Volume 24, Number 1—January 2018
CME ACTIVITY - Synopsis
Zika Virus Testing and Outcomes during Pregnancy, Florida, USA, 2016
Colette Shiu1, Rebecca Starker1, Jaclyn Kwal, Michelle Bartlett, Anise Crane, Samantha Greissman, Naiomi Gunaratne, Meghan Lardy, Michelle Picon, Patricia Rodriguez, Ivan Gonzalez, and Christine L. Curry
Table 6
Association between race/ethnicity, insurance status, and language among Zika virus–positive pregnant women, Miami–Dade County, Florida, USA, 2016*
| Characteristic | No. (%) women | Odds ratio (95% CI) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Race/ethnicity* | 0.0013 | ||
| Non-Hispanic white | 231 (11.2) | Reference | |
| Non-Hispanic black | 655 (31.7) | 0.60 (0.23–1.54) | |
| Hispanic | 903 (43.7) | 1.88 (0.84–4.19) | |
| Haitian | 235 (11.4) | 2.34 (0.94–5.79) | |
| Asian/Pacific Islander |
42 (2.0) |
1.60 (0.32–7.98) |
|
| Insurance | <0.0001 | ||
| Public | 1,362 (65.3) | Reference | |
| Private | 329 (15.8) | 0.76 (0.36–1.64) | |
| Uninsured |
395 (18.9) |
3.08 (1.95–4.86) |
|
| Language | 0.0001 | ||
| English | 1,316 (63.1) | Reference | |
| Spanish | 554 (26.6) | 2.62 (1.63–4.21) | |
| Haitian Creole | 190 (9.1) | 2.91 (1.54–5.52) | |
| Other | 26 (1.3) | 1.46 (0.19–11.11) |
*The Native American and other categories were excluded because there were no clinically positive results in these racial/ethnic groups (complete prediction).
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: December 18, 2017
Page updated: December 18, 2017
Page reviewed: December 18, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.