Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 25, Number 9—September 2019
Research

Clonality of Fluconazole-Nonsusceptible Candida tropicalis in Bloodstream Infections, Taiwan, 2011–2017

Pao-Yu Chen, Yu-Chung Chuang, Un-In Wu, Hsin-Yun Sun, Jann-Tay Wang, Wang-Huei Sheng, Hsiu-Jung Lo, Hurng-Yi Wang, Yee-Chun ChenComments to Author , and Shan-Chwen Chang
Author affiliations: National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (P.-Y. Chen, Y.-C. Chuang, U.-I. Wu, H.-Y. Sun, J.-T. Wang, W.-H. Sheng, Y.-C. Chen, S.-C. Chang); National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei (P.-Y. Chen, H.-Y. Wang, Y.-C. Chen, S.-C. Chang); National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan (J.-T. Wang, H.-J. Lo, Y.-C. Chen)

Main Article

Table 2

Comparisons of clinical and microbiological characteristics between fluconazole-susceptible and fluconazole-nonsusceptible Candida tropicalis bloodstream infections, Taiwan, 2011–2017*

Characteristic Total, n = 344 With FS C. tropicalis BSIs, n = 286 With FNS C. tropicalis BSIs, n = 58 p value
Demographics
Age, y, median (IQR) 62.8 (53.2–73.5) 62.4 (53.0–74.3) 63.4 (55.2–72.1) 0.85
Sex, no. (%) 0.54
M 201 (58.4) 165 (57.7) 36 (62.1)
F
143 (41.6)
121 (42.3)
22 (37.9)

Disease severity
ICU onset, no. (%) 105 (30.7) 85 (29.9) 20 (34.5) 0.49
APACHE II score, median (IQR)
20.0 (15.0–26.0)
20.0 (15.0–26.0)
19.0 (15.5–26.0)
0.85
Healthcare factors, no. (%)†
Solid organ transplant 4 (1.2) 3 (1.1) 1 (1.8) 0.52
Hematopoietic stem cell transplant 10 (2.9) 9 (3.2) 1 (1.8) 0.99
Major surgery 40 (11.6) 34 (11.9) 6 (10.3) 0.99
Parenteral hyperalimentation 189 (59.4) 155 (54.2) 34 (58.6) 0.54
Steroid use 170 (49.4) 133 (46.5) 37 (63.8) 0.02
Chemotherapy 153 (44.5) 123 (43.0) 30 (51.7) 0.22
Neutropenia 91 (26.8) 69 (24.5) 22 (38.6) 0.03
Mechanical ventilator 101 (29.4) 84 (29.4) 17 (29.3) 0.99
Indwelling urinary catheter 138 (40.1) 110 (38.5) 28 (48.3) 0.16
Central venous catheter 286 (83.1) 238 (83.2) 48 (82.8) 0.93
Antifungal exposure 60 (17.4) 34 (11.9) 26 (44.8) <0.001
Antibiotics exposure
300 (87.7)
248 (87.3)
52 (89.7)
0.62
Therapeutic intervention, no. (%)‡
Early appropriate antifungal agents 261 (75.9) 243 (85.0) 18 (31.0) <0.001
Fluconazole as the first antifungal agent 221 (64.2) 185 (64.7) 36 (62.1) 0.71
Early removal of central venous catheter
162/286 (56.6)
131/238 (55.0)
31/48 (64.6)
0.22
Clinical outcomes, no. (%)
Death
7 d 73 (21.2) 60 (21.0) 13 (22.4) 0.81
14 d 117 (34.0) 99 (34.6) 18 (31.0) 0.60
28 d 167 (48.6) 141 (49.3) 26 (44.8) 0.53
In hospital 226 (65.7) 187 (65.4) 39 (67.2) 0.79
Persistence, no. (%)§ 81 (27.7) 65 (26.6) 16 (33.3) 0.34

*Additional information on patient conditions and microbiological data can be found in Appendix Table 3 (https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/EID/article/25/9/19-0520-App1.pdf). APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; BSIs, bloodstream infections; FNS, fluconazole nonsusceptible; FS, fluconazole susceptible; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range.
†Major surgery refers to cardiovascular or abdominal surgery. Classes of antifungal exposure to azole or echinocandin, 31/3 in FS group vs. 24/2 in FNS group; of note, 14 (24.1%) patients in the FNS group experienced breakthrough bloodstream infections, compared with 18 (6.3%) patients in the FS group (p<0.001).
‡Early adequate antifungal agents refers to administration of the recommended dose of an intravenous antifungal agent within 48 h after first positive blood culture collection for a susceptible Candida isolate, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) species-specific breakpoints (14). Early removal of central venous catheters is defined as removal of all similar devices, including tunneled and peripherally inserted central catheters, within 48 h after obtaining the first positive blood culture.
§Persistence is defined as >5 days of blood cultures positive for the same Candida species.

Main Article

Page created: August 21, 2019
Page updated: August 21, 2019
Page reviewed: August 21, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external