Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 26, Number 4—April 2020

Imported Arbovirus Infections in Spain, 2009–2018

Francesca F. NormanComments to Author , César Henríquez-Camacho, Marta Díaz-Menendez, Sandra Chamorro, Diana Pou, Israel Molina, Josune Goikoetxea, Azucena Rodríguez-Guardado, Eva Calabuig, Clara Crespillo, Inés Oliveira, José-Antonio Pérez-Molina, Rogelio López-Velez, and for the Redivi Study Group
Author affiliations: Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain (F.F. Norman, C. Henríquez-Camacho, S. Chamorro, J.-A. Pérez-Molina, R. López-Velez); La Paz-Carlos III Hospital, Madrid (M. Díaz-Menendez, C. Crespillo); Vall d’Hebron-Drassanes, Barcelona, Spain (D. Pou, I. Molina, I. Oliveira); Cruces University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain (J. Goikoetxea); Asturias Central University Hospital, Oviedo, Spain (A. Rodríguez-Guardado); La Fe de Valencia University Hospital, Valencia, Spain (E. Calabuig)

Cite This Article


To determine the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of patients in Spain with imported arbovirus infections, we analyzed 22,655 records from a collaborative network for January 2009–December 2018. Among 861 arbovirus infections, 845 were monoinfections (456 [53%] dengue, 280 [32.5%] chikungunya, 109 [12.7%] Zika) and 16 (1.8%) were co-infections. Most patients were travelers (56.3%) or immigrants returning to Spain after visiting friends or relatives (31.3%). Median patient age was 37 years; most (62.3%) were women and some (28.6%) had received pretravel advice. Only 12 patients were immunosuppressed. Six cases (all dengue monoinfections, none in immunosuppressed patients) were severe. Since 2014, nondengue arbovirus infections increased; until 2016, chikungunya and Zika were most common. Imported arbovirus infections (mostly dengue) were frequently diagnosed, although increased chikungunya and Zika virus infections coincided with their introduction and spread in the Americas. A large proportion of cases occurred in women of childbearing age, some despite receipt of pretravel advice.

In recent decades, pathogenic flaviviruses (yellow fever virus, dengue [DENV], and Zika [ZIKV]) and the alphavirus chikungunya (CHIKV) have become the most common agents of emerging arbovirus diseases among humans. Their geographic distribution, epidemiologic patterns, and modes of transmission overlap considerably, and because of increased human travel and migration, outbreaks have been reported in non–arbovirus-endemic areas. Proposed drivers of virus epidemics include factors that may affect vector distribution, such as climate change, wars/social change, and poverty (decreased vector control measures) (1). Although some factors are unlikely to occur in non–arbovirus-endemic settings, such as Europe, emergence of these infectious diseases in these regions may result from viremic persons with imported infections and presence of competent Aedes albopictus mosquitoes (2). In nontropical areas, the potential international threat of these viruses is increased by the possibility of nonvectorborne transmission, such as transfusional, sexual, and vertical transmission (with possible severe fetal damage) (3). Travelers are at high risk for infection by vectorborne diseases and may contribute to the spread of imported diseases in non–disease-endemic areas (4).

Our objective with this study was to describe the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of patients in Spain with a confirmed diagnosis of imported arbovirus infection. For data, we used the Red Cooperativa para el Estudio de las Infecciones Importadas por Viajeros e Inmigrantes (+Redivi) network (, a specialized network for imported infectious diseases in Spain.


We based our analysis on a cohort included in the +Redivi network. The network initially comprised 4 centers; however, new centers have been included over the years. Currently, +Redivi comprises 22 health centers (1 primary care center and 21 hospitals, specialized and not specialized in travel medicine) in 8 regions of Spain that share a common online database in which new cases of imported infections are registered. A unique data collection sheet is used to gather information about patient demographics, trip characteristics (destination, return date, duration, type of traveler), receipt of pretravel advice, receipt of antimalaria antiprophylaxis (when applicable), reason for consultation, and final diagnosis variables. Because patients were deidentified at the time of study inclusion, we could not link data back to patients. Cases recorded were those in which the final diagnosis was considered to be an imported disease associated with travel (for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients). Returning travelers/immigrants could account for >1 case in the database if they had traveled >1 time and received a new diagnosis of an imported disease. +Redivi classified persons attending a first consultation as follows: immigrant (person living in Spain but born in any other country), VFR (visiting friends and relatives) immigrant (immigrant traveling back from his/her country of birth after visiting friends and relatives), VFR traveler (Spanish traveler returning from his/her first-degree relative’s country of birth), and travelers (conventional international tourists returning from travel, expatriates, and missionaries).

We included in our analysis cases recorded in +Redivi during January 2009–December 2018. We identified patients with a diagnosis of arbovirus infection and compared 2 main populations: those with imported arbovirus infection and those with nonarbovirus infection. Acute/recent arbovirus infection was diagnosed for patients with exposure risk and a virus-positive PCR, positive IgM, evidence of seroconversion, or nonstructural (NS) 1 antigen detection for DENV. A diagnosis of ZIKV infection based on positive IgM required a finding of negative DENV IgM and vice versa or confirmation with a neutralization assay (not available at all centers). We classified cases as severe if there was evidence of shock and plasma leakage, severe hemorrhage, or organ impairment (according to the World Health Organization definition) (5). We performed a descriptive analysis to assess the distribution of these groups according to patient sex, age, type of case (immigrant, VFR, or traveler), time from arrival in Spain to medical consultation, immunosuppression, country of birth, duration of travel, date of first arrival in Spain, length of travel, date of return from travel, travel destination, and rate of pretravel advice receipt.

We expressed qualitative data as relative and absolute frequencies and quantitative data as median and interquartile ranges with 95% CIs. To compare categorical variables, we used χ2 and Fischer exact tests when appropriate; to compare continuous variables, we used the Student t test (for data that were normally distributed) or the Mann-Whitney U test (for data that were not normally distributed). We used bivariate analyses to compare demographic characteristics and performed multivariable logistic regression to determine the association of exposures and outcomes. We obtained adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs and set the threshold for statistical significance as a 2-sided p<0.05.


We analyzed 22,655 records from the +Redivi database; patients included 12,460 (55.0%) immigrants, 3,627 (16.0%) VFR immigrants, 414 (1.8%) VFR travelers, and 6,154 (27.2%) travelers. The most prevalent diagnoses in +Redivi were Chagas disease (18.7%), eosinophilia (5.4%), Plasmodium falciparum malaria (4.9%), latent tuberculosis (4.4%), schistosomiasis (4.1%), strongyloidiasis (3.9%), and arbovirus infections (3.8%). Among travelers, the second most prevalent diagnosis was arbovirus infections (8.2%), which followed acute nonspecific diarrhea (12.3%).

For a total of 861 (3.8%) cases (16 co-infections and 845 monoinfections), the final diagnosis was acute/recent arbovirus infection. Patients with monoinfections included 23 (2.7%) immigrants, 308 (36.5%) VFR immigrants, 21 (2.5%) VFR travelers, and 493 (58.3%) travelers. Arbovirus infections were mainly acquired in South America, Central America, and the Caribbean (p<0.001), except for travelers, who acquired most of their arbovirus infections (mostly dengue) in Southeast Asia (Tables 1, 2).

Regarding reason for medical consultation after travel, most patients with arbovirus infections reported fever, followed by myalgia. Six cases, all caused by DENV, were severe; no fatal cases were recorded. A small proportion of asymptomatic patients (53/845, 6.3%) sought a health examination and received a diagnosis of recent arbovirus infection.

Patients with arbovirus monoinfection were a median 37 years of age (interquartile range 30–46 years), and the proportion of women (62.2%; p<0.001) was higher than that of men. Of 526 women, 415 (78.9%) were in the age range to be fertile (15–50 years of age). Among patients with arbovirus monoinfection, only 12 (1.4%) were immunosuppressed (6 because of HIV infection, 3 because of medication, 3 because of other unspecified reason, and none because of transplant). Data on duration of travel and time elapsed from arrival in Spain to consultation are provided (Tables 1, 2). Regarding pretravel advice, 242 (28.6%) patients with an arboviral monoinfection had received advice.

The risk for arbovirus infection was not related to immunosuppression or duration of travel (Table 3). The risk was higher among female (aOR 1.40; 95% CI 1.21–1.61) than male patients and lower among patients who had received pretravel advice than among those who had not (aOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.55–0.77).


Thumbnail of Proportion of arbovirus monoinfections and co-infections, by virus type and year, compared with total number of infections registered in the Red Cooperativa para el Estudio de las Infecciones Importadas por Viajeros e Inmigrantes (+Redivi, network, Spain, 2009–2018. A) Numbers of arbovirus infections; B) proportion of arbovirus infections compared with total number of infections registered.

Figure. Proportion of arbovirus monoinfections and co-infections, by virus type and year, compared with total number of infections registered in the Red Cooperativa para el Estudio de las Infecciones Importadas por Viajeros...

After 2014, cases of non-DENV arbovirus infection reported in +Redivi increased; CHIKV and ZIKV were the most common arbovirus infections until 2016 (Figure). During the peak of the ZIKV outbreak (mainly December 2015–November 2016), there were 226 cases of arbovirus infections: 85 (37.6%) ZIKV, 82 (36.3%) DENV, 51 (22.6%) CHIKV, and 8 (3.5%) co-infections.


A total of 456 (53%) DENV monoinfections were recorded; the proportion of infected women (262 women, 57.5%, p = 0.009) was higher than that of men. Of 262 women, 222 (84.7%) were 15–50 years of age, and of these, only 85 (38.3%) had received pretravel advice. Among patients with dengue infection, 3 had a previous diagnosis of HIV infection, 2 were immunosuppressed secondary to medication, and 1 was immunosuppressed for unspecified cause. The 6 patients with severe nonfatal dengue acquired the infection in South America (66.7%) and Southeast Asia (33.3%); none were immunosuppressed.


A total of 280 (32.5%) CHIKV monoinfections were recorded; the proportion of women (198 women, 70.7%; p<0.001) was higher than that of men. Of 198 women, 136 (68.7%) were 15–50 years of age, and of these, only 23 (16.9%) had received pretravel advice. Among patients with CHIKV infection, 2 had a previous diagnosis of HIV infection and 2 were immunosuppressed (unspecified cause).


A total of 109 (12.7%) ZIKV monoinfections were recorded; the proportion of women (66 women, 60.6%; p = 0.128) was higher than that of men. Of 66 women, 57 (86.4%) were 15–50 years of age, and of these, only 7 (12.3%) had received pretravel advice. No cases in pregnant women were recorded. Among patients with ZIKV infection, 1 had a previous diagnosis of HIV infection and 1 was immunosuppressed secondary to medication.


At least 16 (1.8%) patients were co-infected with >1 arbovirus (some probable co-infections with positive serology results for DENV and ZIKV were also registered, but these cases could not be confirmed). DENV and ZIKV co-infection occurred in 10 patients and DENV and CHIKV co-infection in 4. Two patients were co-infected with CHIKV and ZIKV. Most patients were travelers (9/16, 56.3%) or VFR immigrants (5/16, 31.3%). The 10 DENV/ZIKV co-infections were acquired in South America (3), Central America and the Caribbean (3), Australasia (1), Southeast Asia (1), sub-Saharan Africa (1), and south-central Asia (1). The 4 DENV/CHIKV co-infections were acquired in South America (3) and Central America and the Caribbean (1). The 2 CHIKV/ZIKV co-infections were acquired in south-central Asia and South America. No co-infections in immunosuppressed patients were recorded.


In recent years, imported emerging arbovirus infections have become a concern because of the increasing number of cases and the possibility of introduction and local transmission in non–arbovirus-endemic areas; several outbreaks have been documented in non–arbovirus-endemic areas, including several countries in Europe (6,7). We report data on ≈850 infections caused by arboviruses over a 10-year period (January 2009 to December 2018) registered at centers belonging to a specialized network for imported infectious diseases in Spain. Imported arbovirus infections were among the top 10 established diagnoses in this national network (despite the large proportion of immigrants included in the network, for whom acute arbovirus infection is an infrequent diagnosis); among travelers, arbovirus infection was the second most frequent diagnosis.

Most cases occurred in conventional travelers, followed by VFRs; the small proportion of cases in immigrants may reflect recent acute (nonviremic) infections. Among VFR immigrants, infection with DENV was relatively less frequent than infection with other arboviruses; whereas, for all other groups, the reverse was true. This distribution may reflect a hypothetical protected state if these patients had already experienced multiple DENV infections before immigration. On the other hand, some of the acute infections acquired by persons in this group may have resulted from waning or incomplete immunity to DENV because homotypic reinfections, as well as poor in vitro neutralizing activity of immune human serum for different strains within a single serotype, have been reported (8,9). These issues could be further explored by investigating the arboviral serostatus of these patients before travel.

As expected, most cases overall were caused by DENV, although in recent years, and coinciding with the introduction of CHIKV and ZIKV in the Western Hemisphere, increased infections caused by CHIKV and ZIKV have been registered. In our study, CHIKV accounted for most of the arbovirus infections diagnosed during 2015, and ZIKV caused most of the arbovirus infections diagnosed during 2016, mirroring the epidemiologic situation and public concern at the time (ZIKV infection could account for some of the asymptomatic patients who may have sought care for reasons such as preconception or predelivery testing on return from travel) (10). Although the network’s catchment area had increased over the years, the proportion of arbovirus infections compared with the total was considered, and increased arbovirus infections were observed during 2015–2017; a downward trend in 2018 reflected global epidemics and increased awareness of these infections.

We found an increased risk for arbovirus infection among women, possibly reflecting increased diagnosis of symptomatic infections. Previous studies have also described increased frequency of arbovirus infections in women compared with men, and female sex has been identified as a key risk factor associated with severe arthralgia caused by CHIKV infection (1113). However, these findings are not consistent; other studies describing complicated infections have found that among patients with CHIKV infection admitted to an intensive care unit, the greater proportion were male (14). These issues, as well as the presence of other possible contributing factors such as underlying conditions, should be explored further.

As expected, having received pretravel information was a protective factor; however, a high proportion of patients did not seek pretravel advice, an area in need of improvement and identified in other studies (15). Although no vaccines are readily available for use in travelers, simple measures may limit the burden of some of these arbovirus infections, such as avoidance of mosquito bites and the correct diagnosis and education of patients who may transmit the infection to others (e.g., sexual transmission of ZIKV). Of note, many cases occurred in women of childbearing age (in some instances despite pretravel advice), an issue of concern given the association of ZIKV and possibly DENV infection with increased risk for congenital malformations (16,17). Although we found no records of ZIKV infections in pregnant women, cases of congenital ZIKV infection have been reported in Spain (18).

Available data about the outcome of arbovirus disease in immunosuppressed patients is limited. In our study, data were registered for 12 immunosuppressed patients with arbovirus disease; we found no association between infection and immune status, and none of the severe cases (all dengue) occurred in immunosuppressed patients. According to published data, CHIKV in solid organ transplant recipients seems to have a benign course and favorable outcome (19,20), whereas data for DENV in these patients are less clear. Case descriptions report uncomplicated outcomes, whereas a recent literature review reported a significantly higher incidence of severe dengue and a higher mortality rate among transplant patients with dengue (2123). A recent report of DENV, ZIKV, and CHIKV infections diagnosed in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients and oncohematologic patients found prolonged viremia in those with DENV and viruria in those with ZIKV; the most common complication was thrombocytopenia, but all patients survived without sequelae (24). However, other case reports reveal less favorable outcomes and even atypical presentations: a fatal pseudotumoral form of ZIKV meningoencephalitis in a heart transplant recipient has been reported (25).

With respect to arbovirus infection in HIV-positive patients, data are scarce, although favorable outcomes have been reported (20,26,27). In a study of 43 HIV-positive patients with confirmed ZIKV infection, no hospitalizations, complications, or deaths were found, and CD4 cell counts and HIV viral load did not differ after ZIKV infection (28). Regarding arbovirus infections in patients immunosuppressed for other reasons, available data are extremely limited and no firm conclusions can be drawn.

Of interest, we found 16 patients co-infected with multiple arboviruses, reflecting co-circulation and transmission by the same species of DENV, ZIKV, and CHIKV vector during the main outbreak periods in Latin America and the Caribbean. No cases were severe. During periods of intense transmission, co-infections are not infrequent or unexpected (29). A recent study that used reverse transcription PCR to investigate patients with acute undifferentiated febrile illness during the CHIKV outbreak in Haiti found that ≈10% of the children with CHIKV infection during the study period were infected with another arbovirus (ZIKV, DENV, or Mayaro virus) (30). These dual infections were diagnosed only after culture of the samples, and the authors concluded that that could suggest a low viral load of the co-infecting virus. In addition, the possibility of sequential infections acquired in areas of co-circulation has been previously noted, and sequential infections in patients returning from travel have been described (31). Further studies would be needed to determine whether co-infections, sequential infections, or both may be associated with a less favorable outcome.

Some study limitations include the inability to identify which case-patients were viremic at diagnosis. The database included confirmed diagnoses, but diagnosis of some cases may have been based on detection of virus IgM (with or without IgG; i.e., recent acute infections), and so the proportion of viremic patients who may be considered to potentially pose a risk for ongoing transmission in areas of Spain where competent vectors are present was not known. Because only imported cases were registered, possible secondary cases resulting from sexual transmission were not included, probably leading to underestimation of the real extent of imported disease. In some cases, cross-reactions between antibodies to the flaviviruses DENV and ZIKV may have posed a diagnostic challenge (neutralization assays were available only at some centers), and some cases of probable co-infections were excluded and considered monoinfections. Also, previous yellow fever vaccination was not recorded for most patients and was therefore not analyzed, although prior vaccination would be expected to yield possible false-positive IgG results and should not have interfered in the classification of cases as acute or recent infections (which was based on IgM, seroconversion, PCR, or NS1 antigen for DENV). Recent yellow fever vaccination may yield false-positive IgM results for DENV and ZIKV, but most of these infections in this series were acquired in regions where such vaccination was not required (Asia, Caribbean, Australasia). Basic information on main presenting symptoms was recorded, but more detailed information on individual symptoms, enabling a possible comparison with regard to presentation of each arbovirus infection, was not possible.

Despite study limitations, we present some aspects of a large series of imported arbovirus infections diagnosed at specialized centers in Spain. Those imported infections may pose a risk for further transmission in areas where competent Ae. albopictus mosquitoes are established, as illustrated by the recent diagnosis of autochthonous DENV and CHIKV infections in several southern European countries such as France, Italy, Croatia, and Spain (2,32). In 2018, the first 6 cases of locally acquired dengue were reported in Spain, 5 in patients who had traveled to Cádiz and Murcia in southern Spain and 1 in a patient from Barcelona (2,33). In 2019, an additional case of autochthonous DENV was diagnosed in Catalonia (34). The virus was probably introduced into these areas by viremic travelers. In past decades, Ae. albopictus mosquito populations have increased in areas of the European Union and are active in several provinces in mainland Spain. Ae. aegypti mosquitoes, the main vector for DENV transmission, have been introduced in areas of Europe, are present in Madeira (Portugal), and have been identified in the Canary Islands (Spain), although after control measures were implemented locally in 2017, no further detections in the Canary Islands were reported (2). Recently, probable sexual transmission of DENV in an area without documented presence of mosquito vectors was reported in Madrid, Spain (35).

These cases highlight the value of having a high index of suspicion and the need for rapid diagnosis of arbovirus infections, which may be aided in specific settings (e.g., emergency departments) by the availability of rapid diagnostic tests to detect specific antigens such as the NS1 DENV antigen. Early detection of imported infections in viremic patients could enhance the study of virus genomics through virus sequencing and phylogenetics, which may be used to investigate infectious disease outbreaks and contribute to transmission chain tracking. Viremic patients could also be instructed to protect themselves from insect bites to prevent further transmission in areas where competent vectors are established.

The number of ZIKV infections in women of childbearing age, despite these women having received pretravel advice, also poses a significant public health concern, coupled with the possible risk for sexual transmission from a partner arriving from a risk area, even several months after travel (36). Although sexual transmission of DENV seems to be a rare route of transmission and the risk is considered extremely low, clinicians should consider this possibility for patients with DENV and no compatible travel history and should advise patients with DENV that the risk for transmission via this route may be minimized through safe sex practices.

These data highlight the challenges posed by these imported infections and the need for improvements, such as the establishment of specific protocols for screening potential blood and organ donors and the enhancement of laboratory capacities. The strengthening of information sources (community-based information and online resources) should be prioritized, not only for at-risk travelers, such as women of fertile age and immunosuppressed patients, but also for physicians in non–arbovirus-endemic areas faced with specific diagnostic and management challenges.

Dr. Norman is a consultant in tropical medicine and parasitology at the Ramón y Cajal Hospital in Madrid, Spain. Her research interests include neglected tropical diseases and emerging pathogens.



We are grateful to Liliana Moreno Velásquez for her contribution to data entry and management.

+Redivi is supported by the Red de Investigación Colaborativa de Enfermedades Tropicales, grant no. 16/0027/0020.

Members of the +Redivi Study Group: Paloma Aguilera (Centro de Atención Primaria Guayaba, Comunidad de Madrid); María Martínez Serrano (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Comunidad de Castilla-La Mancha); Magdalena García Rodriguez (Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana); Yolanda Meije, Joaquim Martínez-Montauti, Xavier Sanz (Hospital de Barcelona, Cataluña); Isabel Pacheco Tenza, Inmaculada Gonzalez Cuello, Belén Martínez López, Jara Llenas (Hospital de la Vega Baja de Orihuela, Comunidad Valenciana); Mar Masiá, Sergio Padilla (Hospital General de Elche, Comunidad Valenciana); Mónica Romero, Philip Wikman-Jorgensen (Hospital General de Elda-Virgen de la Salud, Comunidad Valenciana); Diego Torrús, José Manuel Ramos Rincón (Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Comunidad Valenciana); Eduardo Malmierca (Hospital Infanta Sofía, Comunidad de Madrid); Ana Perez-Ayala, Juan María Herrero, Manuel Lizasoain, Pablo Rojo, Mariano Matarranz, Carlos Zarco (Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid Comunidad de Madrid); Jonathan Fernández Suárez, Jose Antonio Boga Ribeiro (Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo Principado de Asturias); Miren Zuriñe Zubero Sulibarría (Hospital Universitario de Basurto de Bilbao, País Vasco); José Manuel Ruiz Giardin, Juan Victor Sanmartín López (Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Comunidad de Madrid); María Velasco Arribas (Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Comunidad de Madrid); Ana Mena Ribas, María Peñaranda Vera (Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Islas Baleares); Adrián Sánchez Montalvá, Fernando Salvador (Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Cataluña); Ángel Dominguez, (Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena de Sevilla, Andalucía); Begoña Monge-Maillo (Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Comunidad de Madrid); Begoña Treviño, Nuria Serre, Antonio Soriano-Arandes, Cristina Bocanegra (Unitat de Salut Internacional Drassanes, PROSICS, Cataluña).



  1. Grubaugh  ND, Ladner  JT, Lemey  P, Pybus  OG, Rambaut  A, Holmes  EC, et al. Tracking virus outbreaks in the twenty-first century. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:109. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Local transmission of dengue fever in France and Spain [cited 2018 Dec 26].
  3. World Health Organization. WHO Statement on the Fifth meeting of the Emergency Committee under the International Health Regulations (2005) regarding microcephaly, other neurological disorders and Zika virus [cited 2018 Dec 26].
  4. Leder  K, Grobusch  MP, Gautret  P, Chen  LH, Kuhn  S, Lim  PL, et al.; GeoSentinel Surveillance Network. Zika beyond the Americas: Travelers as sentinels of Zika virus transmission. A GeoSentinel analysis, 2012 to 2016. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0185689. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. World Health Organization. Dengue: guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control [cited 2019 Nov 20].
  6. Bordi  L, Carletti  F, Lalle  E, Colavita  F, Meschi  S, Di Caro  A, et al. Molecular characterization of autochthonous chikungunya cluster in Latium region, Italy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:17880. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamer  DH, Chen  LH, Libman  M, Grobusch  MP, Esposito  DH. Travel-associated Zika virus disease. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166:9134. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Waggoner  JJ, Balmaseda  A, Gresh  L, Sahoo  MK, Montoya  M, Wang  C, et al. Homotypic dengue virus reinfections in Nicaraguan children. J Infect Dis. 2016;214:98693. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallichotte  EN, Baric  TJ, Nivarthi  U, Delacruz  MJ, Graham  R, Widman  DG, et al. Genetic variation between dengue virus type 4 strains impacts human antibody binding and neutralization. Cell Reports. 2018;25:121424. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Christian  KA, Iuliano  AD, Uyeki  TM, Mintz  ED, Nichol  ST, Rollin  P, et al. What we are watching–top global infectious disease threats, 2013–2016: an update from CDC’s Global Disease Detection Operations Center. Health Secur. 2017;15:45362. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Peters  CMM, Pijnacker  R, Fanoy  EB, Bouwman  LJT, de Langen  LE, van den Kerkhof  JHTC, et al. Chikungunya virus outbreak in Sint Maarten: Long-term arthralgia after a 15-month period. J Vector Borne Dis. 2018;55:13743. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Delgado-Enciso  I, Paz-Michel  B, Melnikov  V, Guzman-Esquivel  J, Espinoza-Gomez  F, Soriano-Hernandez  AD, et al. Smoking and female sex as key risk factors associated with severe arthralgia in acute and chronic phases of Chikungunya virus infection. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15:263442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lozier  M, Adams  L, Febo  MF, Torres-Aponte  J, Bello-Pagan  M, Ryff  KR, et al. Incidence of Zika virus disease by age and sex—Puerto Rico, November 1, 2015–October 20, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:121923. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Koeltz  A, Lastere  S, Jean-Baptiste  S. Intensive care admissions for severe chikungunya virus infection, French Polynesia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:7946. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Vouga  M, Chiu  YC, Pomar  L, de Meyer  SV, Masmejan  S, Genton  B, et al. Dengue, Zika and chikungunya during pregnancy: pre- and post-travel advice and clinical management. J Travel Med. 2019;26:taz077. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rasmussen  SA, Jamieson  DJ, Honein  MA, Petersen  LR. Zika virus and birth defects—reviewing the evidence for causality. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:19817. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Paixão  ES, Teixeira  MG, Costa  MDCN, Barreto  ML, Rodrigues  LC. Symptomatic dengue during pregnancy and congenital neurologic malformations. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:174850. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sulleiro  E, Rando  A, Alejo  I, Suy  A, Gonce  A, Rodó  C, et al. Screening for Zika virus infection in 1057 potentially exposed pregnant women, Catalonia (northeastern Spain). Travel Med Infect Dis. 2019;29:6971. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosso  F, Rodríguez  S, Cedano  JA, Mora  BL, Moncada  PA, Velez  JD. Chikungunya in solid organ transplant recipients, a case series and literature review. Transpl Infect Dis. 2018;20:e12978. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dalla Gasperina  D, Balsamo  ML, Garavaglia  SD, Rovida  F, Baldanti  F, Grossi  PA. Chikungunya infection in a human immunodeficiency virus-infected kidney transplant recipient returning to Italy from the Dominican Republic. Transpl Infect Dis. 2015;17:8769. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Weerakkody  RM, Patrick  JA, Sheriff  MH. Dengue fever in renal transplant patients: a systematic review of literature. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18:15. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Subbiah  A, Bagchi  S, Bhowmik  D, Mahajan  S, Yadav  RK, Chhabra  Y, et al. Dengue fever in renal allograft recipients: Clinical course and outcome. Transpl Infect Dis. 2018;20:e12875. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gupta  RK, Gupta  G, Chorasiya  VK, Bag  P, Shandil  R, Bhatia  V, et al. Dengue virus transmission from living donor to recipient in liver transplantation: a case report. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2016;6:5961. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Machado  CM, Pereira  BBS, Felix  AC, Oliveira  MC, Darrigo  LG Jr, de Souza  MP, et al. Zika and chikungunya virus infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients and oncohematological patients. Blood Adv. 2017;1:6247. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schwartzmann  PV, Ramalho  LN, Neder  L, Vilar  FC, Ayub-Ferreira  SM, Romeiro  MF, et al. Zika virus meningoencephalitis in an immunocompromised patient. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:4606. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Delgado-Enciso  I, Espinoza-Gómez  F, Ochoa-Jiménez  R, Valle-Reyes  S, Vásquez  C, López-Lemus  UA. Dengue infection in a human immunodeficiency virus-1 positive patient chronically infected with hepatitis B virus in western Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96:1225. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Calvet  GA, Filippis  AM, Mendonça  MC, Sequeira  PC, Siqueira  AM, Veloso  VG, et al. First detection of autochthonous Zika virus transmission in a HIV-infected patient in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Clin Virol. 2016;74:13. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Calvet  GA, Brasil  P, Siqueira  AM, Zogbi  HE, de Santis Gonçalves  B, da Silva Santos  A, et al. Zika virus infection and differential diagnosis in a cohort of HIV-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;79:23743. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Silva  MMO, Tauro  LB, Kikuti  M, Anjos  RO, Santos  VC, Gonçalves  TSF, et al. Concomitant transmission of dengue, chikungunya and Zika viruses in Brazil: clinical and epidemiological findings from surveillance for acute febrile illness. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69:13539. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. White  SK, Mavian  C, Elbadry  MA, Beau De Rochars  VM, Paisie  T, Telisma  T, et al. Detection and phylogenetic characterization of arbovirus dual-infections among persons during a chikungunya fever outbreak, Haiti 2014. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12:e0006505. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Norman  FF, Chamorro  S, Vázquez  A, Sánchez-Seco  MP, Pérez-Molina  JA, Monge-Maillo  B, et al. Sequential chikungunya and Zika virus infections in a traveler from Honduras. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95:11668. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Collantes  F, Delacour  S, Delgado  JA, Bengoa  M, Torrell-Sorio  A, Guinea  H, et al.; Mosquito Alert. Updating the known distribution of Aedes albopictus (Skuse, 1894) in Spain 2015. Acta Trop. 2016;164:648. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. Communicable disease threats report, week 47, 18–24 November 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 26].
  34. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Autochthonous cases of dengue in Spain and France, 1 October 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 20].
  35. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Sexual transmission of dengue in Spain, 18 November 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 20].
  36. Polen  KD, Gilboa  SM, Hills  S, Oduyebo  T, Kohl  KS, Brooks  JT, et al. Update: interim guidance for preconception counseling and prevention of sexual transmission of Zika virus for men with possible Zika virus exposure—United States, August 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67:86871. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2604.190443

Original Publication Date: March 02, 2020

Table of Contents – Volume 26, Number 4—April 2020

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Francesca F. Norman, National Referral Unit for Tropical Diseases, Infectious Diseases Department, Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Carretera de Colmenar Km 9, 1.28034 Madrid, Spain

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: March 17, 2020
Page updated: August 10, 2020
Page reviewed: August 10, 2020
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.