Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 8—August 2021
Dispatch

Genomic Detection of Schmallenberg Virus, Israel

Adi BeharComments to Author , Omer Izhaki, Asael Rot, Tzvika Benor, Mario Yankilevich, Monica Leszkowicz-Mazuz, and Jacob Brenner
Author affiliations: Kimron Veterinary Institute, Beit Dagan, Israel (A. Behar, O. Izhaki, A. Rot, M. Leszkowicz-Mazuz, J. Brenner); Veterinary Field Services, Beit Dagan, Israel (T. Benor, M. Yankilevich)

Cite This Article

Abstract

We discuss genomic detection of Schmallenberg virus in both Culicoides midges and affected ruminants during June 2018–December 2019, demonstrating its circulation in Israel. This region is a geographic bridge between 3 continents and may serve as an epidemiologic bridge for potential Schmallenberg virus spread into Asia.

Simbu serogroup viruses form one of the largest serogroups in the genus Orthobunyavirus of the family Peribunyaviridae, comprising >25 antigenically different, but serologically related, negative-sense single-stranded RNA viruses. These viruses are transmitted mainly by Culicoides biting midges; they persist in the environment by cycling between infected mammalian hosts and Culicoides vectors. Notable examples from the Simbu serogroup are Akabane virus (AKAV), Aino virus, Schmallenberg virus (SBV), Sathuperi virus (SATV), Shamonda virus (SHAV), Peaton virus (PEAV), and Shuni virus (SHUV, which is also suspected of infecting humans.). These viruses are known to cross the placenta of ruminants to the developing fetus, causing abortion, stillbirth, and neonatal malformations that are seen only at birth. The congenital malformations are termed arthrogryposis-hydranencephaly syndrome. Given that the clinical signs can be observed only months after viremia has occurred, field and laboratory practitioners are at a huge disadvantage when facing epidemics caused by these viruses (17).

Until recently, the most studied viruses of the Simbu serogroup were AKAV and Aino virus, both known to be present in Israel (1,3). In 2011, a new Simbu virus emerged in Europe and was named Schmallenberg virus (SBV) (8). Studies suggested that SBV is a reassortant virus, deriving the medium (M) RNA segment from SATV and the small (S) and large (L) RNA segments from SHAV, probably as a result of co-infection of these viruses in either Culicoides vectors or the ruminant hosts (1,9,10).

Figure

Locations and types of farms sampled in study of Schmallenberg virus (SBV), Israel. Farm number match those listed in Table 2. Green, farms from which SBV-positive Culicoides pools were collected; red, farms on which SBV-positive malformed progeny were detected.

Figure. Locations and types of farms sampled in study of Schmallenberg virus (SBV), Israel. Farm number match those listed in Table 2. Green, farms from which SBV-positive Culicoides...

Once SBV emerged in Europe, it was clear to our team in Israel that this virus was either already present in Israel or would be introduced in the future. After AKAV and SHUV outbreaks (3,11) and virus neutralization test assays showing the additional presence of SATV, SHAV, and PEAV in Israel (12), a systematic monitoring system for arboviruses was established in 2015. Serum samples and vectors are collected every month from 13 selected dairy farms representing different geographic regions in Israel (Figure). Specific PEAV, SHUV, and SATV RNA fragments were also detected by nested quantitative PCR (qPCR) from different Culicoides species during 2015–2017 (13). Furthermore, in 2017, RNA fragments of a specific PEAV were detected in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and testicles of a malformed calf exhibiting hydranencephaly (14). SBV was not found in all the studies conducted during 2011–2017, nor was it detected passively in Israel (3,1114). We report the detection of SBV RNA in Israel in both vectors and affected ruminants.

The Study

During June 2018–December 2019, we trapped 13 pools of Culicoides imicola, 8 pools of C. oxystoma, 5 pools of C. puncticollis, and 5 pools of C. newsteadii midges (each pool containing 50 midges) around livestock farms, and we tested CSF from 3 malformed 1-day-old lambs (born on July 3, 2019) and 1 malformed 11-day-old calf (born on November 1, 2019) (Figure; Appendix). We extracted RNA from Culicoides homogenates and CSF using Maxwell 16 Viral Total Nucleic Acid Purification Kit (Promega, https://www.promega.com) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We used total viral nucleic acids (0.4 µg) for cDNA synthesis by UltraScript Reverse transcription (PCR Biosystems, https://www.promega.com) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We performed reverse transcription (RT) nested qPCR targeting the L RNA segment of Simbu serogroup viruses according to Behar et al. (13). We further subjected samples suspected of being Simbu serogroup positive to RT-nested and seminested PCRs performed using S, M, and L segment-specific primer sets (Table 1; Appendix).

Of the 31 species-specific pools from the 4 Culicoides midge species that are known or suspected to be vectors of Simbu serogroup viruses (i.e., C. imicola, C. oxystoma, C. puncticollis, C. newsteadii) (2,12,15), we found that 11 contained RNA of Simbu serogroup viruses in 2018 and 2019 (35% of the total pools tested) (Table 2; Figure; Appendix Table). We identified partial nucleotide sequences of the S (370/830 bp) and L (370/6,882 bp) segments. Phylogenetic analysis of the samples showed that all positive samples were virtually identical to SBV (GenBank accession nos. MT816474–82, MT816485–95) (Appendix Figure, panels A, C). These samples were collected from several different geographic regions in Israel (Table 2, lines 1 and 3–12 in the Samples column; Figure; Appendix Table). In addition, we detected SBV RNA-specific fragments of the S (370/850 bp), M (430/4,373 bp), and L segments (370/6,882 bp) in a CSF sample from a malformed lamb born in July 2019 on a farm in southern Israel (Negev desert) and a malformed calf born in November 2019 on a farm in northern Israel (Galilee) (GenBank accession nos. MT816472, MT816473, MT816483, MT816484, MT816496, MT816497) (Table 2, lines 2 and 13 in the Samples column; Appendix Figure).

In general, the most susceptible period for induction of congenital malformations by Simbu serogroup viruses is 65–70 days of gestation in lambs and 150 days of gestation in calves (1,7). Thus, SBV detection in the respective ruminants fits with viral infection in March–April 2019, suggesting exposure to SBV in Israel in early spring 2019. Nevertheless, reports on severe decline in progeny prolificacy, stillbirths, and malformed lambs were reported by farmers to the Veterinary Field Services from autumn 2018 through December 2019 (Table 2). The detection of SBV in Culicoides pools collected from several of those farms (Table 2, lines 3–5, 7–9, and 11–12 in the Sample column; Figure; Appendix Table) suggests that SBV might have been clinically affecting ruminants in Israel as early as June 2018.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate the circulation of SBV outside Europe. Future studies are needed to determine the seroprevalence of SBV in the Middle East, because this information is essential for understanding the risk of SBV spread into countries in Asia. Because SATV is found in the Middle East (12,13), virus neutralization tests will probably not be able to properly distinguish between antibodies against SBV and those against SATV. Therefore, developing of a competitive ELISA system using SBV-specific antibodies is crucial. Finally, the presence of both SATV and SBV in Israel provides a unique opportunity for comparative studies on possible cross-protection of SBV commercial vaccines between these viruses.

Dr. Behar is a researcher working in the parasitology division of Kimron Veterinary Institute in Beit Dagan, Israel. She established and is running the arbovirus systematic monitoring system of the Israeli Veterinary Services. Her research interests include the interactions among bloodsucking insects, their microbiota, and the pathogens that they transmit.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Raid Almhdi and Rachel Gabrieli for assisting with the insect collections; Shmuel Zamir, Ricardo Wolkomirsky, Lior Zamir, and Faris Hmd for assisting with sample collections; and Martin Beer and Kristin Wernike for external validation.

Top

References

  1. De Regge  N. Akabane, Aino and Schmallenberg virus-where do we stand and what do we know about the role of domestic ruminant hosts and Culicoides vectors in virus transmission and overwintering? Curr Opin Virol. 2017;27:1530. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sick  F, Beer  M, Kampen  H, Wernike  K. Culicoides biting midges—underestimated vectors for arboviruses of public health and veterinary importance. Viruses. 2019;11:37694. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brenner  J, Rotenberg  D, Jaakobi  S, Stram  Y, Guini-Rubinstein  M, Menasherov  S, et al. What can Akabane disease teach us about other arboviral diseases. Vet Ital. 2016;52:35362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hirashima  Y, Kitahara  S, Kato  T, Shirafuji  H, Tanaka  S, Yanase  T. Congenital malformations of calves infected with Shamonda virus, Southern Japan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:9936. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Yanase  T, Murota  K, Hayama  Y. Endemic and emerging arboviruses in domestic ruminants in East Asia. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:168. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Steyn  J, Motlou  P, van Eeden  C, Pretorius  M, Stivaktas  VI, Williams  J, et al. Shuni virus in wildlife and nonequine domestic animals, South Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26:15215. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. St George  TD, Standfast  HA. Simbu group viruses with teratogenic potential. In: Monath TP, editor. The arboviruses: epidemiology and ecology. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1989. p. 146–66.
  8. Hoffmann  B, Scheuch  M, Höper  D, Jungblut  R, Holsteg  M, Schirrmeier  H, et al. Novel orthobunyavirus in cattle, Europe, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:46972. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yanase  T, Kato  T, Aizawa  M, Shuto  Y, Shirafuji  H, Yamakawa  M, et al. Genetic reassortment between Sathuperi and Shamonda viruses of the genus Orthobunyavirus in nature: implications for their genetic relationship to Schmallenberg virus. Arch Virol. 2012;157:16116. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Coupeau  D, Bayrou  C, Baillieux  P, Marichal  A, Lenaerts  AC, Caty  C, et al. Host-dependence of in vitro reassortment dynamics among the Sathuperi and Shamonda Simbuviruses. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8:38195. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Golender  N, Brenner  J, Valdman  M, Khinich  Y, Bumbarov  V, Panshin  A, et al. Malformations caused by Shuni virus in ruminants, Israel, 2014–2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:22678. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brenner  J, Yanase  T, Kato  T, Yaakobi  S, Khinich  E, Paz  R, et al. Serological evidence suggests that several Simbu serogroup viruses circulated in Israel. Vet Ital. 2019;55:819.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Behar  A, Rot  A, Lavon  Y, Izhaki  O, Gur  N, Brenner  J. Seasonal and spatial variation in Culicoides community structure and their potential role in transmitting Simbu serogroup viruses in Israel. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020;67:122230. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Behar  A, Leibovich  BB, Edery  N, Yanase  T, Brenner  J. First genomic detection of Peaton virus in a calf with hydranencephaly in Israel. Vet Med Sci. 2019;5:8792. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kato  T, Shirafuji  H, Tanaka  S, Sato  M, Yamakawa  M, Tsuda  T, et al. Bovine arboviruses in Culicoides biting midges and sentinel cattle in southern Japan from 2003 to 2013. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2016;63:e16072. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2708.203705

Original Publication Date: July 15, 2021

Table of Contents – Volume 27, Number 8—August 2021

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Adi Behar, Department of Parasitology, Kimron Veterinary Institute, PO Box 12, Beit Dagan 50250, Israel

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: June 09, 2021
Page updated: July 18, 2021
Page reviewed: July 18, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external