Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 2—February 2021

Plasmodium falciparum Histidine-Rich Protein 2 and 3 Gene Deletions in Strains from Nigeria, Sudan, and South Sudan

Christiane ProsserComments to Author , Karryn Gresty, John Ellis, Wieland Meyer, Karen Anderson, Rogan Lee, and Qin Cheng
Author affiliations: Australian Defence Force Malaria and Infectious Disease Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (C. Prosser, K. Gresty, K. Anderson, Q. Cheng); Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia (C. Prosser, W. Meyer); University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (C. Prosser, W. Meyer, R. Lee); QIMR–Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane (K. Gresty, K. Anderson, Q. Cheng); University of Technology Sydney, Sydney (J. Ellis); Westmead Hospital, Westmead (W. Meyer); Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, University of Sydney, Sydney (W. Meyer); Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, ICPMR, Westmead Hospital, Westmead (R. Lee)

Cite This Article


Deletion of histidine-rich protein genes pfhrp2/3 in Plasmodium falciparum causes infections to go undetected by HRP2-based malaria rapid diagnostic tests. We analyzed P. falciparum malaria cases imported to Australia (n = 210, collected 2010–2018) for their pfhrp2/3 status. We detected gene deletions in patients from 12 of 25 countries. We found >10% pfhrp2-deletion levels in those from Nigeria (13.3%, n = 30), Sudan (11.2%, n = 39), and South Sudan (17.7%, n = 17) and low levels of pfhrp3 deletion from Sudan (3.6%) and South Sudan (5.9%). No parasites with pfhrp2/3 double deletions were detected. Microsatellite typing of parasites from Nigeria, Sudan, and South Sudan revealed low relatedness among gene-deleted parasites, indicating independent emergences. The gene deletion proportions signify a risk of false-negative HRP2-RDT results. This study’s findings warrant surveillance to determine whether the prevalence of gene-deleted parasites justifies switching malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Nigeria, Sudan, and South Sudan.

During 2000–2015, global malaria incidence and death rates were reduced by more than half (1). Malaria control efforts are credited with increasing life expectancy by 5% globally and by 12.3% in sub–Saharan Africa, where ≈90% of the disease burden is located (2). Gains in malaria control have been attributed primarily to the implementation of key intervention measures including insecticide-treated netting, indoor residual spraying, combination medicines, and diagnostic tests. Malaria decline has been more gradual, or has stalled, in endemic regions with limited access to these interventions (3).

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are recommended, and have become essential, for malaria case management in many regions because they meet the challenges for remote and low-resource settings. These tests are affordable, easy to transport and store, and less skill- and resource-demanding than microscopy, but they offer comparable sensitivity to quality microscopy (4). These RDTs are used, along with Giemsa-stained blood films, for diagnosis of imported malaria in pathology laboratories in Australia (including those of the Australian Defence Force) (5). A preliminary diagnosis using RDTs is made and the diagnosis confirmed by stained thick and thin films. False-negative tests from RDTs will result in delayed treatment, which may affect the patient’s clinical outcomes.

Histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2)–based RDTs are largely preferred for detecting P. falciparum malaria because of their superior sensitivity and heat-stability profile over Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) or aldolase (6). HRP2-based tests detect the HRP2 antigen (and, to a lesser extent, HRP3, because of cross-reactivity) at levels as low as ≈1 ng/mL blood; however, in practice, the detection limit of HRP2-based tests is reportedly comparable with that of quality microscopy (≈200 parasites/μL) (7). This level is adequate for case management but much less sensitive than molecular methods. RDTs have been reported to have failed to detect a substantial proportion of asymptomatic infections (8).

Parasite deletion of the genes pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 has been implicated in false-negative results using HRP2-based RDTs. There are recent reports of pfhrp2-deleted parasites in several countries in Africa (915), as well as India (16), China and Myanmar (17), and countries in South America, including Peru (18). Single pfhrp2 gene deletions represent an increased risk for RDT failure, especially in cases of low parasitemia or inferior RDTs (19). In the instance of a double deletion of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3, the parasite is undetectable with HRP2-based RDTs (20). Because RDTs are the mainstay diagnostic tool for many endemic countries, loss of effectiveness constitutes a public health emergency and poses a major challenge to P. falciparum control and elimination efforts. For countries reliant on RDTs, gene-deletion prevalence data are needed to inform case management policy.

The World Health Organization has estimated a threshold of 5% of parasites lacking HRP2 as the point at which false negatives from lack of antigen expression would likely exceed the rate of false negatives observed using alternative RDTs and, as such, the point at which HRP2-based tests are no longer recommended for that location (21). Therefore, surveillance is critical to estimate whether the prevalence of parasites with gene deletions has reached the threshold for switching RDTs and is recommended to focus primarily on locations or nearby locations where gene deletions have been detected. Imported cases of malaria are a resource to detect gene deletions in countries of origin and the outcomes can prompt large-scale surveillance.

When case management policies for imported malaria are developed, regional pfhrp2/pfhrp3 deletion levels should also be considered. The lack of clarity regarding the status of many endemic regions has fueled concern on the part of physicians. In settings where only RDTs are used for diagnosis, laboratories need to be aware of the possibility of false negatives when testing samples with >5% rate of HRP2 deletion. Consequently, we investigated the pfhrp2/pfhrp3 status of malaria cases imported from travelers, immigrants, and refugees entering Australia to identify evidence for pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletions in P. falciparum from malaria-endemic countries.


Sample Collection and DNA Extraction

Malaria cases in Australia require that a blood sample be sent to a regional reference laboratory for confirmation and storage. We determined Plasmodium spp. infection and species by microscopy (Giemsa-stained thick and thin smears) and confirmed them by PCR (22) at the New South Wales Health Pathology Parasitology Laboratory at Westmead Hospital (Westmead, New South Wales, Australia). We aliquoted whole blood from archived P. falciparum–positive samples from imported malaria cases (n = 210) and recorded deidentified patient information. We extracted genomic DNA from whole blood using QIAamp mini DNA kits (QIAGEN, according to the manufacturer’s directions. We assessed DNA quality by subjecting DNA to agarose gel electrophoresis. We measured DNA concentrations by spectrophotometric analysis using a Nanodrop Spectrophotometer ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher, at 260 nm and 280 nm. We included genomic DNA from P. falciparum laboratory reference strains in each PCR assay as experimental controls for various pfhrp2/pfhrp3 deletion statuses: 3D7 (pfhrp2 +/pfhrp3 +), HB3 (pfhrp2 +/pfhrp3 −), 3BD5 (pfhrp2 −/pfhrp3 −), Dd2 (pfhrp2 −/pfhrp3 +), and D10 (pfhrp2 −/pfhrp3 +). We stored samples at −20°C before use.

Characterization of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3

We investigated the status (presence/absence) of pfhrp2 (PlasmoDB gene ID Pf3D7_0831800) and pfhrp3 (PlasmoDB gene ID Pf3D7_1372200) genes by amplifying across exon 1–exon 2 and exon 2, as previously described (10; Appendix Table). Samples were considered to contain the pfhrp2- or pfhrp3-deleted parasites when there was a negative PCR result for exon 1 or exon 2 of the gene, or both, along with a positive PCR amplifying all 3 single-copy reference genes: merozoite surface protein 1 (pfmsp1), merozoite surface protein 2 (pfmsp2), and glutamate-rich protein (pfglurp). The use of the comparable single copy reference gene assays as a DNA quality control has been observed in several studies reporting P. falciparum with and without deletions to show a concordant limit of detection when the genes are present (23).

Rapid Diagnostic Testing

We used SD Bioline (Standard Diagnostics, HRP2-based malaria RDTs according to the manufacturer’s instructions to test thawed whole blood samples that had been determined to contain P. falciparum with gene deletions (when whole blood was available). We performed additional tests on pfhrp2/pfhrp3 positive and negative samples at various parasite densities, and we conducted comparative tests using BinaxNOW (Inverness Medical Binax, and Carestart (AccessBio, HRP2-based malaria RDTs.

Microsatellite Analysis

We conducted microsatellite analysis as described elsewhere (10). In brief, for each sample originating from Sudan, South Sudan, or Nigeria, we analyzed 7 neutral microsatellite markers (TA1, PolyA, PfPK2, TA109, 2490, 313, and 383). We amplified markers per PCR conditions and primers listed (Appendix Table). We sized amplicons using an ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, We scored alleles manually using Peak Scanner Software version 1.0 (Applied Biosystems), including a minimum peak height of 300 relative fluorescence units (Appendix Figure 1). To exclude artifactual stutter peaks (likely polymerase slippage on extended tandem repeats, which are frequent in Plasmodium genomes), we disregarded peaks less than one third of the predominant peak (24).

Genetic Diversity Phylogenetic Analysis

We produced a predominant haplotype for each sample based on the sizes of the 7 microsatellite markers. We used PHYLOViZ software (25) using a minimum spanning tree approach to compare the genetic diversity and genetic relatedness of the Sudan, South Sudan, and Nigeria cohorts within this study and to compare with parasites from Eritrea and Peru (haplotypes characterized in a previous study [10]). We standardized values for the microsatellite marker sizes against the P. falciparum 3D7 reference strain. We used FSTAT to calculate microsatellite allele frequencies at each locus, average number of alleles, and expected and observed heterozygosity (26).


Patient Data Analysis

This study included parasite samples from persons from 25 countries, with most (194/210) originating from countries in Africa. A large proportion of the patient cohort traveled to Australia from Nigeria (n = 30) or Sudan (n = 39); for all other countries of origin, n<20. The clinical state, when known, was predominantly symptomatic travelers who came to the hospital; however, the cohort included >15 potentially asymptomatic samples collected during refugee screening (n = 8 within the cohort from South Sudan). The study population was composed of 149 male patients, 53 female patients, and 8 patients with unknown gender; age range was 6 months to 79 years at the time of infection (median age 42 years). Of the samples collected, 75.2% had a parasitemia ranging from 0.01% (≈500 parasites/μL) to 30.1% (1,505,000 parasites/μL), with a mean of 1.34 ± 3.00%, 67,000 parasites/μL; 24.8% had a parasitemia <0.01%. Only 48% of patients (when reported) had used chemoprophylaxis (doxycycline, artemether/lumefantrine, or mefloquine), and instances of concurrent conditions were low (reported in <5% of cases, most commonly dengue fever; Appendix Table 2).

Presence/Absence of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3

Figure 1

Summary of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletion key results showing pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletion results for Plasmodium spp. isolates,  by parasite country of origin (where n>4), Australia. National P. falciparum endemicity depicted is measured as population-weighted mean P. falciparum infection rate of children 2–10 years of age, using data available from the Malaria Atlas Project ( Data were mapped using the AuthaGraph world map projection to more truthfully visualize the potential paths of dissemination and adjacency of various endemic zones, as this is considered the most accurate representation of land proportions and relative orientations ( P.f., P. falciparum.

Figure 1. Summary of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletion key results showing pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletion results for Plasmodiumspp. isolates, by parasite country...

We observed pfhrp2 or pfhrp3 deletion (together with positive pfmsp1, pfmsp2, and pfglurp results) in 24 of 210 parasite samples from 12 of 25 countries of origin (Table 1). Results from assays amplifying exon 2 of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 matched the findings from assays amplifying across exon 1–2, suggesting whole rather than partial gene deletion. We observed pfhrp2-deleted parasites in 3 samples from Nigeria (3/30, 10%), 4 samples from Sudan (4/39, 10.26%), and 4 samples from South Sudan (4/17, 17.65%) (Figure 1). We observed a single sample with pfhrp2-deletion in specimens originating from Ghana (1/17, 5.88%), Kenya (1/18, 5.55%), Mali (1/3, 33.33%), Togo (1/1, 100%), and Zambia (1/5, 20%). We found 3 samples (3/27) of unknown African origins to be pfhrp2-deleted.

We observed a single sample with pfhrp3 deletion per origin in parasites from Sudan (1/39, 2.56%), South Sudan (1/17, 5.88%), Tanzania (1/4, 25%), Sumatra (1/2, 50%), and Peru (1/1, 100%). No parasites were observed to have both the pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletion.

Rapid Diagnostic Test Results

We tested 20 gene deletion blood samples with HRP2 RDTs (18 pfhrp2 deleted, 2 pfhrp3 deleted). Of these, 16 samples produced a positive Pf band using HRP2-based SD BioLine malaria RDTs (14 pfhrp2 deleted, 2 pfhrp3 deleted). Of the 16 gene deletion parasites detected by HRP2 RDT, 10 samples had a parasitemia >1000/μL. Four of 18 pfhrp2-deleted parasites failed to be detected by HRP2 RDTs; 3 of these 4 cases had a parasitemia level <500/μL (Table 2). Only 9 of 20 samples gave a positive pan band; 8 of the 9 had a parasitemia level >2,000/μL.

Microsatellite Analysis

Figure 2

Minimum spanning tree of microsatellite allelic data showing genetic relatedness of Plasmodium falciparum populations from Sudan, South Sudan, Nigeria, and Eritrea (A), and pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletion status of haplotypes (B) (positive: gene present; negative: gene absent). Numbered circles represent specific haplotypes. Plots were generated using PHYLOViZ software (25) with a cutoff value of 2 (minimum differences for 2 microsatellite loci) depicted as lines connecting haplotypes and a cutoff value of 3 depicted as haplotype circle arrangements/proximities.

Figure 2. Minimum spanning tree of microsatellite allelic data showing genetic relatedness of Plasmodium falciparum populations from Sudan, South Sudan, Nigeria, and Eritrea (A), and pfhrp2 and ...

We amplified and scored 7 microsatellite loci for each sample from Sudan, South Sudan, and Nigeria (n = 86), finding 88 unique haplotypes. Two samples shared a haplotype, and we observed 2 instances of multiple haplotype infection. All 7 microsatellite markers were found to be polymorphic. We found a mean of 11 alleles per locus, a range from 6 (microsatellite markers TA109 and 2490) to 16 (microsatellite marker 383) distinct alleles. We found the genetic relatedness of P. falciparum populations to correspond weakly with country of origin (represented by small clusters of 2–3 haplotypes), as compared with the population structure of parasites from Eritrea (Figure 2, panel A). Unlike large clustering of pfhrp2/3-deleted parasites in Eritrea, pfhrp2- or pfhrp3-deleted parasites within the cohorts from Sudan, South Sudan, and Nigeria were not found to be more closely related to each other than to pfhrp2/pfhrp3-positive parasites within their cohort (Figure 2, panel B). The expected heterozygosity of populations (by country and by deletion status) did not exceed the observed heterozygosity for any cohort.


Increasing availability and use of HRP2-based malaria RDTs in Africa has been pivotal to improving case management over the past 20 years (27). Evaluation of compliance to RDT outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa found that protocols often varied among healthcare workers, particularly in the case of negative RDT results (28). Increased rates of RDT false-negative results may undermine confidence in adherence to World Health Organization guidelines (29) and would threaten the recent gains in malaria control.

Several countries relying on HRP2-based malaria RDTs lack molecular data on parasite pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletion. Sudan and South Sudan had no previously reported data regarding pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 status. We observed the presence of both pfhrp2 and pfhrp3-deleted parasites in this study, although no double deletions were detected. The presence of these parasites is not altogether unexpected given the low level of pfhrp2- and pfhrp3-deleted parasites previously found in natural P. falciparum populations (30) and the presence of these parasites in neighboring endemic regions (10). The levels of pfhrp2 deletion raise concerns: 10.3% observed from Sudan (mean collection date 2016), and 17.5% from South Sudan (mean collection date 2017–2018) (Figure 1). Mathematical modeling predicts rapid (≈3 years) selection for widespread pfhrp2-deletion within a population subjected to HRP2-based RDT use, with a baseline pfhrp2-deletion level lower than what we observed in parasites originating from Sudan and South Sudan (31). In addition, this region of Africa experiences a great deal of human migration (32,33), notably in Sudan’s neighbor Eritrea (where pfhrp2/pfhrp3 double deletion parasites are prevalent [10]), increasing the risk for deletion-parasite dissemination.

Samples originating from Nigeria (n = 30) were collected during 2011–2015 (1 sample from 2011 was, to our knowledge, the earliest reported pfhrp2-deleted parasite from Nigeria); however, the proportion of pfhrp2-deleted parasites observed (13.3%) is similar to the 17% observed in a 2019 study of contemporary parasites from Nigeria (likewise finding no double deletion) (14). Countries in western Africa, such as Nigeria, often make use of exclusively HRP2-based RDTs (no pan–Plasmodium spp. antigen target); because reliance on P. falciparum–only RDTs would further exacerbate the public health consequences of pfhrp2/pfhrp3-deleted parasites, ongoing monitoring in these locations is warranted (31).

No gene-deleted parasites were observed within the cohorts from several countries (Cameroon, Gambia, Côte d’Ivoire, Madagascar, Malawi, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sumatra, Uganda, Zimbabwe, and all countries in Asia); in 6 countries in Africa, a single gene-deleted parasite was found (pfhrp2: Ghana, Kenya, Mali, Togo, and Zambia; pfhrp3: Tanzania). The sample sizes are insufficient to comment on regional proportions. Baselines for these regions are undetermined, although a low level of false-negative results using HRP2-based RDTs has been reported in rural Ghana (34), and varying levels (0%–30%) of pfhrp2 deletion have been observed in regions of Kenya (12). pfhrp2/pfhrp3 double-deleted parasites have been observed within the China–Myanmar border area, where baseline pfhrp2-deleted parasite proportions were as low as 4% (17). The observation of a low level of gene-deleted parasites in this study emphasizes the need to monitor pfhrp2/pfhrp3 status for early detection of emergent double deletions in the countries of origin.

SD BioLine and Carestart HRP2-based tests consistently produced the same outcome, but those results occasionally differed from results from BinaxNOW, which was less sensitive (Table 2). Subjecting the selected samples to testing with HRP2-based SD BioLine malaria RDTs corroborated the hypothesis that infections by pfhrp2-deleted parasites may occasionally fail to be detected, particularly in cases of low parasite density (<1,000/μL) and less-sensitive RDT varieties. Indeed, most pfhrp2-negative/pfhrp3-positive samples tested positive with HRP2-based SD BioLine malaria RDTs when parasitemia was >1000 parasites/μL, which suggests that HRP3 cross-reaction with HRP2-based tests acts as a failsafe, in cases of adequate parasite density (generally observed to be >1,000 parasites/μL [14]). pfhrp2-deleted parasites, in the absence of a double deletion, may suffer a loss of sensitivity, but these assays remain a viable interim option for remote and low-resource settings.

P. falciparum and pan–Plasmodium spp. RDTs failing to detect pfhrp2/3-deleted P. falciparum through pan–Plasmodium spp. pLDH likely reflects the freezing/thawing of whole blood samples, which is reported to degrade the antigen and to cause hemolysis of the blood, leading to sample inhibition (35). Freeze-thawing of archived blood is not observed to degrade HRP2 appreciably (7).

The main purpose of microsatellite analysis was to compare the genetic relatedness between parasites with gene deletions reported from different areas globally so that we could determine whether parasites with gene deletions were of de novo emergence. For this purpose, we used the same set of microsatellite markers that have been used in other parts of the world, including South America, and included a common control of 3D7 parasite in each run at different laboratories to calibrate outcomes. Microsatellite analyses found high heterogeneity of P. falciparum populations within and between Sudan, South Sudan, and Nigeria. The lack of genetic relatedness observed between gene-deleted parasites, including between the gene-deleted parasites observed in this study and those analyzed within Eritrea in a previous study (10), suggests independent, de novo emergence of parasites with gene deletions. The high level of genetic diversity may reflect the broad geographic and temporal sampling range, as well as the heterogenicity, of natural P. falciparum populations in areas with moderate or high transmission intensities.

We analyzed microsatellite peaks for the presence of multiple peaks (indicating multiple unique haplotypes within an individual infection). Three samples had evidence of infection by multiple strains with cocirculating strains potentially present at lower density; all other samples had no secondary peaks exceeding our thresholds for calling (this necessary threshold may prevent the detection of minor alleles). Although it detected few multiclonal infections in this sample set, microsatellite analysis was able to detect a very high level of heterogeneity (88 haplotypes/86 samples) within and between countries, demonstrating the quality of the analysis. The low level of multiple clone infections may reflect the source of samples. For instance, Nigeria is a high-transmission country with a high median multiplicity of infection; however, the Nigerian cohort was composed of travelers or immigrants to Australia who returned home for family events, usually traveling for <2 weeks.

A notable consideration when interpreting results from this study is the opportunity sampling. Using imported P. falciparum from travelers provided small sample sizes for most countries of origin and a broad collection timeframe (2010–2018). The sampling timeframe does not capture the true prevalence of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletion in contemporary parasite populations or allow us to consider the effects of seasonal profiles (38). As a result, the cohort is not representative of cases within endemic regions, which is noteworthy because pfhrp2/3 deletion needs to be interpreted considering clinical relevance. Deletion proportions between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients within groups were too small and too often status unknown for meaningful analysis. This limitation restricts the conclusions that can be drawn from the screening results, although analyses of imported malaria cases in persons entering Australia has the added benefit of informing local case management.

Because clinicians’ notes informed patient data, the specific geographic origins were limited to the country level (and, in 27 cases, were reported only as having origins in Africa). To the best of our knowledge, travelers contracted malaria parasites from their country of origin. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that parasites were contracted from another endemic region. Specimens from South Sudan were obtained primarily from refugees who had reported staying in camps for long periods (3–12 months), including settlements bordering Uganda and Ethiopia. Therefore, parasites may have originated from bordering endemic regions.

Malaria control is complicated in regions bordering other endemic nations by human–vector migration. Border regions are often rural, which may lead to high transmission coupled with inadequate health services (36). Similarly, the remoteness, limited resources, and political complexity of border regions often produces suboptimal surveillance responses (37). Given the genetic exchange expected between adjacent parasite populations, monitoring of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 for Sudan and South Sudan would ideally be coordinated together with neighboring countries.

In conclusion, analysis of imported P. falciparum cases revealed pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletion from 12 countries, including levels of pfhrp2-deleted parasites exceeding 10% from Nigeria, Sudan, and South Sudan, where pfhrp2-based malaria RDT failure would constitute a major public health threat. These nations require urgent prevalence surveys and ongoing monitoring for early detection of emergent double deletion parasites.

Ms. Prosser is a PhD candidate at Sydney Medical School at the University of Sydney; she is conducting research at the Westmead Institute for Medical Research Westmead and is a scientific officer at the Australian Defence Force Malaria and Infectious Disease Institute. Her primary research interests are malaria drug resistance and diagnostics, molecular epidemiology, and public health.



  1. World Health Organization. World malaria report 2015. Geneva: The Organization; 2016.
  2. World Health Organization. Strategy for malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Subregion: 2015–2030. Manila: WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2015.
  3. World Health Organization. World malaria report 2019. Geneva: The Organization; 2019.
  4. Batwala  V, Magnussen  P, Hansen  KS, Nuwaha  F. Cost-effectiveness of malaria microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests versus presumptive diagnosis: implications for malaria control in Uganda. Malar J. 2011;10:372. DOIGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Government Department of Health. Malaria laboratory case definition (LCD) 2018 [updated 2019 Jan 2] [cited 2019 Sep 15].
  6. Jimenez  A, Rees-Channer  RR, Perera  R, Gamboa  D, Chiodini  PL, Gonzalez  IJ, et al. Analytical sensitivity of current best-in-class malaria rapid diagnostic tests. Malar J. 2017;16:128. DOIGoogle Scholar
  7. Das  S, Peck  RB, Barney  R, Jang  IK, Kahn  M, Zhu  M, et al. Performance of an ultra-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum HRP2-based rapid diagnostic test with recombinant HRP2, culture parasites, and archived whole blood samples. Malar J. 2018;17:118. DOIGoogle Scholar
  8. Donald  W, Pasay  C, Guintran  J-O, Iata  H, Anderson  K, Nausien  J, et al. The utility of malaria rapid diagnostic tests as a tool in enhanced surveillance for malaria elimination in Vanuatu. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0167136. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Parr  JB, Verity  R, Doctor  SM, Janko  M, Carey-Ewend  K, Turman  BJ, et al. Pfhrp2-deleted Plasmodium falciparum parasites in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a national cross-sectional survey. J Infect Dis. 2017;216:3644. DOIGoogle Scholar
  10. Berhane  A, Anderson  K, Mihreteab  S, Gresty  K, Rogier  E, Mohamed  S, et al. Major threat to malaria control programs by Plasmodium falciparum lacking histidine-rich protein 2, Eritrea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:46270. DOIGoogle Scholar
  11. Amoah  LE, Abankwa  J, Oppong  A. Plasmodium falciparum histidine rich protein-2 diversity and the implications for PfHRP 2: based malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Ghana. Malar J. 2016;15:101. DOIGoogle Scholar
  12. Beshir  KB, Sepulveda  N, Bharmal  J, Robinson  A, Mwanguzi  J, Busula  AO, et al. Plasmodium falciparum parasites with histidine-rich protein 2 (pfhrp2) and pfhrp3 gene deletions in two endemic regions of Kenya. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14718. DOIGoogle Scholar
  13. Kozycki  CT, Umulisa  N, Rulisa  S, Mwikarago  EI, Musabyimana  JP, Habimana  JP, et al. False-negative malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Rwanda: impact of Plasmodium falciparum isolates lacking hrp2 and declining malaria transmission. Malar J. 2017;16:123. DOIGoogle Scholar
  14. Funwei  R, Nderu  D, Nguetse  CN, Thomas  BN, Falade  CO, Velavan  TP, et al. Molecular surveillance of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes deletion in Plasmodium falciparum isolates and the implications for rapid diagnostic tests in Nigeria. Acta Trop. 2019;196:1215. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Agaba  BB, Yeka  A, Nsobya  S, Arinaitwe  E, Nankabirwa  J, Opigo  J, et al. Systematic review of the status of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletion, approaches and methods used for its estimation and reporting in Plasmodium falciparum populations in Africa: review of published studies 2010–2019. Malar J. 2019;18:355. DOIGoogle Scholar
  16. Bharti  PK, Chandel  HS, Ahmad  A, Krishna  S, Udhayakumar  V, Singh  N. Prevalence of pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3 gene deletion in Plasmodium falciparum population in eight highly endemic states in India. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157949. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Li  P, Xing  H, Zhao  Z, Yang  Z, Cao  Y, Li  W, et al. Genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 in the China-Myanmar border area. Acta Tropica. 2015;152:2631. DOIGoogle Scholar
  18. Akinyi  S, Hayden  T, Gamboa  D, Torres  K, Bendezu  J, Abdallah  JF, et al. Multiple genetic origins of histidine-rich protein 2 gene deletion in Plasmodium falciparum parasites from Peru. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2797. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gendrot  M, Fawaz  R, Dormoi  J, Madamet  M, Pradines  B. Genetic diversity and deletion of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 and 3: a threat to diagnosis of P. falciparum malaria. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25:5805. DOIGoogle Scholar
  20. World Health Organization. False-negative RDT results and implications of new reports of P. falciparum histidine-rich protein 2/3 gene deletions. WHO reference no. WHO/HTM/GMP/2017.18. Geneva: The Organization; 2017.
  21. World Health Organization, Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance. Results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 7 (2015–2016). Geneva: The Organization; 2017.
  22. Padley  D, Moody  AH, Chiodini  PL, Saldanha  J. Use of a rapid, single-round, multiplex PCR to detect malarial parasites and identify the species present. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2003;97:1317. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cheng  Q, Gatton  ML, Barnwell  J, Chiodini  P, McCarthy  J, Bell  D, et al. Plasmodium falciparum parasites lacking histidine-rich protein 2 and 3: a review and recommendations for accurate reporting. Malar J. 2014;13:283. DOIGoogle Scholar
  24. Anderson  TJ, Haubold  B, Williams  JT, Estrada-Franco  JG, Richardson  L, Mollinedo  R, et al. Microsatellite markers reveal a spectrum of population structures in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:146782. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ribeiro-Goncalves  B, Francisco  AP, Vaz  C, Ramirez  M, Carrico  JA. PHYLOViZ Online: web-based tool for visualization, phylogenetic inference, analysis and sharing of minimum spanning trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W24651. DOIGoogle Scholar
  26. Goudet  J. FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered. 1995;86:4856. DOIGoogle Scholar
  27. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2017. Geneva: The Organization; 2017.
  28. Boyce  MR, O’Meara  WP. Use of malaria RDTs in various health contexts across sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:470. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Altaras  R, Nuwa  A, Agaba  B, Streat  E, Tibenderana  JK, Strachan  CE. Why do health workers give anti-malarials to patients with negative rapid test results? A qualitative study at rural health facilities in western Uganda. Malar J. 2016;15:23. DOIGoogle Scholar
  30. Baker  J, McCarthy  J, Gatton  M, Kyle  DE, Belizario  V, Luchavez  J, et al. Genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2) and its effect on the performance of PfHRP2-based rapid diagnostic tests. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:8707. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gatton  ML, Dunn  J, Chaudhry  A, Ciketic  S, Cunningham  J, Cheng  Q. Implications of parasites lacking Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 on malaria morbidity and control when rapid diagnostic tests are used for diagnosis. J Infect Dis. 2017;215:115666. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Crawley  H. Migration: refugee economics. Nature. 2017;544:267. DOIGoogle Scholar
  33. Neumann  K, Hermans  F. What drives human migration in Sahelian countries? A meta-analysis. Popul Space Place. 2017;23:e1962. DOIGoogle Scholar
  34. Quakyi  IA, Adjei  GO, Sullivan  DJ, Jr., Laar  A, Stephens  JK, Owusu  R, et al. Diagnostic capacity, and predictive values of rapid diagnostic tests for accurate diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum in febrile children in Asante-Akim, Ghana. Malar J. 2018;17:468. DOIGoogle Scholar
  35. Hagen  RM, Hinz  R, Tannich  E, Frickmann  H. Comparison of two real-time PCR assays for the detection of malaria parasites from hemolytic blood samples - Short communication. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2015;5:15963. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Abakar  MF, Schelling  E, Béchir  M, Ngandolo  BN, Pfister  K, Alfaroukh  IO, et al. Trends in health surveillance and joint service delivery for pastoralists in West and Central Africa. Rev Sci Tech. 2016;35:68391. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. World Health Organization. Evidence review group on border malaria: meeting report. World Health Organization, 2018 Malaria Policy Advisory Committee Meeting, October 17–19, 2018. Report no. WHO/CDS/GMP/MPAC/2018.13. Geneva: The Organization; 2018.
  38. Watson  OJ, Verity  R, Ghani  AC, Garske  T, Cunningham  J, Tshefu  A, et al. Impact of seasonal variations in Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission on the surveillance of pfhrp2 gene deletions. eLife. 2019;8:e40339. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2702.191410

Original Publication Date: January 07, 2021

Table of Contents – Volume 27, Number 2—February 2021

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Christiane Prosser, Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, 176 Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: December 22, 2020
Page updated: January 23, 2021
Page reviewed: January 23, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.