Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 27, Number 8—August 2021
Dispatch

Autochthonous Cases of Tick-Borne Encephalitis, Belgium, 2020

Anke Stoefs, Leo Heyndrickx, Jonathan De Winter, Evelien Coeckelbergh, Barbara Willekens, Alicia Alonso-Jiménez, Anne-Marie Tuttino, Yvette Geerts, Kevin K. Ariën, and Marjan Van EsbroeckComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium (A. Stoefs, L. Heyndrickx, K.K. Ariën, M. Van Esbroeck); University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp (J. De Winter, E. Coeckelbergh, B. Willekens, A. Alonso-Jiménez); University of Antwerp, Antwerp (B. Willekens, A. Alonso-Jiménez, K.K. Ariën); Vivasso, Villers-Le-Bouillet, Belgium (A.-M. Tuttino); AZ Zeno Hospital, Knokke-Heist, Belgium (Y. Geerts)

Main Article

Table

Laboratory results confirming TBEV infections in 3 autochthonous human cases, Belgium, 2020

Case no. Symptom onset date Exposure
Sample type, days after symptom onset Flavivirus IFA
PRNT90 titer rRT-PCR
Likely site, postal code Likely route, time IgM† IgG‡
1 Jun 5 Oostkamp, 8020 Tick bite, 2 wk before symptom onset
Serum, 5 TBEV+ TBEV+ 1:25 ND



CSF, 6
TBEV+
TBEV+
ND
ND
2 Jun 21 Lille, 2275 Tick bite, 2 wk before symptom onset
CSF, 18 TBEV+ TBEV+ ND ND



Serum, 20
TBEV+
TBEV+
1:60
ND
3 Jul 20 Wanze, 4520 Multiple tick bites in the weeks before symptom onset Serum, 2 ND +
Serum, 18 TBEV+ TBEV+ 1:194 ND

*CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; IFA, immunofluorescence assay; ND, not done; PRNT90, plaque reduction neutralization testing at 90% sensitivity; rRT-PCR, real-time reverse transcription PCR; TBEV, tick-borne encephalitis virus; +, positive; –, negative. †Only TBEV-positive on the flavivirus mosaic IFA. ‡Also positive signal for >1 other flavivirus on the mosaic IFA, including West Nile virus, Japanese encephalitis virus, yellow fever virus, and dengue virus serotypes 1–4.

Main Article

Page created: June 09, 2021
Page updated: July 18, 2021
Page reviewed: July 18, 2021
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external