page updated: June 14, 2016
Page reviewed: June 14, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external