Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 25, Number 7—July 2019
Historical Review

Facility-Associated Release of Polioviruses into Communities—Risks for the Posteradication Era

Ananda S. BandyopadhyayComments to Author , Harpal Singh, Jacqueline Fournier-Caruana, John F. Modlin, Jay Wenger, Jeffrey Partridge, Roland W. Sutter, and Michel J. Zaffran
Author affiliations: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA (A.S. Bandyopadhyay, J.F. Modlin, J. Wenger, J. Partridge); World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (H. Singh, J. Fournier-Caruana, R.W. Sutter, M.J. Zaffran); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (R.W. Sutter)

Cite This Article


The Global Polio Eradication Initiative continues to make progress toward the eradication target. Indigenous wild poliovirus (WPV) type 2 was last detected in 1999, WPV type 3 was last detected in 2012, and over the past 2 years WPV type 1 has been detected only in parts of 2 countries (Afghanistan and Pakistan). Once the eradication of poliomyelitis is achieved, infectious and potentially infectious poliovirus materials retained in laboratories, vaccine production sites, and other storage facilities will continue to pose a risk for poliovirus reintroduction into communities. The recent breach in containment of WPV type 2 in an inactivated poliovirus vaccine manufacturing site in the Netherlands prompted this review, which summarizes information on facility-associated release of polioviruses into communities reported over >8 decades. Successful polio eradication requires the management of poliovirus containment posteradication to prevent the consequences of the reestablishment of poliovirus transmission.

In 1988, the World Health Assembly resolved to eradicate poliomyelitis by the year 2000 (1). Much progress has been made toward this goal. Two of the 3 wild poliovirus (WPV) serotypes are either certified as eradicated (WPV type 2 [WPV2]) or have not been detected globally since 2012 (WPV type 3 [WPV3]). WPV type 1 (WPV1) continues to circulate only in parts of Afghanistan and Pakistan (2). The eradication goal appears within reach.

Once the eradication of poliomyelitis is achieved, apart from rare cases of poliovirus excretors among immunodeficient persons (3,4), polioviruses will only exist as virus stocks, cultures, and reagents in laboratories, vaccine production sites, and other facilities where live poliovirus stocks are maintained. An essential consideration for the certification of eradication of poliomyelitis as described in the Polio Eradication and Endgame Strategic Plan 2013–2018 (5) and the Global Action Plan for Poliovirus Containment (GAPIII) (6) is the safe and secure containment of poliovirus within facilities designated by their governments for the posteradication retention of poliovirus materials. The declaration of the certification of WPV2 eradication in September 2015 (7) accelerated the implementation of containment work as described in GAPIII. The withdrawal of Sabin poliovirus type 2 from the oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) in April 2016 highlighted the importance of containment, and annual meetings of the Global Certification Commission (GCC) for the Eradication of Poliomyelitis beginning in September 2015, and especially in October 2017, clarified the GCC oversight responsibilities for containment (8,9).

A laboratory accident involving the release of WPV2 from an inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) manufacturing site in the Netherlands in April 2017 (1012) motivated this historical review to describe the frequency and consequences of similar breaches. Our objective is to remind management and workers at all laboratory and manufacturing facilities of their responsibility to assess the risks of stored materials (13).


We performed a literature search by using PubMed with no date restrictions, applying the following search terms in various combinations to identify episodes of facility-associated strains infecting humans or being isolated from environmental samples in nonendemic and nonoutbreak reporting areas to complement the information known to us: poliovirus or polio, contamination, accidental environmental contamination, accidental release, and laboratory accidents. This search found a total of 29 references, all of which are described in this article.


Major Documented Events


Thumbnail of Reported incidents of facility-associated poliovirus release from laboratories and manufacturing sites in the pre–polio vaccine era (shown inside dashed-line frames) and the time of poliovirus vaccine introduction to the present (shown inside solid-line frames). AFP, acute flaccid paralysis; IPV, inactivated poliovirus vaccine; MEF-1, wild poliovirus type 2 laboratory reference strain; WPV, wild poliovirus; WPV3, wild poliovirus type 3.

Figure. Reported incidents of facility-associated poliovirus release from laboratories and manufacturing sites in the pre–polio vaccine era (shown inside dashed-line frames) and the time of poliovirus vaccine introduction to the present (shown...

Facility-associated release of polioviruses resulting from either laboratory or vaccine production sources was not uncommon in the period before the development and widespread use of poliovirus vaccines (1420) (Tables 1, 2; Figure). In 1933, a 29-year-old physician conducting experimental work on poliomyelitis was bitten by a macaque monkey. Although the exposure to poliovirus could not be confirmed, the physician later experienced paralysis and died (20,21). The first case of known exposure to poliovirus in a laboratory setting was reported in 1941 in a technician handling infected tissues in preparation for inoculation into monkeys (19,20,23). Six additional laboratory-associated releases of poliovirus through an infected worker occurred during the same decade: 3 in the United States, of which 2 involved a worker infected with Lansing (Armstrong) strain virus (1820,24,36); and 1 each in Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia) (20,37), Canada (20,25), and the United Kingdom (20,26). Cases of poliomyelitis attributable to clinical trial use of vaccines or faulty production have also been reported. In 1935, twelve cases of paralytic poliomyelitis, of which 6 were fatal, were reported among those receiving trial vaccinations against poliomyelitis (22). In 1955, distribution of 120,000 doses of IPV that had been inadequately inactivated during the production step resulted in the paralysis of 51 children, 5 of whom died; secondary transmission was reported among 113 contacts who experienced paralysis, 5 of whom died (27,28). Although the 1955 incident was inherently distinct from all other examples discussed in this review (with the root cause being faulty production procedure instead of accidental release or exposure), we include it in this report for completeness. The number of subclinical infections with poliovirus during this period is unknown, so the total number of persons affected might have been many times higher (29).

In the 3 decades since the WHA resolution to eradicate poliomyelitis and the formation of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) in 1988, seven documented incidents underscore the potential for facility-associated release of polioviruses into the community in the modern era. In 1991, a WPV3 (Saukett strain), probably from a laboratory source, was isolated in France from a woman from Algeria. A year later, a worker in a vaccine manufacturing facility in the Netherlands transmitted a WPV1 (Mahoney strain) used for IPV production to his son (30). In another incident in the Netherlands in 1993, a child with a travel history to France was reported to have been infected with a strain of WPV3 (Saukett strain) almost identical to that used for IPV production in France. The possibility of laboratory contamination was ruled out, and environmental samples collected from around the child’s home and among his family contacts were negative for poliovirus in cell culture. The source of this infection was not determined (30). In India, 2 incidents were reported during 2000–2003 after the interruption of WPV2 transmission in 1999. A WPV2 laboratory reference strain (MEF-1) was recovered from 3 poliomyelitis patients in September 2000 and 7 patients during November 2002–February 2003. The sources of these infections were not identified (3133).

In September 2014 in Belgium, ≈1013 infectious WPV3 particles were released into the sewage system from a vaccine production plant (34). Subsequent investigations revealed no evidence of WPV3 in samples from a range of environmental samples (35). More recently, in the Netherlands, WPV2 (MEF-1 strain) was accidentally released as an aerosolized high-titer spill when tubing became disconnected in a vaccine production room. One exposed staff member became infected and shed the wild virus strain for ≈4 weeks before testing negative by fecal culture, whereas a second staff member who was also present at the time of the spill did not test positive for poliovirus in throat swabs or stool samples (12). No acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) cases or secondary spread to household contacts was detected.


The laboratory accident in April 2017 involving the exposure of a worker who subsequently excreted WPV2 into the sewage system (12) serves as a stark reminder that the achievements of the GPEI are fragile and can be reversed if remaining sources of polioviruses are not contained to reduce the likelihood and consequences of virus reintroduction after eradication. Even more recently, a suspected contamination of ≈150,000 bivalent OPV vials with type 2 Sabin virus strains has been reported in India (38), highlighting the importance of completeness of containment-related activities for type 2 OPV at all stages of vaccine manufacturing and release. Our review demonstrates that the known risk for poliovirus release from a facility into the community appears to be small, based on only a handful of reported incidents, primarily from vaccine manufacturing sites. However, these reported incidents might represent the proverbial tip of the iceberg, given that the reporting requirements in the past were not very stringent.

The release of polioviruses into the community in the posteradication era is a major public health concern for GPEI as it implements the planned, sequential cessation of OPV use during the polio endgame. With the global discontinuation of type 2 OPV for routine and supplemental immunization in April 2016 and the planned cessation of all OPV use in the next 4–5 years, such release of polioviruses from facilities into the community will become a greater public health concern because population immunity wanes in settings of high population density, poor hygiene, and suboptimal immunity (e.g., tropical developing countries) after OPV withdrawal, increasing the potential for transmission (39).

We should note that in the prevaccine era most of the reported incidents occurred in research settings and the exposed persons did not have vaccine-induced immunity for protection against paralysis or virus transmission. In sharp contrast, the incidents reported in the past 3 decades were related to containment failures at vaccine production plants where the staff are expected to be fully vaccinated. Incidents in the more recent period are likely to be more representative of the public health impact of such containment failures for the current phase of the polio endgame and the near future.

The paucity of reports of laboratory-associated poliomyelitis during the past 3 decades testifies to the effectiveness of vaccines and to improved laboratory facilities and biorisk management. However, laboratory breaches in the past might not have been recognized in the absence of clinical cases, and environmental surveillance was less extensive than it is today. Environmental surveillance for polio, for example, appears to have played a major role in such incidents primarily in the past 2 decades, and more so in recent times, with the expansion and enhancement of scope and methodologies that were introduced as a component of the polio endgame. Furthermore, reporting requirements were less stringent in the past, and we assume that not all facility incidents were recorded. The lack of documented incidents of laboratory accidents during 1955–1991 is difficult to explain but might also have been affected by these factors, in addition to the fact that the formation of GPEI in 1988 led to a more concerted, globally synchronized effort to track and report polio cases and outbreaks.

As seen in the Netherlands incident in 2017, previously vaccinated persons, although probably protected from paralysis, can excrete poliovirus after accidental exposure from containment failures and put the community at risk for virus transmission. This risk underscores the importance of stringent containment measures at the vaccine production sites and preparedness for deployment or enhancement of surveillance activities, such as environmental monitoring, as a public health response strategy.

The smallpox experience illustrates the importance of containment for an eradicated pathogen. Within 1 year of detection of the last known natural case of smallpox in 1977, a case linked to laboratory transmission was reported (40). We have a historic opportunity to benefit from an additional 40 years of experience in risk management and disease-control measures to ensure containment measures are designed, implemented, and maintained to provide a world free from all risks for polio-related paralysis. The first step is a uniform, global awareness of the importance of implementing the GAPIII guidelines to minimize facility-associated risks for poliovirus reintroduction. The risk for accidental release can be minimized by retaining poliovirus in a limited number of poliovirus-essential facilities. GAPIII also proposes further risk reduction by establishing international standards of biorisk management for facility containment (i.e., primary safeguards), population immunity (i.e., secondary safeguards), and facility location (i.e., tertiary safeguards) with assurance by national (National Authority for Containment) and international (GCC) oversight that such standards are met. Timeliness and completeness in implementing these measures through well-defined risk management systems and an effective National Authority for Containment are key for success in sustaining a polio-free world.

Equally important is the identification of materials that are potentially infectious for polioviruses in all facilities that store human stool specimens, respiratory samples, or environmental sewage for any purpose. Depending on the place and time of collection, such materials might harbor infectious polioviruses that have been eradicated (WPV2) or are nearly eradicated (WPV1 and WPV3) in the wild. Identifying the risk, eliminating the risk through destruction, or mitigating the risk of handling such materials is essential (13).

Finally, the risk management approach to containment might have to be optimized and balanced to enable other risk mitigation efforts for the endgame and beyond, such as novel vaccine and drug development to further reduce any risk for vaccine-derived circulation. Timely availability of antiviral drugs and effective novel OPVs that have less risk for reversion to neurovirulence compared with current Sabin vaccines might strengthen outbreak response strategies and mitigate medical risks for inadvertent poliovirus exposure and improve reporting of accidental safety breaches by employees (4143). The World Health Assembly resolution on poliovirus containment (WHA71.16) urges intense efforts to accelerate progress toward poliovirus containment globally (44).

About the Author

Dr. Bandyopadhyay is a senior program officer for polio research at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. His research is focused on generating data regarding the best use of poliovirus vaccines to make them affordable and accessible to vulnerable and underserved populations.



  1. World Health Organization. World Health Assembly resolution WHA41.28. Global eradication of poliomyelitis by the year 2000 [cited 2018 Oct 10].
  2. Global Polio Eradication Initiative. Global wild poliovirus 2012–2018 [cited 2018 Oct 10].
  3. Martín  J. Vaccine-derived poliovirus from long term excretors and the end game of polio eradication. Biologicals. 2006;34:11722. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. de Silva  R, Gunasena  S, Ratnayake  D, Wickremesinghe  GD, Kumarasiri  CD, Pushpakumara  BA, et al. Prevalence of prolonged and chronic poliovirus excretion among persons with primary immune deficiency disorders in Sri Lanka. Vaccine. 2012;30:75615. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Global Polio Eradication Initiative. Polio eradication and endgame strategic plan 2013–2018 [cited 2018 Nov 2].
  6. World Health Organization. WHO global action plan to minimize poliovirus facility-associated risk after type-specific eradication of wild polioviruses and sequential cessation of oral polio vaccine use (GAPIII) [cited 2018 Nov 2].
  7. Global Polio Eradication Initiative. Global eradication of wild poliovirus type 2 declared [cited 2018 Nov 2].
  8. Global Certification Commission for the Eradication of Poliomyelitis. Report from the sixteenth GCC meeting, Paris, France, 4–5 July 2017 [cited 2018 Nov 2].
  9. Global Certification Commission for the Eradication of Poliomyelitis. Report from the special meeting of the GCC on poliovirus containment, Geneva, Switzerland, 23–25 October 2017 [cited 2018 Nov 2].
  10. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, the Netherlands). Employee vaccine manufacturer infected with polio virus [cited 2018 Nov 2].
  11. Bilthoven Biologicals. Employee infected with polio virus [cited 2018 Nov 2].
  12. Duizer  E, Ruijs  WL, van der Weijden  CP, Timen  A. Response to a wild poliovirus type 2 (WPV2)-shedding event following accidental exposure to WPV2, the Netherlands, April 2017. Euro Surveill. 2017;22:30542. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. World Health Organization. Guidance to minimize risks for facilities collecting, handling, or storing materials potentially infectious for polioviruses. WHO/POLIO/18.03 [cited 2019 Jan 27].
  14. Dowdle  WR, Birmingham  ME. The biologic principles of poliovirus eradication. J Infect Dis. 1997;175(Suppl 1):S28692. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Van Rooyen  CE, Rhodes  A. Virus diseases of man. New York: Thomas Nelson & Sons; 1948.
  16. Byers  K, Harding  A. Viral agents of human diseases: biosafety concerns. In: Wooley D, Byers K, editors. Biological safety: principles and practices. 5th edition. Washington: ASM Press; 2017. p. 187–220.
  17. Pike  RM. Laboratory-associated infections: summary and analysis of 3921 cases. Health Lab Sci. 1976;13:10514.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pike  RM. Laboratory-associated infections: incidence, fatalities, causes, and prevention. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1979;33:4166. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sulkin  SE, Pike  RM. Viral infections contracted in the laboratory. N Engl J Med. 1949;241:20513. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pike  RM, Sulkin  SE, Schulze  ML. Continuing importance of laboratory acquired infections. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1965;55:1909. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sabin  AB, Wright  AM. Acute ascending myelitis following a monkey bite, with the isolation of a virus capable of reproducing the disease. J Exp Med. 1934;59:11536. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Leake  JP. Poliomyelitis following vaccination against this disease. Cal West Med. 1936;44:1412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sabin  AB, Ward  R. Poliomyelitis in a laboratory worker exposed to the virus. Science. 1941;94:1134. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Beller  K. Laboratory infection with the Lansing virus [in German]. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde. Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene. 1949;153:26973.
  25. Burns  JS. Poliomyelitis: a case possibly due to intracutaneous inoculation. Can Med Assoc J. 1950;63:4989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. McMATH  WFT. Accidental inoculation with poliomyelitis virus. Lancet. 1955;268:7023. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nathanson  N, Langmuir  AD. The Cutter incident: poliomyelitis following formaldehyde-inactivated poliovirus vaccination in the United States during the spring of 1955. II. Relationship of poliomyelitis to Cutter vaccine. Am J Hyg. 1963;78:2960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Offit  PA. The Cutter incident, 50 years later. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:14112. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Dowdle  WR, Wolff  C, Sanders  R, Lambert  S, Best  M. Will containment of wild poliovirus in laboratories and inactivated poliovirus vaccine production sites be effective for global certification? Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:5962.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mulders  MN, Reimerink  JHJ, Koopmans  MPG, van Loon  AM, van der Avoort  HG. Genetic analysis of wild-type poliovirus importation into The Netherlands (1979-1995). J Infect Dis. 1997;176:61724. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Deshpande  JM, Nadkarni  SS, Siddiqui  ZA. Detection of MEF-1 laboratory reference strain of poliovirus type 2 in children with poliomyelitis in India in 2002 & 2003. Indian J Med Res. 2003;118:21723.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. World Health Organization. Wild poliovirus type 2—reference strains isolated in India. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2003;78:88 [cited 2018 Oct 10].
  33. World Health Organization. Update on actions taken following the isolation of MEF-1 reference poliovirus associated with acute flaccid paralysis cases in India in late 2002 and early 2003. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2003;78:277–84 [cited 2018 Oct 10].
  34. Duizer  E, Rutjes  S, de Roda Husman  AM, Schijven  J. Risk assessment, risk management and risk-based monitoring following a reported accidental release of poliovirus in Belgium, September to November 2014. Euro Surveill. 2016;21:30169. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Duizer  E. Laboratory analysis of environmental samples taken following the reported release of live poliovirus. RIVM letter report 2015–0032 [cited 2018 Oct 10].
  36. Wenner  HA, Paul  JR. Fatal infection with poliomyelitis virus in a laboratory technician; isolation of virus from lymph nodes. Am J Med Sci. 1947;213:918. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gear  JH, Rodger  LM. Studies in poliomyelitis; poliomyelitis in Northern Rhodesia, with special reference to an outbreak occurring on the Roan Antelope Copper Mine, Luanshya, in 1946. S Afr Med J. 1946;20:6703.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sushmi Dey. Contaminated vaccines put India’s “polio free” status at risk. The Times of India. October 1, 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 2].
  39. Upfill-Brown  A, Taniuchi  M, Platts-Mills  JA, Kirkpatrick  B, Burgess  SL, Oberste  MS, et al. Nonspecific effects of oral polio vaccine on diarrheal burden and etiology among Bangladeshi infants. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:4149. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Report on an investigation into the cause of the 1978 Birmingham smallpox occurrence. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1980 [cited 2018 Nov 2].
  41. Bandyopadhyay  AS, Garon  J, Seib  K, Orenstein  WA. Polio vaccination: past, present and future. Future Microbiol. 2015;10:791808. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sutter  RW. Unraveling the mucosal Immunity of inactivated poliovirus vaccine. J Infect Dis. 2018;217:3446. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. McKinlay  MA, Collett  MS, Hincks  JR, Oberste  MS, Pallansch  MA, Okayasu  H, et al. Progress in the development of poliovirus antiviral agents and their essential role in reducing risks that threaten eradication. J Infect Dis. 2014;210(Suppl 1):S44753. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. World Health Organization. World Health Assembly resolution WHA71.16. Poliomyelitis—containment of polioviruses. In: Seventy-first World Health Assembly, Geneva, Switzerland; May 20–26, 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 2].




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2507.181703

Original Publication Date: May 13, 2019

Table of Contents – Volume 25, Number 7—July 2019

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Ananda S. Bandyopadhyay, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, 1432 Elliott Ave W, Seattle, WA 98119, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: June 17, 2019
Page updated: June 17, 2019
Page reviewed: June 17, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.