Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 10—October 2021

Seoul Virus Associated with Pet Rats, Scotland, UK, 2019

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
James G. Shepherd, Andrew E. Blunsum, Stephen Carmichael, Katherine Smollett, Hector Maxwell-Scott, Eoghan C.W. Farmer, Jane Osborne, Alasdair MacLean, Shirin Ashraf, Rajiv Shah, Rory Gunson, Ana da Silva Filipe, Emma J. Aarons, and Emma C. ThomsonComments to Author 
Author affiliations: MRC–University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, Scotland, UK (J.G. Shepherd, S. Carmichael, K. Smollett, S. Ashraf, R. Shah, A. da Silva Filipe, E.C. Thomson); National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow (A.E. Blunsum, E.C.W. Farmer); Public Health England, London, UK (H. Maxwell-Scott, J. Osborne, E.J. Aarons); West of Scotland Specialist Virology Centre, Glasgow (A. MacLean, R. Gunson); London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London (E.C. Thomson)

Cite This Article


We describe a case of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome caused by Seoul virus in a woman in Scotland, UK. Whole-genome sequencing showed the virus belonged to a lineage characterized by recent international expansion, probably driven by trade in pet rats.

Hantaviruses (genus Orthohantavirus, family Hantaviridae) are segmented, single-stranded RNA viruses maintained by chronic subclinical infection of rodent and insectivore hosts. Human infection occurs after exposure to the saliva, urine, or feces of infected animals. The infecting viral species determines syndromic manifestation in humans. Hantaviruses endemic to the Americas, such as Sin Nombre virus and Andes virus, cause hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, whereas Old World hantaviruses, mainly Hantaan virus, Dobrava virus, and Seoul virus (SEOV), cause hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS). We identified and treated HFRS in a woman in Scotland, UK.

The Study

In 2019, a woman 51 years of age sought treatment at Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (Glasgow, Scotland, UK) for fever, diarrhea, vomiting, and malaise that had developed 5 days earlier. A teacher in Glasgow, she lived with her husband and 3 teenage children. Her 12-year-old daughter had experienced a febrile illness associated with myalgia the previous week but recovered without seeking medical attention. There was no notable travel history.

The patient had bred fancy rats (Rattus norvegicus domestica) for the previous 2 years. She owned 37 rats, which were housed in cages in her bedroom. Three months before, she had acquired 4 stud rats from a local breeder. She had overseen several recent litters; 27 of her rats were newborn or juvenile. The patient and her 12-year-old daughter cared for the rats, whereas her husband and other children had little contact with the animals.

At admission, the patient had conjunctival suffusion, pallor, and temperature of 38.9°C. We found evidence of mild perioral bleeding. She had a blood pressure of 91/66 mm Hg and a heart rate of 125 bpm.

Blood tests revealed mild lymphopenia, hemoglobin levels within reference levels, and a platelet count of 70 ×109/L (reference range 150–410 × 10^9/L) (Table 1). Her serum creatinine was 87 mmol/L (reference range 40–130 mmol/L). She had transaminitis, but her bilirubin and coagulation results were within reference ranges. She had elevated levels of C-reactive protein (58 mg/L [reference range 1–10 mg/L]). Urine dipstick showed microhematuria and proteinuria. An abdominal ultrasound showed no abnormalities. She had negative serologic results for viral hepatitis and HIV.

Our differential diagnosis included leptospirosis, rat-bite fever, and hantavirus infection. We prescribed oral doxycycline and intravenous benzylpenicillin. Her hemodynamic condition stabilized with intravenous fluids during the next 48 hours. However, oliguria and acute kidney injury developed; creatinine levels peaked at 182 mmol/L. Polyuria also developed, and she required intravenous fluid therapy before her renal function began to recover.

Blood and urine cultures yielded no growth. Samples sent to the Rare and Imported Pathogens Laboratory (Porton Down, UK) tested negative for Leptospira by enzyme immunoassay and PCR but positive for hantavirus IgG by serologic assay (Table 2). Reverse transcription PCR found hantavirus RNA in patient blood samples. Genomic sequencing matched SEOV small segments in GenBank.

The patient’s condition improved with supportive therapy, and she was discharged after a 12-day inpatient stay. A public health team inspected her property and recommended that the rats be euthanized, to which she agreed. However, the breeder who supplied the animals removed the rats from the property and refused to cooperate further.

At a clinic appointment 28 days after seeking treatment, the patient had no symptoms. Renal function, liver enzymes, and platelets had normalized, and proteinuria had resolved. Serologic assays demonstrated an increase in IgG titer against Old World hantaviruses (Table 2). We determined the genomic sequences of SEOV small, medium, and large segments by metagenomic sequencing of a stored blood sample from time of admission.


HFRS is characterized by fever, renal impairment, and thrombocytopenia. HFRS, especially cases associated with Hantaan virus, is responsible for many deaths in Southeast Asia (1), whereas HFRS associated with SEOV causes relatively mild disease with a case-fatality rate of <1% (2). SEOV cases often begin with fever, malaise, and gastrointestinal symptoms before progressing to shock and acute kidney injury of varying severity (3,4). Associated transaminitis is suggestive of HFRS caused by SEOV (2), as illustrated in this case. Most infections are probably subclinical or mild, as demonstrated by this patient’s daughter, who had experienced mild symptoms suggestive of SEOV infection. However, we were unable to obtain a sample for serologic confirmation.


Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the small (A), medium (B), and large (C) segments of Seoul virus isolated from a patient in Scotland, United Kingdom, 2020 (bold text; GenBank accession nos. MZ343375–7), and reference sequences. Isolate names indicate GenBank accession number as well as location and date of isolate. Phylogenetic relationships inferred by RAxML ( using the general time-reversible plus gamma distribution plus invariable site model as determined by jModeltest ( The tree was rooted at midpoint. Numbers to the left of nodes indicate bootstrap values based on 1,000 replicates. Gray circles indicate sequences associated with domesticated rats. Scale bar indicates substitutions per site.

Figure. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the small (A), medium (B), and large (C) segments of Seoul virus isolated from a patient in Scotland, United Kingdom, 2020 (bold text; GenBank accession...

SEOV is widely distributed because of the ubiquity of its principal host, the R. norvegicus rat (5). In the United Kingdom, where the virus is established in wild rodents, cases of human disease have been associated with occupational exposure in agricultural workers (6,7). However, growing evidence exists of SEOV circulation among pet rats. The United Kingdom has a network of pet rat owners who trade rats for breeding. In 2013, SEOV was isolated from pet rats in a breeding colony linked to cases of human infection in the United Kingdom (4,8). Later, human cases of SEOV associated with ratteries were reported in France (9) and the Netherlands (10). In 2017, a large SEOV outbreak among pet rat owners was linked to in-home ratteries in the United States and Canada (11). We used RAxML ( to conduct a phylogenetic analysis of SEOV sequences derived from rats associated with these outbreaks (4,8,9,10,11) in addition to the virus sequence from the patient described in this report; these isolates formed a well-supported monophyletic clade (Figure). This clade is distinct from SEOV sequences recovered from wild rodents in Europe and the Americas, suggesting a single introduction and international expansion of this lineage into domesticated rat populations, rather than separate local introductions from wild rats. A recent study from the Netherlands revealed evidence of international trading of rats by breeding farms and private persons, a practice that might promote cross-border dispersal of this lineage (12).

The risk for SEOV transmission from domesticated rats might be greater than that posed by wild rodents. A seroprevalence study performed in 2014 revealed that 34.1% of fancy rat owners in the United Kingdom had antibodies against SEOV, compared with 3.3% of healthy blood donors and 1.7% of farmers (13). These findings might reflect the behaviors of owners fancy rats who often view their pets as valued companion animals. In our study, the patient and her daughter reported kissing the rats and housing them in bedrooms. Owners might not follow public health advice on preventive measures such as avoiding kissing or holding small mammals near the face and keeping rodents out of sleeping and eating areas; public health messaging should be tailored to address the specific health beliefs of this community (14). Although the patient in this study agreed to the proposed euthanasia of her rats, the breeder preemptively removed them from the property and refused to cooperate further, mirroring the behavior of breeders in other outbreaks (10,15). This pattern suggests breeders’ rejection of SEOV as a major pathogen (10,15). A holistic response to future outbreaks might prevent similar situations. For example, an outbreak in the United States was effectively controlled by a mixture of methods including euthanasia, intensive owner education, and test and quarantine approaches that enabled the protection of uninfected rats (11).

In summary, we report the persistence of a SEOV lineage associated with pet rats in the United Kingdom, highlighting the ongoing risk for HFRS among pet rat owners. This lineage has undergone recent international dissemination, probably driven by trade of pet rats. Engagement and education within the community of owners and breeders will be crucial to limiting further SEOV infections transmitted from pet rats. Physicians should consider SEOV in any febrile patient with a recent history of rat exposure.

Dr. Shepherd is a clinical research fellow at the University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. His research interests include the use of next-generation sequencing for the detection of novel and emerging viruses.



J.G.S., S.C., K.S., S.A., R.S., A.S.F., and E.C.T. are supported by the Medical Research Council (grant no. MC_UU_1201412).



  1. Clement  J, LeDuc  JW, Lloyd  G, Reynes  JM, McElhinney  L, Van Ranst  M, et al. Wild rats, laboratory rats, pet rats: global Seoul hantavirus disease revisited. Viruses. 2019;11:652. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Clement  J, LeDuc  JW, McElhinney  LM, Reynes  JM, Van Ranst  M, Calisher  CH. Clinical characteristics of ratborne Seoul hantavirus disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:3878. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Woods  C, Palekar  R, Kim  P, Blythe  D, de Senarclens  O, Feldman  K, et al. Domestically acquired seoul virus causing hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome-Maryland, 2008. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:e10912. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Taori  SK, Jameson  LJ, Campbell  A, Drew  PJ, McCarthy  ND, Hart  J, et al. UK hantavirus, renal failure, and pet rats. Lancet. 2013;381:1070. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lin  XD, Guo  WP, Wang  W, Zou  Y, Hao  ZY, Zhou  DJ, et al. Migration of Norway rats resulted in the worldwide distribution of Seoul hantavirus today. J Virol. 2012;86:97281. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. McKenna  P, Clement  J, Matthys  P, Coyle  PV, McCaughey  C. Serological evidence of Hantavirus disease in Northern Ireland. J Med Virol. 1994;43:338. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jameson  LJ, Logue  CH, Atkinson  B, Baker  N, Galbraith  SE, Carroll  MW, et al. The continued emergence of hantaviruses: isolation of a Seoul virus implicated in human disease, United Kingdom, October 2012. Euro Surveill. 2013;18:47. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. McELHINNEY  LM, Marston  DA, Pounder  KC, Goharriz  H, Wise  EL, Verner-Carlsson  J, et al. High prevalence of Seoul hantavirus in a breeding colony of pet rats. Epidemiol Infect. 2017;145:311524. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Reynes  J-M, Carli  D, Bour  J-B, Boudjeltia  S, Dewilde  A, Gerbier  G, et al. Seoul virus infection in humans, France, 2014–2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:9737. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Swanink  C, Reimerink  J, Gisolf  J, de Vries  A, Claassen  M, Martens  L, et al. Autochthonous human case of Seoul virus infection, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:215863. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Knust  B, Brown  S, de St Maurice  A, Whitmer  S, Koske  SE, Ervin  E, et al.; Multistate Seoul Virus Outbreak Investigation Team. Seoul virus infection and spread in United States home-based ratteries: rat and human testing results from a multistate outbreak investigation. J Infect Dis. 2020;222:13119. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuperus  T, de Vries  A, Hoornweg  TE, Fonville  M, Jaarsma  RI, Opsteegh  M, et al. Seoul virus in pet and feeder rats in the Netherlands. Viruses. 2021;13:443. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Duggan  JM, Close  R, McCann  L, Wright  D, Keys  M, McCarthy  N, et al. A seroprevalence study to determine the frequency of hantavirus infection in people exposed to wild and pet fancy rats in England. Epidemiol Infect. 2017;145:245865. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Robin  C, Perkins  E, Watkins  F, Christley  R. Pets, purity and pollution: why conventional models of disease transmission do not work for pet rat owners. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:1526. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fill  MA, Mullins  H, May  AS, Henderson  H, Brown  SM, Chiang  C-F, et al. Notes from the field: multiple cases of Seoul virus infection in a household with infected pet rats—Tennessee, December 2016–April 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66:10812. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2710.211298

Original Publication Date: August 27, 2021

Table of Contents – Volume 27, Number 10—October 2021

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Emma Thomson, University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Stoker Bldg Rm 302, 464 Bearsden Rd, Glasgow, Scotland G61 1QH, UK

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: July 20, 2021
Page updated: September 19, 2021
Page reviewed: September 19, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.