Volume 25, Number 8—August 2019
Sustained Low-Level Transmission of Zika and Chikungunya Viruses after Emergence in the Fiji Islands
Zika and chikungunya viruses were first detected in Fiji in 2015. Examining surveillance and phylogenetic and serologic data, we found evidence of low-level transmission of Zika and chikungunya viruses during 2013–2017, in contrast to the major outbreaks caused by closely related virus strains in other Pacific Island countries.
Zika virus and chikungunya virus (CHIKV) have caused outbreaks in several tropical regions, including the Pacific (1). The first known Zika virus outbreak occurred in Yap Island (Federated States of Micronesia) in 2007 (2), followed by an explosive outbreak in French Polynesia in 2013–2014 (3), then other Pacific islands (4) and Latin America (5). CHIKV first appeared in the Pacific in 2011 (6), causing multiple outbreaks from 2013 onward (4).
In Fiji, the first confirmed Zika virus infections were detected in July 2015; these were locally acquired. By March 2016, a total of 13 confirmed infections had been reported (7). The first recorded CHIKV infection was an imported case detected in March 2015 (8); 24 autochthonous infections were identified by June 2016 (9). CHIKV and Zika virus were subsequently detected in travelers returning from Fiji (10,11). Outbreaks of dengue virus (DENV) have been recorded in Fiji (4,12), and evidence from other settings indicates that DENV and Zika virus can exhibit similar transmission characteristics in the same location (13). Despite enhanced surveillance, no large outbreaks of Zika or chikungunya were identified in Fiji, unlike in other settings (3,4). We describe the introduction, epidemiology, and transmission of Zika virus and CHIKV in Fiji during 2013–2017, in a context of concurrent circulation of DENV (4,12).
We retrieved surveillance data for patients with prolonged fever (PF), defined as any fever lasting >3 days, and acute fever and rash (AFR) in Fiji (Figure), as well as data on suspected and confirmed Zika virus, CHIKV, and DENV infections (Appendix Table 1). We reconstructed phylogenetic trees of Zika virus and CHIKV sequences by using Bayesian inference (Appendix Tables 2, 3). We recruited 778 participants in Fiji during September–November 2013 as part of a community-based serologic survey (Appendix Figure 1). We collected follow-up samples from the same participants in the Central Division (N = 333) during October–November 2015. We tested serum samples by using a recombinant antigen-based microsphere immunoassay to detect Zika virus, CHIKV, and DENV-1–4 IgG (Appendix). Analysis of neutralizing antibodies against Zika virus and DENV in a subset of 69 paired serum samples showed good concordance with the microsphere immunoassay for Zika virus (κ = 0.71) and DENV (κ = 0.80) (Appendix Table 4).
Surveillance data recorded during 2013–2017 indicated cyclical increases in AFR and PF each year, concurrent with the hot and rainy season occurring in December–April (Figure). Molecular testing of blood samples from symptomatic patients suggested outbreaks of DENV-1 in 2013, DENV-3 in 2014, and DENV-2 in 2017. In 2015, Zika virus and CHIKV apparently were co-circulating at low levels alongside DENV-1, DENV-2, and DENV-3. In 2016, an increase in proportional positivity for Zika virus and CHIKV was detected among 804 AFR and PF patients, suggesting higher transmission of these viruses but not widespread circulation (Zika virus, 32/804 [4%]; CHIKV, 86/804 [11%]; DENV-2, 10/804 [1%]; DENV-4, 2/804 [<1%]). Additional CHIKV (n = 2) and Zika virus (n = 1) infections were detected during the first half of 2017.
We aligned the envelope (E) gene sequences of Zika virus strains collected in Fiji during 2015–2016 (Appendix Table 2) with sequences from other countries. All Zika virus strains belonged to the Asia lineage and segregated into 2 separate clades (posterior probability >0.99) (Appendix Figure 2, panel A). The Fiji Zika virus strains belonged to the Asia and Oceania clade; 2 strains collected in 2016 grouped with viruses isolated in Japan in 2016 (posterior probability >0.99), including 1 from a traveler returning from Fiji. The estimated time of most recent common ancestor of this cluster was September 2013 (95% higher probability density [HPD] interval September 2011–August 2015). The remaining Fiji strains formed a distinct cluster with strains from Southeast Asia and other Pacific Islands. We dated the origin of this second cluster to November 2013 (95% HPD interval March 2013–July 2015).
We aligned the E1 gene sequences of Fiji CHIKV strains collected during 2015–2016 (Appendix Table 2) with sequences from other countries. All strains belonged to the Asia genotype; Fiji strains formed a monophyletic group with strains from Tonga sampled in 2014 (posterior probability 1.00) (Appendix Figure 2, panel B). This grouping suggested a single introduction of CHIKV into Fiji in February 2014 (95% HPD interval December 2013–August 2014) and subsequent persistence in the population.
Zika virus seroprevalence in 2013 was 7.8% (95% CI 6.1%–10%); we observed no significant differences between age groups, sexes, residential divisions, or areas (Table). In 2015, seroprevalence was 21.9% (95% CI 17.6%–26.8%), and the only significant difference observed was between rural (14.2% [95% CI 8.3%–22%]) and urban (26.6% [95% CI 19.5%–34.6%]) areas (p = 0.0202). Compared with 2013, Zika virus seroprevalence in 2015 was significantly higher overall (p<0.0001). However, no change was observed in the CHIKV seroprevalence between 2013 (0.8% [95% CI 0.3%–1.7%]) and 2015 (0.9% [95% CI 0.2%–2.6%]), and no significant differences were observed in the demographic variables described for Zika virus. The seroprevalence of DENV in 2013 was 73% (95% CI 69.7%–76.1%) and was lower among persons in the 0–19 years age group compared with other age groups (p<0.0001) (Table). We observed no significant difference by sex. DENV seropositivity was higher in the Northern than in the Central and Western divisions (p<0.0368) and higher in urban than in rural areas (p = 0.0136). During 2013–2015, we observed a significant increase in DENV seroprevalence (82.9% [95% CI 78.4%–86.8%]; p = 0.0004) among persons 0–19 years of age (p = 0.0013), women and girls (p = 0.0002), and participants living in the Central Division (p = 0.0018) and urban areas (p = 0.0048). Seroprevalence in 2015 remained lower in persons 0–19 years of age than in other age groups (p<0.0137) but was significantly higher in women and girls compared with men and boys (p = 0.039) and in urban compared with rural areas (p = 0.0053).
Analysis of paired samples collected in 2013 and 2015 from the same participants supported previous serologic findings on all samples collected (Appendix Table 5). Among these participants, 55/311 (17.7% [95% CI 13.6%–22.4%]) seroconverted to Zika virus, 40/311 (12.9% [95% CI 9.3%–17.1%]) seroconverted to DENV, and 1/311 (0.3% [95% CI 0.008%–1.8%]) seroconverted to CHIKV (Appendix Table 6).
We found evidence of low-level transmission of Zika virus and CHIKV in Fiji for multiple years after their initial introduction into a population that probably was immunologically naive, despite an ecologic environment subject to large and recurrent DENV outbreaks. Similar evidence of low-level Zika virus circulation has been observed in other settings (14). Our findings indicate that Zika virus circulated before the first confirmed cases in 2015 and that multiple introductions from other Pacific islands might have occurred, which suggests the possible role of Zika virus in a cluster of Guillain-Barré syndrome cases of unknown etiology in Fiji during February–May 2014 (15). However, there was no epidemiologic or serologic evidence that CHIKV circulated in Fiji before it was first reported in 2015. High DENV seroprevalence in 2013 and 2015 suggests that DENV is endemic in Fiji, with seroprevalence increasing with age. Our data also suggest that DENV and Zika virus transmission occurs mostly in urban areas where peridomestic mosquitoes, notably Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus, are abundant.
Our study highlights the difficulties in detecting and anticipating outbreaks of Zika virus and CHIKV and the value of having multiple data sources available. Stronger clinical and laboratory surveillance capacities are needed to ensure the early detection of these and future infectious disease threats.
Dr. Kama is a medical doctor with the Fiji Ministry of Health. Since 2008, he has worked in communicable disease control in Fiji. His area of interest is public health surveillance and response to communicable disease emergencies.
This work was part of ISID-Pacific and R-ZERO Pacific programs funded by the French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs (Pacific Fund nos. 06314-09/04/14, 12115-02/09/15, 03016-20/05/16, and 04917-19/07/17). The study also received support from the Embassy of France in the Republic of the Fiji Islands. The study was supported by the French Government’s “Investissement d’Avenir” Program (Labex IBEID no. ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID). C.L.L. was supported by an Australia National Health and Medical Research Council Fellowship (grant no. 1109035). A.J.K. was supported by a Wellcome Trust/Royal Society Sir Henry Dale Fellowship (grant no. 206250/Z/17/Z). The seroprevalence study was part of MSc research work by M.K. performed at the University of the South Pacific.
- Cao-Lormeau V-M. Tropical islands as new hubs for emerging arboviruses. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:913–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duffy MR, Chen T-H, Hancock WT, Powers AM, Kool JL, Lanciotti RS, et al. Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2536–43. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cao-Lormeau V-M, Roche C, Teissier A, Robin E, Berry A-L, Mallet H-P, et al. Zika virus, French polynesia, South pacific, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:1085–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cao-Lormeau V-M, Musso D. Emerging arboviruses in the Pacific. Lancet. 2014;384:1571–2. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ikejezie J, Shapiro CN, Kim J, Chiu M, Almiron M, Ugarte C, et al. Zika Virus Transmission - Region of the Americas, May 15, 2015-December 15, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66:329–34. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dupont-Rouzeyrol M, Caro V, Guillaumot L, Vazeille M, D’Ortenzio E, Thiberge J-M, et al. Chikungunya virus and the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti in New Caledonia (South Pacific Region). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12:1036–41. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fiji Ministry of Health and Medical Services. Fiji Ministry of Health and Medical Services travel advice [cited 2018 Jan 31]. http://www.health.gov.fj/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Fiji-Ministry-of-Health-Travel-Advice.pdf
- Fiji Ministry of Health and Medical Services. Chikungunya alert [cited 2018 Jan 31]. http://www.health.gov.fj/?p=4366
- Fiji Ministry of Health and Medical Services. People continue to support Fight the Bite—Clean Up Fiji campaign [cited 2018 Jan 31]. http://www.health.gov.fj/?p=5751
- Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited. Zika virus infection weekly report, 27 February 2017 [cited 2018 Jan 31]. https://surv.esr.cri.nz/PDF_surveillance/ZikaWeekly/2017/20170227Zikaweekly.pdf
- Australian Government Department of Health. Summary information about overseas-acquired vectorborne disease notifications in Australia [cited 2018 Jan 31]. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/F4E393746A4B690FCA2580D4007DB251/$File/13-Jan-18-overseas-notifications.pdf
- Kucharski AJ, Kama M, Watson CH, Aubry M, Funk S, Henderson AD, et al. Using paired serology and surveillance data to quantify dengue transmission and control during a large outbreak in Fiji. eLife. 2018;7:
e34848. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Funk S, Kucharski AJ, Camacho A, Eggo RM, Yakob L, Murray LM, et al. Comparative analysis of dengue and Zika outbreaks reveals differences by setting and virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:
e0005173. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruchusatsawat K, Wongjaroen P, Posanacharoen A, Rodriguez-Barraquer I, Sangkitporn S, Cummings DAT, et al. Long-term circulation of Zika virus in Thailand: an observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:439–46. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pastula DM, Khan AS, Sharp TM, Biaukula VL, Naivalu TK, Rafai E, et al. Investigation of a Guillain-Barré syndrome cluster in the Republic of Fiji. J Neurol Sci. 2017;372:350–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
TableCite This Article
Original Publication Date: June 25, 2019
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Table of Contents – Volume 25, Number 8—August 2019
|EID Search Options|
|Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.|
|Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.|
|Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.|
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Van-Mai Cao-Lormeau, Institut Louis Malardé, PO Box 30, 98713 Papeete, Tahiti