Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 23, Number 8—August 2017

Human Metapneumovirus and Other Respiratory Viral Infections during Pregnancy and Birth, Nepal

Jennifer L. Lenahan, Janet A. Englund, Joanne Katz, Jane Kuypers, Anna Wald, Amalia Magaret, James M. Tielsch, Subarna K. Khatry, Stephen C. LeClerq, Laxman Shrestha, Mark C. Steinhoff, and Helen Y. ChuComments to Author 
Author affiliations: University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA (J.L. Lenahan, J.A. Englund, J. Kuypers, A. Wald, A. Magaret, H.Y. Chu); Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle (J.L. Lenahan, J.A. Englund, H.Y. Chu); Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (J. Katz, S.C. LeClerq); George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA (J.M. Tielsch); Nepal Nutritional Intervention Project, Kathmandu, Nepal (S.K. Khatry, S.C. LeClerq); Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu (L. Shrestha); Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA (M.C. Steinhoff)

Cite This Article


CME Logo

In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s). Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CME activity: (1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; (2) study the education content; (3) take the post-test with a 75% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at; and (4) view/print certificate.

Release date: July 13, 2017; Expiration date: July 13, 2018

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

•     Evaluate incidence of and risk factors for human metapneumovirus (HMPV) infection during pregnancy, based on a surveillance study in Nepal.

•     Compare clinical presentation and symptoms of HMPV infection during pregnancy, based on a surveillance study in Nepal.

•     Identify birth outcomes associated with HMPV infection during pregnancy, based on a surveillance study in Nepal.

CME Editor

Deborah Wenger, MBA, Copyeditor, Emerging Infectious Diseases. Disclosure: Deborah Wenger, MBA, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

Laurie Barclay, MD, freelance writer and reviewer, Medscape, LLC. Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships: owns stock, stock options, or bonds from Alnylam; Biogen; Pfizer.


Disclosures: Jennifer L. Lenahan, MPH; Joanne Katz, ScD; Jane Kuypers, PhD; James M. Tielsch, PhD; Subarna K. Khatry, MBBS, DOMS, FRCS; Stephen C. LeClerq, MPH; Laxman Shrestha, MD; Mark C. Steinhoff, MD; and Helen Y. Chu, MD, MPH, have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. Janet A. Englund, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships: served as an advisor or consultant for Gilead; received grants for clinical research from Alios; Gilead; GlaxoSmithKline; Novavax; Pfizer. Anna Wald, MD, MPH, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships: served as an advisor or consultant for AiCuris; Amgen; GlaxoSmithKline; Merck; received grants for clinical research from Genocea; Vical. Amalia Magaret, PhD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships: served as an advisor or consultant for AiCuris; Immune Design.



Human metapneumovirus (HMPV) is a respiratory virus that can cause severe lower respiratory tract disease and even death, primarily in young children. The incidence and characteristics of HMPV have not been well described in pregnant women. As part of a trial of maternal influenza immunization in rural southern Nepal, we conducted prospective, longitudinal, home-based active surveillance for febrile respiratory illness during pregnancy through 6 months postpartum. During 2011–2014, HMPV was detected in 55 of 3,693 women (16.4 cases/1,000 person-years). Twenty-five women were infected with HMPV during pregnancy, compared with 98 pregnant women who contracted rhinovirus and 7 who contracted respiratory syncytial virus. Women with HMPV during pregnancy had an increased risk of giving birth to infants who were small for gestational age. An intervention to reduce HMPV febrile respiratory illness in pregnant women may have the potential to decrease risk of adverse birth outcomes in developing countries.

Human metapneumovirus (HMPV), a paramyxovirus discovered in 2001, is a previously unrecognized cause of respiratory infections in infants, children, and adults (1). HMPV is estimated to cause 5%–25% of respiratory infections among infants and children (25) and 1.5%–10.5% of respiratory infections among adults (611). In children, HMPV is responsible for 5%–15% of hospitalizations for lower respiratory tract illness (12). In adult populations, HMPV is responsible for up to 11% of hospitalizations for acute respiratory illness, particularly in adults with underlying heart or lung disease (5,10,11).

Illness and death from respiratory viruses among pregnant women have received greater appreciation globally following the pandemic influenza outbreak in 2009. Pregnancy is known to have an immunomodulating effect, and pregnant women are at elevated risk for complications of both seasonal and pandemic influenza (13,14). The epidemiology and clinical presentation of noninfluenza respiratory viral infections, including HMPV, during pregnancy, as well as the consequence of such infections on the fetus, are not well described, despite advances in sensitive and rapid molecular diagnostic methods and increasing surveillance of respiratory viruses in diverse populations.

This study describes the clinical characteristics of infection due to HMPV and other respiratory viruses among pregnant women in a rural population in South Asia. It also examines the effects of HMPV infection during pregnancy on birth outcomes.


We obtained data for this study during 2 consecutive community-based randomized controlled trials of year-round seasonal influenza vaccination among pregnant women in a rural population in Sarlahi, Nepal. We conducted an active, home-based surveillance with a door-to-door census to identify married women of reproductive age during April 2011–September 2013 (15). Follow-up occurred every 5 weeks at households where women of reproductive age resided to determine whether a woman had become pregnant. All married women 15–40 years of age identified as pregnant with gestational age of 17–34 weeks during the study period were offered enrollment and randomized into 1 of 2 study arms: vaccination or placebo.

From the time of vaccination with study vaccine or placebo through 180 days postpartum, a field interviewer visited the household weekly to conduct a morbidity interview for each day in the preceding week. If a participant had an influenza-like illness (ILI) episode (defined as reported fever plus >1 of the following symptoms: cough, myalgia, rhinorrhea, or sore throat), a midnasal swab specimen was collected and tested for respiratory viral infection by real-time reverse transcription PCR (1619). Viral infection was defined as the molecular detection of the virus concurrent with symptoms of a respiratory illness. Any symptoms separated from the illness episode by at least 7 symptom-free days were considered part of a separate illness episode. This analysis does not include influenza, however, because it is analyzed separately as part of the clinical trial of maternal immunization (20).

We estimated gestational age at time of respiratory virus infection in pregnancy by subtracting the date of last menstrual period from the date of delivery, based on maternal recall. The “mother’s smoking” variable captured whether cigarettes or bidi (a hand-rolled cigarette common in South Asia) were smoked in the previous 30 days. Ethnic group was dichotomized as Pahadi (origins in the hills of Nepal) versus Madheshi (origin in the plains of Nepal). We placed women in the categories of Brahmin (highest caste), Chhetri (higher caste), Vaiysha (working caste), Shudra (lower caste), and Muslim. We defined household size as number of persons sharing a cookstove; we defined household density as the number of persons per room, excluding kitchen and storerooms.

We calculated the incidence of infection by using days of follow-up from enrollment through 180 days postpartum. Among women with HMPV and other respiratory viruses, the duration of illness and the week following the illness period were excluded from time at risk. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the characteristics of pregnant and postpartum women with and without HMPV and other respiratory viral infections. Bivariate Poisson regression analyses were performed to assess potential risk factors including household density, number of children <5 years of age in the household, caste, ethnic group, maternal education, and smoking.

To assess differential clinical symptoms related to infection comparing pregnant and postpartum women, we assigned a 1-point score to each of the following symptoms: fever, cough, sore throat, rhinorrhea/nasal congestion, and myalgia (2123). We used a Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare severity scores and total days with symptoms among pregnant and postpartum women. We also compared the proportion of women experiencing each individual symptom for pregnant and postpartum women.

Birth outcomes assessed were birthweight and gestational age at birth. We defined low birthweight (LBW) as <2,500 g. We defined small for gestational age (SGA) with INTERGROWTH-21 standards (24). We defined preterm birth (PTB) as birth before 37 weeks completed gestation. We assessed associations between HMPV during pregnancy and birthweight and gestational age with linear regression, whereas we used Poisson regression to assess binary outcomes (LBW, SGA, PTB). As a reference, we also compared birth outcomes between women with and without any febrile respiratory illness during pregnancy. Finally, we calculated the proportion of ILI episodes with respiratory viruses other than HMPV; the symptoms associated with these episodes are reported.

We performed analyses using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and Stata version 13.1 (StataCorp LLP, College Station, TX, USA). Institutional review board approval for the randomized controlled trial was given by the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, the Institute of Medicine at Tribhuvan University, and the Nepal Health Research Council, with deferral from Seattle Children’s Hospital. Approval for this analysis was received from the University of Washington institutional review board. The primary trial was registered under NCT01034254.


Incidence and Risk Factors

During April 2011–September 2013, we enrolled and vaccinated 3,693 eligible women; weekly surveillance visits continued through May 2014. Median follow-up time was 48 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 44–53 weeks) among women with HMPV and 49 weeks (IQR 43–55 weeks) among women without HMPV. Overall, we collected 944 nasal swab specimens from enrolled women.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of HMPV positivity and seasonality among pregnant women in study of HMPV and pregnancy, Sarlahi, Nepal, April 2011–September 2013. Women were followed until 180 days after birth. HMPV, human metapneumovirus.

Figure 1. HMPV positivity and seasonality among pregnant women in study of HMPV and pregnancy, Sarlahi, Nepal, April 2011–September 2013. Women were followed until 180 days after birth. HMPV, human metapneumovirus.

During this 3-year period, 55 (1.5%) women had an HMPV illness episode. The overall incidence of HMPV was 16.4 cases/1,000 person-years (95% CI 8.9–30.3); this represents 25 cases among pregnant women (16.7 cases/1,000 person-years, 95% CI 10.8–25.8) and 30 cases among postpartum women (16.1 cases/1,000 person-years, 95% CI 7.5–30.1). Incidence peaked at 71.9 cases/1,000 person-years for September 2011–January 2012. During May 2013–January 2014, no HMPV infections were observed (Figure 1). Other respiratory viruses detected among pregnant women in this cohort were rhinovirus (n = 98), coronavirus (n = 30), parainfluenza (n = 23), bocavirus (n = 9), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (n = 7), and adenovirus (n = 6) (Table 1).

Among the 25 pregnant women with HMPV, median gestational age at time of illness was 32.5 weeks (IQR 22.0–37.0 weeks). Women with and without HMPV had similar body mass indexes at enrollment: a median of 20.1 (IQR 18.4–22.4 weeks) among women with HMPV and 20.7 (IQR 19.1–28.0 weeks) among women without HMPV. Hypertension was uncommon in the cohort, identified in 43 (1.2%) of women without HMPV and in no women with HMPV.

Median household density was 3 persons/room among women with and without HMPV. Median years of maternal education was 0 (IQR 0–8.0) among women with HMPV and 5 (IQR 0–10.0) among women without HMPV. Three (5.5%) women with HMPV and 108 (3.1%) women without HMPV had smoked in the 30 days before enrollment (Table 2). In Poisson regression analysis, none of the risk factors analyzed, including caste and household density, altered HMPV risk.

Clinical Symptoms

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Symptom duration among pregnant and postpartum women in study of human metapneumovirus and pregnancy, Sarlahi, Nepal, April 2011–September 2013.

Figure 2. Symptom duration among pregnant and postpartum women in study of human metapneumovirus and pregnancy, Sarlahi, Nepal, April 2011–September 2013.

The most common symptom among pregnant and postpartum participants with HMPV infection was cough (67.3%), followed by rhinorrhea/nasal congestion (58.2%) and myalgia (56.4%). All women with HMPV detected had fever, as this symptom was required for a swab to be taken (Table 3). Median symptom duration was 5 days among both pregnant and postpartum women (Table 3; Figure 2). No difference was noted in the presence or duration of symptoms between pregnant and postpartum women.

In respiratory disease associated with respiratory viruses among pregnant women overall, cough was the most common symptom in all illnesses except parainfluenza and RSV, for which rhinorrhea/nasal congestion was the most common symptom. The longest duration of symptoms was observed among women with bocavirus and parainfluenza 2–4 (7 days). The highest severity score was observed among women with bocavirus, who had a score of 22 (range 6–50) (Table 1).

Twenty-four (43.6%) women with HMPV also experienced viral co-infections, with rhinovirus the most common (n = 14; 25.4%), followed by coronavirus (n = 4; 7.3%) and parainfluenza (n = 3; 5.5%). One pregnant woman had HMPV, rhinovirus, and coronavirus concurrently. Symptom duration and severity were similar between women with and without viral co-infection.

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Timing of nasal swab specimen collection and visits for care among 25 pregnant women with human metapneumovirus infection, Sarlahi, Nepal, April 2011–September 2013.

Figure 3. Timing of nasal swab specimen collection and visits for care among 25 pregnant women with human metapneumovirus infection, Sarlahi, Nepal, April 2011–September 2013.

Twelve pregnant women (48.0%) and 18 postpartum women (60.0%) received medical care during the period of their HMPV illness episode (Table 3; Figure 3). Six women (10.9%) sought care >1 time during their illness. Of the 38 total visits, 16 (42.1%) women visited a medicine shop or local doctor, 12 (31.6%) visited a health post, and 10 (24.4%) visited a primary health center, a medicine shop or local doctor, or hospital. Only 1 woman’s hospital visit was potentially related to HMPV. This woman was 4 weeks postpartum at the start of symptoms and had rhinovirus concurrently; she reported 11 days of symptoms, and visited the hospital twice and a health post once during her illness. No participant died of respiratory illness potentially related to HMPV.

Effect on Birth Outcomes

All women with HMPV during pregnancy delivered live infants. Two (8.0%) of the 25 women with HMPV during pregnancy gave birth to preterm infants; 5 (25.0%) delivered LBW infants. The median gestational age of infants in both groups was 40 weeks (IQR 38–41 weeks), and the median birthweight in both groups was 2.8 kg (IQR 2.4–2.9 kg among women with HMPV, 2.5–3.1 kg among women without HMPV). No differences were noted in birthweight or preterm birth between infants born to women with and without HMPV during pregnancy, nor were differences noted between women with and without fever during pregnancy. However, women with HMPV during pregnancy were found to be 1.7 times as likely to deliver an SGA infant compared with women without HMPV during pregnancy (p = 0.031). Non-HMPV fever during pregnancy did not have a notable effect on SGA risk (Table 4).

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Timing of illness episode and birth outcomes among 25 pregnant women with human metapneumovirus infection, Sarlahi, Nepal, April 2011–September 2013.

Figure 4. Timing of illness episode and birth outcomes among 25 pregnant women with human metapneumovirus infection, Sarlahi, Nepal, April 2011–September 2013.

Women with HMPV during pregnancy who delivered preterm infants experienced the onset of symptoms 25–30 days before delivery (median 27.5 days); women who delivered LBW infants had symptom onset 25–90 days before delivery (median 42 days) (Figure 4). Three women (60.0%) who delivered LBW infants visited a health post during their illness period; 1 woman (50.0%) who delivered a preterm infant visited a medicine shop/local doctor during her illness.

Among the 30 women with HMPV postpartum, 8 (26.7%) had infants who had HMPV within 1 month of their mother’s illness. Four of these mother–infant pairs had HMPV simultaneously; in 2 pairs, the mother had a positive swab before the infant’s swab, and in 2 pairs the infant had a positive swab before the mother’s swab.


In this analysis, we describe the incidence and clinical presentation of HMPV and other respiratory viruses during pregnancy, as well as birth outcomes associated with HMPV infection during pregnancy. HMPV was a relatively common cause of ILI during and after pregnancy and was associated with an increased risk of SGA birth in women with HMPV respiratory illness compared with women without such illness. HMPV exhibited a clear peak during the first of the 3 years of the study. Despite the rural, resource-limited setting, most women with HMPV accessed healthcare, and nearly 20% visited a health center or physician during their illness.

Incidence of HMPV among women during and after pregnancy was 16.5/1,000 person-years, >4 times as high as the RSV incidence in this cohort during the same time period (3.9/1,000 person-years). Pregnant and postpartum women with HMPV also appeared to exhibit longer fever duration (3 days vs. 2 days) and longer overall symptom duration (5 days vs. 4 days) compared with women in the same cohort with RSV (25). Overall, rhinovirus was the most commonly detected pathogen among pregnant women in this cohort (n = 98); coronavirus was also relatively common (n = 30). This finding is notable because Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus during pregnancy have been found to be associated with severe complications and illness in the woman and the infant (2628).

No notable difference in HMPV severity was noted between pregnant and postpartum women. This finding contrasts with previous literature on influenza and RSV, which demonstrates elevated risk for severe disease among pregnant women (13,14,2931). However, much previous research on respiratory illness severity in pregnancy focused on hospital-related outcomes, such as admission to an intensive care unit, which we were unable to capture in this study.

Previous estimates of adult HMPV incidence ranged from 15 to 53/1,000 person-years (611), but accurate estimates of HMPV incidence are difficult to obtain, particularly in a community setting. Many adults with HMPV infections do not seek medical care, and among those who do, many are not tested for viral infections (11). Walsh et al. followed prospectively enrolled young adults (18–40 years of age), healthy elderly adults (≥65 years of age), and high-risk adults (those with symptomatic lung disease) over 4 consecutive winters (32). That study found that 4.3%–10.6% of young adults experienced HMPV infection in any given year, higher than the proportion noted in the healthy elderly (2.2%–6.4%) or the high-risk cohort (2.9%–8.6%), supporting our finding that HMPV is a major pathogen among young adults. These findings also align with the proportion of maternal respiratory swabs positive for HMPV in our study (6.7%), although only 55% of participants in the Walsh et al. young adult cohort reported fever (32).

The HMPV seasonality demonstrated in this subtropical area is somewhat earlier than the seasonality documented in other settings in the Northern Hemisphere, with most cases typically occurring in January through April (2,4,6,11,3237). Although most research has been done in temperate climate zones, a study from India demonstrated only 1 HMPV peak over the 3-year study period, which suggests that HMPV may exhibit a nonannual cycle in this setting (37).

Although clinic visits in this area of Nepal can be heavily confounded by factors such as location and socioeconomic status, we found that most women with HMPV were seen by a healthcare provider and one quarter of the visits were to a primary health center or MD/MMBS doctor. Considering the frequency of healthcare visits among women with HMPV in this resource-limited region, future research should investigate lower respiratory complications and longer-term sequelae of HMPV in pregnant and postpartum women.

We found that febrile illness due to HMPV during pregnancy is associated with increased SGA risk (risk ratio 1.7; p = 0.031). Infants who are born SGA are at increased risk for poor growth and early death, particularly in developing countries. Reasons for SGA births include maternal malnutrition, use of drugs or alcohol during pregnancy, intrauterine infection, maternal anemia, or hypertension during pregnancy (38). Rates of hypertension, maternal smoking, and alcohol use are low in this cohort, and we found no difference in body mass index between pregnant women with and without SGA births. It is possible that a systemic inflammatory response due to HMPV febrile respiratory illness may be associated with increased risk of SGA, although it is not clear why this would be due to HMPV alone rather than febrile respiratory illness in general. No difference was noted in LBW or PTB between infants born to women with and without HMPV during pregnancy. Overall, the observed incidences of LBW and PTB in this cohort were slightly lower than previous estimates in the region, reflecting an overall improvement in health in the population. Among all women enrolled, 25% gave birth to an LBW infant, compared with 30.4% in previous studies; 13% gave birth preterm, compared with 18.3% in previous studies (15,39). In the parent trial of maternal influenza immunization, influenza vaccination during pregnancy was effective in prevention of influenza infection in infants and was also associated with increased birthweight (20). This finding suggests that prevention of potential respiratory illness during pregnancy may decrease the risk of adverse birth outcomes.

Limitations of this study included the relatively small number of women with HMPV during pregnancy. We observed most outcomes at rates at 10%–50%, but with only 25 women having HMPV during pregnancy, we had the power only to detect risk ratios of 1.6 to 3.5. A further limitation was the collection of swabs only in cases of febrile respiratory illness; asymptomatic or afebrile infections would not have been captured. Because previous studies have found that adults with HMPV are often afebrile, with fever reported among 0–55% of adults, we likely underestimated the true incidence of HMPV (6,11,32,34,40). Preceding respiratory viral infections may increase risk for secondary bacterial infections, such as pneumococcus and staphylococcus. Unfortunately, in this study we did not test for bacterial infections and thus cannot assess whether these had an effect on clinical outcomes. The study was confined to a single rural district, which may have limited the variation in risk factors, such as caste and education. However, this region of Nepal (in the plains along the border with Bihar, India) is broadly representative of South Asia, a region with a population density and birth rate among the highest in the world. Few studies of HMPV have been conducted in these types of settings, particularly among pregnant women, which is notable because the presentation and clinical outcomes of disease may differ in regions of the world with high rates of household density, malnutrition, and indoor air pollution.

In summary, in this prospective study involving active, home-based surveillance in a rural South Asia setting, we found that HMPV is a relatively frequent cause of symptomatic febrile illness during pregnancy. These data may help providers to make decisions about therapeutic care, particularly as more inexpensive viral diagnostic tests become available. Finally, as attempts to develop a vaccine or antiviral therapy for HMPV are currently under way, the identification of risk factors for infection and for severe disease is crucial to identify groups that would benefit most from these advances, and to help develop focused prevention strategies.

Ms. Lenahan is currently a research manager at Save the Children Federation, Inc., focusing on pneumonia. She previously worked as a senior infectious disease research associate at Seattle Children’s Hospital in Seattle, Washington, USA. Her research interests include respiratory illness, viral surveillance, and vaccine-preventable illnesses.



We acknowledge the Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project–Sarlahi staff in Kathmandu and Sarlahi District, Nepal, and the mothers and infants who participated in this study.

This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants K23-AI103105 (H.Y.C.) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (grant 50274).



  1. van den Hoogen  BG, de Jong  JC, Groen  J, Kuiken  T, de Groot  R, Fouchier  RA, et al. A newly discovered human pneumovirus isolated from young children with respiratory tract disease. Nat Med. 2001;7:71924. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Caracciolo  S, Minini  C, Colombrita  D, Rossi  D, Miglietti  N, Vettore  E, et al. Human metapneumovirus infection in young children hospitalized with acute respiratory tract disease: virologic and clinical features. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27:40612. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Foulongne  V, Guyon  G, Rodière  M, Segondy  M. Human metapneumovirus infection in young children hospitalized with respiratory tract disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25:3549. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Williams  JV, Harris  PA, Tollefson  SJ, Halburnt-Rush  LL, Pingsterhaus  JM, Edwards  KM, et al. Human metapneumovirus and lower respiratory tract disease in otherwise healthy infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:44350. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kahn  JS. Epidemiology of human metapneumovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:54657. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Falsey  AR, Erdman  D, Anderson  LJ, Walsh  EE. Human metapneumovirus infections in young and elderly adults. J Infect Dis. 2003;187:78590. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Silva  RC, Mendes  GS, Rojas  MA, Amorim  AR, Couceiro  JN, Lupi  O, et al. Frequency of viral etiology in symptomatic adult upper respiratory tract infections. Braz J Infect Dis. 2015;19:305. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Zimmerman  RK, Rinaldo  CR, Nowalk  MP, Gk  B, Thompson  MG, Moehling  KK, et al. Influenza and other respiratory virus infections in outpatients with medically attended acute respiratory infection during the 2011-12 influenza season. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2014;8:397405. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Widmer  K, Griffin  MR, Zhu  Y, Williams  JV, Talbot  HK. Respiratory syncytial virus- and human metapneumovirus-associated emergency department and hospital burden in adults. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2014;8:34752. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Reiche  J, Jacobsen  S, Neubauer  K, Hafemann  S, Nitsche  A, Milde  J, et al. Human metapneumovirus: insights from a ten-year molecular and epidemiological analysis in Germany. PLoS One. 2014;9:e88342. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Haas  LE, Thijsen  SF, van Elden  L, Heemstra  KA. Human metapneumovirus in adults. Viruses. 2013;5:87110. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Feuillet  F, Lina  B, Rosa-Calatrava  M, Boivin  G. Ten years of human metapneumovirus research. J Clin Virol. 2012;53:97105. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Memoli  MJ, Harvey  H, Morens  DM, Taubenberger  JK. Influenza in pregnancy. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2013;7:10339. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jamieson  DJ, Honein  MA, Rasmussen  SA, Williams  JL, Swerdlow  DL, Biggerstaff  MS, et al.; Novel Influenza A (H1N1) Pregnancy Working Group. H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection during pregnancy in the USA. Lancet. 2009;374:4518. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tielsch  JM, Steinhoff  M, Katz  J, Englund  JA, Kuypers  J, Khatry  SK, et al. Designs of two randomized, community-based trials to assess the impact of influenza immunization during pregnancy on respiratory illness among pregnant women and their infants and reproductive outcomes in rural Nepal. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:40. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuypers  J, Wright  N, Corey  L, Morrow  R. Detection and quantification of human metapneumovirus in pediatric specimens by real-time RT-PCR. J Clin Virol. 2005;33:299305. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin  ET, Taylor  J, Kuypers  J, Magaret  A, Wald  A, Zerr  D, et al. Detection of bocavirus in saliva of children with and without respiratory illness. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:41312. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuypers  J, Martin  ET, Heugel  J, Wright  N, Morrow  R, Englund  JA. Clinical disease in children associated with newly described coronavirus subtypes. Pediatrics. 2007;119:e706. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuypers  J, Wright  N, Ferrenberg  J, Huang  ML, Cent  A, Corey  L, et al. Comparison of real-time PCR assays with fluorescent-antibody assays for diagnosis of respiratory virus infections in children. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:23828. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Steinhoff  MC, Katz  J, Englund  JA, Khatry  SK, Shrestha  L, Kuypers  J, et al. Year-round influenza immunisation during pregnancy in Nepal: a phase 4, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;S1473-3099(17)30252-9.
  21. Roussy  JF, Carbonneau  J, Ouakki  M, Papenburg  J, Hamelin  , De Serres  G, et al. Human metapneumovirus viral load is an important risk factor for disease severity in young children. J Clin Virol. 2014;60:13340. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Papenburg  J, Hamelin  , Ouhoummane  N, Carbonneau  J, Ouakki  M, Raymond  F, et al. Comparison of risk factors for human metapneumovirus and respiratory syncytial virus disease severity in young children. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:17889. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hahn  A, Wang  W, Jaggi  P, Dvorchik  I, Ramilo  O, Koranyi  K, et al. Human metapneumovirus infections are associated with severe morbidity in hospitalized children of all ages. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141:221323. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Papageorghiou  AT, Ohuma  EO, Altman  DG, Todros  T, Cheikh Ismail  L, Lambert  A, et al.; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014;384:86979. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chu  HY, Katz  J, Tielsch  J, Khatry  SK, Shrestha  L, LeClerq  SC, et al. Clinical presentation and birth outcomes associated with respiratory syncytial virus infection in pregnancy. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0152015. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Malik  A, El Masry  KM, Ravi  M, Sayed  F. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus during Pregnancy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:5157. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Alserehi  H, Wali  G, Alshukairi  A, Alraddadi  B. Impact of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) on pregnancy and perinatal outcome. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:105. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wong  SF, Chow  KM, Leung  TN, Ng  WF, Ng  TK, Shek  CC, et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of women with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:2927. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rasmussen  SA, Jamieson  DJ. Influenza and pregnancy in the United States: before, during, and after 2009 H1N1. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55:48797. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Bhalerao-Gandhi  A, Chhabra  P, Arya  S, Simmerman  JM. Influenza and pregnancy: a review of the literature from India. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2015;2015:867587.
  31. Wheeler  SM, Dotters-Katz  S, Heine  RP, Grotegut  CA, Swamy  GK. Maternal effects of respiratory syncytial virus infection during pregnancy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:19515. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Walsh  EE, Peterson  DR, Falsey  AR. Human metapneumovirus infections in adults: another piece of the puzzle. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:248996. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McAdam  AJ, Hasenbein  ME, Feldman  HA, Cole  SE, Offermann  JT, Riley  AM, et al. Human metapneumovirus in children tested at a tertiary-care hospital. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:206. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Talaat  KR, Karron  RA, Thumar  B, McMahon  BA, Schmidt  AC, Collins  PL, et al. Experimental infection of adults with recombinant wild-type human metapneumovirus. J Infect Dis. 2013;208:166978. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilkesmann  A, Schildgen  O, Eis-Hübinger  AM, Geikowski  T, Glatzel  T, Lentze  MJ, et al. Human metapneumovirus infections cause similar symptoms and clinical severity as respiratory syncytial virus infections. Eur J Pediatr. 2006;165:46775. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Aberle  SW, Aberle  JH, Sandhofer  MJ, Pracher  E, Popow-Kraupp  T. Biennial spring activity of human metapneumovirus in Austria. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27:10658. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Banerjee  S, Sullender  WM, Choudekar  A, John  C, Tyagi  V, Fowler  K, et al. Detection and genetic diversity of human metapneumovirus in hospitalized children with acute respiratory infections in India. J Med Virol. 2011;83:1799810. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Katz  J, Lee  ACC, Kozuki  N, Lawn  JE, Cousens  S, Blencowe  H, et al.; CHERG Small-for-Gestational-Age-Preterm Birth Working Group. Mortality risk in preterm and small-for-gestational-age infants in low-income and middle-income countries: a pooled country analysis. Lancet. 2013;382:41725. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hughes  MM, Katz  J, Mullany  LC, Khatry  SK, LeClerq  SC, Darmstadt  GL, et al. Seasonality of birth outcomes in rural Sarlahi District, Nepal: a population-based prospective cohort. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:310. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Widmer  K, Zhu  Y, Williams  JV, Griffin  MR, Edwards  KM, Talbot  HK. Rates of hospitalizations for respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, and influenza virus in older adults. J Infect Dis. 2012;206:5662. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Follow Up

Earning CME Credit

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions (with a minimum 75% passing score) and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers.

You must be a registered user on If you are not registered on, please click on the “Register” link on the right hand side of the website.

Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions, you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. For questions regarding this activity, contact the accredited provider, For technical assistance, contact American Medical Association’s Physician’s Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please go to The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit may be acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US, please complete the questions online, print the AMA PRA CME credit certificate, and present it to your national medical association for review.

Article Title:
Human Metapneumovirus and Other Respiratory Viral Infections during Pregnancy and Birth, Nepal

CME Questions

1.   You are advising a prenatal clinic in Nepal regarding human metapneumovirus (hMPV) infection during pregnancy. According to the surveillance study in Nepal by Lenahan and colleagues, which one of the following statements about incidence of and risk factors for hMPV infection during pregnancy and up to 6 months postpartum is correct?

A. Overall incidence of hMPV was 5.4 cases/1000 person-years

B.   Overall incidence of hMPV was half that of respiratory syncytial virus in the same cohort during the same period

C. Incidence peaked at 71.9 cases/1000 person-years during the hMPV season, from September

2011 through January 2012

D. Higher median household density was a significant risk factor for hMPV infection

2.   According to the surveillance study in Nepal by Lenahan and colleagues, which one of the following statements about clinical presentation and symptoms of hMPV infection among pregnant women with fever testing positive for hMPV is correct?

A. The most common symptom was cough (67.3%), followed by rhinorrhea/nasal congestion (58.2%) and myalgia (56.4%)

B.   Median duration of symptoms was 2 weeks

C. Mortality rate was 15%

D. Viral coinfections were uncommon

3.   According to the surveillance study in Nepal by Lenahan and colleagues, which one of the following statements about birth outcomes associated with hMPV infection during pregnancy is correct?

A. Median gestational age of infants born to mothers with hMPV infection was significantly less than that of those born to mothers without hMPV infection

B.   Among pregnant women with hMPV, 26.3% of their infants with known birthweights were low birthweight vs 24.8% among noninfected women

C. Among women with hMPV postpartum, 12% had infants who had hMPV within a month of their mother's illness

D. Preterm births occurred in one quarter of pregnant women infected with hMPV

Activity Evaluation

1. The activity supported the learning objectives.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree






2. The material was organized clearly for learning to occur.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree






3. The content learned from this activity will impact my practice.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree






4. The activity was presented objectively and free of commercial bias.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree







Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2308.161358

Related Links

Table of Contents – Volume 23, Number 8—August 2017

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Helen Y. Chu, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave, MS 359779, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98104, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: July 11, 2017
Page updated: July 13, 2017
Page reviewed: July 13, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.