Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 25, Number 9—September 2019

Vaccine Effectiveness against DS-1–Like Rotavirus Strains in Infants with Acute Gastroenteritis, Malawi, 2013–2015

Khuzwayo C. JereComments to Author , Naor Bar-Zeev, Adams Chande, Aisleen Bennett, Louisa Pollock, Pedro F. Sanchez-Lopez, Osamu Nakagomi, Jacqueline E. Tate, Umesh D. Parashar, Robert S. Heyderman, Neil French, Miren Iturriza-Gomara1, and Nigel A. Cunliffe1
Author affiliations: University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi (K.C. Jere); Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre (K.C. Jere, N. Bar-Zeev, A. Chande, A. Bennett, L. Pollock, R.S. Heyderman, N. French, M. Iturriza-Gomara); University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK (K.C. Jere, N. Bar-Zeev, A. Bennett, L. Pollock, N. French, M. Iturriza-Gomara, N.A. Cunliffe); Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA (N. Bar-Zeev); University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain (P.F. Sanchez-Lopez); Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan (O. Nakagomi, J.E. Tate); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (U.D. Parashar); University College London, London, UK (R.S. Heyderman)

Cite This Article


Atypical DS-1–like G1P[8] rotaviruses emerged in 2013 in Malawi after rotavirus vaccine introduction. Vaccine effectiveness among infants hospitalized with acute DS-1–like G1P[8] rotavirus gastroenteritis was 85.6% (95% CI 34.4%–96.8%). These findings suggest that vaccine provides protection against these strains despite their emergence coinciding with vaccine introduction.

Rotavirus remains a major cause of severe dehydration, diarrhea, and death among children <5 years of age in many low-income countries. After the introduction of Rotarix (Glaxo SmithKline, rotavirus vaccine into Malawi’s immunization schedule in October 2012, enhanced surveillance combined with case–control studies have described the substantial population impact and effectiveness of Rotarix on hospitalized rotavirus disease and diarrheal deaths (1,2).

Both of the globally available rotavirus vaccines, Rotarix and RotaTeq (Merck & Co.,, have been shown to protect against rotaviruses with a broad range of G and P types, as defined by the 2 viral outer-capsid proteins (3,4). A whole-genome classification system describes rotavirus strains more completely by assigning genotypes to each of its 11 double-stranded RNA segments (5). Most rotavirus strains contain either a Wa (G1-P[8]-I1-R1-C1-M1-A1-N1-T1-E1-H1) or DS-1 (G2-P[4]-I2-R2-C2-M2-A2-N2-T2-E2-H2) genotype constellation (6). Typically, G1P[8] strains, including the Rotarix strain (RIX4414), possess a Wa-like genetic backbone, whereas G2P[4] strains generally have a DS-1–like genotype constellation (6). A switch in predominant rotavirus genotype from G1P[8] to G2P[4] after Rotarix introduction has been described in various settings (7,8), and higher vaccine effectiveness (VE) against G1P[8] strains has been described compared with G2P[4] in some settings (2,9). It is not known whether these changes in strain distribution and strain-specific differences in VE are related to differences in cross-protection afforded by the outer capsid proteins (G and P type) or to the distinct genetic backbones possessed by DS-1–like strains and the Wa-like Rotarix strain.

Previously, we demonstrated that all G1P[8] strains detected before Rotarix introduction in Malawi had a Wa-like genetic backbone (10). Shortly after Rotarix introduction, atypical DS-1–like G1P[8] rotavirus strains were detected, which provided an opportunity to examine whether emergence of DS-1–like G1P[8] strains could be the result of reduced protection afforded by the Wa-like G1P[8] Rotarix vaccine.

The Study

We used enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect rotaviruses in stool samples collected from children <5 years of age with acute gastroenteritis at Queen Elisabeth Central Hospital (QECH; Blantyre, Malawi) (2). We used reverse transcription PCR to assign G and P genotypes to rotavirus-positive samples (10,11). Samples with sufficient volume and containing G1 (n = 110), G2 (n = 64), or other (G4, G9, or G12, n = 42) rotavirus strains were selected at random during January 2013–December 2015.

We generated rotavirus whole-genome sequences (WGS) using the HiSeq 2000 platform (Illumina Inc., as described previously (10). We derived consensus sequences using Geneious ( and genotyped them using RotaC ( All complete nucleotide sequences generated in this study were deposited into GenBank (12) (accession nos. MG181227–941).

We calculated rotavirus VE using logistic regression to compare 2-dose versus 0-dose vaccination status among hospitalized strain-specific rotavirus diarrhea case-patients and concurrently hospitalized control patients with non–rotavirus-caused diarrhea, matched by age at admission. We defined concurrency of controls for each endpoint (Table) as any patient hospitalized for diarrhea who tested negative for rotavirus occurring in the same date range (between the first and last hospitalized strain-specific case) in which cases of strain-specific rotavirus were detected. We limited VE analysis to infants <12 months of age because previous analysis did not demonstrate statistically significant protection in the second year of life (VE 31.7%, 95% CI −140.6% to 80.6%) (2). We obtained ethics approval from the National Health Sciences Research Committee, Malawi (867), and the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK (000490).


Thumbnail of Monthly number of rotavirus cases at Queen Elisabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi. Numbers are based on the presence of either DS-1–like (A) or Wa-like (B) constellation of rotavirus strains.

Figure. Monthly number of rotavirus cases at Queen Elisabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi. Numbers are based on the presence of either DS-1–like (A) or Wa-like (B) constellation of rotavirus strains.

Of 216 rotavirus strains sequenced, 114 (53%) had a Wa-like and 88 (44%) a DS-1–like genotype constellation. Among Wa-like strains, 72% were G1, <1% were G2, and 25% were G12. Of the DS-1–like strains, 31% were G1 and 69% were G2. Of the 110 G1 strains analyzed by WGS, 75% were Wa-like and 25% were DS-1–like. We detected atypical G1 rotaviruses with DS-1–like genotype constellation in Malawi in 2013; their circulation peaked in 2014 and subsequently decreased in 2015 (<1%, 1/72) (Figure).

In logistic regression analysis adjusted for year of presentation, Rotarix effectiveness against DS-1–like G1P[8] rotavirus was 85.6% (95% CI 34.4%–96.8%; p = 0.01). Effectiveness estimates against Wa-like G1 (VE 76.7%, 95% CI −153.8% to 97.9%) and DS-1–like G2 (VE 48.5%, 95% CI −154.3% to 89.6%) rotaviruses included wide bounds and the null value (Table).


Atypical DS-1–like G1 rotavirus strains emerged in Malawi shortly after Rotarix vaccine introduction (10). Although strain oscillation and emergence of novel types have been reported globally in the absence of vaccination, the mechanisms driving this phenomenon are not well understood. It is possible that the emergence of these DS-1–like G1P[8] strains was coincidental with vaccine introduction. The high VE strongly suggests that escape from vaccine-induced immunity is not the driver for emergence. The swift decline in prevalence of these strains is in contrast with more sustained changes in strain circulation described in other settings in the context of high VE (13). The decline could have been precipitated by the observed high VE or may represent a natural phenomenon related to viral fitness and associated periodic nature of the circulation of the DS-1–like strains, which has been observed historically and globally in the absence of vaccine. These findings support continued use of rotavirus vaccine in this population as an intervention to reduce severe diarrhea caused by rotavirus strains possessing either Wa-like or DS-1–like genetic backbones. The observed decline in rotavirus hospitalizations in children after vaccine introduction (2), together with reduction in infant diarrhea deaths in Malawi (14), are public health benefits that could be sustained through rotavirus vaccination in this region, which has one of the highest burdens of rotavirus disease.

The VE against DS-1–like G1P[8] strains in this study resembles our previous findings of VE of 82% (95% CI 42%–95%) against all G1P[8] strains 3 years after vaccine introduction (2013–2015) (2). In contrast, we were unable to demonstrate statistically significant VE against DS-1–like G2 rotaviruses despite a comparable number of such strains, consistent with our earlier study (VE 45.9%, 95% CI −47.0% to 80.1%; p = 0.228) (2). The apparently lower VE against rotavirus disease caused by DS-1–like strains associated with G2, but not with G1P[8], lends support to the proposed dominant role of the outer capsid proteins VP7 and VP4 as drivers of homotypic protection. Although increasing evidence suggests that Rotarix vaccine does not provide the same degree of protection against G2 strains as G1 strains, this difference in protection appears to have little effect on total VE among populations in which vaccination performs optimally and high VE is maintained. However, the difference in protection between the strains may exacerbate underperformance of rotavirus vaccines in low-resource settings such as Malawi, where overall VE is generally lower for reasons that remain poorly understood (2,15).

We could not demonstrate statistically significant effectiveness against Wa-like G1P[8] rotaviruses (p = 0.23). Wa-like G1P[8] cases became dominant and replaced DS-1–like G1P[8] once vaccine coverage had reached high and stable levels (Figure). At high population vaccine coverage, case–control analysis of VE became challenging and difficult to power sufficiently.

Our data demonstrate that Rotarix provides a high degree of protection against severe disease caused by homotypic G1P[8] rotaviruses in Malawi regardless of genomic backbone. VE for patients <1 year of age is comparable to that seen in middle-income countries. The lower VE against heterotypic G2P[4] strains previously described (15) suggests that more detailed immune response studies, clarification of the correlates of protection for rotavirus disease, and strain surveillance are needed to monitor the impact of sustained, high vaccine coverage on rotavirus strain distribution.

Dr. Jere is a Wellcome International Training Fellow who conducted this research as part of his postdoctoral studies. His research interests are in enteric viral pathogens.



We thank the laboratory staff at the Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme and the sequencing and informatics teams at the Centre for Genomic Research (CGR), University of Liverpool, UK.

This work was supported by an investigator-initiated research grant from GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (eTrack no. 207219) and by the Wellcome Trust (Programme grant no. 091909/Z/10/Z and the MLW Programme Core Award). K.C.J. is a Wellcome Trust Training Fellow (grant no. 201945/Z/16/Z). M.I.-G. is partly supported by the NIHR HPRU in Gastrointestinal Infections.

Author contributions: K.C.J., N.B.-Z., N.A.C., and M.I.-G. conceived and designed the study. K.C.J. and N.B.-Z. collected clinical data and stool samples. K.C.J. performed the laboratory work. K.C.J. and N.B.-Z. carried out the statistical analyses. K.C.J. drafted the manuscript, with major input from N.A.C. and M.I.-G. All authors contributed to interpretation of the data and commented on the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Disclaimer: The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA was provided the opportunity to review a preliminary version of this manuscript for factual accuracy, but the authors are solely responsible for final content and interpretation. The authors received no financial support or other form of compensation related to the development of the manuscript.

M. I.-G. is affiliated with the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections at University of Liverpool in partnership with Public Health England, in collaboration with University of East Anglia, University of Oxford, and the Quadram Institute. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health or Public Health, England.

Potential conflicts of interest: K.C.J., N.B.-Z. and N.F. have received investigator-initiated research grant support from the GSK group of companies. M.I.-G. has received investigator-initiated research grant support from the GSK group of companies and Sanofi Pasteur Merck Sharpe & Dohme and Merck. O.N. has received research grant support and honoraria from Japan Vaccine and MSD for delivering lectures on rotavirus vaccines. N.A.C. has received research grant support and honoraria for participation in rotavirus vaccine data safety monitoring committee meetings from the GSK group of companies. All other authors report no potential conflicts.



  1. Tate  JE, Burton  AH, Boschi-Pinto  C, Parashar  UD; World Health Organization–Coordinated Global Rotavirus Surveillance Network. Global, regional, and national estimates of rotavirus mortality in children <5 years of age, 2000–2013. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(Suppl 2):S96105. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bar-Zeev  N, Jere  KC, Bennett  A, Pollock  L, Tate  JE, Nakagomi  O, et al.; Vaccine Effectiveness and Disease Surveillance Programme, Malawi (VACSURV) Consortium. Population impact and effectiveness of monovalent rotavirus vaccination in urban Malawian children 3 years after vaccine introduction: ecological and case-control analyses. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(Suppl 2):S2139. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Vesikari  T, Karvonen  A, Prymula  R, Schuster  V, Tejedor  JC, Cohen  R, et al. Efficacy of human rotavirus vaccine against rotavirus gastroenteritis during the first 2 years of life in European infants: randomised, double-blind controlled study. Lancet. 2007;370:175763. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zaman  K, Dang  DA, Victor  JC, Shin  S, Yunus  M, Dallas  MJ, et al. Efficacy of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants in developing countries in Asia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:61523. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Matthijnssens  J, Ciarlet  M, Heiman  E, Arijs  I, Delbeke  T, McDonald  SM, et al. Full genome-based classification of rotaviruses reveals a common origin between human Wa-Like and porcine rotavirus strains and human DS-1-like and bovine rotavirus strains. J Virol. 2008;82:320419. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Matthijnssens  J, Ciarlet  M, McDonald  SM, Attoui  H, Bányai  K, Brister  JR, et al. Uniformity of rotavirus strain nomenclature proposed by the Rotavirus Classification Working Group (RCWG). Arch Virol. 2011;156:1397413. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Zeller  M, Rahman  M, Heylen  E, De Coster  S, De Vos  S, Arijs  I, et al. Rotavirus incidence and genotype distribution before and after national rotavirus vaccine introduction in Belgium. Vaccine. 2010;28:750713. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kirkwood  CD, Boniface  K, Barnes  GL, Bishop  RF. Distribution of rotavirus genotypes after introduction of rotavirus vaccines, Rotarix® and RotaTeq®, into the National Immunization Program of Australia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(Suppl):S4853. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Braeckman  T, Van Herck  K, Meyer  N, Pirçon  JY, Soriano-Gabarró  M, Heylen  E, et al. RotaBel Study Group. Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in prevention of hospital admissions for rotavirus gastroenteritis among young children in Belgium: case-control study. BMJ. 2012;345(aug08 1):e4752.
  10. Jere  KC, Chaguza  C, Bar-Zeev  N, Lowe  J, Peno  C, Kumwenda  B, et al. Emergence of double- and triple-gene reassortant G1P[8] rotaviruses possessing a DS-1–like backbone after rotavirus vaccine introduction in Malawi. J Virol. 2018;92:e0124617.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunliffe  NA, Ngwira  BM, Dove  W, Thindwa  BD, Turner  AM, Broadhead  RL, et al. Epidemiology of rotavirus infection in children in Blantyre, Malawi, 1997-2007. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(Suppl):S16874. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Benson  DA, Karsch-Mizrachi  I, Lipman  DJ, Ostell  J, Rapp  BA, Wheeler  DL. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:1720. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hungerford  D, Allen  DJ, Nawaz  S, Collins  S, Ladhani  S, Vivancos  R, et al. Impact of rotavirus vaccination on rotavirus genotype distribution and diversity in England, September 2006 to August 2016. Euro Surveill. 2019;24.
  14. Bar-Zeev  N, King  C, Phiri  T, Beard  J, Mvula  H, Crampin  AC, et al. VacSurv Consortium. Impact of monovalent rotavirus vaccine on diarrhea-associated post-neonatal infant mortality in rural communities in Malawi: a population-based birth cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e103644. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bar-Zeev  N, Kapanda  L, Tate  JE, Jere  KC, Iturriza-Gomara  M, Nakagomi  O, et al.; VacSurv Consortium. Effectiveness of a monovalent rotavirus vaccine in infants in Malawi after programmatic roll-out: an observational and case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:4228. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2509.190258

Original Publication Date: July 30, 2019

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 25, Number 9—September 2019

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Khuzwayo C. Jere, University of Liverpool, Institute of Infection and Global Health, Ronald Ross Bldg, 8 West Derby St, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: August 21, 2019
Page updated: August 21, 2019
Page reviewed: August 21, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.