Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 12—December 2021

Characterization of Swine Influenza A(H1N2) Variant, Alberta, Canada, 2020

Jamil N. Kanji1Comments to Author , Kanti Pabbaraju, Matthew Croxen, Susan Detmer, Nathalie Bastien, Yan Li, Anna Majer, Hussein Keshwani, Nathan Zelyas, Ifeoma Achebe, Corinne Jones, Maureen Rutz, Angela Jacobs, Keith Lehman, Deena Hinshaw, and Graham Tipples
Author affiliations: Alberta Precision Laboratories, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (J.N. Kanji, K. Pabbaraju, M. Croxen, N. Zelyas, G. Tipples); University of Alberta, Edmonton (J.N. Kanji, M. Croxen, N. Zelyas, I. Achebe, D. Hinshaw, G. Tipples); University of Saskatchewan, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada (S. Detmer); Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (N. Bastien, Y. Li, A. Majer); Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Edmonton (H. Keshwani, K. Lehman); Alberta Health Services, Red Deer, Alberta, Canada (I. Achebe, C. Jones, M. Rutz); Alberta Health Services, Edmonton (A. Jacobs); University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (D. Hinshaw)

Cite This Article


Influenza strains circulating among swine populations can cause outbreaks in humans. In October 2020, we detected a variant influenza A subtype H1N2 of swine origin in a person in Alberta, Canada. We initiated a public health, veterinary, and laboratory investigation to identify the source of the infection and determine whether it had spread. We identified the probable source as a local pig farm where a household contact of the index patient worked. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the isolate closely resembled strains found at that farm in 2017. Retrospective and prospective surveillance using molecular testing did not identify any secondary cases among 1,532 persons tested in the surrounding area. Quick collaboration between human and veterinary public health practitioners in this case enabled a rapid response to a potential outbreak.

Rapid detection and reporting of novel influenza A virus (IAV) strains are critical to prompt evaluation of a pandemic threat (1). For example, in 2009, health officials in Mexico reported a variant influenza A(H1N1) virus of swine origin; that variant quickly caused a pandemic (2). Although uncommon, transmission of swine variant IAV strains from pigs to humans has been documented on several occasions (3). Pig farming is structured such that the animals move to different types farms as they grow. Usually, piglets are born in farrowing farms, transferred to nurseries upon weaning, and then sent to finisher barns at 10–12 weeks of age. These farms usually span >2 geographically separate sites. Collectively, the combination of farrowing, nursery, and finisher farms form a chain where later farms are referred to as downstream from prior ones in the chain.

In 2005, updates to the International Health Regulations instituted mandatory reporting of pathogens such as novel influenza variants in all member states of the World Health Organization (2). Since then, 29 cases of swine influenza A(H1N2) variant H1N2v) strains have been reported to the World Health Organization, including 25 cases in the United States during 2011–2018, 1 case in Brazil in 2015, and 2 cases in Brazil in 2020 (47). In addition, 2 cases of H1N2v infection were detected in Canada: 1 in Alberta in October 2020 and 1 in Manitoba in April 2021 (8). Since the 2010–11 influenza season, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported >465 cases of swine IAV variants, including H1N1v, H1N2v, and H3N2v, in humans (9). We report the detection and genetic characterization of an H1N2v IAV isolated from a patient in Alberta. We also describe the public health response and relevant investigations regarding the case.


Case Description

During the second week of October 2020, a child <18 years of age was brought to a local emergency department with a 4-day history of cough, fever, pharyngitis, and rhinorrhea. At admission, the patient was afebrile, had mild tachycardia and tachypnea, and had an oxygen saturation of 93% on ambient air. We did not find signs of respiratory distress and discharged the patient after collecting specimens for respiratory virus testing. The patient was born in Canada and up-to-date with all routine immunizations and influenza vaccinations until 2016.

Consent was provided for the patient and the patient’s household members to be included in this report provided that no identifiable information was published. Presentation of the data contained in this report has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Board at the University of Alberta (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; study no. Pro00105933).

Diagnostic Evaluation

The patient’s nasopharyngeal swab sample tested negative for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by real-time reverse transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) (10). Multiplex molecular respiratory virus testing (NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel; Luminex Corporation, detected the presence of IAV; however, the virus could not be subtyped. A second rRT-PCR confirmed the presence of IAV but not influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus (11,12). Partial Sanger sequencing of the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes using universal primers (13) yielded sequences that closely resembled isolates of swine H1N2 IAVs available in GenBank.

Epidemiologic Inquiry

The patient had no history of travel, contact with persons from outside the county, or contact with persons who had respiratory illness. One of the patient’s household contacts worked with animals at a local pig farm. No household contacts reported symptoms of influenza-like illness or coronavirus disease (COVID-19) before the onset of illness in the index patient. However, 1 household contact reported influenza-like illness symptoms ≈2 days after symptom onset in the index patient. All household contacts remained at home for 10 days after symptom onset in the household contact. Both symptomatic persons recovered. Two asymptomatic household members, including one who worked at the farm of interest, consented to serologic testing by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay; samples were collected 35 days after identification of the index patient. The index patient and symptomatic household member declined serologic testing.

Public Health Response

Upon confirmation of swine IAV, which occurred 3 weeks after collection of the original nasopharyngeal swab sample, provincial public health teams, in collaboration with the Alberta Precision Laboratories (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada), undertook heightened influenza surveillance measures in the geographic zone of Alberta where the case was identified. All respiratory specimens collected for community and hospital-based SARS-CoV-2 testing in that region during October 5–November 4, 2020, were retrieved from storage and tested for IAV (12). We conducted prospective testing for IAV on all respiratory specimens submitted for SARS-CoV-2 testing from that area during November 4–10, 2020. Patients being tested for SARS-CoV-2 were informed they would also be tested for IAV.

Upon notification of the case, the Office of the Chief Provincial Veterinarian (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) began a veterinary investigation in collaboration with industry veterinarians and university partners to explore potential links to local pig herds. Staff of the Chief Provincial Veterinarian investigated the health, history and biosecurity practices of the farm where the household contact worked. Past samples collected from local pig herds showed IAVs of multiple subtypes in the farms supplying piglets to the herd of interest. In December 2017, a closely related H1N2 virus had been isolated from the nursery supplying the farm. In October 2019, a virus from the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 clade was isolated from the nursery; this strain was most recently detected at the nursery in February 2020.

Characterization of H1N2v Strain

We forwarded the patient’s sample to the National Microbiology Laboratory (Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada) for isolation and further characterization. The virus was cultured on Madin-Darby canine kidney cells in 1 passage using standard techniques (14).

We conducted HI assays with 0.5% vol/vol turkey red blood cells and 4 HA units of A/Alberta/01/2020 (H1N2)v. We treated each serum with receptor-destroying enzyme (Denka Seiken, at a 1:4 dilution for 18 hrs at 37°C and 45 min at 56°C, then performed adsorption with packed turkey red blood cells (15). We defined the HI titer as the highest dilution of the serum capable of inhibiting hemagglutination.

We determined phenotypic susceptibility for oseltamivir and zanamivir by using a chemiluminescent NA inhibition assay (NA-Star Influenza Neuraminidase Inhibitor Resistance Detection Kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific, at the National Microbiology Laboratory. The assay used viruses standardized to equivalent NA enzyme activity and incubated with 0.0316–1,000 nmol of oseltamivir or zanamivir. We calculated the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) by plotting the percentage inhibition of NA activity against the inhibitor concentration, using PRISM version 4 (GraphPad Software, for curve fitting.

We conducted whole-genome sequencing of the H1N2v isolate on the MinION (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, and MiSeq (Illumina, platforms. We generated sequence data and prepared and sequenced libraries using the DNA Library Prep Kit and iSeq 100 (Illumina; Appendix). We conducted phylogenetic characterization of the H1N2v isolate by comparing human H1N2v and swine H1N2 HA (segment 4) sequences available on GenBank. We also aligned sequences and visualized the phylogenetic trees (Appendix).


We used the rope technique to collect samples from several farms, including the farm of interest (16). We also collected 56 deep nasal swab and 11 pen-based oral fluid samples from farms downstream of the farm of interest, as well as 12 nasal swab and 6 oral fluid samples from the farm of interest. We placed individual nasal swab samples in 1.5 mL of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and vortexed them before extracting 500 µL pooled samples from 3–4 swabs for PCR (17). We subtyped the RNA from the strongest positive pooled nasal swab or oral fluid sample from each farm. Samples were analyzed at the University of Saskatchewan (Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada) by using the VetMAX-Gold Swine Influenza Virus Detection rRT-PCR kit and the VetMAX-Gold Swine Influenza Virus Subtyping rRT-PCR kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (18).



Phylogenetic trees of A/Alberta/01/2020 H1N2v and related strains, United States and Canada, 2016–2020. A) The H1α-3a subclade. B) The H1α-3a subclade with ≈2 years of changes (2017–2018) of A/swine/Alberta/SD0237/2017 and A/swine/Alberta/SD0267/2017. The trees were built with IQ-TREE version 2.0.3 ( on the basis of hemagglutinin sequences. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values based on 1,000 replicates. Red bars identifies clades; all clades presented have % age bootstrap values >70. Diamond indicates A/Alberta/01/2020 (H1N2)v. Scale bar indicates number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Figure. Phylogenetic trees of A/Alberta/01/2020 H1N2v and related strains, United States and Canada, 2016–2020. A) The H1α-3a subclade. B) The H1α-3a subclade with ≈2 years of changes (2017–2018) of A/swine/Alberta/SD0237/2017 and...

BLAST ( analysis of historical swine H1N2 and H1N2 isolates from western Canada yielded a close match to a virus strain found on only a few farms in central Alberta, including a farm in the pig supply chain of the herd of interest. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the human A/Alberta/01/2020 H1N2v isolate belonged to the evolutionary branch found at the nursery that supplied the farm where the household contact worked (A/swine/Alberta/SD0237/2017 and A/swine/Alberta/SD0267/2017); the most similar sequence was collected from the source farm in 2017 (Figure; Appendix Table). The A/Alberta/01/2020 H1N2v sequence shared high genetic similarity (98%–>99%) with 8 genes from multiple swine H1N2v and H3N2 strains from western Canada and the United States (Table). The H1 gene sequence most resembled sequences found in the H1α-3a subclade.

Two members of patient’s household had HI titers of 20. Seasonal vaccine serum for A/Hawaii/70/2019 H1N1 elicited no HI titer against A/Alberta/01/2020 H1N2v. We found that A/Alberta/01/2020/H1N2v was susceptible to oseltamivir (IC50 0.41 nmol) and zanamivir (IC50 2.16 nmol). The control strain, A/Brisbane/10/07 H3N2, was sensitive to oseltamivir (IC50 0.61 nmol) and zanamivir (IC50 3.19 nmol).

Surveillance for Additional H1N2v Cases

This case occurred during the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, when there was no circulating seasonal influenza in the province (19). We did not identify additional cases of IAV from retrospective testing of 1,276 archived respiratory specimens nor prospective testing of 256 specimens submitted for respiratory virus testing.

IAV Testing

In total, 3/13 pooled nasal swab and 2/6 oral fluid samples from the farm of interest tested positive for IAV. Cycle threshold (Ct) values were 34.7–36.6; we considered values <38 to be positive. We found that all positive pooled nasal swab and oral fluid samples from the 2 sites of interest with the lowest Ct value (34.7) had the H1 gene; however, we could not identify the NA type. The sample with the second lowest Ct value (35.4) from the same downstream site was subtyped as N2, as was the only positive (Ct 36.0) sample from the other downstream farm tested.

At the nursery, all 3 pooled nasal swab and all 6 oral fluid samples tested positive for IAV (Ct 29.8–34.7). We identified H1, H3, N1, and N2 genes in the pooled nasal swab sample with the lowest Ct value (29.8) from the nursery.


We report pig-to-human transmission of H1N2v virus in Alberta, Canada. The source of H1N2v infection in the index patient is unclear, but one of the patient’s household contacts worked at a pig farm where a similar H1N2 virus was found in 2017.

IAV is transmitted through close contact and contaminated objects (5). Transmission of IAV from swine to humans is usually the result of close contact or self-inoculation from contaminated farm surfaces (3,20,21). In Canada, pig farms must adhere to strict farm biosecurity measures, such as policies requiring workers to shower before leaving, use of facility-specific uniforms and boots, and designation of clean and dirty zones (2224). Thus, the likelihood of the index patient acquiring infection through fomite-related transmission is very low. Because the index patient never visited the farm of interest, the virus was probably transmitted through respiratory droplets from the household contact who worked at the farm. Humans have poor seroconversion to H1N2 viruses (20), so it is possible that the household contact had partial protection from previous exposure, despite having an HI titer of 20. Partial protection might also explain the limited forward transmission observed in this study, especially because H1N2v virus is associated with mild illness and limited transmission (5).

Although not an exact predictor of protection, HI titers of 40 are considered the minimum protective level for humans (25). Therefore, titers of 20 against the isolated strain would not indicate a recent stimulation of the antibodies or a protective cross-reaction. However, a very mild or asymptomatic infection might not result in a high titer immune response (26). Because testing with A/Hawaii/70/2019 (H1N1) antiserum elicited no titer, seasonal vaccination would probably not provide protection against A/Alberta/01/2020/H1N2v.

Extensive surveillance testing in the geographic area of the index patient did not detect additional cases, indicating minimal spread. After detection of a variant influenza, active case-finding is critical because of the potential pandemic threat posed by emerging strains. A comparative evaluation of H1N1v and H1N2v viruses isolated during 2011–2016 found that many swine H1 strains capable of infecting humans possess adaptations for efficient replication and enhanced transmission through respiratory droplets (27). Furthermore, the H1 antigens in most isolates were distinct from those of vaccine strains; thus, routine influenza vaccine is unlikely to provide adequate protection against variant strains. Even 1 zoonotic event could enable adaptations for human infection and transmission (28).

We found low levels of circulating virus among pigs at the farm where the index patient’s household member worked and those downstream from it, possibly because the 2 sites were finisher barns where medium-sized grower pigs are raised until they reach market weight. Sows who have antibodies to IAV from vaccination or natural exposure can pass maternally derived antibodies to their offspring through colostrum. The amount of maternally derived antibodies detected in newborn piglets varies within litters, not only because antibodies vary among sows, but also because the firstborn piglets consume the most colostrum. In total, 60%–100% of nursing piglets born to a vaccinated sow have HI titers >120 at 5 days old. On average, 75% of the nursing piglets of vaccinated sows have a strong titer (>120) that is homologous between the vaccine and circulating strains (i.e., autogenous vaccines) (S. Detmer, University of Saskatchewan, pers. comm., 2021 Jun 5). As such, there is limited detection of virus in farrowing barns. In contrast, IAVs are often detected in and isolated from nursing piglets 14–24 days of age on farms that do not vaccinate sows, further demonstrating that maternally derived antibodies from vaccinated sows limit infection in nursing piglets until these antibodies wane at 6–8 weeks of age (29). By the time pigs reach the finisher barns, they often have experienced infection in the nursery, farrowing barn, or both and have acquired their own immune response to endemic strains of IAV. In finisher barns, acquired immunity among pigs causes many IAV infections to be subclinical and undetected (30).

In 2016, analysis of whole influenza genomes isolated from pigs in Canada and the United States demonstrated the splitting of the H1α clade into 3 distinct subclades: H1α-1, H1α-2, and H1α-3 (31). We found that A/Alberta/01/2020/H1N2v most closely resembles strains belonging to the H1α-3 virus clade; however, the variant strain does not contain the amino acid deletions at sites 129 and 130 in the HA gene. Therefore, A/Alberta/01/2020/H1N2v probably belongs to the H1α-3a virus clade. Further study is required to assess if the H1α-3a virus cluster is antigenically in addition to genetically distinct from the H1α-3 virus cluster.

A zoonotic H1α-3 H1N2v virus strain (A/Ohio/24/2017/H1N2) was isolated from a human in the United States in 2017 (32). The A/Ohio/24/2017/H1N2 and A/Alberta/01/2020 strains share high nucleotide identity (91.3%–96.6%) within 8 major genes; however, this proportion is lower than that of other H1N2 strains (Table). As of July 2021, 9 distinct H1α-3a viruses have been detected in the United States. These 9 viruses were probably associated with animal movements from Alberta to the US states of Iowa and South Dakota. These animal movements stopped in 2018 and there is no evidence of continued transmission or geographic spread of these strains in the United States (31).

A major limitation of this study is the 3-week delay in confirming the patient’s H1N2v infection. Therefore, active surveillance testing of persons and pigs in the patient’s geographic region was delayed, possibly diminishing our ability to detect additional active cases. However, we mitigated this limitation in human sampling by testing banked samples collected for SARS-CoV-2 testing beginning ≈1 week before the collection of the patient’s nasopharyngeal swab sample. The delay might have contributed to the higher Ct values for IAV testing of samples from pigs at the farm of interest, because the active phase of infection probably occurred several weeks earlier in most pigs. The higher Ct values of >30 also decreased our ability to amplify certain gene segments for strain identification.

As of September 2021, no further H1N2v virus cases have been identified in humans in that area of Alberta. This case occurred when IAV incidence among humans was uncharacteristically low, probably because of nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (33). These interventions simplified IAV screening. Our results highlight the importance of expanding collaborations between the human and veterinary sectors to enable timely identification, reporting, and investigation of emerging zoonotic pathogens of pandemic potential.

Dr. Kanji is a medical microbiologist at Alberta Precision Laboratories, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. His research interests include zoonotic pathogens, clinical laboratory diagnostics, and infection control measures.



  1. Cook  PW, Stark  T, Jones  J, Kondor  R, Zanders  N, Benfer  J, et al. Detection and characterization of swine origin influenza A(H1N1) pandemic 2009 viruses in humans following zoonotic transmission. J Virol. 2020;95:e0106620. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Katz  R. Use of revised International Health Regulations during influenza A (H1N1) epidemic, 2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:116570. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowman  AS, Nelson  SW, Page  SL, Nolting  JM, Killian  ML, Sreevatsan  S, et al. Swine-to-human transmission of influenza A(H3N2) virus at agricultural fairs, Ohio, USA, 2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:147280. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Government of Canada (Public Health Agency of Canada). Human emerging respiratory pathogens bulletin 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 18].
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reported infections with variant influenza viruses in the United States 2017 [cited 2020 Nov 18].
  6. World Health Organization. Influenza A(H1N2) variant virus—Brazil 2020 Jul 9 [cited 2020 Nov 18].
  7. Resende  PC, Born  PS, Matos  AR, Motta  FC, Caetano  BC, Debur  MD, et al. Whole-genome characterization of a novel human influenza A(H1N2) virus variant, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:1524. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Government of Canada. Human influenza A with swine origin. 2021 [cited 2021 May 29].
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Novel influenza A virus infections. 2021 [cited 2021 May 8].
  10. Pabbaraju  KWA, Douesnard  M, Ma  R, Gill  K, Dieu  P, Fonseca  K, et al. Development and validation of reverse transcriptase-PCR assays for testing of SARS-CoV-2. Official Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada. 2020;6:1622. DOIGoogle Scholar
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC protocol of realtime RTPCR for swine influenza A(H1N1). 2007 [cited 2021 Jan 7].
  12. Pabbaraju  K, Wong  S, Wong  AA, Appleyard  GD, Chui  L, Pang  X-L, et al. Design and validation of real-time reverse transcription-PCR assays for detection of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:345460. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoffmann  E, Stech  J, Guan  Y, Webster  RG, Perez  DR. Universal primer set for the full-length amplification of all influenza A viruses. Arch Virol. 2001;146:227589. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamamoto  I, Takaku  H, Tashiro  M, Yamamoto  N. High yield production of influenza virus in Madin Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells with stable knockdown of IRF7. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59892. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kendal  APPM, Skehel  JJ. Concepts and procedures for laboratory-based influenza surveillance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1982.
  16. Detmer  SE, Patnayak  DP, Jiang  Y, Gramer  MR, Goyal  SM. Detection of Influenza A virus in porcine oral fluid samples. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2011;23:2417. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Detmer  S, Gramer  M, Goyal  S, Torremorell  M, Torrison  J. Diagnostics and surveillance for Swine influenza. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2013;370:85112. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang  J, Harmon  KM. RNA extraction from swine samples and detection of influenza A virus in swine by real-time RT-PCR. Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2123:295310. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Government of Canada. Influenza weekly reports 2020–21 season. 2021 [cited 2020 Nov 18].
  20. Terebuh  P, Olsen  CW, Wright  J, Klimov  A, Karasin  A, Todd  K, et al. Transmission of influenza A viruses between pigs and people, Iowa, 2002-2004. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2010;4:38796. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lauterbach  SE, Wright  CM, Zentkovich  MM, Nelson  SW, Lorbach  JN, Bliss  NT, et al. Detection of influenza A virus from agricultural fair environment: Air and surfaces. Prev Vet Med. 2018;153:249. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Canadian Pork Council. Visitors and farm biosecurity. 2021 [cited 2021 May 30].
  23. Alarcón  LV, Allepuz  A, Mateu  E. Biosecurity in pig farms: a review. Porcine Health Manag. 2021;7:5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hancock  K, Veguilla  V, Lu  X, Zhong  W, Butler  EN, Sun  H, et al. Cross-reactive antibody responses to the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:194552. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. To  KKW, Zhang  AJX, Hung  IFN, Xu  T, Ip  WCT, Wong  RTY, et al. High titer and avidity of nonneutralizing antibodies against influenza vaccine antigen are associated with severe influenza. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:10128. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pulit-Penaloza  JA, Pappas  C, Belser  JA, Sun  X, Brock  N, Zeng  H, et al. Comparative in vitro and in vivo analysis of H1N1 and H1N2 variant influenza viruses isolated from humans between 2011 and 2016. J Virol. 2018;92:e0144418. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee  JH, Pascua  PN, Decano  AG, Kim  SM, Park  SJ, Kwon  HI, et al. Evaluation of the zoonotic potential of a novel reassortant H1N2 swine influenza virus with gene constellation derived from multiple viral sources. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;34:37893. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Chamba Pardo  FO, Wayne  S, Culhane  MR, Perez  A, Allerson  M, Torremorell  M. Effect of strain-specific maternally-derived antibodies on influenza A virus infection dynamics in nursery pigs. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0210700. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Poljak  Z, Dewey  CE, Martin  SW, Christensen  J, Carman  S, Friendship  RM. Prevalence of and risk factors for influenza in southern Ontario swine herds in 2001 and 2003. Can J Vet Res. 2008;72:717.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson  MI, Culhane  MR, Trovão  NS, Patnayak  DP, Halpin  RA, Lin  X, et al. The emergence and evolution of influenza A (H1α) viruses in swine in Canada and the United States. J Gen Virol. 2017;98:266375. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rambo-Martin  BL, Keller  MW, Wilson  MM, Nolting  JM, Anderson  TK, Vincent  AL, et al. Influenza A virus field surveillance at a swine-human interface. MSphere. 2020;5:e0082219. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Partridge  E, McCleery  E, Cheema  R, Nakra  N, Lakshminrusimha  S, Tancredi  DJ, et al. Evaluation of seasonal respiratory virus activity before and after the statewide COVID-19 shelter-in-place order in Northern California. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2035281. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2712.210298

Original Publication Date: November 01, 2021

1Current affiliation: University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Table of Contents – Volume 27, Number 12—December 2021

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Jamil Kanji, Public Health Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Foothills Medical Centre, 3030 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4W4, Canada

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: September 28, 2021
Page updated: November 19, 2021
Page reviewed: November 19, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.