Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 25, Number 7—July 2019
Dispatch

Carbapenem and Cephalosporin Resistance among Enterobacteriaceae in Healthcare-Associated Infections, California, USA1

Kyle RizzoComments to Author , Sam Horwich-Scholefield, and Erin Epson
Author affiliations: California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA.

Main Article

Table 2

Carbapenem and cephalosporin resistance among Enterobacteriaceae reported in healthcare-associated infections by California hospitals, aggregated by county, 2014–2017*

County Carbapenems
Cephalosporins
2014–2015
2016–2017
2014–2015
2016–2017
No. (%) isolates† % R No. (%) isolates† % R No. (%) isolates† % R No. (%) isolates† % R
Alameda 280 (72.4) 1.8 342 (84) 2.0 215 (56.3) 27.4 258 (63.2) 29.8
Butte 40 (97.6) 0 46 (93.9) 0 40 (100) 22.5 47 (97.9) 14.9
Contra Costa 141 (50.5) 5.7 197 (57.8) 3.0 120 (43.8) 40.0 159 (46.9) 40.3
Fresno 324 (91.3) 0 379 (95.5) 0.3 293 (85.4) 18.4 351 (89.5) 21.1
Imperial 33 (100) 3.0 NS NS 32 (97.0) 43.8 NS NS
Kern 165 (97.6) 1.8 137 (89) 0.7 100 (61.0) 17.0 110 (71.9) 19.1
Kings 35 (100) 0 33 (100) 0 36 (100) 16.7 33 (100) 27.3
Los Angeles 1,294 (46.9) 6.6 1,477 (49.6) 7.1 2,044 (74.7) 28.7 2,263 (75.8) 32.4
Marin 38 (97.4) 0 NS NS NS NS NS NS
Monterey 85 (95.5) 0 111 (78.7) 0 69 (76.7) 8.7 112 (80.6) 16.1
Napa NS NS 31 (93.9) 0 NS NS 32 (97.0) 9.4
Orange 365 (56.6) 3.6 363 (54.7) 4.1 530 (85.8) 26.4 548 (84.8) 24.5
Placer 70 (70.0) 1.4 108 (89.3) 1.9 60 (60.0) 21.7 79 (64.8) 24.1
Riverside 233 (56.0) 3.4 249 (55.8) 2.4 315 (77.2) 23.8 371 (84.1) 22.6
Sacramento 381 (86.6) 1.0 392 (81.8) 3.3 336 (78.1) 22.9 388 (82.9) 27.3
San Bernardino 301 (67.9) 3.0 337 (72.9) 3.0 217 (61.8) 33.2 212 (67.9) 42.5
San Diego 657 (53.8) 4.0 573 (50.8) 3.1 946 (80.0) 32.7 901 (81.5) 31.7
San Francisco 405 (96.4) 1.2 432 (96.0) 2.1 374 (87.4) 21.7 381 (84.1) 22.6
San Joaquin 61 (71.8) 0 53 (54.1) 3.8 80 (94.1) 16.3 95 (97.9) 18.9
San Luis Obispo NS NS NS NS NS NS 30 (100) 13.3
San Mateo 137 (98.6) 0.7 107 (98.2) 2.8 92 (67.2) 28.3 82 (73.9) 25.6
Santa Barbara 113 (99.1) 1.8 106 (98.1) 0.9 108 (95.6) 11.1 107 (99.1) 11.2
Santa Clara 370 (55.2) 1.4 557 (69.2) 1.8 413 (62.5) 25.9 659 (81.1) 26.9
Shasta NS NS NS NS 67 (97.1) 11.9 59 (96.7) 10.2
Solano 91 (95.8) 6.6 121 (99.2) 0.8 55 (58.5) 32.7 80 (67.2) 35.0
Sonoma 71 (68.3) 0 99 (92.5) 1.0 81 (78.6) 17.3 77 (72.6) 14.3
Stanislaus 92 (62.2) 2.2 98 (66.2) 1.0 106 (74.6) 29.2 98 (68.1) 28.6
Tulare NS NS NS NS 36 (69.2) 22.2 41 (74.5) 14.6
Ventura 42 (29.0) 0 61 (48.4) 3.3 128 (89.5) 11.7 119 (95.2) 20.2
Yuba NS NS 36 (97.3) 2.8 NS 27.4 37 (97.4) 13.5

*Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were resistant to imipenem, meropenem, doripenem, or ertapenem. Enterobacteriaceae resistant to ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, or cefotaxime were cephalosporin resistant. The percentage of resistant Enterobacteriaceae is not shown when <30 Enterobacteriaceae are reported within a county. NS, not shown; % R, percentage resistant.
†The number and percentage of Enterobacteriaceae with reported antimicrobial susceptibility test results as a proportion of the overall number reported (i.e., with or without antimicrobial susceptibility test results).

Main Article

1Preliminary data from this analysis were presented in a poster at IDWeek 2018 in San Francisco, California, USA, October 5, 2018.

Page created: July 08, 2019
Page updated: July 08, 2019
Page reviewed: July 08, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external